|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 276 OF 914 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Sep-24-11
 | | WannaBe: Looks like father time have finally caught up with Dick Clark. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | Jim Bartle: I saw the play live, I've read the play-by-play, I've watched the replay, and I was still confused. The play-by-play I gave was incomplete, only the second part of the play. Here's the whole thing: "# C.Jones safe on failed fielder's choice, Bourn to third.
# C.Jones was out advancing, pitcher H.Rodriguez to shortstop Desmond to third baseman Zimmerman to first baseman Marrero to second baseman Espinosa, Bourn scored, C.Jones out." So Bourn was on second, got hung up on the play but got back to second when the third baseman dropped a throw. But at that time Jones was already at second, and headed back to first. They threw to first and Jones was tagged out in a short rundown, as Bourn took third. At this point Washington has screwed up by allowing a runner to advance to third on the out, bad but no disaster. Then Bourn (or the third-base coach) saw nobody was covering home and scored easily. That's a disaster. |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | perfidious: <Phony Benoni: I wonder why the regular season doesn't end on Sunday this year.> If the TV networks told MLB to begin the season in a January blizzard, it's odds-on they'd try it. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | technical draw: <The pitcher did not go home to cover, or is that the centerfielder's job?> You don't know much about baseball. That's the bat boy's job... |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | perfidious: <td> A favourite play in olden days to go after a pitcher was to bunt between the mound and first, so as to spike the pitcher when he went over to make the play. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | technical draw: <perfidious> That's uncivilized. Why not just beanball him when he's batting? |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | WannaBe: <technical draw: ... Why not just beanball him when he's batting?> Reminds me of one of D. Drysdale's saying about intentional walks: "Just hit the guy, why waste 3 more pitches?" Did you know, IBB counts in your pitch count. But back in the days of Big D, they really didn't care (much) about pitch counts. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | technical draw: I could never figure out why they have to throw the pitches in an intentional walk. Why not just signal the umpire and the batters takes the base? Anything to quicken the pace of the game. |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | Phony Benoni: <td> Ask Johnny Bench. But they do it for the same reason they kick the PAT in football. Besides, an IBB is probably the quickest play in baseball. No pitcher-catcher conferences. No pitcher pawing around the mound and holding the ball until the stars come into conjunction. No batter stepping out to readjust himself after every pitch. Even Mike Hargrove could usually finish an IBB in less than five minutes. Most important, it provides a crucial break for fans to rush to the fridge and grab another beer. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | technical draw: <Most important, it provides a crucial break for fans to rush to the fridge and grab another beer.> Don't change the rule! Don't change the rule! |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | Phony Benoni: OK, back to serious business here.
First, a stock market tip. Buy champagne futures. With three teams clinching divisions last night, there's bound to be a shortage by Monday. The divisions are now all decided, and we're down to wild card races and playoff seeding. AL Wild Card: Boston by 2.5 over Tampa Bay, 3.5 over Angels. Boston: 6 games left; 3 at Yankees, 3 at Baltimore. Yankees may not be trying their hardest, but the rivalry with Boston is such that they won't roll over and die. Baltimore has been finishing strong. Tampa Bay: 5 games left; 2 vs. Toronto, 3 vs. Yankees, all at home. May still be in it; the Yankees won't have the motivation against them that they'll have against Boston. Angels: 5 games left; 2 vs. Oakland, 3 vs. Texas, all at home. Very faint. NL Wild Card: Atlanta by 3 over St. Louis, 5 over the Giants, and a magic number of 1 over SF. Ain't gonna happen. Atlanta: 5 games left; 2 at Washington, 3 home to Philadelphia. May be a couple of losses in there. St. Louis: 5 games left; 2 home to Cubs, 3 at Houston. A hot streak is very possible, but they've been staggering of late. Seeding: with the Wild Card team almost surely coming for the #1 seed's division, #2 vs. #3 seed becomes important. #2 is home vs. Wild Card; #3 plays at #1. AL: Detroit and Texas tied, with Detroit holding the tiebreaker. NL: Milwaukee one game ahead of Arizona, with Arizona holding the tiebreaker. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | technical draw: To the Yankees I say: Take Boston out now. That way it will put fear into the heart of Tampa Bay and they will be push-overs. If you wait until Boston clinches you will find a motivated Red Sox team and it will be harder. |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | WannaBe: In California, high-school level, you just tell the ump, and the batter is awarded first base, no need to throw the ball. (Heavens forbid, you lob the ball to the back stop... Which we've all seen, even in the Big League.) |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | technical draw: <The Marlins' Miguel Cabrera hit an intentional walk pitch thrown by Todd Williams during the 10th inning resulting in a run scored for the Marlins. > You can swing at intentional walk pitches. |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | Phony Benoni: As long as you don't step on the plate; that's an automatic out, probably for interference. That's why the pitches are always WAY out of the strike zone, which can lead to interesting situations. There have undoubtedly been winning runs that scored on wild pitches during an intentional walk. In fact, I seem to recall the Tigers doing it not so long ago. Research! |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | Phony Benoni: Note from <RESEARCH>: You called? http://seattle.sbnation.com/seattle... And that's why they play the game. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | Jim Bartle: I once saw Pete Rose get a hit during an attempted intentional walk against the Giants. It was early in the seaons, Rose turned to the catcher and asked, "Why are you walking a .230 hitter," and he reached out and slapped the next pitch into rightfield. (He was hitting righty.) |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | Jim Bartle: Yankees already up 6-0 on Boston in the second. This washed-up guy Jeter hit a two-run homer. |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | Phony Benoni: Atlanta seemed to be continuing their moonwalk to the wild card. They lost to Washington, but the Cards were down 1-0 with two out and a runner on in the bottom of the ninth. The Cubs' closer then proceeded to issue three walks tying the game, and a wild pitch giving St. Louis the win. Two game margin now, and the Giants remain on life support. <JB> And Boston was using one of their two decent starters. Hoo, boy. |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | WannaBe: Gotta love early Fall, college football Saturday, NFL Sunday/Monday night, Baseball, Hockey is around the corner, too bad them basketball brats don't want to play this season. Just imagine, if you are Detroit, Lions are playing well, Tigers are in the playoffs, Red Wings are looking good as they usually do. U of M and Mich St. are playing. Too bad, the Pistons don't want to join the fun. I bet <Phony Benoni> is rolling in Beaker Heaven. Now if the economy would do better, in Detroit and US as a whole. |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | Jim Bartle: "The Cubs' closer then proceeded to issue three walks tying the game, and a wild pitch giving St. Louis the win." They brought back Mitch Williams? |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | Jim Bartle: NBA season is already way too long. Nobody will miss it if they play 60 games instead of 82. They really need to reduce the season to one home game vs. each team, make each game a real event. And give the traveling teams enough rest days. Then only let 12 teams into the playoffs, give the top four teams a bye for the first round. This old-timer remembers when only six teams made the playoffs. Of course there were only nine teams in the league. |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | WannaBe: 2/3 of the league made the playoffs? Wow... |
|
| Sep-24-11 | | I play the Fred: <NBA season is already way too long. Nobody will miss it if they play 60 games instead of 82. They really need to reduce the season to one home game vs. each team, make each game a real event. And give the traveling teams enough rest days. Then only let 12 teams into the playoffs, give the top four teams a bye for the first round.> Great minds think alike, <Jim> - this is almost exactly how I would run the NBA. The only thing different I would do is keep the schedule unbalanced - 50 games in conference, just 10 against the other conference. I like championships wherein the finalists didn't face off during the season. Adds a dash of mystery to the event. <This old-timer remembers when only six teams made the playoffs. Of course there were only nine teams in the league.> And people think it's too easy <nowadays>! |
|
Sep-24-11
 | | perfidious: <Jim> Your suggestions are reasonable, but do you really think the owners (some, anyway) would go for a plan which eliminates eleven home dates to rake in the coin? As it stands, if you're a fan of either Knicks or Rangers, I've got a helluva sweetheart deal for you, if you want season tickets! Up front, besides the expected 41 home dates, you're forced to pay for all your preseason games, as well as the maximum number of possible games in the postseason. Oh, yes-for any postseason games those teams don't play, you'll eventually get a refund-after the Dolan family has sucked the interest off it all those months. Don't even get me started on the subject of PSLs in the NFL....... |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 276 OF 914 ·
Later Kibitzing> |