chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Walter Thomas Mayfield vs William Robert Trinks
60th US Open (1959), Omaha, NE USA, rd 12, Aug-01
Borg Defense: General (B00)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more games of W R Trinks
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-21-10  jbtigerwolf: Omaha Championship... so it's a tournament. Not a blitz game. So why is this not the shortest tournament game in the Guinness Book Of Records?
Aug-22-10  soothsayer8: I think there's a reason I've never heard of the "Borg Defense" o_O I think the opening code says it all about this game.
Aug-26-10  abstract: soft trinks XD
Jan-06-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: As part of my US Open researches I had to look into this game "seriously", since the US Open was held in Omaha in 1959 and I have heard reports of a Fool's Mate occurring in the US Open.

I'm pretty sure this is it.

The players are W T Mayfield (TX) and W R Trinks (IN), making it unlikely this was a local Omaha tournament. Both did play in the US Open at Omaha, and Mayfield did indeed defeat Trinks in the tournament. (See players #114 and #126 in the crosstable at: Game Collection: US Open 1959, Omaha

Their ratings coming into the tournament were 1640 and 1658 respectively, but the rating system was quite different in 1959. Those would probably be equivalent to 1200-1300 today.

Their game was played in the final round when Mayfield had scored 3.0/11, Trinks 2.5/11. Neither were going anywhere except home as soon as possible.

So I wouldn't be surprised if this were the game. Trinks, beyond caring about his result, decides to go out with a laugh. I don't know if Mayfield was in on the joke or not, but he wasn't arguing.

Jul-21-12  Joey Hawks: gee whiz; even I could play better.
Oct-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  tim butler: Lots of my games are like this.
Oct-22-12  wildrookie: William Trinks? I believe that William drinks... and heavily too :)
Nov-03-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: There are shorter games. See below (a section, almost entirely written by me, of a Wikipedia article):

<In terms of number of moves, the quickest mate possible in chess is known as Fool's mate (1.g4 e5 2.f3?? Qh4# and variants thereof). This has been known to occur in amateur play. ChessGames.com gives a game L. Darling-R. Wood, 1983 (1.g4 e6 2.f4?? Qh4#).[4] Bill Wall lists, in addition to Darling-Wood, three other games that ended with Black checkmating on the second move.[5] In a tournament game at odds of pawn and move, White delivered checkmate on move 2: W. Cooke-"R____g", Cape Town Chess Club handicap tournament 1908 (remove Black's f-pawn) 1.e4 g5?? 2.Qh5#.[6] The same game had previously been played in Leeky-Mason, Dublin 1867.[7]

The shortest decisive game ever played in master play that was decided because of the position on the board (i.e. not because of a forfeit or protest) is Z. Đorđević – M. Kovačević, Bela Crkva 1984. It lasted only three moves (1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 c6 3.e3?? Qa5+ winning the bishop), and White resigned.[2][8][9] This was repeated in Vassallo-Gamundi, Salamanca 1998.[2] (In a number of other games, White has played on after 3...Qa5+, occasionally even drawing the game.)[10]

There have been many forfeited games (which could technically be regarded as losses in zero moves), the most notable examples being Game 2 of the 1972 world championship match between Boris Spassky and Bobby Fischer, which Fischer defaulted,[11] and Game 5 of the 2006 world championship match between Vladimir Kramnik and Veselin Topalov, which Kramnik defaulted.[12] A game between Fischer and Oscar Panno, played at the Palma de Mallorca Interzonal 1970, went 1. c4 resigns. Panno refused to play to protest the organizers' rescheduling of the game to accommodate Fischer's desire not to play on his religion's Sabbath. Panno was not present when the game was to begin. Fischer waited ten minutes before making his move and went to get Panno to convince him to play. Fifty-two minutes had elapsed on Panno's clock before he came to the board and resigned.[13][14] (At the time, an absence of sixty minutes resulted in a forfeit.)[15]

Under recently instituted FIDE rules, a player who is late for the beginning of a round loses the game, as does a player whose cellphone makes any sound in the tournament hall. The former rule was used at the 2009 Chinese Championship to forfeit Hou Yifan for arriving five seconds late for the beginning of a round.[16] The latter rule was used to forfeit Aleksander Delchev against Stuart Conquest after the move 1.d4 in the 2009 European Team Championship.[17]

The German grandmaster Robert Hübner also lost a game without playing any moves. In a World Student Team Championship game played in Graz in 1972, Hübner played one move and offered a draw to Kenneth Rogoff, who accepted. However, the arbiters insisted that some moves be played, so the players played the following ridiculous game: 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. Ng1 Bg7 4. Qa4 0-0 5. Qxd7 Qxd7 6. g4 Qxd2+ 7. Kxd2 Nxg4 8. b4 a5 9. a4 Bxa1 10. Bb2 Nc6 11. Bh8 Bg7 12. h4 axb4 draw agreed). The arbiters ruled that both players must apologize and play an actual game at 7 p.m. Rogoff appeared and apologized; Hübner did neither. Hübner's clock was started, and after an hour Rogoff was declared the winner.[18] The young star players Wang Chen and Lu Shanglei both lost a game in which they had played no moves. They agreed to a draw without play at the 2009 Zhejiang Lishui Xingqiu Cup International Open Chess Tournament held in Lishui, Zhejiang Province, China. The chief arbiter declared both players to have lost the game.[19]

A game may be drawn in any number of moves, or even no moves, if the tournament officials (unlike those at Graz and Lishui) do not object. According to ChessGames.com, in the 1968 Skopje–Ohrid tournament Dragoljub Janosevic and Efim Geller agreed to a draw without playing any moves.[20] Tony Miles and Stewart Reuben did the same thing in the last round of the Luton 1975 tournament, "with the blessing of the controller", in order to assure themselves of first and second places respectively.[21][22]> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...

Nov-03-13  DoctorD: <Phony Benoni> said:

"Their ratings coming into the tournament were 1640 and 1658 respectively, but the rating system was quite different in 1959. Those would probably be equivalent to 1200-1300 today."

It always hard to compare and contrast ratings from earlier times, but this reminds me of a statement a friend of mine made in the 1970s, when I first learned the game. He was rated 1900-2000 in the 50s and when I asked him why his rating had dropped to the low 1600s, he said, "Back in those days, you could count on "C" players losing a piece in the opening."

Nov-04-13  SoUnwiseTheKnight B4: Anyone who attempts a Borg at a US Open is probably in for some trouble.
Nov-04-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robed.Bishop: When I saw the Star Trek episodes involving the Borg, I had the impression they were pretty smart. I guess I was wrong.
Nov-11-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Georges Koltanowski in San Antonio Light (San Antonio, Texas), 22 Nov 1959, p. 12-D:

<The following game played in the twelfth round at the U. S. Open in Omaha will make the event famous: White: Walter Mayfield, Texas; Black: William Trinks, Indiana. 1.P-K4 P-KN4 2.N-QB3 P-KB4 3.Q-R5 Mate. The game was actually played! You'd think that by now everyone would know his "A. B. C.">

Nov-12-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Tabanus> That would appear to confirm the story, insofar as we can trust Koltanowski. But we do know from the crosstable that Mayfield defeated Trinks in the last round. And, if Koltanowski did invent the whole thing, surely he would have had the good sense not to mention the players' names.

I do have a citation for the crosstable on the collection page, but just to make it clear:

"Chess Life", October 5, 1959, p.9. Mayfield is player #114, Trinks #127.

Nov-12-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Edward Winter talks about this game here:

CN-3295: http://en.chessbase.com/post/edward...-

(

<CG> munches link above. Add a trailing "-" to the url, or copy this

en.chessbase.com/post/edward-winter-presents-uns-
olved-che-mysteries-6-

Ah that doesn't work either, due to <CG> line truncating. OK, as they say in Maine "You can't get there from here!"

)

and also here:

CN-4493: http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Nov-12-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Also CN-4994 http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

and this link:

http://turot.altervista.org/matto-d...

which has a nice copy of the Chess Life report.

Nov-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... (from Chess Life, 20 Oct 1959) says Koltanowski directed the tournament, using this game in one of his newspaper columns. I found K.'s mention of it (with the same wording) in two Texas newspapers. No mystery.
Nov-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: http://turot.altervista.org/matto-d...

which has the Oct 20 1959 CL article, makes mention of a 1936 US Open game involving a master that took only 5 moves.

Anybody know which game from Omaha this was?

Nov-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: From Philadelphia. Must be W C Arnold vs M L Hanauer, 1936
Nov-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Tabanus> Yes, that is the game. By the way, Arnold's full name is uncertain.

W C Arnold (kibitz #1)

As for Mayfield - Trinks, Spence does not include it in his tournament book.

We do know this:

1) Mayfield and Trinks were paired round 12 of the US Open at Omaha, 1959;

2) Mayfield is credited with winning the game;

3) Koltanowski reported that the result was a three-move win for Mayfield.

The question remains where Koltanowski got the information, since it was most unlikely he actually witnessed the game. It may be on the up-and-up, but it's not impossible that the players were having a little joke.

Nov-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <Tab>, and <Phony>, thanks for the info on <Arnold--Hanauer (1936)>.

RE: Question about Koltanowski...

Well, who was the TD at Omaha?

The Italian site has the CL report, which clearly says Koltanowski was. Weren't scoresheets collected even back then?

Nov-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <zanzibar> Yes, Koltanowski was definitely the tournament director. If nothing else, the crosstable ("Chess Life", October 5, 1959, page 9) states this explicitly.

I do not know the the exact method used in 1959 to report results, but in a large Swiss System tournament such as the US Open it probably involved one or both players notifying the tournament direction staff by handing in a copy of the score at a designated location. We know of such collections of scoresheets because Spence often speaks of having been given access to them..

Normally, there is no question about the scores. But this in not a normal game, and should set off some red flags.

Trinks was not a very good player, but he was experienced and no idiot. It seems very unlikely he would fall for this unawares.

This was the final of a 12-round tournament. Unless you've played in one, you don't know how grueling that is. Players are known to get goofy in the last round. I know. I've been there.

Since the directing staff in all likelihood did not observe the game, there was nothing to stop the players from handing in this score as a joke. Or for Mayfield alone to do so when Trinks didn't show up, having left the tournament early without telling anybody. I've been in that situation too, and it is very tempting to hand in the score of Morphy vs. Duke or something.

There is no evidence of chicanery, and there are indications that the game was actually played as we have it here. That is usually enought, but in this extraordinary situatio, I'd feel better with more confirmation.

Nov-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Forgot to mention -- the game in <not> in Spence's tournament book.
Nov-16-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: A couple of thoughts in reply.

At this point the game, incredible though it might appear, seems to be legit. If only because of Koltanowski (and the lack of any contravening evidence).

On the other hand, it could easily be as <phony> says, turned in as a scoresheet but not actually played on the board.

Or Trinks could have deliberately played it out, just wanting to have a day off.

One can speculate as we often do, but it's a legitimate part of the historical record.

Mar-02-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: He got tight on a couple of trinks.
Dec-22-16  Kamagong42: talk about making a move first before Trinking!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Daily puzzles, news, and more!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
mate del loco
from ninja007's favorite games by ninja007
w3
from Checkmate miniatures by Kasputin
Macho Grob Spike/Borg Defense (B00) 1-0 Fool's Mate mini
from G-Men Wear Black Like Fredthebear by fredthebear
Fool's mate. What more needs to be said?
from The Best Of The Worst by TheAlchemist
checkmated games
by amtr
super quick deadly traps and such
by jungol
Another Fool
from Quick checkmates by D.Observer
Fool's mate.
from Blunderful by Tactic101
coralsea's favorite games
by coralsea
White wasn't FOOLED by black's weird opening.
from MorphyMatt's world of the weird by MorphyMatt
McDonalds... Im loving it
from Really Messed Up Games by hidude
Fool's Mate
from Brutal Attacking Chess by Timothy Glenn Forney
Fool's Mate!
from Patzerific by FENfiend
Macho Grob Spike/Borg Defense (B00) 1-0 Fool's Mate mini
from Checkmate Patterns # Fredthebear Mating Patterns by fredthebear
Another Fool!
from Quickest Games by GoodKnight
Chessman1's favorite games 1
by Chessman1
Macho Grob Spike/Borg Defense (B00) 1-0 Fool's Mate mini
from Howlerz, Handy Trapz, Hidden Snarez & Shockerz by fredthebear
Fool's Mate
from The Greatest Blunders in Chess by chessman95
Fool's Mate
from Ware Art Thou, O' Fredthebear? Strange Days Here by fredthebear
No chessmen were harmed in the mating of this King
from Captureless games played through to checkmate by Lossmaster
plus 23 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC