< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Feb-13-16 | | SimplicityRichard: <JimmyVermeer: Marshall could have won faster: 19.Rc1 Rxc2 20.Re1?? 1. Why Re1 and not Rxc2?
2. 20...Rc6? How can Black play Rc6 when his rook is at a8? I feel your variation and assertion is incorrect. You missed something in your calculation. Conclusion: Marshall played brilliantly!# |
|
Aug-22-17
 | | jinkinson: <SimplicityRichard> After 19. Rc1 Rxc2 20. Rxc2, Black can win by playing 20...Re8 21. Rc1 (or Bc3) Re6 followed by either Rg6# or Re1#. |
|
Aug-23-17 | | Ang Dalubhasa: I love this game. |
|
Mar-29-18 | | ChessHigherCat: 20. Black to move would be the ultimate Wed. puzzle |
|
Apr-08-18 | | Saniyat24: What a position reached after 20...R8e3..!! |
|
Aug-04-18 | | pawnpro: dan should have 0-0 on move 7 |
|
Mar-06-21
 | | NM JRousselle: 20 ... R8e3 looks nice, but Rxc2 is better. |
|
Dec-20-21 | | Mathematicar: I absolutely love this fantastic game! |
|
Dec-20-21 | | Messiah: <Mathematicar: I absolutely love this fantastic game!> Yes, not bad. |
|
Dec-20-21 | | Messiah: <lemaire90: Greatest pun ever.> No. |
|
Dec-20-21 | | faulty: Messiah> which (in Your opinion) is the greatest chessgames.com pun ever? [This is a sincere and serious question] |
|
Dec-20-21
 | | saffuna: The two greatest puns to date are:
<Michael Rohde Boat Ashore>
Rohde vs Seirawan, 1988 and
<Indian's Queen Defense>
Topalov vs Anand, 2005 |
|
Dec-21-21 | | Messiah: <faulty>
A Widenmann vs L Tack, 1985 <Our Base Is Under A Tack>, or anything else from me (myself). I'm the funniest contributor ever. |
|
Dec-21-21 | | Messiah: <faulty> If possible, V S Gujrathi vs Vachier-Lagrave, 2020 is even better, as the game itself is very good. |
|
Aug-02-23 | | generror: After S Levitsky vs Marshall, 1912 (the "Gold Coin Game"), Janowski should have known that Marshall likes to put his pieces en prise in front of the king's pawns. But really, <8.Kf1> is such a bad idea... Stockfish doesn't think it's too bad, but I certainly do. What was he afraid of that he didn't play <8.Nbd2>? He usually was a strong player, but here he really helps Marshall out big-time, from start to finish. <saffuna>, I agree that <Michael Rohde Boat Ashore> is an all-time great xD |
|
Aug-02-23 | | generror: Marshall would already been winning with <14...Bh3!> (D) (more gold coins!!), at the very least <15.Rg1 Nxb4 16.Bxh7+ Kh8 17.Qd1 Qxd1+ 18.Rxd1 Bd7 19.Bd3 Nxd3 20.Rxd3 Bb5> wins the exchange. click for larger view |
|
Aug-02-23 | | generror: I just realized that Tartakower in his <500 Master Games of Chess> gives the move order <7...O-O 8.cxd5 Bb4+> (D) and here, <9.Kf1> is much, much more understandable.  click for larger viewI guess the score here is wrong, Tartakower is usually quite reliable. Strangely, some early comments also refer to <9.Kf1>, so apparently the Tartakower score was uploaded first but later changed. Can anyone of the semi-deities who can access the change log confirm this? And can anyone shed more light on the strange mystery of <Kf1>? |
|
Nov-08-23 | | Ziryab: I don’t know how important the move order is, but intend to pursue this. This game captured my attention yesterday when I encountered it in Irving Chernev, <The 1000 Best Short Games of Chess> (1955). |
|
Nov-08-23
 | | Sally Simpson: Soltis in his book on Marshall has 7...Bb4+ adding because of this move players started to play 7.0-0 before playing c5. After 7...Bb4+ and 8.Nbd2 being played instead of 8.Kf1 see Tarrasch vs Marshall, 1914 |
|
Nov-08-23 | | stone free or die: The match page by <phony> gives <NY Sun 1912> as a source. Maybe on the way home I'll access Proquest at my local library and look for it. I tried <BDE> but it only had the R1-2,10 games. I found a 1946 French source with a different move order, one which I think makes more sense. Here's th PGN: <
[Event "Marshall--Janowski match (1912)"]
[Site "Biarritz FRA"]
[Date "1912.09.??"]
[Round ""]
[White "Janowski, David"]
[Black "Marshall, Frank James"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C42q"]
[EventDate "1912.09.??"]
[Source "L'Aube 1946-11-01 p4"]
[Source_url
"https://www.retronews.fr/journal/l-aube/
1-decembre-1946/721/2071311/4"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.c4 O-O 8.
cxd5 Bb4+ 9.Kf1 Qxd5 10.Qc2 Re8 11.Nc3 Nxc3 12.bxc3 Qxf3 13.cxb4 Nc6
14.Bb2 Nxb4 15.Bxh7+ Kh8 16.gxf3 Nxc2 17.Bxc2 Bh3+ 18.Kg1 Re2 19.Rc1
Rae8 20.Bc3 R8e3 21.Bb4 Rxf3 22.Bd1 Rf6 0-1
>
Please note I had to break up the Source_url to avoid all the <CG> auto-magic-crap of Daniel's. Here's the link: https://www.retronews.fr/journal/l-... So, according to this source, it's 9.Kf1 |
|
Nov-08-23 | | unferth: I've found the score via newspapers.com in both the Sept. 24, 1912 Birmingham Post and the Sept. 28, 1912 Newcastle Weekly Chronicle. Can't copy the text, & the links are behind a paywall, but both agree on 7 c4 O-O 8 cxd5 Bb4+ 9 Kf1. |
|
Nov-08-23 | | unferth: The unsigned column ("Chess Notes") in the Post also gives the following note to 7...O-O: "Marshall's pet form of the Petroff, with which he has won a number of fine games." |
|
Nov-09-23 | | stone free or die: Thanks for the better sourcing <unferth>, which seems to seal the deal. |
|
Nov-09-23
 | | perfidious: Biarritz could be a lovely place to die:
T Emery vs Menchik, 1939 |
|
Jan-26-24 | | Messiah: <perfidious: Biarritz could be a lovely place to die> https://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_R... And not even horribly expensive! |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·
Later Kibitzing> |