chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Amos Burn vs Alexander Halprin
"Slow Burn" (game of the day Nov-22-2020)
Vienna (1898), rd 29, Jul-12
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation (D50)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)better is 7...O-O 8.Rc1 Nbd7 9.Qc2 a6 10.a3 Re8 11.cxd5 cxd5 = -0.03 (37 ply)= +0.49 (29 ply)better is 14...Nd7 15.Bd3 g6 16.Rf1 Re8 17.O-O-O e5 18.e4 Kg7 = +0.30 (25 ply) ⩲ +0.85 (24 ply)better is 31...Ne8 32.h4 Nd6 33.R4e3 Nf5 34.Bxf5 exf5 35.Nf3 Bd7 ⩲ +0.56 (29 ply)better is 32.h4 Na6 33.a3 Nb8 34.Bd1 Na6 35.Bf3 Nc7 36.Bh5 Ne8 ⩲ +1.08 (30 ply)better is 32...Ne8 33.Bg4 Nd6 34.R4e3 Nf5 35.Rd3 g5 36.a4 Kg7 37.a5 ⩲ +0.58 (31 ply) ⩲ +1.17 (28 ply) after 33.h4 Rd8 34.Bg4 Nc7 35.h5 Ne8 36.Ng6 Bd7 37.R1e2 Nc7 37...Ne8 38.Be4+ Kg8 39.Ng6 R8f7 40.Bd3 Nd6 41.a4 Nf5 ⩲ +0.96 (31 ply) ± +1.83 (30 ply) 39...Ne8 40.Bg6 Rf8 41.Bxe8 Rfxe8 42.b4 Re7 43.Rf3 Bd7 ⩲ +1.28 (33 ply)+- +2.60 (32 ply) 43.Bh7+ Kxh7 44.Rxg7+ Kh8 45.Rc7 Nd7 46.Nxd7 R1f7 +- +2.65 (33 ply) 43...Re1 44.Bd3 c5 45.Ng4 Nxg4+ 46.Rhxg4 g5 47.dxc5 Kf7 ⩲ +1.20 (32 ply) 44.Bd3 h5 45.a4 Bd7 46.Nxd7 Nxd7 47.Rxh5 Re1 48.Ra5 a6 ± +2.40 (30 ply) ⩲ +1.12 (31 ply) 45.Bd3 Nxe5 46.dxe5 Rd8 47.Rxh6 Rxd3 48.Rxd3 gxh6 ⩲ +1.43 (32 ply) 45...Rc1 46.a5 Rc3 47.Ne1 Rxg3 48.Kxg3 Rf6 49.Be8 Rf1 = +0.32 (27 ply) ⩲ +1.27 (29 ply) after 46.Ne5 Ra1 47.Bd3 Nxe5 48.dxe5 Rd8 49.Rxh6 Rxd3 50.Rxd3 better is 47...b6 48.Be4 Bb7 49.Rxh6 Nf6 50.Bb1 Rb2 51.Rhg6 Nh5 ⩲ +0.79 (26 ply) 48.c5 Kh8 49.Bc4 a5 50.Bxe6 Nf6 51.Bc4 Bf5 52.Ne5 Kh7 ± +1.52 (28 ply)= +0.33 (28 ply) 51...Bd7 52.Kg3 Rf6 53.Rf4 Be8 54.a5 a6 55.d5 Rxf4 = +0.35 (27 ply) ± +1.60 (27 ply) 55.d5 exd5 56.cxd5 cxd5 57.Bc2 Rc1 58.Re8 Bd7 59.Rd8 Kf7 ± +1.84 (28 ply) 55...Nh7 56.Bxh7+ Kxh7 57.Ra5 a6 58.Rae5 Rhf1 59.R5e4 ⩲ +0.91 (30 ply) 56.Ra5 a6 57.d5 Ra1 58.dxc6 Bxc6 59.Ne5 Rhe1 60.Rxe1 ± +2.14 (30 ply) 56...Rc1 57.d5 cxd5 58.cxd5 Rhd1 59.Bc4 Ng6 60.dxe6 Nxe5 ⩲ +0.98 (29 ply)better is 57.Be2 Rc1 58.d5 exd5 59.cxd5 Kg8 60.d6 Rhd1 61.Bxd1 ± +2.46 (26 ply) ± +1.72 (27 ply) after 57...Kg8 58.d5 cxd5 59.cxd5 a6 60.Nd4 exd5 61.Rxd5 Rhe1 59...Rc1 60.d5 cxd5 61.cxd5 Rc3 62.Kf2 Rd1 63.Ne5 Be8 ± +1.56 (26 ply) 60.Bxg6 Nf6 61.Ne5 Rdf1 62.Rxf1 Rxf1 63.h5 Rd1 64.Rd3 +- +3.10 (30 ply) ⩲ +1.32 (30 ply) 61.Ng4 g5 62.hxg5 Nxg5 63.Nf2 Rde1 64.Be2 Rhf1 65.d5 ± +1.74 (28 ply) ⩲ +0.51 (28 ply) 65...Rxd4 66.Rxa7 c5 67.Kf3 Rf1+ 68.Ke2 Rg1 69.h5 Rxg2+ = +0.08 (28 ply) ± +2.25 (29 ply) 69.Bf7+ Kg7 70.Nf4 Ne4+ 71.Kh2 Nd6 72.Rd7 Rgxg2+ 73.Nxg2 ± +1.97 (28 ply)better is 69...Nh5+ 70.Kg4 Nf6+ 71.Kf4 Re1 72.Kf3 Rxd4 73.Kf2 Red1 = +0.17 (26 ply) ⩲ +0.72 (18 ply) 70...Rd7 71.Rb5 Rc1 72.Ne5 Rc7 73.Kf4 Kg7 74.b4 Nd7 75.c5 ⩲ +0.58 (26 ply) 71.Kf4 Nc5+ 72.Ke5 Nxb7 73.Kxd4 Nd8 74.Ne5 Kf8 75.b4 Rb1 ⩲ +1.42 (27 ply)= 0.00 (31 ply) 72...Re2 73.Nf4 Rc2 74.Rxa7 Rxc5 75.Nxe6 Rc3+ 76.Kh2 Ra1 = +0.06 (28 ply) ± +2.14 (33 ply) 75.c7 Rxg6 76.Rb8+ Kf7 77.c8=Q Rxc8 78.Rxc8 Kf6 79.Rf8+ ± +2.47 (33 ply)= 0.00 (36 ply) after 75...Kf8 76.c7 Rxh4+ 77.Kg3 Rg4+ 78.Kf2 Rc2+ 79.Ke3 Rg7 89...Kxc6 90.Rh8 e5+ 91.Kd3 Rh2 92.Rxh5 Kd5 93.b4 Rh3+ = +0.08 (36 ply) 90.Kc5 Rd2 91.Kb5 Rd5+ 92.Ka6 Kxc6 93.b4 e5 94.b5+ Kd6 +- +4.30 (30 ply) ± +1.57 (31 ply)better is 91...Rb2 92.Kc4 Rf2 93.Rh8 Rf4+ 94.Kc3 Rf3+ 95.Kb4 Rf4+ ± +1.53 (27 ply) 92.Rh8 a5 93.h5 Rh3 94.Kc4 Kc6 95.h6 Rh4+ 96.Kc3 Kd5 ± +2.10 (28 ply) ⩲ +1.05 (30 ply) 95...a6 96.Kc4 Rc2+ 97.Kb3 Rh2 98.h5 e4 99.Rh8 e3 100.Kc3 ⩲ +1.08 (30 ply) 96.b5 e4+ 97.Ke3 Rh3+ 98.Ke2 Kc5 99.Rxa7 Rxh4 100.Ke3 +- +3.02 (35 ply) ± +1.57 (32 ply) 97.Rh7 a6 98.Kc4 Rc2+ 99.Kb3 Rh2 100.h5 Rh3+ 101.Kc4 Rh4+ ± +1.70 (30 ply) ⩲ +0.51 (42 ply) 98...Rh2+ 99.Kf3 Rxh4 100.b5+ Kb6 101.Ra6+ Kb7 102.Ke2 Rh3 ⩲ +0.72 (40 ply)+- +2.53 (40 ply) 100.Kd3 Rh1 101.Ra8 Rb1 102.Kc2 Rb4 103.Kc3 Rc4+ 104.Kb3 Rb4+ ± +2.47 (42 ply) 100...Rb4 101.Kd3 e4+ 102.Ke3 Kd5 103.b6 Rb3+ 104.Kf2 Kc6 = 0.00 (48 ply)+- +3.42 (45 ply) 102...Re4+ 103.Kd3 Rd4+ 104.Ke3 Rd7 105.Ke4 Rh7 106.Kxe5 Rd7 +- +5.54 (36 ply)+- +15.22 (30 ply)+- mate-in-62 after 107...e4better is 117.Kc5 Rb1 118.Rf2 Rc1+ 119.Kb4 Rb1+ 120.Kc3 Rc1+ 121.Kb2 +- +10.71 (35 ply)+- +3.94 (51 ply) 121...Ka6 122.Rd5 Rb1+ 123.Kc4 Ra1 124.Kd4 Rc1 125.Ke5 Rc8 +- +3.82 (35 ply)+- +10.06 (32 ply)139...Rb8 140.axb8=Q+ Kxb8 141.Re8# +- mate-in-21-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35434 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Burn/Halprin games
sac: 62.Rf7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-06-04  capablancakarpov: Hey Benjamin Lau! The position after White´s 53 move could be a picturesque position, something like " Rook prisoners in enemy territory ".
Aug-06-04  suenteus po 147: <capablancakarpov> Sadly, Benjamin Lau is no longer with us. I haven't seen that he's been updating his collections either. He may still visit once in a while, though, as you can't tell when he "last visited" so he may pop up unawares and see your post. I suppose there's always hope.
Aug-17-05  DanRoss53: 82... e5+ appears to be the last chance at a draw. After 83. ♔d5 ♔f6 84. ♘e7 ♖ed2+ 85. ♔e4 ♖d4+ 86. ♔f3 ♖c3+ 87. ♔e2 ♖c2+ repitition is inevitable.
Nov-01-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: According to Richard Forster, Burns' biographer, 108.Rxe5? was a blunder allowing Black to achieve a drawn ending. Correct was 108.Kc5 intending Kc6; after Black checks the king away, it settles on a6, with an easy win. "Until his slip on move 128 Halprin defends superbly, avoiding countless traps." After 128...Ka6! White could not force a win.
Nov-01-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <FSR> I do not understand why "After <128...Ka6!> White could not force a win".


click for larger view

After <128... Ka6> 129. Kc3 Ra1 (not <129... Rxa5?> 130. Rxa5+) 130. Kd4 Rd1+ 131. Ke5 Rd7 132. Rd5 Rg7 133. Kd6 Rg1 134. Kc6 White is surely winning?

Nov-01-09  Manic: <Chessical> is correct.

The tablebase gives a win in 33, which involves black checking from the side as this is the toughest defence, because if white brings the rook back the black rook can block the white king from moving up the board.

The king ends up all the way on b1 after these checks, giving up the a pawn to reach the lucena position which is a theoretical win.

Perhaps we can say that Richard Forster did not see this plan. It is not the most obvious plan but in a sense it is clearly the only way for white to make progress due to all the checks. Maybe Forster was thinking narrowly in that white needed both pawns to win. Obviously he did not have the benefit of a tablebase.

Nov-01-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Thanks for the correction, guys. I'm not sure how IM Forster, whose book is meticulously researched (and who did use computers to aid his analysis) missed this.
May-15-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  dernier loup de T: For the fun, after such a long game, Burn could try the terrible trap 139...Rh7; maybe, angry with this shameless provocation, Burn would just have punished it by burning this insolent rook: 140. Rxh7 and Black will at last surrender?
May-15-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  dernier loup de T: Halprin could try it of course, not Burn, who was well known as a gentleman......
Jul-04-16  zanzibar: Unnormalized Site tag, needs fixing.
Nov-21-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Slow Burn. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIY...
Nov-22-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: White's play from moves 62 through 69 look quietly amazing, as he manages to win two pawns and Bishop for a Rook whilst simultaneously defending the seemingly helpless g2 pawn. The R & 2 Pawn finish probably took much longer than necessary, but if memory serves--for once--the theory of winning such a position (and the King side equivalent of R & g-pawn and h-pawn vs. R) did not exist for another half century.
Nov-22-20  Messiah: This "pun" is at least 2750 in being unfunny.
Nov-22-20  schnarre: ...White's light-squared Bishop was virtually a surgeon's needle: poking, prodding, & guarding as Black seemed to have difficulty responding to it for so long.
Nov-22-20  morfishine: My mum used to say "Sometimes its best just not to say anything"
Nov-22-20  Ironmanth: Love this game; any data on how long this took?! Thanks chessgames. Y'all stay safe out there.
Nov-22-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Decent pun, a bonus point for how well it fits the game. Instructive endgame. White's patient advance of his Pawns was rewarded in the end.
Nov-22-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: Really like 84 Ne3!

I thought white played a very interesting game, and R + P's are always tense.

Like the pun as it is directly related to the game.

Nov-22-20  Granny O Doul: Yes, the pun is simple and apposite. Not every pun needs be a knee-slapper. Sometimes a good stern talking-to is sufficient.
Nov-22-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Agreed, contrary to the protestations of <mucker the omniscient>.
Nov-22-20  TheTamale: <FSR> 9 times out of 10 I'm going to hate a song like that, but that one is really sweet. Even my favorite tag team of Messiah and morfshine can't deny it!
Nov-22-20  morfishine: <TheTamale> You are correct sir, when I saw the game had 139 moves, I went no further, closed the browser and went about my chores

but that is a sweet song

Nov-25-20  TheTamale: <morfshine> Same... 139 moves is about 109 more than I'm likely ever to play out.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC