|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Aug-29-05 | | jcmoral: 1. a (d4)
2. a (open)
3. a (attack)
4. maybe 1300-1500
5. neither (mostly correspondence)
6. c (neutral)
7. c (slim edge)
8. b (win more than draw)
9. b
10. e (~16 years on and off) |
|
Aug-29-05
 | | keypusher: 1 a (e4)
2 c
3 a (I am not completely happy with the question. I think you can be aggressive but not play like Tal, e.g. be an ultra-materialist like Korchnoi or Fischer).4 1800 (estimate, not rated)
5 b
6 c
7 c
8 b
9 b
10 f |
|
| Aug-29-05 | | sitzkrieg: 1. g
2. f
3. h
4. estimated 1055,3
5. i
6. a
7. i
8. g
9. j
10. z
|
|
| Aug-29-05 | | misguidedaggression: 1.b (followed very closely by a)
2.c
3.c
4.1507 But I sandbag.
(Actually, my rating hasn't caught up to my strength yet.)
5.a
6.c
7.c
8.b
9.b
10.e (though I only became rated a little over a year ago.) |
|
| Aug-29-05 | | martis27: 1) a - e4
because i hate Q-side games (such things like minority attack is awful for me) and i like to manoeuvre my pieces in the center and in the king side and also i keep my eye on chance to organize attack against enemy's king.2) a - open
3) c - Careful, but can attack when needed
4) 2000-2100, but I hope to increase +200 within one year :) 5) a - blitz - but i read chess books maybe 20 times more than i play chess. I prefer reading chess books to playing coffee-house chess games :) 6) a - white - not because to have some advantage, but to make game open as possible. As black against e4 i used to answer e5 hoping for spanish or two knights(4.Ng5) or scotch but I streamed when my opponent even did not try to open the center(d4/c3+d4) and played d3 and developed remaining pieces. Thats why i switched to sicillian recently. 7) c - slim advantage
8) b - but I still lose more games than i win :)
9) b
10) b |
|
| Aug-29-05 | | Resignation Trap: My response: 1. e) 2. c) 3. c) 4. 1900 5. a) 6. c) 7. c) 8. b) 9. b) 10. f) |
|
| Aug-29-05 | | TIMER: 1 a; 2 b closed, or semi-open; 3 c ;4 2150; 5 b OTB.I prefer longer games; 6 c; 7 c; 8 b; 9 b; 10 e (but not much for the last few years) |
|
| Aug-29-05 | | Grunfeld: 1) a
2) a
3) c
4) 1500 (estimated)
5) neither (mainly online correspondence)
6) c
7) c
8) b
9) b
10) a
|
|
| Aug-29-05 | | somethingstrong: 1. a
2. a
3. a
4. 1750-1850
5. b
6. c
7. c
8. b
9. a (good players punish sacs that aren't at least somewhat clear)
10. b |
|
| Aug-29-05 | | NakoSonorense: <Giancarlo>
1. a
2. a
3. c
4. ~1650
5. a
6. c
7. c
8. b
9. a
10. a |
|
| Aug-29-05 | | Ce Nedra: <Giancarlo>
1.)a
2.)c
3.)c
4.)1132
5.)b
6.)c
7.)c
8.)b
9.)b
10.)a
|
|
| Aug-29-05 | | teme: 1. c
2.c but I like closed a little better
3.c I have no idea usually depends on my mood and what kind of position I am in.
4. 1850~ uscf
5.a
6. a defenetly because I am really bad in openings.
7.a
8.b
9.a
10.b
Also I think a question like "Whats your favorite part of the game?opening,middle game or endgame." should be on here. |
|
| Aug-30-05 | | BishopofBlunder: 1. a
2. a
3. a (often, too much so)
4. 900 (and falling)
5. b (though I am developing an taste for blitz)
6. c
7. b
8. b (the only time I draw is when I stalemate an opponent)
9. a (my endgame stinks)
10. a (seriously), f (off and on) |
|
| Aug-30-05 | | ranchogrande: 1:e. 2:c.3:c.4:2300.5:b.
6:a.7:c:8:b.9:b.10:f.
And thanks for running the show - and how about the olympics <Giancarlo> ? |
|
| Aug-30-05 | | Giancarlo: The winter olympics in Torino ought to be great. I'm looking forward to them :-) |
|
| Aug-31-05 | | whatthefat: 1. b
2. c
3. a
4. 1600
5. c
6. c
7. c
8. b
9. a
10. a |
|
| Sep-21-05 | | jcr2001: why dont you post the survey on sites that give websurvey services and just give the link to everyone? not only is it easier to vote, its easier for u to see the results. anyway, my ansers are 1)e 2)c 3)c 4)1250 5)c 6)a 7)c 8)b 9)b 10)c |
|
| Sep-21-05 | | PizzatheHut: <Giancarlo> Here are my answers. By the way, when do you plan on posting the results? I'm very curious as to the outcome of this survey. 1) b
2) b
3) b
4) 1800
5) b
6) c
7) c
8) b
9) b
10) c |
|
| Sep-27-05 | | Kwesi: 1) b
2) a
3) c
4) no rating
5) b
6) a
7) c
8) b
9) b
10)a |
|
| Sep-30-05 | | Giancarlo: My friends, sorry I have not been on the site in so long, I've been very busy :-p Many a funeral as well as perparing for university. My apologies. Results will be posted soon none the less!! With intresting relations... That said, lets see whos winning FIDE! |
|
| Oct-14-05 | | Silman: Giancarlo & all those who helped with his "research" by responding on the Andras Adorjan page. You have done a disservice to Andras Adorjan & the chess world in general by ruining a page devoted to one of the greatest chess philosophers of all time. I look forward to seeing the results of your research in print & trust they either expand or dispel Andras Adorjans theories! |
|
| Oct-29-05 | | Giancarlo: <Silman>
I think you are merely looking for an argument to start, and I will not take part in it. |
|
| Oct-30-05 | | lopium: I'm not sure, but I think this player has a higher percentage of draws than... Kramnik! ahahazz!! |
|
Oct-30-05
 | | Open Defence: <lopium: I'm not sure, but I think this player has a higher percentage of draws than... Kramnik! ahahazz!!> but a very innovative player.. his book Black is OK is a must read .. nice ideas even if you dont play the systems in the book, nice motifs |
|
| Oct-30-05 | | lopium: Well, I have to have this book one day! I guess he likes to play with black, or at least wanted to win with black, nice.
Maybe I'll buy this book, thanksxz Open Defence.
(Open Defence is like the Ruy Lopez? Or... I just read it was an open opening, but here to be a defence... well I guess some others opening with e4-e5. Hehe.)
May be a good player, has a good wins/losts rapport. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
