chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Joel Benjamin vs Emory Tate
28th World Open (2000), Philadelphia, PA USA, rd 7, Jul-03
French Defense: King's Indian Attack (C00)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Benjamin/E Tate games
sac: 15.Bxc5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Benjamin destroys Tate with a Tate-like tactical blitzkrieg.
Dec-06-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: Premature aggression by Black here. The charging Black pawns are match, wood, and oxygen for the fire - Tate burns his own castle to the ground!

Black's queenside minor pieces are not fully operable after ten moves (as is often the case in French miniatures, the problem French Bc8 never gets involved); his firemen cannot get to the scene in time.

After 12.exf5 exf5, it looks like Black will have some operational space for his minor pieces to get moving. Then 13.0-0-0 f4? opens the b1-h7 diagonal for the White queen to blow in. White follows with 14.h4, willing to gambit his dark-squared bishop in order to open the h-file ASAP, which happens a few moves later.

After 19...Be3+ (practically a spite check at that point), White rejects the routine capture of Black's dark-squared bishop to pour gasoline on the fire. Unusual to see each side beg to be rid of their dark-squared bishops.

There's something attractive about watching 25.Nf3# a knight retreat give mate, perhaps by association with other king hunts w/knight finales.

Instead, it looks like 10...e5 was needed for Black so that Qc7 could be played with an eye toward eventually connecting his rooks. It was a strange sort of KIA by White, easy to misconstrue.

Dec-06-19  Carrots and Pizza: Crazy game, looks like blitz chess!
Jun-01-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: Benjamin is sort of dismissive of Tate in his book, apparently irritated that he was known for spectacular wins. Benjamin thought Tate took chances all the time, and was bound to win some.
Jun-01-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <saffuna.....Benjamin thought Tate took chances all the time, and was bound to win some.>

As Tate did the only time we met, in the 1991 World Open blitz event: he played straight down a main line of the Modern Benoni known to offer Black few prospects, got a poor position and only managed to win after I blundered.

Jun-01-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: What do you think, <perf>? Benjamin in effect said Tate played for brilliancies so he could have the wins published, but lost many attempts at brilliancies.
Jun-01-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Tate was probably more dangerous to GMs than most players of his strength would be, but his tendency towards offbeat opening lines and loose play could bring him in for the occasional nasty defeat by a weaker player.

Tate's style reminds me of what we call a maniac in poker: super-loose and hyperaggressive, can get a big stack in a hurry and throw it off equally quickly when things don't go just so. In the end, that player will get good and broke. Done over a few myself.

Jun-01-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: Benjamin: <By 2000 one could expect a GM opponent with 5-1 in the World Open. Instead I played FM Emory Tate, a colorful personality with a go-for-broke attacking style. Tate has acquired a kind of cult following, but I’ve always believed anyone can produce an occasional brilliancy if you sacrifice pieces in every game. Here Tate could only watch his opponent sacrifice for fun and profit.>

After 10...g5:

<This is the kind of optimistic lunge that few other players would dare to consider. But sometimes principles do matter.>

Jun-01-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: <... a maniac in poker: super-loose and hyperaggressive, can get a big stack in a hurry and throw it off equally quickly when things don't go just so.>

An interesting comparison.

Aug-14-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: 10...g5 followed by 11...f5 is about the craziest @#$% I've ever seen. Especially against a grandmaster.
Aug-14-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: 14. h4, 15.Bxc5 and 20.Kb1 were very Grandmasterly (though SF confirms that White could have taken the bishop). Neat mate at the end, too.

<I’ve always believed anyone can produce an occasional brilliancy if you sacrifice pieces in every game. >

I have proved Benjamin wrong!

Aug-15-23  Granny O Doul: With 20. Kb1 White snuffs out his opponent's last hope; that he could make the game unpublishable. Kind of like Vaganian's 28...Raf8 in this famous game: Reshevsky vs Vaganian, 1976

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC