Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

page 1 of 47; games 1-25 of 1,174  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. P F Schmidt vs R Arlauskas   ½-½ 32 1939 3rd SELL Baltic Student Olympiad B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 2. Konstantinopolsky vs E Gerstenfeld   1-0 44 1940 Lvov corr B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 3. D Ackerman vs R Pohle   1-0 35 1949 50th US Open B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 4. N Bergqvist vs Pilnik 0-1 42 1950 Dubrovnik olm B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 5. V Liublinsky vs Kotov   0-1 40 1952 Moscow-ch B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 6. Tal vs A Darznieks 1-0 30 1953 Riga ch B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 7. Krogius vs G Borisenko 1-0 20 1953 3rd Soviet Team-ch final B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 8. J Klavins vs Y Kots   1-0 28 1953 3rd Soviet Team-ch final B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 9. Nezhmetdinov vs L Shamkovich 1-0 34 1954 URS-ch sf B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 10. L Shamkovich vs E Kuzminykh   1-0 50 1954 URS-ch sf B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 11. Eigil Pedersen vs Sajtar   ½-½ 23 1954 Prague / Marianske Lazne Zonal B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 12. L Schmid vs Edmund Adam   1-0 17 1954 Dyckhoff mem-A corr5456 B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 13. Byvshev vs Tolush 0-1 36 1954 Leningrad ch-city B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 14. Nezhmetdinov vs Petrosian 0-1 44 1954 URS-ch21 B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 15. Byvshev vs Furman   1-0 42 1954 URS-ch21 B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 16. Nezhmetdinov vs N Vedenski 1-0 39 1954 2nd Soviet Team Cup B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 17. L Barden vs Sajtar   ½-½ 22 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men) fin-A B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 18. Keres vs Sajtar 1-0 20 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men) fin-A B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 19. E Joppen vs B Rabar   1-0 35 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men) fin-A B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 20. Bronstein vs B Rabar   ½-½ 17 1954 Belgrade B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 21. Bronstein vs B Milic 1-0 41 1954 Belgrade B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 22. A Bannik vs S G Lebedev   1-0 50 1955 URS-ch 1L B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 23. V Goldin vs Ambarian 1-0 19 1955 Armenian Ch B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 24. B Rabar vs Udovcic   1-0 30 1955 YUG-ch B94 Sicilian, Najdorf 25. R Bogdanovic vs B Rabar   ½-½ 16 1955 YUG-ch B94 Sicilian, Najdorf  page 1 of 47; games 1-25 of 1,174

REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Dec-03-04    Backward Development: no notable games for such a theoretical line as this?? i would recommend spassky-fischer, a good polugaevsky line, and of course a kasparov win. Dec-04-04    Backward Development: CG.com... Never mind, i just explored some more and came to the conclusion that this code is for lines in which black avoids the main lines... sorry for the 'slander'. regards. Dec-04-04    chessgames.com: Right, most of the notables are found here Sicilian, Najdorf (B96). In any case, we have no control over what is "notable", it's determined simply by the number of appearances in game collections. Dec-04-04    Backward Development: gotcha. wow, do you guys have a 'rapid response team'? i just wrote my last post about...a minute and a half ago! pretty impressive... Oct-01-06    hicetnunc: Does anybody know a refutation of 6.Bg5 e5?! Dec-06-06    notyetagm: From GM Danny King's Najdorf update at http://www.chesspublishing.com/cont...: <Game 6, Mueller-Kasimdzhanov features a system that is growing in popularity: click for larger view I know that Tony has discussed this before, but I'm bringing you up-to-date with the latest games and giving my own views. I find this system attractive, not least because of an important practical consideration: it comes fairly soon in the game so there is less chance of White deviating and avoiding it. Moreover, in securing the e5 square for the knight, the idea has a sound positional basis.> [Event "Mainz Ordix open"] [Site ""] [Date "2006.??.??"] [Round "3"] [White "Müller, Matthias"] [Black "Kasimdzhanov, Rustam"] [Result "0-1"] [WhiteElo "2401"] [BlackElo "2672"] [NIC "SI 6.2"] [ECO "B94"] [PlyCount "60"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 Nbd7 7. f4 e6 8. Qf3 h6 9. Bh4 e5 10. Nf5 exf4 11. O-O-O g5 12. Bf2 Ne5 13. Qe2 Bxf5 14. exf5 Bg7 15. h4 Qe7 16. hxg5 hxg5 17. Rxh8+ Bxh8 18. Qd2 O-O-O 19. Bb6 Re8 20. Qxd6 Qxd6 21. Rxd6 Ned7 22. Bg1 Ng4 23. Rd1 Bxc3 24. bxc3 Ne3 25. Bxe3 Rxe3 26. Kd2 Nc5 27. Bc4 f6 28. Rh1 Re5 29. Rh7 Rxf5 30. Rf7 f3 0-1 Apr-17-08    sentriclecub: Can someone explain further the pros/cons beyond what this amateur sees. <> of 6...e6 P-is the most popular reply P-adds better coverage to the center P-very flexible C-pins the knight C-black has 1 piece developed to white's 3 C-Qa5 can lead to doubled f-pawns after Bxf6 <> 6...Nbd7 P-develops a piece P-knight can attack e5 twice when white plays f4 P-Qa5 works good to scare white and unbook him C-blocks in the light square bishop C-slower to castle by one tempo Apr-17-08    KingG: <sentriclecub> Counting against 6...Nbd7 is also the fact that it might be a bit premature to commit the knight to d7. That is not only because you might want to put it on c6, but also because you weaken the e6 square by blocking in the bishop. This could leave you vulnerable to sacrifices on e6, since 7.Bc4 is the most popular reply to 6...Nbd7. By the way, this may also be the reason that 6...e6 is more popular: White finds it more difficult to place both his bishops on their ideal attacking squares c4 and g5. Of course, there is nothing preventing 6...e6 7.Bc4, but Black then finds it easier to equalise then after 6...Nbd7 7.Bc4. In any case, I don't think generalities help that much in these positions. 6...e6 is more popular simply because analysis and practice indicates that it's a better move. Even Petrosian played 6...Nbd7, so I don't think there is anything obviously wrong about it. However, I must say that in sharp positions I like to have the option of castling as quickly as possible, even if I don't end up using it. Apr-18-08    sentriclecub: Thanks KingG, what a fast reply. I think I'll go with 6...e6 next time I face Bg5 on FICS.org

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions. Nothing in violation of United States law. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator. NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.