Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Irving Chernev
Number of games in database: 20
Years covered: 1921 to 1944
Overall record: +7 -12 =1 (37.5%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
A46 Queen's Pawn Game (2 games)
D05 Queen's Pawn Game (2 games)
E34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation (2 games)

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Irving Chernev
Search Google for Irving Chernev

(born Jan-29-1900, died Sep-29-1981, 81 years old) Ukraine (federation/nationality United States of America)

[what is this?]
Irving Chernev was born in Priluki in the Ukraine. He was a noted chess author, with books aimed for the beginner to below master level. He passed away in San Francisco, California, USA in 1981.

Wikipedia article: Irving Chernev

 page 1 of 1; 20 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Reshevsky vs Chernev 1-0501921SimulC53 Giuoco Piano
2. A Miller vs Chernev 0-191928New YorkC45 Scotch Game
3. Chernev vs M L Hanauer 0-1151938USA-ch prel AD24 Queen's Gambit Accepted
4. J Balint vs Chernev 1-0341938USA-ch prel AA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
5. J Balint vs Chernev 1-0101938USA-ch prel AC57 Two Knights
6. J Platz vs Chernev 1-0291939New York chE34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation
7. Chernev vs W Cruz 1-0221940New YorkA47 Queen's Indian
8. Chernev vs E S Jackson 1-0221940New YorkD05 Queen's Pawn Game
9. Chernev vs Seidman  0-1501942USA-chD41 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch
10. Denker vs Chernev 1-0221942USA-chA46 Queen's Pawn Game
11. H Baker vs Chernev 0-1321942USA-chE17 Queen's Indian
12. Chernev vs H H Hahlbohm 1-0241942USA-chD05 Queen's Pawn Game
13. Reshevsky vs Chernev 1-0301942USA-chE34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation
14. Chernev vs Kashdan 0-1331942USA-chD93 Grunfeld, with Bf4 & e3
15. Darby vs Chernev 0-1411943Grand National corrA07 King's Indian Attack
16. Shainswit vs Chernev ½-½321944New York ch-USAE47 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3
17. Chernev vs H Steiner 0-1271944USA-chA46 Queen's Pawn Game
18. I A Horowitz vs Chernev 1-0351944New York ch-USAB83 Sicilian
19. Chernev vs D Gladstone  1-0351944USA-chA04 Reti Opening
20. Chernev vs Denker  0-1381944USA-chE10 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 1; 20 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Chernev wins | Chernev loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-05-14  Petrosianic: <that leads me to believe he'd say Alekhine as overrated as a pox for beating his hero.>

Not quite. In the same article, he named Alekhine as the most brilliant player ever.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: The Chernev article of the Nov/Dec 1933 Chess Review.

‘The perfect game is Réti-Kostiæ, Teplitz, 1922.

The most important game. Pillsbury-Tarrasch, Hastings, 1895.

The most exhaustive – and exhausting – annotator is Tartakower.

The laziest. Lasker and Teichmann.

The most interesting matches were Alekhine-Bogoljubow, 1929, Tarrasch-Schlechter, 1911, and Capablanca-Euwe, 1931.

The most interesting combinative game was Alekhine-Cohn, Stockholm, 1912.

The coolest player under fire is Kashdan.

The perfect annotators are Alekhine, Marco and Grünfeld.

The game most interestingly annotated is Bernstein-Nimzowitsch, St Petersburg, 1914, by Marco in the Wiener Schachzeitung.

The most brilliant move was move no. 36 R-Q5, in the game between Alekhine and Tartakower, Vienna, 1922.

Perhaps the most overrated player was Morphy.

The most underrated player was Teichmann.

The greatest “natural” player was Zukertort.’

As Phoney Benoni says this is 1933 so don't start weeping because Fischer, Tal, Karpov, Kasparov and Carlsen are not given a mention.

I think I can disagree with every one of Chernev's 1933 choices and everyone will disagree with mine.

Morphy must come out top at the greatest 'natural' player, I'd have John Cochrane or David Janowski as the most underrated players.

The most overrated....don't have a clue....if pushed.....Henry Bird.

But surely...

The most important game. was not Pillsbury-Tarrasch, Hastings, 1895. It was the first game played with the 'new' pieces in the Spanish Court around about 1500. Just a little tweaking was required regarding pawn promotion and that was it. Perfection.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: When I mentioned 1933, it was not to suggest Alekhine as the answer but to emphasize that these were relatively early opinions of Cnernev, and would not necessarily be those he evolved over the remaining 50 years of his life. Naming Reti vs B Kostic, 1922 "The Perfect Game" seems silly to us now, especially knowing his later choice of Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1922 as the "Greatest Ever".

But his choice of Morphy as most overrated is interesting. I think it's not so much a knock on Morphy as on the prevailing attitude about him. There are many competent critics and strong players who suggest that in a set match Morphy would beat any man living. Chernev apparently disagreed.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <OhioChessFan:... Per the ongoing discussion... >

What does per mean?

Sep-06-14  ljfyffe: <offramp>Excuse the intrusion. "As per", most likely.
Sep-06-14  zanzibar: This usage is similar to apropos:

apropos [...]

prep. With regard to; concerning:

<Apropos our date for lunch, I can't go.>

* * * * *

per [...]

prep. 2. According to; by:

<Changes were made to the manuscript per the author's instructions.>

Usage has blended the two usages, and I think per is often used in place of apropos here is the US.

Sep-09-14  ljfyffe: Most over-rated personal opinions: Chernev.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Chess is not for the timid> - Chernev, Irving.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: He was the 142nd fastest gun in the west.
May-02-15  Howard: Chernev, granted, did have a tendency to over-embellish.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Every Chess master was once a beginner> - Irving Chernev.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Play the move that forces the win in the simplest way. Leave the brilliancies to Alekhine, Keres and Tal> - Irving Chernev.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <If once a man delays castling and his king remains in the center, files will open up against him, bishops sweep the board, rooks will dominate the seventh rank, and pawns turn into queens> - Irving Chernev.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <The sign of a great master is his ability to win a won game quickly and painlessly> - Irving Chernev.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <A master looks at every move he would like to make, especially the impossible ones> - Irving Chernev.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Happy birthday, Irving Chernev!!

Thanks for some great books.

And some stinkers.

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Quite an interesting discussion on Lasker vs Capablanca. And all right here at Chernev's player page which seems fitting. Personally, I like Lasker for his longevity. He was 66 years old when he finished 3rd at Moscow 1935, a mere half point behind Botvinnik for crying out loud. Incredible
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Happy birthday, Oiving!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <morfishine: Lasker ...He was 66 years old when he finished 3rd at Moscow 1935, a mere half point behind Botvinnik for crying out loud.>

If they hadn't penalised him for crying out loud he might have won.

Mar-05-18  parmetd: Has anyone made a database of the most instructive games ever played?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Game Collection: The most instructive games of chess ever played
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <Sally Simpson> Why do you answer that pompous blowhard <parmetd>? I forgot, you are a fine fellow and a good hearted soul

IMHO: This whole site should put him on ignore


Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <morfishine: <Sally Simpson> Why do you answer that pompous blowhard <parmetd>? I forgot, you are a fine fellow and a good hearted soul IMHO: This whole site should put him on ignore >

Do you really think you make your <enemies> look bad with posts like that?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Morf,

The lad has never done me any harm, nobody here has and even if they thought they did they didn't.

Sometimes I despair at them all for getting sucked into some obscure and pointless argument or for posting some absolute trash about a chess player but I'm just as capable at posting nonsense along with the best of them.

If I have so called enemies then I'm too gullible to notice and too thick skinned to even care.

Feb-20-19  brimarern: ‘When I was a young player, I read The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev which made chess seem extremely easy. However, I then read Alekhine’s Best Games of Chess, which made chess seem impossibly difficult. I eventually discovered that the truth lies somewhere between the two.’ -GM John Nunn
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC