chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vasily Yemelin vs Esad Goric
Rijeka (2001), Rijeka CRO, rd 2, Dec-02
French Defense: Tarrasch. Closed Variation (C05)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 749 more games of V Yemelin
sac: 21.Bxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-27-06  makaveli52: 27. Qxg7+ Kxh4 28. g3+ Kh3 29 Rh2#
weird puzzle for chessgames.com, its rarely mates in 4-5
Feb-27-06  makaveli52: 27. Qg6+ is the right move Qxg7 doesnt work due to Kh5 oops
Feb-27-06  erimiro1: Although the mate is not in 2, like most Monday puzzles, it's easy enough.
Feb-27-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Maybe a little tough for Monday? (I got it pretty quickly, but still ...)

Feb-27-06  jmi: I got that.

Once you'd notice the Queen posting to h7 square, the rest are all forced moves and it's pretty much straightforward from there on.

Mate in 4. Pretty easy enough.

Feb-27-06  MatedStan: <makavelia52> you're right, 27. Qg6+ was the right move but grabbing the pawn would not ruin the combination. You would simply have to realize the error and repeat the past position and play Qg6+. Taking the pawn is still a winning try for those that did not see far enough ahead.
Feb-27-06  patzer2: This is a bit challenging for a Monday puzzle. I saw the solution with 25. Qh7+! easy enough, but found as I looked a little deeper this was not such a simple postion.

The combination actually begins with the blunder 20...Bxg5?? (better was 20...f6 or 20...Qd8), when the demolition of pawn structure 21. Bxh7+!! initiates the first part of today's (25. ?) puzzle.

Also, I confess I did not find the most efficient end to this combination. I figured out 25. Qh7+! Kxg5 26. h4+ Kg4 easy enough, but after 27...Kxh4 went for 28. Kf2 . This wins OK, but much more efficient is the quick two-move mate with 28. g3+ Kh3 29. Rf2#

Feb-27-06  Zaius: I knew this would be a simple forced mate puzzle but I just couldn't do it. I tried my best to visualize the forced mate and I would catch myself making mistakes as to where pieces were when I was about 3 moves deep. Very frustrating. Anybody have tips for better visualizing the boards and not letting existing pieces on the board interfere with your visualization?

Thanks

Feb-27-06  dzechiel: This was not a typical Monday puzzle for me. I got the solution, but instead of the typical one or two seconds, I spent a few minutes trying to decide how to follow up the obvious check and knight capture.

For a few moments I thought it might be a perpetual check and that white was trying to achieve a draw, but I decided to look further. Up until that point I had always considered the second move to be 26 ♕xg7+, but now I decided to look at pawn checks.

I liked 26 h4+ as it forced the black ♔ deeper into enemy territory. Then I saw that with 27 ♕g6+ black would have to take the h-pawn, I would get 28 g3+ followed by 29 ♖h2#. All forced of course, but not as obvious as I am used to on Mondays.

This really felt more like a Wednesday puzzle to me.

Feb-27-06  patzer2: <Zaius> Visuzlization takes practice. Here's some tips:

(1) Try setting up toward the end of a difficult puzzle and working backwards. Then put the easier puzzles together in your mind from the beginning to solve the bigger combination.

(2) Also visualize each half move at a time clearly before moving to the next move in your mind. This will slow your calculation time at first, but you'll find it will speed it up with more accuracy as you get in the habit.

(3) Work out combinations from both sides of the board. Playing them out as the aggressor and trying to defend against them as the opponent. Seeing combinations from both sides makes it easier to recall familiar patterns.

(4) Using a blank board, try visualizing some simple piece moves or combinations, beginning with one-move and two-move mates, without pieces on the board.

(5) Work on endings. You'd be surprised how much visualizing the move of pawns or a few pieces in an endgame will improve visualization.

(6) Work on specific categories of tactics one at a time. For example, tudying a number of Knight Forks in one session for a while will improve your visualization of combinations using this tactic.

(7) Don't be too hard on yourself. Chess blindness effects everyone to a certain degree. If you miss one that you'd like to understand, be patient work on it and add it to your memory bank of familiar patterns.

(8) Work on learning simpler combinations and patterns before progressing to more difficult combinations. It's better to know a lot of simple patterns that you can integrate than to spend too much time studying difficult patterns you might rarely see.

(9.) Don't compare yourself to others in this area. The point is to improve your visualization at a pace comfortable for you, and not to try to match the ability of others.

(10.) You might try to limit blitz play, especially if it gets you in the habit of moving pieces without completely visualizing resulting positions.

Feb-27-06  Zaius: Thanks, <patzer2>
Feb-27-06  prinsallan: Hard for monday, but kind of easy anyway.
Feb-27-06  Catenaccio: so you guys are trying to find the solution without moving the pieces on a ches board, like if it was in a real game? That sounds hard. I make to Friday sometimes (if I am very lucky) but I always move pieces around and have like a hundred fails before I can find a solution; and often even that one is wrong. What would you think would be the better way to improve my tactics, going on with the actual pieces or to try to move them just in my mind?
Feb-27-06  jmi: <Catenaccio: so you guys are trying to find the solution without moving the pieces on a ches board, like if it was in a real game? That sounds hard. I make to Friday sometimes (if I am very lucky) but I always move pieces around and have like a hundred fails before I can find a solution; and often even that one is wrong. What would you think would be the better way to improve my tactics, going on with the actual pieces or to try to move them just in my mind?>

I can't speak for others but the problem I currently have during OTB play is knowing when such an opportunity exists!

In an actual game, no one is going to tell you,"hey! that's mate in 4!" My mind had to constantly absorb and find new patterns to rearrange my thoughts into some tactics or plan that I can use to great effect for every single move my opponent or I make. Believe me, sometimes, it gets overwhelming and I can get depressed when I fail to spot a move!

As for tactics, I find there is no substitute for experience and I just have to make the additional effort to learn and remember.

I find that as I do more combinations and tactics, my mind becomes sharper and I realise I was not memorising positions but acquiring "pattern recognition" skills.

I always try to visualise without moving the pieces on the board because that is how a real world situation presents itself during OTB play and I literally force myself to it. When I first started, it was very difficult and often my mind starts to wander if I was not focused. I could barely visualise the board beyond 1 move! But as I studied harder and take longer times to pause and think, I can see 3-4 moves. Seeing beyond 5 moves (unless they're forced moves) is still beyond me.

Do note that I normally don't see beyond 4 moves and even then, I realise that I map my thoughts into usually 3 or 4 prime candidate moves and then slowly eliminating each one in turn if I ever found a refutation.

Occasionally I still layout the pieces esp. when certain variations become extremely complex and prefer to move on the board but I know the only way to do better in chess is to learn to visualise it in my mind.

I also realise that keeping my body fit helps to improve my concentration and stamina and keeps my mind alert for longer periods (which definitely helps in tournaments).

As for chessgames puzzles, if I fail to spot a move, then I just put it down and make an effort to remember it should a similar problem crop out in the future. I don't overly criticise myself when I don't always find the answers to the puzzles as I realise that learning chess is always an ongoing process.

Feb-27-06  Marius: 19. Ra2 seems to prepare all the tactical idea
Feb-27-06  Richerby: Quite hard for a Monday, I think, if you're doing the puzzles in your head (which is the most beneficial way to do these things). But, then, I did make it a little harder for myself by missing 29.♖h2# and going for 29.♕h5+ thinking 29... ♕h4 30.♕xh4# but missing the possibility of 29... ♔xg3 30.♖g2#. Close enough, I reckon.
Feb-27-06  Mariusfj: My suggestion was: 25 Qh7+ Kxg5 26 h4+ Kg4 27 Qg6+ Kxh4 28 Kf2 and black cant stop Rh1# Any comments?
Feb-27-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: First few moves are obvious, though it took a little work to find the mate.
Feb-27-06  cjhasbrouck: Far too difficult for Monday.

If every puzzle were this hard or harder, I'd never be able to solve a single puzzle, and I'd probably stop trying and start visiting purely for the daily quote. :(

Don't make Mondays this hard, Chessgames. :( :( :(

Keep Thursday - Sunday as hard as you want it to be, but reserve at least Mondays for scrubs like me. There are a lot of us, I promise.

Feb-27-06  sfm: The good old Bxh7+ - Ng5+ - Qh5 combi, one of the first things French-users learn to look out for - usually the hard way! Hilarious to see that also very strong players somehow manage to forget about it. Instead of 20.-,Bxg5?? 20.-,Qd8 looks like the safest move but a very sexy follow-up to Black's previous move it is not.
Feb-27-06  VargPOD: Got it.

The first move was very easy to find. Rest required some work, but the position after second move implies that there has to be a mating combination, even if you don't find it at first try.

Feb-27-06  pwolff: I found this visualization theme interesting. I'm working on my visualization skills, which currently are pretty bad (I guess it reflects my rating at about 1450:). But how do you guys visualize the board? Do you actually "see" the pieces on their new spots after a move? I'm thinking more like: "Now I pretend that the queen moves to h7 with check. Then the only move the king has is to take the knight on g5, so let's pretend that the king is on g5..." and so on. But I never actually "see" (or visualize in my mind) the new board position. I just pretend that the pieces has moved. In complex positions I constantly forget where all the pieces has moved/whos turn it is and has to start over. Any comments?
Feb-27-06  Soltari: I agree this one is too hard for a monday. I wasn't able to solve it on the puzzle screen, the combination is too long.
Feb-27-06  mbt123au: Feb-27-06 makaveli52: 27. Qxg7+ Kxh4 28. g3+ Kh3 29 Rh2# weird puzzle for chessgames.com, its rarely mates in 4-5

Feb-27-06 makaveli52: 27. Qg6+ is the right move Qxg7 doesnt work due to Kh5 oops

G7 WORKS...BECAUSE AFTER Kh5..just move back to h7

Feb-27-06  nfazli: had this been a wedensday puzzle I would've solved it a whole lot faster,pretty sure,,,but for monday I was looking for a quick mate...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC