chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Deep Blue (Computer) vs Garry Kasparov
"Tangled Up in Blue" (game of the day Oct-16-16)
IBM Man-Machine, New York USA (1997)  ·  Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov. Modern Variation (B17)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 65 times; par: 22 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Deep Blue/Kasparov games
sac: 9.O-O PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Click on the e8 square to see a computer engine analysis of the position.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-15-16  WorstPlayerEver: <rwbean> <page 12/Dec-04-10>

Rybka 4: 11... Nh7 12. Bg3 Ng5 13. Nh4 Nf6 14. Qd3 Bd7 (loses pretty quickly)

Yeah, but ironically 14... b5 is a far better take.

Oct-16-16  belgradegambit: A tribute to an unlikely Nobel Prize winner.
Oct-16-16  wtpy: Belgradegambit, some early poetry was likely sung, so in a sense the Nobel prize was just coming full circle.
Oct-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: The Petrov Defense would have been a good choice for Kasparov. It was certainly something he knew well (for example, he used it against Karpov), and it is lot safer for black than this nonsense.
Oct-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  JimmyRockHound: belgradegambit - and one of the most deserving in recent years...
Oct-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: ∞

<wtpy: Belgradegambit, some early poetry was likely sung, so in a sense the Nobel prize was just coming full circle.>

As a matter of fact, not only poems as we think of them but things we now think of as great works of literature (such as the Iliad and the Odyssey) were sung.

And if you look at traditions in Arabic verse, *all* of those poems were sung.

Oct-16-16  morfishine: Lets see, Joel Benjamin with a computer beats Kasparov, who doesn't have a computer

Am I supposed to be impressed?

*****

Oct-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: ∞

Now, you see, this is what you get if you're Kasparov and you play the Karpov Variation.

Oct-16-16  tea4twonty: < and everyone of them words rang true, <<<<< Tangled Up in Blue <<<<>>>>>>>>>>
Oct-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  4tmac: 8..x♘! was necessary....playable....did he get too clever by half; forget; or something.
Oct-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: One of the worst games of chess of all time.
Oct-16-16  Pyrandus: Worst, but for payement! (Kasparov était vendu!)
Oct-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robyn Hode: One amusing thing is that Stockfish 7, a free program, would mop the floor with Deep Blue.
Oct-16-16  dfcx: <Robyn Hode: One amusing thing is that Stockfish 7, a free program, would mop the floor with Deep Blue.>

According to wiki,
<In June 1997, Deep Blue was the 259th most powerful supercomputer according to the TOP500 list, achieving 11.38 GFLOPS on the High-Performance LINPACK benchmark.>

Well my current Mac laptop with an i5 processor can do 18.74 GFLOPS, almost twice as fast. Not to mention the progress in AI after 20 years.

I would be really disappointed if Deep Blue can hold up against any of the current chess engines.

Oct-17-16  Mendrys: <morfishine: Lets see, Joel Benjamin with a computer beats Kasparov, who doesn't have a computer Am I supposed to be impressed?>

Joel Benjamin merely consulted with the team that created Deep Blue, he didn't play any of the games so I don't think your point is valid.

Oct-17-16  WorstPlayerEver: <Mendrys>

You don't know. That's exactly why Garry asked for Deepie's output... and didn't get it.

Oct-17-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: the mighty has fallen!
Oct-17-16  Mendrys: <WorstPlayerEver: <Mendrys> You don't know. That's exactly why Garry asked for Deepie's output... and didn't get it.>

That proves nothing. In any case the logs were released later and nobody has been able to provide any compelling evidence that there was ever any cheating. Of course the logs could have been altered but that is besides the point! Most of the speculation around the cheating is based on the fact that Gary asked for the logs after game 2 and didn't get them. They just could have as easily modified them then as well.

To me it seems clear. Gary had laid out a clever trap for Deep Blue in game 2 that it didn't fall for. When he got toasted instead he became psychologically tilted and played poorly, as evidenced in this game or was the Deep Blue team accused of cheating in this game as well?

Oct-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: Kasparov underestimated Deep Blue's strength. In the end, it's a simple as that.
Oct-18-16  WorstPlayerEver: <Mendrys>

Really? So why they dismantled DB? To destroy the evidence. What else? DB team just put a psychological trick on Kasparov.

Oct-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: The Caro-Couldn't
Oct-18-16  Mendrys: <WorstPlayerEver: <Mendrys>

Really? So why they dismantled DB? To destroy the evidence. What else? DB team just put a psychological trick on Kasparov.>

If that were true, which it is not - One bank is at the National Museum of American History while the other bank is at another museum, it still would not prove anything. This is specious logic at its best.

It's really down to what RookFile said - "Kasparov underestimated Deep Blue's strength..."

Oct-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Absentee: <Mendrys: <WorstPlayerEver: <Mendrys>

Really? So why they dismantled DB? To destroy the evidence. What else? DB team just put a psychological trick on Kasparov.>

If that were true, which it is not - One bank is at the National Museum of American History while the other bank is at another museum, it still would not prove anything. This is specious logic at its best. >

You're only saying that because you haven't seen the pictures of Joel Benjamin chained inside Deep Blue. They're a little blurred, but it's clearly him.

Jan-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  posoo: it is OVIUS dat kaspovar THREW da match at da behest of da IBEMERS in order to advance da cause of da compoters and corpotions. a SHAM!

now we have stuckfoil and people sniff their rubkas. a true tragedy and LASKER CRIES.

Mar-27-17  ahmadov: Is this not the game that Kasparov called a "catastrophe"?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 15)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Kasparov on Kasparov: Part I
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
16...Bc6 - 18...Bxe7
from World Championships Blunders by amadeus
Caro-Kann Def. Karpov
from RPaterno1's favorite games ("Ramon's Lab") by RPaterno1
C-K Karpov. Modern Variation (B17) 1-0 The computer could cope
from To V or not to V?! by fredthebear
The computer sacrifices too
from Comp Chomps, Chumps and Challenges by fredthebear
It can evaluate faster, but not necessarily better.
from 20 Moves or Less by fredthebear
Tangled Up in Blue
from GM vs Computer by larrewl
Caro-Cann, Deep Blue-Kasparov
from elixab's favorite games by elixab
Kaspy goes down to machine!
from champs vs champs by kevin86
rugged's favorite games
by rugged
September 12: Tangled Up in Blue
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
Kasparov
from Great masters losing by WhiteRook48
Kasparov loses in 19 moves against Deep Blue.
from GK Collection on the move by fredthebear
Deep Blue
from lemgelo's favorite games with white by lemgelo
Solitaire Chess by Bruce Pandolfini
from Published Games by Year & Unconfirmed Source II by fredthebear
fm avari viraf's favorite games
by fm avari viraf
Keene al Sam C Pp 133-134
from Inverted Rook's favorite games by Inverted Rook
masthan07's favorite games
by masthan07
CK Kas gets beat by computer
from Rick's Picks by rickturner7
Segunda derrota com Deep Blue
from Partidas de Xadrez by adalav
chocobonbon's favorite games
by chocobonbon
plus 81 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC