chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Viktor Kupreichik vs Viktor Korchnoi
"Hail to the Viktors" (game of the day Oct-15-2004)
Grandmasters-Young Masters (1970), Sochi URS, Oct-??
French Defense: Advance Variation (C02)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Kupreichik/Korchnoi games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-15-04  DanielBryant: Viktor is the victor over Viktor.
Oct-15-04  zugzwangdragon: Wow...I've seen a lot of French Advances in my day, but this is incredibly unorthodox. Black seemed to waste too much time in the opening. Korchnoi's opening moves all had a plan behind them, but they seem uncoordinated. Regardless of the opening, however, I think 13. ...O-O-O was the losing move. White had too much initiative on that side of the board.
Oct-15-04  arieszodiac: I though Viktor deep penetration passed out, or his running out of time, ...nb4?? a blunder!!
Oct-15-04  TheHappyPrince: There is a typo indeed. It should be 22...Qb7 instead of 22...Kb7 :-)
Oct-15-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  xenophon: to the victor-whichever-the spoils
Oct-15-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: Er, yes, 22...Qb7
Oct-15-04  themindset: i believe that black was fine out of the opening. i think black blew it between the 17th and the 20th move.

19...axb4 and 20...Kb8 are both particularly appalling.

Oct-15-04  kevin86: I believe it goes:

Hail to the victors valient
Hail to the conquering heroes
Hail Hail to Michigan
The leaders and Best

Hail to the Victors valient
Hail to the conquering heroes
Hail hail to Michigan,the champions of the West.

Note:Michigan was in the Western conference before the Big Ten was began-it is an old,good song.

Oct-15-04  Phoenix: <Chessgames.com>

Go Blue!

Feb-15-05  GreenDayGuy: What was with the early queenside pawn advances? Could that really be part of a plan? If anyone knows, could they explain it to me?
Aug-26-05  uladzik: I'm just a novice. Could someone explain, what would happen if the back knight takes the white rook on a6? Is the problem here that the blacks can't protect the pawn on b6?
Aug-26-05  Shams: <uladzik> yes, and also black is down a piece for the exchange. 27...Nxa5 28.Rxa6 Kc7 29.Qa4 will win more material for white.
Feb-24-07  Gilmoy: 18 .. Rg7 to double on g? But the split Rooks become a target for Ra8+, making Kb8 necessary. They each sacked 1 pawn for a tempo to get a Rook vertical -- but White's Rook advanced with a threat, which won the 2nd tempo to finish his doubling. That tied down the Queen to defend a8, and then Black was forked at b6 and a8, and the pin threat wins.
Feb-24-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: I don't think ...Nb4 was even a blunder. Black had no answer to 27. Nxa5 Nxa5 28. Rxb6 that I can see.
Apr-05-14  Poisonpawns: E.Sveshnikov comments after Korchnoi`s 13..0-0-0?
"But this is going too far ! Obviously we can understand Korchnoi's desire to play for a win against his young opponent (this was a training tournament for masters against grandmasters), but queenside castling is too risky. What 's more, it seems that Korchnoi was unaware that he was up against an outstanding attacking player !"

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC