< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 47 OF 112 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Mar-22-06 | | whiskeyrebel: I can sure as @#*! point out some regular disposable dreck in Chess Life I'd axe before doing away with Evans. This stinks. I'm in favor of working in new voices and features..but come on..the "people" love him. I guess I'd better take my anger over to his page rather than soil Mr. Schiller's. |
|
Mar-22-06
 | | Joshka: <EricSchiller> Thanks for your comments about Larry. You are right on! Politics of course is involved I would presume. I'll be looking forward to hearing from Larry on what happened. Maybe Fred Wilson can get him for an interview on his Tuesday night show. I understand the up and coming youths want and need peers from their generation, but there are other writer's they could have axed. They also may feel that they need to cut all ties to a certain individual now exiled in Iceland. I would have rather seen Byrne and Benko's articles cut first, before Larry's. Heck they could save 2 pages and cut "Easy Does It" by Robert Lincoln and "Key Crackers" by David L. Brown. |
|
Mar-22-06 | | schnarre: <Eric Schiller> Sign-of-the-times Politics? |
|
Mar-23-06
 | | Eric Schiller: <whiskeyrebel> Thanks for that, and I'll knowck back a bit of single malt in gratitude. |
|
Mar-24-06 | | vesivialvy93: hi Eric ,
first ; i would like to thank you for all the interresting comments on this database very instructive ! and i know more about chess politics and the uscf , dirty sometimes ! it's the same in Canada .
i have questions for you !
1: with your schedule , games , writing, coaching ect... how do you find the time to write here so often ?
2: there is no money for chess in Canada ! (Montreal) even Alexandre Lesiege quit for poker lately ! is it as bad in US as in Canada ?
3: What kind of guy is Kasparov in person ?
4 and the last :if you're remember a funny game you have in this database vs J.A Lacasa Diaz (2435!) a quick win ! i think you win in 6-7 moves ! was he tired , 2 games a day ! what explanation he gave to you after that one !
Thank you !
ps-let me know on this page if you come in montreal |
|
Mar-24-06
 | | Eric Schiller: <vesilialvy> Here are the answers to your questions: 1. Visiting Chessgames is part of my daily routine and I often drop in when taking a short break. I'm always busy, but can't work non-stop all day :-) I'm taking over as editor of www.chesscountry.com, but I expect to continue to visit here on most days. It is the best chess community on the Internet, despite some squabbling about Fischer and Topalov and Kramnik. 2. Yes, it is bad in the US. We have very few high quality tournaments and when there are large prizes the competition is brutal. Even famous players sometimes walk away with less than $100 in prizes, after bearing all of the costs of the event themselves. That's why players have to teach and write and do other things to make a living. 3. I wrote a lot about Kasparov in my "Learn from Garry Kasparov's Greatest Games". I've always enjoyed being with Kasparov, it is always interesting. He has a great knowledge of history and Russian politics, and even when I argue with him on politics, we have a lot of fun. I saw him most recently last weekend in Chicago, but he was very busy signing autographs so didn't have time to talk much. At the same time, I have to admit that he can be difficult and he doesn't believe in hiding his opinions, so he can come across as a little arrogant. But as geniuses go, he's fairly normal in person and nothing like the way he's often portrayed by his critcs. He's very good with kids, too. 4. It was a game from the Dos Hermanas Internet Qualifier, played at 8+2, but it is just an opening trap. He's not the only strong player to fall for it. I won a game against Tatiana Abrahamyan, a WFM who played in the US Championship, using the same trap in a normal tournament (T Abrahamyan vs E Schiller, 2003). It is one of many traps available in the Pterodactyl Defense, which is one of my favorites. |
|
Mar-29-06 | | schnarre: <Eric Schiller> <"I'm taking over as editor of www.chesscountry.com,..."> Good luck in that endeavor! |
|
Mar-29-06
 | | keypusher: The link is screwed up above because of an extra comma, I think. Try this: http://www.chesscountry.com/
Good luck, Eric! |
|
Mar-31-06 | | HannibalSchlecter: Hi Eric, There is an IM in my club who doesn't believe in fianchettoing against the Dutch defense because he says by not playing g3 black is deprived of his traditional plans of storming the kingside or at least making it less effective since there isn't a pawn on g3. Do you have any suggestions for black if white doesn't fianchetto in the Dutch? Thank you in advance. |
|
Mar-31-06 | | who: I'm no master, but I think the basic idea for black is that if white doesn't play an early g3 black can play b6 and fianchetto his queen bishop. Without the fianchetto the queen bishop is very hard to develop around that pawn on f5, but now it becomes a powerful piece. My understanding is this is the main reason for white to play g3. |
|
Apr-01-06
 | | Joshka: Eric, this is probably a typo, but just wanna be sure. I have a few of your books and enjoy them! In "Gambit Opening Repertoire For White" are the 4. c4 lines givin in the Goring Gambit lines correct? The responses are 4...dc3 (e.p. understood although not stated) The majority lines are of course 4. c3. Thanks in advance! |
|
Apr-01-06
 | | Eric Schiller: <HannibalSchlecter> I agree, and don't have the fianchetto lines in my repertoire, though sometimes I can transpose into them. Objectively, g3 is as effective as anything else, but you need to know the theory well. I tend to use gambits instead. |
|
Apr-01-06
 | | Eric Schiller: <Joshka> Just a typo, should be 4.c3. Sorry. |
|
Apr-02-06 | | riskdoc: <Eric Schiller> I have your books Standard Chess Openings, Gambit Chess Openings, and Unorthodox Chess Openings. They have been very helpful in my understanding of opening concepts as a beginning/intermediate player. I notice, however, that there is no discussion in any of these volumes regarding the Saragossa Opening (1.c3). While this opening is completely out of favor with the top ranked players, it does appear to provide some success with lower rated players (ie., below 2500). I did a SCID analysis of the opening with my database of over 2000000 games and found that it had a score of 54.4% across all games (found a total of 662 games with this position). Of course, some of these games transposed into other openings. I have used the opening in online correspondence play and have had some success against higher rated players. I am a Caro-Kann player with black and it seems to provide some similarities when playing white. I also like the Colle System, and find it can easily transpose into the Colle. It also can easily transpose into the Exchange Variation of the QGD. I was wondering what your opinion was on this little discussed opening? |
|
Apr-02-06 | | who: Topalov vs Hydra, 2004 transposes into 1.c3 |
|
Apr-02-06
 | | Eric Schiller: <riskdoc> The Saragossa is not a standard chess opening so it wasn't in SCO. In Unorthodox Chess Openings it is discussed in the context of formations, but 1.c3 really doesn't define any opening. It is used to transpose into other openings, and has no independent theory. So to look for openings with 1.c3, you really have to look at all openings that have c2-c3 played in the first 4 moves somewhere. I don't recommend 1.c3 except as a way of getting to a London, Colle or similar QP game. A reversed CAro-Kann doesn't make sense because if 1.c3 e5 2.d4 Black plays 2...exd4 3.cxd4 d5 with an Exchange QGD. So 1.c3 simply doesn't have an individual identity. |
|
Apr-02-06 | | square dance: <eric schiller> <I've been lobbying for a draw flag for over 20 years...> i think this is a great idea and another way to make chess more enjoyable for the audience. |
|
Apr-02-06 | | drukenknight: I guess I missed this, but what the heck is a draw flag? |
|
Apr-02-06 | | schnarre: <riskdoc> Against 1...e5 I've usually seen 2. Qc2 played; vs 1...d5, then 2. d4 for a reversed Caro-Kann is viable (though I'd try to transpose to a Torre if possible here); & against most other replies either 2. e4 or 2. Nf3 come to mind. |
|
Apr-02-06 | | riskdoc: <Eric Schiller and schnarre> Thank your for your responses to my question! riskdoc |
|
Apr-03-06 | | schnarre: <riskdoc> Good Hunting! |
|
Apr-10-06 | | aragorn69: <Eric> Did you enjoy Goldowsky's April-1st spoof interview at http://www.chesscafe.com/skittles/s... ? I think you're alluded in the following segments:
<<Eric Swiller has been a big influence on me. Rudolph Spielmann’s wonderful book, The Art of Sacrifice in Chess, was rewritten by Swiller and titled, Attack Like A World Champion With Rudolph Spielmann. Spielmann’s original book is a decent treatise on attack and how to grab the initiative. Swiller, in his element, however, totally out-writes Spielmann, (I mean, isn’t the title just great?), and explains ideas way better than even the old master ever could. Swiller has provided me with all kinds of great ideas about chess, and I don’t even know where to begin to praise him.>>
[...]
<So, by reading de la Masta and Swiller, you’ve become a great player. There were rumors that you bribed FIDE with $3,000 for your third norm. Is this true?>
<<Well, actually, it was $5,000.>>
<It is true then? You bribed FIDE with $5,000?>
<<Let’s take things a step at a time here. I only had the money because Swiller gave it to me first. He gave it to me to promote his books, of course. But I agreed, you see, because, like I said before, I think his writing is fantastic.>>
[...]
<<I can’t, especially not with any of these Ru, Russ, (well, you know, foreign) GMs. They’re all thieves and cheaters. As soon as you ask them for openings advice, the next thing you know they’re making requests for you to throw a game. (Did you not see De Guzzleman – Kreepman, American Open 2005? I mean, how else could Kreepman qualify for the US Championships?) I’m not that desperate. Like I said before, Eric Swiller keeps my coffers full. Did I mention before that all of his books are runaway bestsellers? It’s the truth. Let me just make sure that that’s on the record.>><Thank you, Anthony, for your time, and your interesting opinions.>
<<Ah, no sweat – this was great. Now that I’ve got two capital letters in front of my name, people all of a sudden care about what I (or is it the letters?) have to say.>> Well, well...
Although the last bit might rather apply to some well-known LifeMaster... |
|
Apr-10-06
 | | keypusher: <aragorn69> I clicked on the link. Stupid and mean-spirited, not remotely clever enough to qualify as satire. Is chesscafe that hard up for material? |
|
Apr-10-06
 | | Eric Schiller: <aragorn69> No, I don't think it is funny or well-written or cooparable to the many fine April Fool's jokes in circulation. It is just another attack on me from the fiends at Chess Cafe, organizers of the boycotts against my books and software. The boycott is not just from Chess Cafe, but involves the entire USCF sales operation which has been doing terribly since the incmpetent Hanon Russell took over and initiated the boycott of me and many other authors that he simply doesn't like. I've been the butt of various jokes over the year, and don't mind when it is all in fun and designed to amuse, rather than hurt. The cover of "Not the BCM" was unflattering, but it was my own fault for being so obese at the time. But the point of that was to be funny, and it was. But there is nothing funny about this April Fool's "joike", which is just part of their relentless campaign against me. Meanwhile, if you want to see my books, go to stores like Barnes & Noble or online at Amazon or a responsible chess dealer like the London Chess Center (Chess4Less). I'm sure that some of them can help you become a better players, including my book on Spielmann's games which is being reissued in an expanded version by Hardinge Simpole, who are also boycotted by the Chess Cafe even though they mostly republish books that have withstood the test of time. Visit them at http://www.hardingesimpole.co.uk/ and decide for yourself whether the Chess Cafe boycott is justified. It would be funnier if I were not subject to very stressful times because of the boycott's affect on my income. And my landlord won't accept a joke in lieu of rent money. |
|
Apr-10-06 | | Akavall: "Swiller" alone indicates very bad taste. I found nothing funny in the article either. I just wonder why does ChessCafe keeps bringing <Eric Schiller> up? Wouldn't it be a better policy to pretend he doesn't even exist? |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 47 OF 112 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|