chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Garry Kasparov vs Lajos Portisch
"Very Garry" (game of the day Jun-26-07)
Niksic (1983)  ·  Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov-Petrosian Variation. Petrosian Attack (E12)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 65 times; par: 47 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Kasparov/Portisch games
sac: 21.Bxg7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-14-10  VladimirOo: I tought Kasparov considered his win over Topalov his favorite game.

Kasparov vs Topalov, 1999

Apr-11-11  LIFE Master AJ: http://www.lifemasteraj.com/old_af-...
Apr-11-11  picard: <Life Master AJ> that was the worst analysis i have ever seen.
Sep-04-11  DrMAL: <ray keene: he chose this one for his list!> Well, I am not sure how long his list was but he included it in his 5-DVD video "My Story" as well. Rightfully so, this game is brilliant and was personally important to his career. Moreover, as he points out in that video (volume 4, all are HIGHLY RECOMMENDED), it reflects his amazing style and underlying approach that so great helped chess. Seems Keene's statement is made out of jealousy perhaps rightfully so, his contribution to chess was incomparably less.

As pointed out in the video, Portisch went 16...Na5 to attack the pawn on c4 (a good move) but then he played 17...exd5 instead of 17...Nxc4 and the knight was left doing nothing later on. This is where Garry already obtained a big advantage but he started to struggle with how to best proceed. Houdini shows 19.Bxh7+ as best (19.Nd4 also very strong), this move reflects Kasparov's style as well. After 20...Kg8! (actually, by far the best move) Kasparov was shocked and went into a long thought. He and GM Plaskett talked about 21.Rh5! objectively the best move according to engines such as Houdini. But, for Kasparov, whose chess philosophy was based on three dimensions (material, time, quality) rather than most at that time who thought material much more important, 21.Bxg7!? was a "straight swap" as he put it.

After 21.Kxg7 (best) Houdini evaluates 22.Ne5 as indeed best, still giving solid advantage to white with 22.Rf5 as also very strong. According to this engine, they both played the best possible sequence until 26...Qc5?! where 26...Qe5 or 26...Qe2 were stronger. After 27.Qh7! white's attack was decisive if conducted perfectly. Kasparov did so where, according to Houdini (the position is quite complicated still so it's good to check here!) Portisch played best moves as well with the exception of 30...Ne5? instead of 30...Bd6 either way black was lost. The king walk finishes this Masterpiece with beautiful style. This was indeed one of Kasparov's (many!) amazing games and it particularly exemplifies his style being very instructive to all as such. And it is one for Keene to be totally jealous of (too bad he clearly is). Even the CG caption "Very Garry" is "Verry Apropos."

Sep-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: it was a very light hearted and good natured discussion-over a very good lunch. the point was to identify the quintessential kasparov win-i felt the karpov game was better because it made garry the youngest ever world champion and was full of truly original dynamic ideas which i had never seen before-such as rooks doubled behind a pawn on e6!! btw i annotate the win v portisch in the times next saturday; and promise- i was never jealous of garry-i dont come into his league as a player!! i have always admired him-occasionally disagreed with him but never felt envy at all.
Sep-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <ray> It's unfortunate, but the statement impugning you and your considerable contributions to chess was made by a poster who has a proven track record of imputing his own feelings to others.

As to being nowhere near Kasparov as a player, who among us is?

Sep-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: The Jules Verne restaurant--second coming of the Divan?
Oct-02-11  DrMAL: <ray keene: i was never jealous of garry-i dont come into his league as a player!!> My apology, Ray, your comment perplexed me before and I took it wrong way. While he won his last game in the 1985 WC match, Kasparov was otherwise not proud of Karpov vs Kasparov, 1985. Rightfully so, with verification from modern engine I showed there how 23.f5! could have won. Kasparov was doubtless aware of this but without engine it is much more difficult to "prove." And why would he want to do this for game that he won to become WC anyway? This game, on the other hand, was truly one of his very best, cheers.
Oct-28-11  Crazychess1: 21.Bxg7!! is one of my favorites from Kasparov. It really does look like old-time chess. And then to follow it up with something like 22.Ne5 . . . truly elegant.
Oct-28-11  bronkenstein: Kasparov himself comments the game (start from 4:50 If you want to go straight to the beginning) :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRZd...

Dec-20-11  Nemesistic: Iv just watched an hour or so of a marathon Kasparov documentary called "My Story",and he picks this game out as one of his favourites..

The interviewer/narrator seems really impressed when GK says to him "You'll like this" and shows him the mating possibilities after the bishop sac ( which GK says isn't a sac,because of the resulting position! ).

I was impressed too

Jan-19-12  indoknight: the surprises combo was begin at 17.d5! black cannot 17...Nxc4 because 18.Bxc4 Qxc4 19.Qxc4 Rxc4 20.Ne5!! Rc2 21.dxe6! threatening fork in Rook at d7!
Jun-09-12  Anderssen99: Although 21.Bxg7 is strong and in the true "Kasparovian Style" the alternative 21.Rh5 is even stronger. Is it not?
Jun-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 21.Rh5 looks really strong. White threatens once again to sac the Bishop on g7 and with much greater effect as the Rook is on the Kingside now in comparison to the game continuation, and moreover Qe4 look like a threat too, especially if black tries to meet Bxg7 followed by Ne5 with 21...Nc4, which leaves him without possibility to cover h7 by Queen from c2. 21...Qc2 is the only way to meet both threats at once I can see but after 22.Qxe7 Qxb2 23.Ne5 with threats like 24.Ng6 fxg6 25.Qe6+ etc. or 24.Qh4 black position is a ruin. After 23...Rc1 24.g4 Rxf1+ 25.Kxf1 black probably doesn't get a mate but he will be hardly able to liberate his play without loss of a Pawn or two with simple technical win for white.
Sep-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Kasparov comments on his game: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10dE...
Jan-23-13  Tigranny: I feel that this game is better than Game 24 of 1985, but definitely not better than Kasparov-Topalov. It just seems to have more beauty in it with the double bishop sac, along with it being Game of the Day.
Jan-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Tigranny: I feel that this game is better than Game 24 of 1985, but definitely not better than Kasparov-Topalov. It just seems to have more beauty in it with the double bishop sac, along with it being Game of the Day.>

But it isn't a double bishop sacrifice, because Kasparov picked up Portisch's bishop on d5 after he played Bxh7+. It's a single-bishop sacrifice. In fact after 20....Kg8 it looks like you're in the middle of a double-bishop sac. When I first saw this game I immediately focused on 21.Bxg7 for just that reason. I'm sure lots of other rotten players did the same. And it appears from the commentary here that 21.Rh5 may have been stronger than the sacrifice anyway, and Portisch certainly missed some better defenses.

Frankly I've never really understood the love for this game. Young Kasparov played lots of better ones, I think.

Jan-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Here's a really good post by sneaky from 2005 explaining how different this game is from the classic two-bishop sacrifice.

<A common double bishop sac works like this:

It starts off with Bxh7+ (conceivably Bxh2+ but this is much more rare, so I'll describe it from White's point of view here.) After ...Kxh7 (usually forced) comes Qh5+ and ...Kh8. Then the second bishop is given up: Bxg7, and in light of Qh8# it must be captured, so ...Kxg7, and then usually comes a check to get the king over to the h-file, and finally a rook lift to threaten Rh(something)+ which brings down the house.

That is your garden variety double bishop sac, seen in countless games starting with Lasker vs J Bauer, 1889 but also see Koltanowski vs Defosse, 1936 and G Kuzmin vs Sveshnikov, 1973 for more examples of the common form this sacrifice takes.

This game on the other hand does not fit that mold at all.>

Of course, the fact that the game isn't a chessic cliche makes it better. But I've still never been able to get that enthusiastic about it (and I have no trouble getting enthusiastic about Kasparov games).

Mar-03-13  Tigranny: <keypusher> Sorry. I just realized now that you said it was just one bishop being sacced. Possibly overrated I guess now.
Sep-27-13  Shams: Why has 15.c4 not gained any traction, I wonder? I've only been able to find one other game: Kozul (2590) - Gofshtein (2530), Nova Gorica 1997 1-0 (http://www.365chess.com/view_game.p...). In that contest Black played 15...Na5 immediately instead of trading on c4.

Shredder seems happy enough with Garry's pawn sack, here...

Oct-29-14  SpiritedReposte: Good pun as this is definitive Kasparov style. Sacrificing material, getting the initiative and pressing for the win.

Much like Fischer, maybe you don't like Kasparov's personality, but its hard not to like his chess.

Nov-14-14  kia0708: SHOCK & AWE !
Jan-18-15  G Kasparov: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. Nc3 Bb7 5. a3 d5 6. cd5 Nd5 7. e3 Nc3 8. bc3 Be7 9. Bb5 c6 10. Bd3 c5 11. O-O Nc6 12. Bb2 Rc8 13. Qe2 O-O 14. Rad1 Qc7 15. c4 cd4 16. ed4 Na5 17. d5 ed5 18. cd5 Bd5 19. Bh7 Kh7 20. Rd5 Kg8 21. Bg7 Kg7 22. Ne5 Rfd8 23. Qg4 Kf8 24. Qf5 f6 25. Nd7 Rd7 26. Rd7 Qc5 27. Qh7 Rc7 28. Qh8 Kf7 29. Rd3 Nc4 30. Rfd1 Ne5 31. Qh7 Ke6 32. Qg8 Kf5 33. g4 Kf4 34. Rd4 Kf3 35. Qb3

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Jan-19-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: I know that white won a lot of games with this a3 system. The question is what to do about it. I think Korchnoi had the right idea. Play g6. Portisch might have played 7.....g6, for example. It aims to transpose the game into an a Gruenfeld where white has been not as aggressive in the center.

Kasparov vs Korchnoi, 1983

Jan-02-17  paavoh: @ <shams> Sorry for the tardiness of my reply, but it seems Black tends to exchange pawns on d4 right away after Rad1, before White can repeat Kasparov's idea. Black also follows up with Bf6 and the matters become more even.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Kasparov on Kasparov: Part I
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
best game kasparov ever played
from coralsea's favorite games by coralsea
Queesn Indian GK
from jojo52's favorite games by jojo52
Queen's Indian- King's End
from Arcus' favorite games by Arcus
Naked king
from PositionalBomber's Best chess games by PositionalBomber
Volume 36
from Chess Informant Golden Games by Olanovich
Method B's favorite games
by Method B
Destroying the Castle
from newbie inspiration's favorite games by newbie inspiration
Niksic 1983
by Tabanus
complicated one
from double bishop sac's by gmalino
A double BB variation, out of the classic venue.
from Double Bishop sacrifices by Stelling
#3-Niksic 1983 (76/422)
from World's Greatest Chess Games by DanBoyle
masthan07's favorite games
by masthan07
Chess Informant Best Games 2
by koinonia
very Garry 1-0 SPELA
from xfer's favorite games2007 by xfer
Its all home prep? Maybe. Brilliant? Definitely!!! Beautiful?
from Kasparov's Chess Triumphs by LIFE Master AJ
Very Garry! Great Attack!!
from Alapin 2...Nd5 ....4.Bc4 gambit line by Nova
Favourite Games
by Nobis
The Very Best Games Of Garry Kasparov
by depamas
His absolute favorites: GK's Golden Chess Stock
by SirChrislov
Formal and forced show. (15+37 collections)
from The most overrated chess games of all times by EdgeFor15
plus 174 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC