chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Yuri Averbakh vs Boris Spassky
USSR Championship 1961a (1961), Moscow URS, rd 6, Jan-19
Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen. Classical Variation (B84)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Averbakh/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-30-17  Kafelnikov64: One move backwards would have made a nice Tuesday puzzle, don't you think?
Jan-30-17  YouRang: The solution to the puzzle is simple enough. But Spassky set it up with the subtle <35.h4!>


click for larger view

If white takes the pawn, he exposed his king on the g-file, and black can follow with (say) ...Kh7 and ...Rg7+. It also clears the 3rd rank so that Re3 threatens Qh3+.

Perhaps it was fear of this attack potential that compelled white to decline the pawn, opting instead for <36.Rd4?>


click for larger view

This unfortunately allows a much worse threat with <36...h3+!>, putting the white king in a box where he is at the mercy of black's R+Q+R battery .

White finished with 37.Kg1? and the mate-in-3 (technically, 37.Kf2 is better since it loses more slowly).

Jan-30-17  AlicesKnight: 38 ....Rf1+ forces 39.Kxf1, when ...Qe1 is mate thanks to the h3 pawn. The charge of this P from move 34 recalls a similar charge in the Larsen-Spassky USSR v. World brilliancy. Larsen vs Spassky, 1970
Jan-30-17  KlingonBorgTatar: Was Averbakh in time trouble hereabouts? For a while he seemed to be winning. He tore apart Spassky's Paulsen Defense early on.
Jan-30-17  stacase: I noted that Spassky was Black, and looked around for a few seconds, nothing looked promising then, Oh! Look at that, 38. ...RF1+ forces White's King to take the Rook and yup the Queen flies down to deliver mate because Black's h3 Pawn covers the escape route. I thought, "It can't be that easy." Then I remembered, it's MONDAY !!!
Jan-30-17  Cheapo by the Dozen: Fun one. Futz around on the e-file for a few tries until it's clear that nothing works, then try the next forcing move that comes to mind. Bingo!
Jan-30-17  morfishine: Its mate in 2: <38.Rf1+> followed by 39.Qe1#

*****

Jan-30-17  Sularus: hmmmm... monday...
38. ... Rf1+
39. kxR Qe1++
Jan-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  gawain: Great Monday puzzle. It was easy--the first move I tried was the winner--but it is still nifty how the tactic works, thanks to the h3 pawn covering the square g2.
Jan-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: Clever tactic.
Admittedly it is not difficult, but it's nice to see the majority solve the puzzle. Above all, chess it to be enjoyed!

a pleasant Monday to all!

Jan-30-17  drollere: 36. ... h3 seals the deal.
Jan-30-17  stst: <Spassky's games are always so asthetically pleasing.> It couldn't be....unless he never lost, or it could be argued that it's still pretty when he lost...
Jan-30-17  ChessHigherCat: 1 e4 ...? Black to play and blow everybody's mind in 38 moves
Jan-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: < stst: <Spassky's games are always so asthetically pleasing.> It couldn't be....unless he never lost, or it could be argued that it's still pretty when he lost... >

it is! His losses to Fischer especially were aesthetically pleasing! lOL

Jan-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: What I'm saying is...

win or lose, there is beauty to be found in all the games of the great masters.

Jan-30-17  zanzibar: Yeah!
Jan-30-17  ChessHigherCat: <chrisowen don't be veg winked dad faculty.> Sorry for the delayed response, but I had to run that through my zodo-wafarian transmogrification software. In answer to your question: No, I am not the Gatekeeper. I am the Keymaster. Why do you ask?
Jan-30-17  ruzon: <ChessHigherCat>: Mute chrisowen if you want, but please don't make fun of him. He has a mental illness that has gotten progressively worse over the years.
Jan-30-17  ChessHigherCat: Okay sorry, I thought he had invented some kind of cryptic poetry. It seems kind of coherent.
Jan-30-17  ChessHigherCat: I tried to delete it but it's too late. If you're a monitor you can delete it if you like (along with the following messages, so people don't imagine that I really insulted him).
Jan-30-17  ChessHigherCat: <chrisowen: <ChessHigherCat> Sorry hu muddle man deaf angles huts q pras get school v?> Don't be sorry Chris, everything's okay and keep up with your poetry!
Jan-30-17  detritus: Man, that h-pawn charge really wreaks havoc with White's position. Would 35. h4 from White have salvaged the position for him? I guess I don't understand what the point of 35. Rd2 was.
Feb-01-17  kevin86: Mate in two started by rook sac.
May-27-17  zydeco: This is one of these games where it's hard to know if the players were seeing very far ahead or improvising move to move. Averbakh initiates a dubious sacrifice, is a clear exchange down, but has perpetual check. Spassky, to avoid it, hands Averbakh two pawns but gets an initiative. Interesting game, which demonstrates Spasky's versatility: flexibility in the opening, skill in defense, and a real gift for managing imbalanced positions.
Jul-15-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  WTHarvey: Black mates in 3 (decoy).


click for larger view

37. ... ?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC