Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Veselin Topalov vs Alexey Shirov
Morelia-Linares (2008), Linares ESP, rd 11, Mar-03
Gruenfeld Defense: Exchange. Spassky Variation (D87)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 15 times; par: 48 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 71 more Topalov/Shirov games
sac: 14.d5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "D87"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-03-08  dabearsrock1010: anyone know is 14.d5 theory and anything else about this interesting line
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: 14.d5 has been theory for a very long time - it was played for the first time in Maicherczyck vs Niephaus, 1949 and made famous a year later in Bronstein vs Boleslavsky, 1950.
Premium Chessgames Member
  minasina: this was live commentary with GM Sergei Shipov (RUS)
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: Shirov has decent results with the Grunfeld Repertoire Explorer: Alexey Shirov (black) and used it to great effect during his match win over Kramnik in Cazorla 1998

Here I got the sense that he lost the same game over again. It's too bad he didn't have some prepared improvement to rehabilitate this line for a better result.

Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Topalov gave Shirov a beatdown in this game.
Mar-03-08  LPeristy: I'll never get tired of these dynamic (read utterly ridiculous) exchange sacrifices that Topalov plays. He's the closest thing we have to a modern-day Tal. Say what you want about Toilet-gate, Danailov, his ethics, etc, his is still the most exciting chess today.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: It would have been quite interesting if black had played 23...Qb6+, forcing the exchange of queens.

click for larger view

It looks like a very active position after the exchange, above.

Mar-03-08  mindkontrolle: that was brutal!!! some mismatch huh, a-holes....
Mar-04-08  Ipecac: <Jimfromprovidence: It would have been quite interesting if black had played 23...Qb6+, forcing the exchange of queens.>

Still slightly better for White I think, and Topa surely has that line prepared also.

Anyway, it looks more drawish that what was played, for sure.

<tpstar: It's too bad he didn't have some prepared improvement to rehabilitate this line for a better result.>

23...Bxd5 was the "improvement" I believe

Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Ipecac: <tpstar: It's too bad he didn't have some prepared improvement to rehabilitate this line for a better result.>

23...Bxd5 was the "improvement" I believe>

It wasn't a direct improvement compared to any previous game (Topalov's 20.Bd3 was the novelty), and considering the long time Shirov spent thinking about it I doubt if he had it prepared, but the idea to eliminate White's strong pawn center may not be bad - providing, of course, Black follows it later logically with 26...Qxd5 instead of Qb6+? It might actually be better than 23...Qb6+ 24.Qxb6 axb6 which may look "safer", but where White remains with more than enough compensation for the exchange - connected passed pawns in the center, powerful bishop pair and good squares for all his minor pieces.

Mar-04-08  Ipecac: <Eyal: It wasn't a direct improvement... ...good squares for all his minor pieces.>

Sure, but I didnīt say it was preparation either, I only said that Shirov thought that he was improving what he did in last yearīs game.

What Iīm sure is that is a tricky line: any other thing but taking B would have favoured black. But, well, what do you expect from Topalov? Did Shirov expect Topa to miscalculate or misjudge the position? Thatīs not the kind of blunder Topa does; he miscalculates the endgames, blunders when defending, or fails when in time pressure a bit more than the average super GM, but no what Shirov tried to do with him.

I think Shirov, showing the form heīs showing actually, should play in a safe fashion and aim for draw, without complications, otherwise will happen what happened yesterday.

Mar-04-08  euripides: As far as I remember an improvement for Black over their previous game was published within a day or so - as has happened with this game. So the onus was possibly on Topalov to come up with something; which he did.

I'm glad for chess that a player like Shirov is prepared to play into critical lines sometimes - similarly playing the Bayonet against Radjabov. When Topalov is on top form, even Kramnik or Leko have to work hard to hold him in 'safe' openings, so I wonder whether Shirov would be well advised to play against his natural style. I agree he could find something that does suit him in which Toaplov would be less well prepared, as Carlsen did; but maybe he was interested to see what Topalov came up with.

Mar-04-08  badest: <euripides: ... but maybe he was interested to see what Topalov came up with.> This is a refreshing attitude, but it sort of feels like when I am on Playchess... "an interesting line, hmmm...let's see what happens". Shirov is a professional, after all. I don't think it is very wise to let Topa have the initiative. In such cases he often transforms into a Rybka-monster.
Apr-28-08  aazqua: Although Topa has made some innovative echange sacs in the past this one is pure theory. Stop banging the drum Topaholics.
Apr-28-08  aazqua: What's wrong with 24 n*b?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gilmoy: <aazqua: 24..Nxe3> From <minasina>'s link, commentary by GM Shipov: 25.d6! Rd7 26.Qe6+ Kh8 27.Rf8+! .
Jun-28-08  notyetagm: Wow, Topalov really can attack.
Sep-01-08  chess4life234: Why can't white play 22... Rxe5 instead of Nxe5? I haven't been able to find an advantage for White.
Jul-03-10  willychess: I think 21 .. Qb6 maybe is good to black. I donīt see the adventange to white (the black knight have access to c4). But itīs an obvious move and topalov must have analized it.
Jul-03-10  goldenbear: <willychess> Black's knight cannot access c4. I've spent a few odd hours checking out this ending, and I get feeling the center pawns are unstoppable.
Premium Chessgames Member
  hedgeh0g: Typical Shirov. Plays the same line against the same opponent who beat him mercilessly with it last time. It's not that difficult to prepare for Shirov when you know exactly what line he intends to play.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <hedgeh0g> It's a tricky business at best nowadays to play the same lines time and again; in the mid 1990s, Nunn wrote that even then, it was likely better to keep a more flexible approach because of computers. The players of the mould of Taimanov and Andrei Sokolov, for all their tremendous knowledge in their favourite lines, are only too vulnerable if a prospective opponent should come up with something.
Premium Chessgames Member
  hedgeh0g: <perfidious> I agree. You can see Gelfand and Kramnik have already started deviating a little from their ubiquitous Petrov, for example.
Aug-15-11  Hesam7: 26. ... Qxd5 has been suggested as an improvement for Black. But after 27. Nf4 Qd4+ 28. Kh1 Rf7 29. Qh3:

click for larger view

29. ... Rcf8 (Shipov's recommendation) 30. g3 g5 31. Qg4! h6 32. Rd1! where White has an advantage.

29. ... Re8 (My engine's recommendation) 30. g3 Qc3 31. Qg2 g5 32. Qd5 Qc6 33. Qxc6 bxc6 34. Bc4 gxf4 35. Rxf4 Re7 36. Kg2 Kg7 37. Bxf7 Rxf7 38. Rxf7+ Kxf7 39. Kf3 and I landed it in a losing king and pawn endgame! Obviously Black's play can be improved but his position is a lot more dangerous than it meets the eye.

Other rook moves seem worse.

Jul-14-15  victor antoni: si pues la mayoria a ganado shirov solo q lo sorprendio con unas ideas de laboratorio nada mas.. ok.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
martinsaw's favorite games II
by martinsaw
Gruenfeld Def: Exchange. Spassky Var (D87) 1-0 Dynamic exch sac
from T Tops Distract Fredthebear by fredthebear
Gruenfeld Def: Exchange. Spassky Var (D87) 1-0 Dynamic exch sac
from P-Q4 Attax by fredthebear
2.exch.sac for Bg7
from Great tactical games by tallike
from Grunfeld 1st collection by SantGG
tpalov attacks
by girard
White to Play Move 30
from How to Finish by Mayoigo2
the classical xchng sac for white in d87
from champ chess by r00ksac
Grunfeld Exch 7. Bc4 12. Bd3 14. d5 Sokolsky
by SeazerCZ
Fire on Board 4: Self-Immolation
by arkansaw
from Annotations v.08: Linares by chessmoron
e4 D87 Grunfeld, Echange
from D 4 GAMES ... by howardb86
Tabiyas 00013 +15 Moves + 100 Games
by Miguel Medina
Grunfeld Exchange, 7.Bc4
by KingG

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC