chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Sergey Karjakin vs Magnus Carlsen
Carlsen - Karjakin World Championship (2016), New York, NY USA, rd 13, Nov-30
Spanish Game: Closed. Martinez Variation (C78)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 3 times; par: 55 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 71 more Karjakin/Carlsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-30-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Didn't take Carlsen very long to get a splendid position!

By move 16 or so I preferred Black's game.

Nov-30-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Don't know if Karjakin could have held after 38. Rb1 Qf6 32. Be2 (-1.30 @ 31 depth, Komodo 9.1), but he had no chance after 38. Rc1? Ra1 (#22 @ 40 depth, Komodo 10.2).
Nov-30-16  jerseybob: This whole 8.a3 line seems inferior to me. White might've varied earlier with 5.d3!?, as in Fischer-Smyslov 1965. But that said, in this game, 21.a4 looks bad, eventually opening lines to black's advantage. 21.d4?!?! might be worth a look, this being blitz.
Dec-01-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <jerseybob> This was a rapid game, not blitz.
Dec-01-16  aporia: Is it clear that 36. ... Nxc4 allows a perpetual check or something? There must be something obvious I'm missing. Qb2 looks very strong but much less clear.
Dec-01-16  beatgiant: <aporia>
Maybe 36...Nxc4 <37. Qb4> Qf2 38. Qxc4 Ra2 <39. Qf1> holds?
Dec-01-16  aporia: Thanks, beatgiant.
Dec-01-16  Al2009: After 22. Qe2?! why 22… a5?!

22…Nh5! (threatening Nhg3!) seems much better

a) 23. Bd2 Nhg3! 24. hxg3 Nxg3 25. Qd1 Nxe4 26. fxe4 Bg3!

b) 23. Nf2!? Ne3! 24. Bxe3 fxe3 25. Qxe3 Nf4! 26. Ng4 h5!

OK Carlsen won the PENALTY challenge.

Again, I do prefer the old formula: 24 games, not only 12. Only 12 games to decide the WCC is – as Clint Eastwood would say – a “pussy generation” formula :-)))))

Dec-01-16  Open Defence: If White tries to draw by 33.Rxe3 then 33...Qd4 34.Qd3 Qb6 35.Kf2 Qc5 36.Bb3 Rb8 37.Qc3

and Black should not play 37...Qxe3 but 37...fxe3+ and after 38.Qxe3 Qxb5 Black should be winning

Dec-01-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: nice roll to finish by champ
Dec-01-16  fisayo123: Carlsen's best game of the match.
Dec-04-16  mistreaver: I really liked the point behind 29...gxf6.
For instance, after the approximate
30 Kh1 Rg8 31 Rg1 there is 31... Bg3! And Black is winning:


click for larger view

Dec-10-16  jerseybob: <FSR: <jerseybob> This was a rapid game, not blitz> My mistake.
Dec-23-16  1971: 22...a5! is one of the best moves I've ever seen. This game typifies Carlsen's style.
Dec-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: Yes,22-a5 is very instructive.A way of finding it is to start with the weakness of d4,combined with Nf5,eying the white bishop and queen.
Jan-17-17  Al2009: <1971> <"22...a5! is one of the best moves I've ever seen. This game typifies Carlsen's style.">

IDIOT, IDIOT, 1000 TIMES IDIOT!!
I showed 22...Nh5! to 4 GM, and all of them agreed that 22...Nh5! and the sac 23... Ng3!! were quickly winning.

Shut up IDIOT and ridicolous conformist!!! You would say that Carlsen is right even if he's putting a pole in your ass! Why are you trying to play chess, if you don't know the difference between a knight and an orangutan???

Jan-22-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: 38.Rxc7 was a blunder that lost immediately to 38...Ra1!. It seems that white's best move was <38.Rb1>


click for larger view

But the question that remains is whether the resulting position could have been held. Black still has a strong rook on the 2nd rank, a powerfully placed knight on e3, an active queen, and even Pf4 that supports the Ne3 and controls g3, next to white king. Since white's heavy pieces are in poor position to counter-attack, black can even threaten to push the g and h pawns.

Without a doubt, Carlsen (who had a considerably more time on his clock, and who is among the best at fast chess) would have tried to press these advantages for the win.

Trying to determine best play with deep sliding engine analysis, I come up with this:

[PART 1 OF 2]

<38...Qf6 39.Be2>

I think Carlsen would have found 38...Qf6 quickly since the only reasonable choices are d4 and f6, and f6 presents more threats. After that, 39.Be2 is practically forced.

In preparation for attack, Black has time to get his king off of h1, where he could be vulnerable to checks on the 8th rank, as well as checks on the a1-h8 diagonal (which give him more freedom to play ...g5). Attacks always work best when counter-attacks are pre-squelched.

<39...Kh7>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 37 ply:
-1.87 40.Qf2 Rd2 41.Kg1 Qd4 42.Kh1 Qc3 43.h4
-1.92 40.h4 Qd4 41.Kh1 Rd2 42.Qf2 Qc3 43.Re1
-2.04 40.Kg1 Qg6 41.Qf2 Nxd5 42.Rb3 Ne3 43.b6

<40.Qf2 Rd2>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 41 ply:
-2.24 41.Kg1 Qd4 42.Kh1 Qc3 43.h4 h5 44.Kg1
-2.30 41.Kh1 Qc3 42.h4 h5 43.Kg1 Kh8 44.Kh2
-2.32 41.h4 h5 42.Re1 Qb2 43.Kg1 Kh8 44.Kh2

<41.Kg1 Qd4 42.Kh1>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 51 ply:
-2.44 42...Qc3 43.h4 h5 44.Re1 Kg8 45.Kg1 Qb2
-2.28 42...Kh8 43.Qe1 Nc2 44.Qf1 Qc5 45.e5 dxe5
-2.02 42...Qa4 43.Re1 Qa2 44.Kg1 Qa7 45.Kh1 Qc5

<42...Qc3>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 44 ply:
-2.42 43.h4 h5 44.Re1 Kh8 45.Kg1 Kg8 46.Kh1
-2.61 43.Re1 g5 44.Kg1 Kg6 45.Kh1 Qb2 46.Kh2
-2.64 43.Kg1 g5 44.Re1 Kg6 45.Kh1 Qb2 46.Kh2

[CONTINUED...]

Jan-22-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: [PART 2 OF 2]

<43.h4 h5>
Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 40 ply:
-2.42 44.Re1 Qb2 45.Kg1 Kg8 46.Kh1 Nc2 47.Rd1
-3.92 44.Kg1 Qc2 45.Re1 Qb2 46.Kh2 Kg6 47.Kg1
-4.14 44.Kh2 Qc2 45.Re1 Qa2 46.Kg1 Qb2 47.Kh2

<44.Re1 Qb2 45.Kg1 Kg8>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 38 ply:
-2.92 46.Kh2 Kh8 47.Kg1 Kh7 48.Kh2 Kg6 49.Kg1
-4.66 46.Kh1 Nc2 47.Rd1 Nd4 48.Rxd2 Qxd2 49.e5

<46.Kh2 Kh8>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 46 ply:
-4.06 47.Kh1 Nc2 48.Rd1 Nd4 49.Rxd2 Qxd2 50.Kh2
-4.99 47.Kg1 Kh7 48.Kh2 Kg6 49.g3 Nc2 50.Rd1

<47.Kh1 Nc2 48.Rd1 Nd4 49.Rxd2 Qxd2>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 31 ply:
-4.35 50.e5 Nxe2 51.Kh2 dxe5 52.d6 cxd6 53.b6
-4.35 50.Kh2 Nxe2 51.e5 dxe5 52.d6 cxd6 53.b6
-8.08 50.Qf1 Nxe2 51.Kh2 Kg8 52.Kh3 Qe3 53.Kh2

<50.e5 Nxe2 51.Kh2 dxe5 52.d6 cxd6 53.b6 Qb2 54.b7 Qxb7 55.Qxe2 Qe7>


click for larger view

Stockfish_16090917_x64_modern @ 53 ply:
-5.97 56.Qe1 Kh7 57.Kg1 d5 58.Qa5 Qd6 59.Qa8

I'll stop here. I think black is clearly winning, up two pawns with one of them a passed pawn. The engine evals are steadily rising. Easily resignable.

Jan-22-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <Al2009: <1971> <"22...a5! is one of the best moves I've ever seen. This game typifies Carlsen's style.">

IDIOT, IDIOT, 1000 TIMES IDIOT!!
I showed 22...Nh5! to 4 GM, and all of them agreed that 22...Nh5! and the sac 23... Ng3!! were quickly winning.>

You really are a most unpleasant person aren't you?

It's only made worse by being a poor and yet overconfident analyst. In this case, you posted this:

<Al2009: After 22. Qe2?! why 22… a5?! 22…Nh5! (threatening Nhg3!) seems much better

a) 23. Bd2 Nhg3! 24. hxg3 Nxg3 25. Qd1 Nxe4 26. fxe4 Bg3! >


click for larger view

The line was pretty solid, except it should have ended " ". Your winning line for black is a winning line for white.

Jan-24-17  Al2009: SACRIFICE 22...NH5 – NHG3! INSTEAD OF 22…A5

The sac is correct, however the analysis can be improved…

After 22…Nh5! 23. Bd2, Nhg3!! 24. hxg3 Nxg3 25. Qd1 (25. Qe1 Qh6! ) now 25…Nxf1! (and not 25…Nxe4?) 26. Qxf1 Bg3! and then 27…Rf5! (with idea Rh5 etc.) is clearly winning for Black.

If 27. Nf2 Bxf2+ 28. Kxf2 (28. Qxf2 Qxd3 ) Qg3+ 29. Kg1 Rf5! for instance 30. Be1 Qg6 31. Qe2 Rh5! 32. Qe4 Qh6 etc.

Material is almost the same (Rook + 1 pawn against 2 Bishops) but Black’s attack on Kingside is devastating.

Jan-24-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <Al2009: SACRIFICE 22...NH5 – NHG3! INSTEAD OF 22…A5 The sac is correct, however the analysis can be improved…

After 22…Nh5! 23. Bd2, Nhg3!! 24. hxg3 Nxg3 25. Qd1 (25. Qe1 Qh6! ) now 25…Nxf1! (and not 25…Nxe4?) 26. Qxf1 Bg3! and then 27…Rf5! (with idea Rh5 etc.) is clearly winning for Black.>

I'm afraid you have white making an ill-advised move after 25...Nxf1:


click for larger view

You have 26.Qxf1? which boxes in the king which is clearly going to come under attack after ...Bg3.

Much better is to recapture with the king: <26.Kxf1>


click for larger view

and now 26...Bg3 is not even a threat. White has superior mobility and probably a winning game after opening up his bishops with a c4 break.

But even if you did have a better move (and you don't), responding to someone's comment about a different move with "IDIOT IDIOT" is uncalled for.

Jan-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ColeTrane: <Al2009> whatever happened to your lecture on "respecting other chess players"...?
Mar-25-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: https://youtu.be/JoQ4GidQP-k

A Knight on the sixth rank is famously called a "bone in the throat" due to its deep penetration into enemy territory while controlling several key squares. Here's the best known example, also from a WC match = Karpov vs Kasparov, 1985

White chose a quiet Ruy Lopez line (6. d3 & 8. a3) in this key playoff game, and sometimes that system includes h3 Opening Explorer . I have always admired Carlsen for playing mainstream defenses as Black against the Spanish Torture, and scoring quite well with them. After the fact, watch how he trades on d5, then gets in 15 ... f5 gaining space, then 16 ... f4 17. c3 Nf5 and the Knight is perfectly perched on the Kingside. After 25 ... Ne3, you get the sense that Black has a strategically won game. White blundered with 38. Rxc7?? leading to 38 ... Ra1 (Skewer) 0-1 and Carlsen only needed a draw in their final Rapid playoff game to retain his WC title.

Many purists object to WC contests being ultimately decided by Rapid or Blitz games, but in our modern era, we must end the match sometime.

Aug-03-17  mathlover: Is this a classical game or otherwise.
Aug-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: In the history of pawn sacrifices, there have been many great ones. Many famous ones. Many profitable ones.

Surely 30...e4 must rank highly in the list of famous pawn sacs, allowing Black to make the most of his beast knight on e3.

In fact the beast knight is so valuable Carlsen could be considered to have a material advantage anyway, after the pawn sac.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: RAPID (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
11) We're On E3 Street (8 points)
from Best Games of 2016 by tpstar
Rapid Game 3
from Carlsen in world championships: the 2016 match by alexmagnus
Magnus Carlsen
by akatombo
...Ne3 [tactical octopus]
from 55e_Middlegames - strategic OUTPOST ! by whiteshark
A1 JASONSKY COLLECTION [Black]
by chess.master
Carlssen halfway home
from sudden victory!!! by kevin86
A1 ISAACSKY COLLECTION [Black]
by chess.master
AlbertPalbert123's favorite games
by AlbertPalbert123
...Ne3 [tactical octopus]
from 55e_Middlegames - strategic OUTPOST ! by Jaredfchess
Why Carlsen was winning even without final Rxc7 blunder
from Games analyzed by YouRang by YouRang
Best of 2016
by Chnebelgrind
carlsen games
by nadvil
abderit's favorite games
by abderit
Game 36
from 2016 Exciting Games (Naiditsch/Balogh/Maze) by Qindarka
A1 MARCUSKY/TOBYSKY COLLECTION [Black]
by chess.master


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC