chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian vs Viktor Korchnoi
Korchnoi - Petrosian Candidates Quarterfinal (1980), Velden AUT, rd 6, Mar-19
Queen's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation (E12)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 69 more Petrosian/Korchnoi games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-06-15  Howard: British Chess Magazine claims that Petrosian had a significant advantage here.

But where was it ?!

Apr-11-15  Howard: Still wondering....

Korchnoi analyzed this game, by the way, in the Informant, but for rather obvious reasons, his notes were probably biased.

Apr-13-15  Howard: Still beating the drum here...

Just how much better was Petrosian's
position?

Apr-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The position after 29...Rc8 looks to me like a total draw:


click for larger view

Going backwards, the last big decision was after 27...f7-f6,


click for larger view

I suppose that here, instead of 28.Rd5, Petrosian could have played 28.e5xf6.


click for larger view

That looks slightly better. But there is a reason that Petrosian was world champion, and there must have been a good reason for him NOT to have played 28.exf6. I don't know what that reason was; the difference doesn't look huge anyway.

Prior to that the game looks fairly level throughout, at least to me. Perhaps the BCM was being overenthusiastic.

I wish I could be more help!

Apr-13-15  jvv: Well, white could try 21.Rd1 or 28.exf6, but I don't see anything decisive.
May-03-15  Howard: BCM was apparently "overenthusiastic" then.
Nov-30-16  Howard: No forced win for Petrosian, then. BCM apparently made an error, then.
Dec-01-16  Petrosianic: <BCM apparently made an error, then.>

"Significant advantage" doesn't mean "Won game".

Dec-03-16  Howard: True ! But I'm still wondering where that "significant advantage" took place.

This particular match has always been of interest to me over the years, but then I've always been a Petrosian buff.

Dec-03-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: At what point did BCM say: "Petrosian had a significant advantage here."

After which move?

Dec-03-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  shalgo: I looked back at Robert Byrne's New York Times columns about this match, but he does not analyze this game in them. (He analyzes only the decisive fifth and ninth games.)
Dec-04-16  Howard: BCM didn't give a specific move as far as when Petrosian had an advantage.
Jan-25-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zenchess: Instead of the drawish 24. Bf1, White can play 24. Bd7, followed by Bb5 at some point. It targets the c-pawn and prevents Black from ever linking up his pawn majority. While I see no clear win, Black has to play a lot of defensive moves and work for equality.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
96d_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 4
by whiteshark
Match Petrosian!
by amadeus
Match Korchnoi! (i) The Early Years (1956-1984)
by amadeus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC