chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Friedrich Saemisch vs Aron Nimzowitsch
"The Immortal Zugzwang Game" (game of the day Jan-31-2009)
Copenhagen (1923), Copenhagen DEN, rd 6, Mar-09
Queen's Indian Defense: Classical. Traditional Variation Nimzowitsch Line (E18)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 80 times; par: 34 [what's this?]

Annotations by Aron Nimzowitsch.      [48 more games annotated by Nimzowitsch]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Saemisch/Nimzowitsch games
sac: 20...fxe4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-17-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: "The most powerful weapon in chess is to have the next move." -- David Bronstein

"Yeah, right." -- Friedrich Saemisch

Sep-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: <Phony Benoni>, Bronstein's statement could be plausible if modified to the *right* to make the next move.
Nov-07-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: <kereru> It may not be a true zugzwang, but true zugzwangs are quite rare outside problems, so when OTB players use the term to describe positions in which only one player must worsen their position by virtue of having the move, it is surely as forgivable as the special use by problemists of the word "phase".
Nov-07-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <scutigera: <kereru> It may not be a true zugzwang, but true zugzwangs are quite rare outside problems...>

If chess games were played to checkmate Zugzwang would occur in almost every game.

Nov-07-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <If chess games were played to checkmate Zugzwang would occur in almost every game.>

Unless we resign,we haveto move.In that sense chess is eternal zugzwang..

Nov-07-15  Mr. V: <moronovich> Eternal Zugzwang, you say? I think I see the title for one of my future plays . . .
Nov-07-15  JimNorCal: Isn't this a true ZZ? White has a few pawn moves. When exhausted the remaining moves lose.
Nov-30-15  kereru: While it's certainly a good move, the idea of 25...h6 is actually very simple - Black takes the g5 square away from the Queen and now threatens to win it with 26...R5f3 27.Bxf3 Rxf3.

As Heidenfeld pointed out, White can defend against this threat by giving up a piece with 26.Bc1 Bxb1 27.Rgf1, which would be technically "better" than than making a null move like 26.b3 and allowing 26...R5f3. So no, it's not a "zugzwang".

The game didn't even attract all that much attention at the time, it was mainly a Nimzowitsch PR job. See http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Dec-01-15  RookFile: I wonder if 13. Nxd5 with a white advantage was known in those days.
Dec-01-15  beatgiant: <RookFile>
13. Nxd5 Nxd5 14. Nxc6 Bxc6 15. Rxc6 Nxf4 16. gxf4 Qxd4 does not look like much White advantage to me.
Dec-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <beatgiant> Go one more move, Mr Kramnik! 17 Rxe6!


click for larger view

Komodo gives a .71 which indicates a large edge, but maybe some trouble in conversion.

So 13 Nxd5 would have been worth trying, but 13...Nxd4 14 Nxe7+ Qxe7 15 Qe3 looks to be a safe line for Black. Stockfish 0.18/33 Komodo 8 0.26/24

Dec-05-15  RookFile: Yes, that looks right. Microscopic edge for white. When white played Ne5 he probably played it for some reason other than exchanging it for the knight that was on b8. It stands to reason he should look at alternatives to 13. Nxc6.
Dec-26-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: For those of you that have the knowledge, this game is the main subject of The London Times Listener Crossword number 4377, <Russian Roulette>, by Rasputin (Saturday, December 19th 2015, Review Section).
Jan-28-16  ragtag: They can't move until Joe gets out of the bathroom.....
May-30-16  faysalshovon: sdjhdfff fdgsagtrtrwsersdsdsaghhj dsgh
Jul-20-16  Charly Dono: The immortal of the game is the end of zugzwang , not the previous development. It is the spirit of chess Nimzowitch , put into the same size space , time and pieces (life)
Apr-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <Karpova: <wellsometimes>

You aren't wrong:
24...Re2! (25.Qb3 Ba4 26.Rc8+ Rf8) is given as a simple win of the Queen on pages 284 of Garry Kasparov's 'On my Great Predecessors Part I', Everyman, 2003>
>

I just saw that, too, as I was playing through the game but I was afraid to ask because I thought I nobody would answer (as usually happens when there's no error to correct) or else somebody would say: "No, you %##$%, that loses everything because..."

Apr-29-17  catlover: <offramp> Interesting. Looks like crossword puzzles for VERY serious crossword fans.
Apr-29-17  JimNorCal: Over the months I return to see my comment above, that after exhausting Qside pawn moves white will have to make a losing move. One response is from <kereru> and reads in part "White can defend ... by giving up a piece ... So no, it's not a "zugzwang"."

I've tried to make sense of that but failed. So it's still a zugzwang position, at least in my view.

Apr-30-17  JimNorCal: Personally, I would not equate "giving up a piece to obtain a lost position" with "sac a piece". But that's just me.
Apr-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <JimNorCal: Personally, I would not equate "giving up a piece to obtain a lost position" with "sac a piece". But that's just me.>

What if you are a piece ahead at the time, as in this game?

Apr-30-17  JimNorCal: After donating the piece, White is down 2 pawns. A lost position.

If he did not have to move, White has a material advantage- piece for 2 pawns. Hey, "if he did not have to move" ... there's a name for that condition ... starts with 'z' ...

Apr-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <JimNorCal: Over the months I return to see my comment above, that after exhausting Qside pawn moves white will have to make a losing move. One response is from <kereru> and reads in part "White can defend ... by giving up a piece ... So no, it's not a "zugzwang"." I've tried to make sense of that but failed. So it's still a zugzwang position, at least in my view.>

As with many arguments, it comes down to how you define the term at issue. Some people define zugzwang as <you lose because you have to move and for no other reason>. A simple example is: White: pawn on d7, K on e6. Black: King on d8. If Black has to move, he loses. If he doesn't, he draws. Under this definition, the final position in this game isn't zugswang. From the wikipedia article:

<White has a few pawn moves which do not lose material, but eventually he will have to move one of his pieces. If he plays 1.Rc1 or Rd1, then 1...Re2 traps White's queen; 1.Kh2 fails to 1...R5f3, also trapping the queen, since White cannot play 2.Bxf3 because the bishop is pinned to the king; 1.g4 runs into 1...R5f3 2.Bxf3? Rh2 mate. Angos analyzes 1.a3 a5 2.axb4 axb4 3.h4 Kh8 (waiting) 4.b3 Kg8 and White has run out of waiting moves and must lose material. Best in this line is 5.Nc3!? bxc3 6.bxc3, which just leaves Black with a serious positional advantage and an extra pawn.[46] Other moves lose material in more obvious ways.

However, since Black would win even without the zugzwang,[47] it is debatable whether the position is true zugzwang. Even if White could pass his move he would still lose, albeit more slowly, after 1...R5f3 2.Bxf3 Rxf3, trapping the queen and thus winning queen and bishop for two rooks.>

The article suggests that the final position of Podgaets vs M Dvoretsky, 1974


click for larger view

and Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 after 34....Rg8


click for larger view

are purer examples of middlegame zugzwang than this one.

Whatever. It's still a cool game (though overrated in my opinion). I looked back through the kibitzing and saw that I argued, excessively rudely, with <Once> about it. Sorry, <Once>.

Apr-30-17  JimNorCal: OK, <kp> and <kereru>, the threat to play R5f3 and get Q, B, 2Ps for 2R and Kt is a fair argument. Also the Winter history article is fascinating. So many of the Winter links fail, I hadn't even bothered to click through.
Apr-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <JimNorCal:> I'm with you. If you define Zugzwang as being forced to make a move that gives you an inferior position or loses a few points, then someday, when the computers have figured out how to win every game with white from move 1, white will start each game with d4 and announce ZUGZWANG!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 8)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Game 76
from Guinness Book - Chess Grandmasters (Hartston) by Qindarka
Great Games: 1900-1929
by ARubinstein
Game 9
from Blockade (Nimzowitsch) by Qindarka
d4 : QID : Classical
by ISeth
A beautifully played zugzwang
from Game of the Days by hidude
chessmani's favorite games
by chessmani
Zugzwang!!!
from Immortal Games by Karnatakiaditya
Played this game as a child ... still amazed by it.
from All time favorite games by zanshin
Unique Themes: Zugzwang
by ravel5184
Morten's favorite games
by Morten
musicmanTRIBALx's favorite games
by musicmanTRIBALx
max05's favorite games
by max05
Queen's Indian
by Chezter75
"Duels of the Mind" - 12 Best Games Of Chess
by Tigranny
A knight sacrifice completely paralyzes Saemisch.
from Knights Add Spice D&E Shield Fredthebear by fredthebear
The Immortal Zugzwang Game
from Popularity Counts! by dac1990
Immortal Zugzwang by Nimzovich
from Real Classics by Levit8chess
Great Games
by Montreal1666
August 2- Queen's Indian
from Openings of the Day 2012 Starting July 2nd by shinelikeastar
Aron Nimzowitsch's Best Games
by KingG
plus 278 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC