1.Pawn Majority on the Wing Furman vs Kholmov, 1963  (E46) Nimzo-Indian, 41 moves, 0-1 Pawn Majority on the Wing (P-30) Bronstein vs Kotov, 1948  (D31) Queen's Gambit Declined, 41 moves, 1/2-1/2 2.Pawn Majority on the Wing Botvinnik vs Euwe, 1934  (C83) Ruy Lopez, Open, 48 moves, 1/2-1/2 3.Pawn Majority on the Wing Spielmann vs Colle, 1928  (B03) Alekhine's Defense, 27 moves, 0-1 4.Pawn Majority on the Wing Pilnik vs Geller, 1955  (B59) Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3, 38 moves, 0-1 5.Pawn Majority on the Wing Lasker vs Janowski, 1909  (C68) Ruy Lopez, Exchange, 37 moves, 1-0 6.Piece Concentration on the Wing Averbakh vs R Fuchs, 1956  (E75) King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line, 26 moves, 1-0 7.Piece Concentration on the Wing Tal vs K Langeweg, 1973 (B85) Sicilian, Scheveningen, Classical, 30 moves, 1-0 8.Piece Concentration on the Wing Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1914  (C62) Ruy Lopez, Old Steinitz Defense, 42 moves, 0-1 9.Space Superiority on the Wing J Perlis vs Salwe, 1906  (C29) Vienna Gambit, 25 moves, 1-0 Space Superiority on the Wing (P-24) Tal vs O Jakobsen, 1972 (B53) Sicilian, 44 moves, 1-0 10.Space Superiority on the Wing Botvinnik vs Reshevsky, 1938  (A25) English, 37 moves 11.Space Superiority on the Wing Keres vs Euwe, 1940  (E33) Nimzo-Indian, Classical, 55 moves, 1-0 12.Space Superiority on the Wing Chigorin vs Tarrasch, 1893  (A07) King's Indian Attack, 62 moves, 0-1 13.Space Superiority on the Wing Petrosian vs Pilnik, 1956  (A56) Benoni Defense, 50 moves, 1-0 14.Space Superiority on the Wing Petrosian vs Larsen, 1966  (A16) English, 61 moves, 0-1 Space Superiority on the Wing (P-21) Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896  (C11) French, 50 moves, 1-0 15.Space Superiority on the Wing Karpov vs D Uddenfeldt, 1972  (B93) Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4, 27 moves, 1-0 16.The Blocked Pawn Chain L Forgacs vs Tartakower, 1909  (C13) French, 28 moves, 1-0 17.The Blocked Pawn Chain Reshevsky vs Najdorf, 1953  (E97) King's Indian, 41 moves, 1-0 18.The Blocked Pawn Chain Maroczy vs H Suechting, 1905   (D61) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox, Rubinstein Attack, 48 moves, 1-0 20.The Flank Attack and the Centre Tarrasch vs Charousek, 1896  (B09) Pirc, Austrian Attack, 17 moves, 1-0 21.The Flank Attack and the Centre Schlechter vs Pillsbury, 1903  (B06) Robatsch, 23 moves, 0-1 22.The Flank Attack and the Centre A Vajda vs Kotov, 1949  (B85) Sicilian, Scheveningen, Classical, 29 moves, 0-1 23.The Flank Attack and the Centre Pachman vs Filip, 1954  (E14) Queen's Indian, 36 moves, 1-0 24.The Flank Attack and the Centre Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1892  (C65) Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense, 28 moves, 1-0 25.The Flank Attack and the Centre Pachman vs D Ciric, 1968  (A04) Reti Opening, 31 moves, 1-0 26.The Flank Attack and the Centre Spassky vs Geller, 1968  (B25) Sicilian, Closed, 32 moves, 1-0 27.The Minority Attack Capablanca vs Lasker, 1921   (D63) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense, 48 moves, 1-0 29.The Minority Attack Smyslov vs Keres, 1948  (D51) Queen's Gambit Declined, 41 moves, 1-0 30.The Minority Attack: The Struggle for Control of c4 P Trifunovic vs Pirc, 1948 (D63) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense, 20 moves, 1/2-1/2 31.The Minority Attack: The Struggle for Control of c4 Kotov vs Pachman, 1950  (D63) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense, 68 moves, 1-0 32.The Minority Attack: The Struggle for Control of c4 Pachman vs Ragozin, 1948  (D43) Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav, 60 moves, 1/2-1/2 36.The Minority Attack: The Advance of ...b7-b5 Pachman vs Averbakh, 1952 (D30) Queen's Gambit Declined, 23 moves, 1/2-1/2 The Minority Attack: The Change in Pawn Formation after ..d5xe4 Ivkov vs Fischer, 1966  (A49) King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4, 42 moves, 0-1 37.The Minority Attack: The Change in Pawn Formation Ragozin vs Kotov, 1947 (D63) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense, 30 moves, 1/2-1/2 38.The Minority Attack: The Change in Pawn Formation Stahlberg vs Gligoric, 1949 (D68) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense, Classical, 56 moves, 1/2-1/2 39.The Minority Attack: The Change in Pawn Formation I Platonov vs Petrosian, 1964  (B06) Robatsch, 26 moves, 0-1 40.The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position Lasker vs Capablanca, 1914  (C68) Ruy Lopez, Exchange, 42 moves, 1-0 41.The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position E Richter vs E Paoli, 1949 (D45) Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav, 28 moves, 1-0 The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position (P-25) Reti vs Rubinstein, 1923  (A06) Reti Opening, 50 moves, 1-0 42.The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position Botvinnik vs J H Donner, 1963  (A14) English, 31 moves, 1-0 43.The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position Filip vs Euwe, 1955  (A13) English, 39 moves, 1-0 44.The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position Reshevsky vs Smyslov, 1945  (D15) Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, 71 moves, 0-1 The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position (P-31) Tarrasch vs K Walbrodt, 1896 (D50) Queen's Gambit Declined, 55 moves, 1/2-1/2 45.The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position Bogoljubov vs Reti, 1920  (C50) Giuoco Piano, 54 moves, 0-1 46.The Strategical Points: Advanced Pawns G A Thomas vs Rubinstein, 1922  (C77) Ruy Lopez, 41 moves, 0-1 47.The Strategical Points: Advanced Pawns Euwe vs Najdorf, 1953  (E60) King's Indian Defense, 37 moves, 1-0 50.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Fischer vs Panno, 1970  (A07) King's Indian Attack, 36 moves, 1-0 51.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Karpov vs Korchnoi, 1974  (B77) Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack, 27 moves, 1-0 52.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Bogoljubov vs Capablanca, 1924  (D05) Queen's Pawn Game, 32 moves, 0-1 53.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Geller vs Unzicker, 1952  (D15) Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, 30 moves, 1-0 54.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Alekhine vs Rubinstein, 1921  (D02) Queen's Pawn Game, 51 moves, 1-0 55.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Schlechter vs W John, 1905  (D31) Queen's Gambit Declined, 50 moves, 1-0 56.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Tartakower vs Lasker, 1909  (A22) English, 53 moves, 0-1 57.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Kotov vs Botvinnik, 1939  (E33) Nimzo-Indian, Classical, 38 moves, 0-1 58.The Strategical Points: Weak Squares in the Pawn Chain Alekhine vs Lasker, 1924  (D35) Queen's Gambit Declined, 36 moves, 0-1 59.Dynamic Elements: Lead in Development Botvinnik vs Denker, 1945  (D13) Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Exchange Variation, 30 moves, 1-0 60.Dynamic Elements: Lead in Development Petrosian vs Taimanov, 1955  (D46) Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav, 24 moves, 1-0 61.Dynamic Elements: Gain in Time at the Cost of Material J Mieses vs Maroczy, 1903  (C21) Center Game, 23 moves, 0-1 62.Dynamic Elements: Gain in Time at the Cost of Material J Podgorny vs V Stulik, 1956  (C35) King's Gambit Accepted, Cunningham, 19 moves, 1-0 63.Dynamic Elements: Gain in Time at the Cost of Material Boleslavsky vs Flohr, 1950  (B11) Caro-Kann, Two Knights, 3...Bg4, 32 moves, 1-0 66.Dynamic Elements: Gain in Time at the Cost of Material Bondarevsky vs V Mikenas, 1950  (D09) Queen's Gambit Declined, Albin Counter Gambit, 5.g3, 31 moves, 1-0 Dynamic Elements: Cooperation of pieces and pawns (P-45) A Fuderer vs Pachman, 1955  (C44) King's Pawn Game, 54 moves, 0-1 Dynamic Elements: Cooperation of pieces and pawns (P-22) Rotlewi vs Rubinstein, 1907   (D32) Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch, 25 moves, 0-1 67.Dynamic Elements: Cooperation of pieces and pawns Geller vs Kotov, 1955  (C90) Ruy Lopez, Closed, 29 moves, 1-0 68.Dynamic Elements: Cooperation of pieces and pawns Gligoric vs B Rabar, 1955 (E47) Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3, 28 moves, 1-0 69.Dynamic Elements: Cooperation of pieces and pawns Geller vs Sokolsky, 1950  (C18) French, Winawer, 25 moves, 1-0 71.Dynamic Elements: Cooperation of pieces and pawns Keres vs Unzicker, 1956  (C67) Ruy Lopez, 27 moves, 1-0 72.Dynamic Elements: Cooperation of pieces and pawns Spielmann vs Rubinstein, 1911   (C49) Four Knights, 37 moves, 1-0 73.Dynamic Elements: The positional Sacrifice Euwe vs Alekhine, 1935  (D81) Grunfeld, Russian Variation, 44 moves, 0-1 75.Dynamic Elements: The positional Sacrifice Reti vs Znosko-Borovsky, 1922  (D61) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox, Rubinstein Attack, 33 moves, 1-0 76.Dynamic Elements: The positional Sacrifice Smyslov vs P Trifunovic, 1955  (A17) English, 48 moves, 1-0 77.Dynamic Elements: The positional Sacrifice Pachman vs M Ujtelky, 1957  (E75) King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line, 34 moves, 1-0 78.Dynamic Elements: The positional Sacrifice Panov vs Simagin, 1943  (B76) Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack, 31 moves, 0-1 Dynamic Elements: The positional Sacrifice (P-34) Spassky vs Petrosian, 1969  (E12) Queen's Indian, 56 moves, 0-1 79.Dynamic Elements: The positional Sacrifice Maroczy vs Tartakower, 1922  (A84) Dutch, 35 moves, 0-1 Methods of Conducting the Fight: Attack and Defense (P-15) Morphy vs P Bonford, 1858  (C52) Evans Gambit, 27 moves, 1-0 Methods of Conducting the Fight (MCF): Attack and Defense Evans vs Rossolimo, 1955  (C98) Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin, 66 moves, 0-1 81.MCF: Repulsion of Tactical Threats Spassky vs Geller, 1956  (D32) Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch, 42 moves, 0-1 83.Methods of Conducting the Fight: The Counter-Attack Spielmann vs Keres, 1938  (C11) French, 26 moves, 0-1 84.Methods of Conducting the Fight: The Counter-Attack A Bisguier vs A Fuderer, 1955  (A07) King's Indian Attack, 28 moves, 0-1 Methods of Conducting the Fight: The Counter-Attack (P-21) J Diez del Corral vs Korchnoi, 1968  (B44) Sicilian, 29 moves, 0-1 85.Methods of Conducting the Fight: Preventive Defense Rubinstein vs Janowski, 1925  (A50) Queen's Pawn Game, 25 moves, 1-0 86.Methods of Conducting the Fight: Preventive Defense Saemisch vs Gruenfeld, 1929  (E24) Nimzo-Indian, Samisch, 48 moves, 1-0 87.Methods of Conducting the Fight: Preventive Defense Nimzowitsch vs J Bernstein, 1923  (D37) Queen's Gambit Declined, 49 moves, 1-0 89.Methods of Conducting the Fight: Preventive Defense K Behting vs Nimzowitsch, 1910  (B07) Pirc, 50 moves, 0-1 90.Methods of Conducting the Fight: Tacking E Cohn vs Duras, 1905  (C84) Ruy Lopez, Closed, 43 moves, 0-1 91.Methods of Conducting the Fight: Tacking Steinitz vs Showalter, 1898  (C02) French, Advance, 39 moves, 1-0 92.Methods of Conducting the Fight: Tacking Lasker vs Salwe, 1909   (C66) Ruy Lopez, 65 moves, 1-0 MCF: Technical Conversion of Superiority (P-18) Tarrasch vs Alekhine, 1922  (E10) Queen's Pawn Game, 40 moves, 0-1 93.MCF: Technical Conversion of Superiority Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1927  (D51) Queen's Gambit Declined, 82 moves, 1-0 94.MCF: Technical Conversion of Superiority R Nezhmetdinov vs A Chistiakov, 1949  (C11) French, 42 moves, 0-1 Individual Style: Psychological play (P-16) Tarrasch vs Lasker, 1908  (C66) Ruy Lopez, 41 moves, 0-1 Individual Style: Psychological play (P-27) Nimzowitsch vs P S Leonhardt, 1911   (C49) Four Knights, 48 moves, 1-0 95.Individual Style: Psychological play B Thelen vs F Treybal, 1927  (D63) Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense, 49 moves, 1-0 Individual Style: Psychological play (P-37) Panno vs Pachman, 1955  (D41) Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch, 43 moves, 1-0 Individual Style: Psychological play (P-19) Pachman vs Z Doda, 1965  (A57) Benko Gambit, 37 moves, 1-0 98 games