|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jul-11-05
 | | Boomie: Marshall's position looks fine after move 17. Perhaps his affinity for king side attacks led him astray. Many of us would play the minority attack 18. a4 which gives white good play on the queen side. With 18. ad1 and 19. e3?, Marshall telegraphs his intention to attack the king side. After 20. c3!, white's small positional advantage has vanished. 21. b1? is vulnerable to a shot, 21...e5, which Capa misses. After 21...g5, 22. g3 just about equalizes. 22. xg5? followed by 23. xe3? produces a lost game. The rest is technique which Capa had in abundance. |
 |
| Aug-31-05 | | Koster: fritz says black missed a much quicker win with 26...Qf6 instead of Rxd4. Black threatens to win immediately with attack on f2 and h4-h2 squares and after whites Qb8ch the black K has g7 so no e5ch for white. |
 |
| Jan-25-06 | | chessmaster pro: Why doesn't Marshall take that bishop??? |
 |
| Jan-25-06 | | CapablancaFan: <chessmaster pro> Confused. At what point could Marshall have taken the bishop safely? |
 |
| Mar-13-06 | | who: <azi> capablanca writes that Marshall could have done much better had he played more off-beat openings such as the vienna. |
 |
| Apr-03-06 | | wolverine199: <Koster> and Fritz was preceded by Capablanca. On Chernev's "Capablanca's Best Endings", there is a comment on move 26: <Although this pretty move led to a win, Capablanca commented objectively that the better move , overlooked by all the analysts, was 26 Qg7-f6, whereby the King is provided with a flight-square at g7. This would have spared him some trouble.'I was highly praised,' says he, 'because of the excelence of my play in this position, while in reality I could have done better.'> |
 |
| May-31-06 | | Astudent of the game: At 5. a3 seems to serve no purpose.... what am I missing? Nf3 would see a better move. It does open the bishop; however, the bishop is not used for anything in the next few moves. Would it not be wiser to defend the bishop already being used and get your knight out? |
 |
| Jun-18-06 | | ChessDude33: <Astudent of the game> (I'm guessing you mean 5. e3) Well...there is really no difference between the two moves. After 5.Nf3 play could go 5...Ne4 6. Bxe7 Qxe7 7. e3 Nxc3 8. bxc3 Nd7 9. Bd3 and end up at the same place as in the game. <It does open the bishop; however, the bishop is not used for anything in the next few moves. > If you wanna castle your gonna have to bring the bishop out. <Would it not be wiser to defend the bishop> They can still play 5...Ne4 and the bishop gets traded off anyway. |
 |
| Jun-25-06 | | babakova: <Why doesn't Marshall take that bishop???> I assume you mean on move 32 with 32.Rxe4? I was looking at the board at first and couldnt figure it out then I saw 32.Rxe4? Nf3+ and now if 33.Kf1 Nd2+ forks rook and king and wins, if instead 33.Kh1 Qa1+ mates... |
 |
| Jun-25-06 | | CapablancaFan: <babakova> <Why doesn't Marshall take that bishop???> <I assume you mean on move 32 with 32.Rxe4? I was looking at the board at first and couldnt figure it out then I saw 32.Rxe4? Nf3+ and now if 33.Kf1 Nd2+ forks rook and king and wins, if instead 33.Kh1 Qa1+ mates...> Ahh very good Daniel son! |
 |
| Aug-16-07 | | Karpova: <Gypsy: <I've read that White could have drawn or won with Qe8+ at some stage, but I don't see it in the game.> That is because some author introduced an error into the game record and this error was propagated from source to source. The error allowed a combination starting with Qe8. (See Chernev "Capablanca's Best Endings".)> Edward Winter on Evans' "The 10 Most Common Chess Mistakes … and how to avoid them!": <Then page 157 has an alleged position from the Marshall v Capablanca match of 1909 (5th game), with Evans claiming that, “incredibly”, White missed an immediate victory (mate or gain of the queen) through 45 Qe8+. Untrue, because Marshall’s queen was on b6, and not c6. This elementary matter has been pointed out countless times, and even by Evans himself on page 750 of Chess Life & Review, November 1974.’>
http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... |
 |
| May-12-09 | | TheWizardfromHarlem: Capablanca studied..u can tell by his openings. they improved throughout the match if a line was bad or didnt lead to anything he found his mistakes and he made sure he changed it before the next game. |
 |
Jun-10-09
 | | visayanbraindoctor: A cold-blooded tactical game by Capablanca and Marshall, this game deserves more attention.  click for larger view12. Rfe1 dxc4 allows Marshall to maneuver his Queen to the 4th rank. 13. BXc4 b6 14. Qe4.... 18...Rbc8  click for larger viewGiven his central and Kingside superiority Marshall embarks on a plan that looks quite reasonable, and which I believe many chessplayers would also take, to attack the Kingside beginnign with a rook lift 19. Re3. Capablanca reacts vigorously, first trying to exchange off white's dangerous rook on the 3rd rank, 19... cxd4 20. cxd4 Rc3 21. Bb1  click for larger viewThen Capa plays the cold-blooded 21... g5, inviting the subsequent knight sacrifice by Marshall 22. Nxg5. Not many chessplayers would play such a move, as it leads to hair-rising complications and hanging pieces. Capa before playing this move must have seen that the line 26. Rxd4 leads to a win.  click for larger viewThe reason why he played 26. Rxd4 instead of 26...Qf6 <Although this pretty move led to a win, Capablanca commented objectively that the better move , overlooked by all the analysts, was 26 Qg7-f6, whereby the King is provided with a flight-square at g7. This would have spared him some trouble.'I was highly praised,' says he, 'because of the excellence of my play in this position, while in reality I could have done better.'> is probably because he had already seen that this <pretty> move should win as well, even several moves back. Otherwise he probably would not have gone into the line leading into this position at all, beginning with 21...g5. For some psychological reason, once a clear way to an advantage has been calculated, most players just tend to follow their original calculated line; why waste time calculating other winning lines? If so, Capa must have preconceived the remarkable position after 28. e5+ even several moves back.  click for larger viewBlack's King is under discovered check, while at the same time his Bishop and Rook are hanging. Capa must have seen that the resource 28... Be4 not only blocks the discovered check, but also removes one of the hanging pieces and neutralizes white's dangerous bishop.  click for larger view |
 |
Jun-10-09
 | | visayanbraindoctor: After several more easier-to-find moves, the game settles down in this position 37. Qxe6. click for larger viewCapablanca must have seen that his advantage should be enough to win, and probably already had a plan of how to go about it even during the middle game. A classic case of Fischer's hypothesis. <"Capablanca was among the greatest of chess players, but not because of his endgame. His trick was to keep the openings simple, and then play with such brilliance in the middle game that the game was decided - even though his opponent didn't always know it - before he arrived at the ending." - Fischer> In the above position, many players no doubt would have gone after the White outside passed a-pawn, and thus leave their exposed King to a perpetual check, something that Marshal must have counted upon. Unfortunately for Marshall, Capablanca carries out the only plan that could even conceivably win the game. He mostly leaves the passed pawn alone and instead goes for a direct attack on the White King with his Queen and Bishop, while shuffling his own King between h5 and g6 to avoid successive checks and so gain tempo for the attack; and he places his Queen in squares where it can ward of checks by the White Queen but still be available to attack White's King. During the final Q and B attack Capa had to foresee the following remarkable position.  click for larger viewWhite is about to queen his passed pawn, which Capa had left alone to march up the a-file. However, now comes 52... Bxf3  click for larger viewSuddenly mate is threatened, and poor Marshall remarkably has no checks. With the same two pieces that he is threatening mate with, Capa economically also defends all squares in which Marshall can check the Black King (a6, c6, e8). A fantastic game! |
 |
Jun-10-09
 | | visayanbraindoctor: In conclusion: I do not think that this game is as well-known as other Capablanca - Marshall games. I think it deserves more attention. It clearly shows how dangerous an attacking player Marshall was, and how good Capablanca was in complications and in steering his brilliant middlegames into endgames won as a 'matter of technique'; and how difficult such 'matter of technique' endgames could be. |
 |
Oct-10-10
 | | Sastre: If 25.Qc7, Capablanca says <25...Rc8 26.Qxb7 Rc1 27.Qb8+ Kg7 28.Rf1 Qd2> is winning outright (from 'My Chess Career'). |
 |
Oct-10-10
 | | visayanbraindoctor: I forgot to note that in the above position, aside from <With the same two pieces that he is threatening mate with, Capa economically also defends all squares in which Marshall can check the Black King (a6, c6, e8).>  click for larger viewMarshall can deliver a check with his Queen anyway on a6, c6, or e8 in order to draw away the Black Queen from mating his King, and then think of promoting his a7 pawn to a Queen. But it is not to be. Astonishingly, however Capa captures, the a8 square is defended! 53. Qa6+ Qxa6
53. Qe8+ Qxe8
53. Qc6+ Bxc6
Everything falls in place with computer-like precision. And there is no doubt that Capablanca had seen all these even several moves before. It's games like this that gave rise to the legend of the chess machine, although this particular game is not well known. |
 |
| Dec-08-11 | | King Death: <visayan> Thanks for pointing out this game. It's a defensive masterpiece by Capablanca. Twice that bishop goes to e4 and causes White nothing but pain. One nice point after the brilliant 28...Be4 is that Marshall couldn't regain his piece with 29.Be4+ Re4 30.f3 Re2 31.fg Qg4 when Qb7 or Qa8 both fail after another little tactic, 32...Rg2+. The back rank weakness makes 31...Be4 possible too after 32.Re4 Nf3+ 33.Kf1 Nd2+ and wins. |
 |
| May-03-12 | | Anderssen99: Capa missed: 26...,Qf6. 27.Qg3,h5. 28.f3 (28.e5?,Rxd4!!. 29.exf6??,Rxd1#),Rxd4. 29.Re1,Qe5!! (Forcing white to abandon the pin on the N). 30.f4,Qd6. 31.Qf3,f5 and W. is crushed (e.g. 32.a3,fxe4. 33.Bxe4,Bxe4. 34.Rxe4,Re1+. 35.Qf1,Qc5+ mates). |
 |
| Jun-17-12 | | checkmateyourmove: I think this gem has not had so much spot light because capa wouldnt want it to. i think he gets himself in jams then bails himself out. he would of preferred to get high praise for winning all aspects of the chess game not just parts of it. As far as a game its amazing, to see a legend fight his way out of fairly even positions is as exciting as seeing him win like a machine too from move 1 to 60. |
 |
Oct-06-12
 | | Peligroso Patzer: Cyrus Lakdawala wittily writes of Marshall’s <13. Qe4> (which he annotates “!?”, being more generous than the “?!” given this move in annotations found in the copy of this game in ChessBase’s Mega Database 2012): “Marshall was good at what he did but sometimes what he did wasn’t so good!” (<Capablanca: Move by Move>, by LAKDAWALA, Cyrus, Everyman Chess ©2012, at page 83.) Lakdawala elaborates with the observation that: “Typically, Marshall waste[d] no time transferring his queen over to the kingside in the hopes of launching an attack” (ibid., p. 83), but in this case the position does not warrant immediate attack. |
 |
Oct-06-12
 | | Peligroso Patzer: In the position after <15. Bc4-d3>: click for larger viewLakadawala (in the book cited in my previous post, at p. 83) refrains from the comment I probably could not have resisted: "Will he see it?" The chances that Capa would notice the mate threat were approximately 110%; and what follow-up did Marshall envision after <15. ... Nf6>? The game continuation is less than convincing. |
 |
Oct-06-12
 | | Peligroso Patzer: Note: In the first of my two preceding comments the move is numbered incorrectly: the move reference should read <14. Qe4>. |
 |
| Jan-04-13 | | chrisfalter: @Boomie - After 21...g5 22. Qg3 Lakdawala gives 22...Rxe3 23. fxe3 Nxe4 and white has insufficient compensation for the pawn deficit. Also, 21...e5 is not a shot that Capa missed; it is a mistake he avoided (22. Qxe5 Qxe5 23. Nxe5 and white is up a safe pawn) @Peligroso Patzer - Lakdawala states that he is "not a big fan of" <13. Qe4>, so I think he meant to award a '?!' (dubious) rather than a '!?' (intereresting). Editor's error. |
 |
| Jan-04-13 | | chrisfalter: Speaking of editing errors, here's my post in good English: @Boomie - After 21...g5 22. Qg3 Lakdawala gives 22...Rxe3 23. fxe3 Nxe4 and white has insufficient compensation for the pawn deficit. Also, 21...e5 is not a shot that Capa missed; it is a mistake he avoided (22. Qxe5 Qxe5 23. Nxe5 and white is up a safe pawn) @Peligroso Patzer - Lakdawala states that he is "not a big fan of" <14. Qe4>, so I think he meant to award a '?!' (dubious) rather than a '!?' (interesting). Editor's error. |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |