chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

NN vs Siegbert Tarrasch
"Wear and Tarrasch" (game of the day Jun-01-2006)
Munich (1915)
Spanish Game: Open. Breslau Variation (C83)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 20 [what's this?]

Annotations by Irving Chernev.      [4 more games annotated by Chernev]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more NN/Tarrasch games
sac: 12...Bd6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-01-06  jajaja: can anyone with an engine analyze the position if white plays 14.Qd2 please? I guess if black plays c4 now white can play Ne2
Jun-01-06  sharpnova: chernev is wrong.

after 19. Qf2 white is winning.

Jun-01-06  Manic: According to Fritz, the sacrifices Tarrasch makes in this game are not as good as it seems. After ...Bg4 evaluation is +2.09 after Qd2, not Qc2. And even after Qc2, ...Qh4 gives a +2.41 evaluation. 18... Nc6 is apparently better than Rc8 with -.38 compared to +1.06 for ...Rc8. e5 hands advantage to black, when Bf4 was apparently better. Take note however that fritz is not perfect so as a result it cannot calculate 20 moves ahead, so perhaps Tarrasch's sacrifices were sound?
Jun-01-06  jajaja: <Manic> its true but I think a normal PC fritz would defeat Tarrasch without any problem.
Jun-01-06  EmperorAtahualpa: Strange that nobody has kibitzed on this game before. It's a gem! Obviously Tarrasch was toying around with his opponent.

Can anyone explain the pun for me please? Thanks.

Jun-01-06  Microbe: I think it's like the well used phrase "wear and tear". No?
Jun-01-06  borisbadenoff: <al wazir: I'm not sure I agree with Chernev about 19. Qf2 Qxf2+, because after 20. Kxf2 Nd3+ 21. Ke3! Rxc1 (21...Nxc1 22. Nc3) 22. Rxc1 Nxc1 23. Nc3 g5 (threatening Bf4+) 24. g3 (preventing Bf4+), the black is trapped> <sharpnova: chernev is wrong. after 19. Qf2 white is winning.>

I don't think so.

After 21. Ke3 comes Nb4 and not Rxc1. And white is losing

Jun-01-06  borisbadenoff: After 14. Qc2 c5 is to play immediatly.

But why should Tarrasch have cared. he was obviously better than his opponent. So no matter how unsafe his play he would win

Jun-01-06  Whitehat1963: What an incredible finish!
Jun-01-06  Hidden Skillz: i remember seeing these positions in laskers book and if im correct he spoke about this play by tarrasch as being sound
Jun-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <borisbadenoff: After 21. Ke3 comes Nb4 and not Rxc1. And white is losing>

All right, I'll bite: 19. Qf2 Qxf2+ 20. Kxf2 Nd3+ 21. Ke3 Nb4 22. Na3. Now what?

The complication in my line comes if black pushes his b ♙, driving away the ♘ on c3. My analysis: if 21...Nxc1 22. Nc3 b4, then 23. Nd5 Ne2 24. h3 Ng3 (24...Bh5 25. g4 Ng3 26. Rf3, and black has to lose a piece) 25. hxg4 Nxf1+ 26. Rxf1.

Anyway, there's way more play in the position than Chernev implied. But hey! with a name like his you know he isn't going to give white a fair shake.

Jun-01-06  borisbadenoff: Hmm alright. I see. Probably advantage for white yes. Maybe the knight in longterm is able to regain a pawn. But even then white is still better.

Jun-01-06  chessmoron: This is a beauty. Very dazzling by Tarrasch.
Jun-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: A sparkling finish! Black captures the white queen-but when white tries to do likewise,he is immediately mated. Neat mate with two bishops-merely black's only remaining forces,not counting pawns.
Jun-01-06  Jack Kerouac: The dogmas of Tarrasch bark up the wrong tree,
The insights of Fischer,
will set your game free.
Jun-01-06  AniamL: If 25.g3, then 25...Bxe2 26.gxh4 Rf3!

Right? I might have overlooked something as I don't have a board or program in front of me.

Jun-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Chernev didn't have the benefit of a strong computer program. After 14. Qd2! White can organize his defense for a won position. <jajaja> I haven't subjected the position to a long and deep analysis on Fritz 8, but what I've seen convinces me White can win the piece and then exchange the extra material back to emerge at least the exchange up (+2.00) with a won position.

There's a lot of wishful thinking in this old analysis.

Jun-01-06  dakgootje: Beaty indeed. Had my thoughts at some of the moves whether black would still be able to win, but he completed the game with a nice finish
Jun-01-06  LPeristy: I wonder if white was releaved to find that he had weathered the storm and was up material only to find that he was suddenly mated.
Jun-01-06  goldenbear: I think Tarrasch knew what he was doing. This game is a work of art. He wouldn't have played like this against Lasker.
Jun-01-06  jperr75108: An impressive performance by Tarrasch. He controls the game for the whole game from the very beginning with black.
May-30-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Some of the tactical motifs from this game remind me of those from an even more spectacular attacking gem, "Rubinstein's Immortal". I am providing a link to the Rubinatein game for anyone who may not be familiar with, or who may wish to take another look at it:

Rotlewi vs Rubinstein, 1907

Jun-06-07  Dr. Siggy: In his famous "Tarrasch's Best Games of Chess", New York 1949, pp. 370-1, Fred Reinfeld wrote the following words as an introduction to this particular game: "The Breslau Variation, with its numerous scintillating possibilities, is a line of play which is particularly suitable for adoption against an amateur. Tarrasch was of course a past master of the brilliant resources of the variation, which apparently gives White an all too difficult game for over-the-board play". I'm afraid I can't agree with <patzer2> when he says that, after 14. Qd2, White can organize his defense for a won position: games such as <Wolf vs Tarrasch, Teplitz-Schoenau 1922> and <Wolf vs Tarrasch, Carlsbad 1923> clearly demonstrate that it is not so...

I think <Manic> is right pointing out as the best move in the position 18...Nc6! instead of 18...Rc8. But I won't go as far as <sharpnova> claiming that, after 19. Qf2, White is winning: with the help of "Fritz 8", I've come to the conclusion that, after 19.Qf2 Qxf2+ 20.Kxf2 Nd3+ 21.Ke3 Nb4! (suggested by <borisbadenoff>) 22.Na3 Be7! 23.Kf4 h5 24.h3 Be2! 25.Rh1 Nd3+ 26.Ke3 Nxc1 27.h4 Nd3!! 28.Kxe2 Nxb2 29.Rh3 b4 30.Nb1 Rc2+! 31.Nd2 Nc4 32.Rd3 Nb2! 33.Rb3 a5! 34.Rb1 Na4! 35.Ra1 Nb2!, the best that White can get is a draw by repetitions of moves!

In my humble opinion, Tarrasch's final combination is one of the most beautiful illustrations of what we can achieve with two Bishops against a castled position!...

Nov-17-07  kellmano: <Chernev: If 19.Qf2 Qxf2+, or if 19.Qb3 Nf3+ wins>

I wish i was so well respected i could get away with if 19.Qf2 Qxf2+

Sep-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: First appearance in our DB of 11...Nxe5, but the <American Chess Bulletin>, September 1913, shows it had been linked with Tarrasch for a couple of years:

http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?...

I don't want to cast aspersions, but this has the smell of a composed game.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
98_C80-C83_Ruy Lopez, Open
by whiteshark
zz85#__How to get away with Checkmate otb
by whiteshark
Double Bishop Mate (Example #2) 26...Bf3# 0-1 (???)
from Checkmate: Checkmate Patterns by CoachTatiana
Game 176.
from Tarrasch's Best Games of Chess. Part III. by Dr. Siggy
Dazzler!!!....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by Trigonometrist
Spanish, Open. Breslau Var (C83) 0-1 Notes by Chernev
from yDiagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfir by fredthebear
Spanish, Open. Breslau Var (C83) 0-1 Dbl B Mate w/Chernev notes
from Spaniards Sailin' Abroad by fredthebear
Dazzler!!!....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by kishchess
June 1: Wear and Tarrasch
from Game of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
Lopez, 4 loyal knights & Petrov's pet robot
by regi sidal
two bishops of Tarrasch corner poor NN
from Favrozone by kevin86
Amusing Games
by Jaredfchess
gunjan jambhulkar's favorite games
by gunjan jambhulkar
TheDrunkenPawn's favorite games
by TheDrunkenPawn
Double Bishop Mate (Example #2) 26...Bf3# 0-1 (???)
from Z Checkmate: Checkmate Patterns by PinkLedDoor
Amusing Games
by sleepyirv


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC