chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Tigran Petrosian vs Viktor Korchnoi
Korchnoi - Petrosian Candidates Quarterfinal (1980), Velden AUT, rd 6, Mar-19
Queen's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation (E12)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 69 more Petrosian/Korchnoi games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-06-15  Howard: British Chess Magazine claims that Petrosian had a significant advantage here.

But where was it ?!

Apr-11-15  Howard: Still wondering....

Korchnoi analyzed this game, by the way, in the Informant, but for rather obvious reasons, his notes were probably biased.

Apr-13-15  Howard: Still beating the drum here...

Just how much better was Petrosian's
position?

Apr-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The position after 29...Rc8 looks to me like a total draw:


click for larger view

Going backwards, the last big decision was after 27...f7-f6,


click for larger view

I suppose that here, instead of 28.Rd5, Petrosian could have played 28.e5xf6.


click for larger view

That looks slightly better. But there is a reason that Petrosian was world champion, and there must have been a good reason for him NOT to have played 28.exf6. I don't know what that reason was; the difference doesn't look huge anyway.

Prior to that the game looks fairly level throughout, at least to me. Perhaps the BCM was being overenthusiastic.

I wish I could be more help!

Apr-13-15  jvv: Well, white could try 21.Rd1 or 28.exf6, but I don't see anything decisive.
May-03-15  Howard: BCM was apparently "overenthusiastic" then.
Nov-30-16  Howard: No forced win for Petrosian, then. BCM apparently made an error, then.
Dec-01-16  Petrosianic: <BCM apparently made an error, then.>

"Significant advantage" doesn't mean "Won game".

Dec-03-16  Howard: True ! But I'm still wondering where that "significant advantage" took place.

This particular match has always been of interest to me over the years, but then I've always been a Petrosian buff.

Dec-03-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: At what point did BCM say: "Petrosian had a significant advantage here."

After which move?

Dec-03-16  shalgo: I looked back at Robert Byrne's New York Times columns about this match, but he does not analyze this game in them. (He analyzes only the decisive fifth and ninth games.)
Dec-04-16  Howard: BCM didn't give a specific move as far as when Petrosian had an advantage.
Jan-25-17  Zenchess: Instead of the drawish 24. Bf1, White can play 24. Bd7, followed by Bb5 at some point. It targets the c-pawn and prevents Black from ever linking up his pawn majority. While I see no clear win, Black has to play a lot of defensive moves and work for equality.
Jan-20-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Sitting by the fireplace, a border collie at my feet, smoking a pipe full of dope (me, that is), reminiscing about the glorious two months when User: Howard went absolutely radio rental about an inconsequential draw from 40 years earlier.

It brings a tear of mirth to my tired, locked-down eyes.

Jan-20-21  Petrosianic: <Sally Simpson: At what point did BCM say: "Petrosian had a significant advantage here."

After which move?>

Beats me. I don't think he did. P missed wins in Games 4 and 5, granted. But in this one, White enjoys the minimal advantage of the first move for most of the game, but is nowhere near a win. K defends properly, and it's a good game all around.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC