chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Jun-11-22
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Dearborn, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2938--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've retired from serious play--not that I ever took playing chess all that seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any US Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to High Heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 18634 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-11-22 M Blau vs Keres, 1959 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Not a good recommendation for the DERLD. Out of 59 moves, White makes only three in Black's half of the board. And two of those conist of 3.Bb5 and 6.Bxc6.
 
   Jun-11-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Er, it's back. Karpov vs Timman, 1988
 
   Jun-10-22 Orlo Milo Rolo
 
Phony Benoni: Marco!
 
   Jun-10-22 Lilienthal vs Bondarevsky, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Another one for you King Hunters. Black's monarch travels fron g8 to b8, then takes the Great Circle Route back to h3 before calling it a day.
 
   Jun-10-22 GrahamClayton chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> I've posted a question for you at L T Magee vs J Holland, 1948
 
   Jun-10-22 L T Magee vs E L Holland, 1948 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> The source you cite, <Chess Review, May 1948, p. 24>, gives Black's name as <E Holland> "Chess Life" (June 5, 1948, p. 1) has a table of results giving <E L Holland>. That form also appears in USCF rating supplements for a player fro ...
 
   Jun-09-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: SkinnVer Here Among the Fold?
 
   Jun-09-22 Flohr vs Bondarevsky, 1947 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Black's bishop makes me think of Godzilla emerging from the depths of the ocean to wreak havoc. However, in the end it's his Two Little Friends who steal the show. Well, maybe not so litt.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Ritson-Morry vs G T Crown, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: it was the last round. Rison-Morry was mired in last place. These things happen.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Adams vs M Kagan, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Some more informztion. The game was published in <Chess Review>, March 1948, p. 23. Black's name is given as "M Kagan", and the location as "Massachusetts". There is no other game data, but I think we can now safely assume Black is <Milton Kagan>. Earlier in the ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Living in the Past

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 276 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Looks like father time have finally caught up with Dick Clark.
Sep-24-11  Jim Bartle: I saw the play live, I've read the play-by-play, I've watched the replay, and I was still confused.

The play-by-play I gave was incomplete, only the second part of the play. Here's the whole thing:

"# C.Jones safe on failed fielder's choice, Bourn to third. # C.Jones was out advancing, pitcher H.Rodriguez to shortstop Desmond to third baseman Zimmerman to first baseman Marrero to second baseman Espinosa, Bourn scored, C.Jones out."

So Bourn was on second, got hung up on the play but got back to second when the third baseman dropped a throw. But at that time Jones was already at second, and headed back to first. They threw to first and Jones was tagged out in a short rundown, as Bourn took third.

At this point Washington has screwed up by allowing a runner to advance to third on the out, bad but no disaster. Then Bourn (or the third-base coach) saw nobody was covering home and scored easily. That's a disaster.

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Phony Benoni: I wonder why the regular season doesn't end on Sunday this year.>

If the TV networks told MLB to begin the season in a January blizzard, it's odds-on they'd try it.

Sep-24-11  technical draw: <The pitcher did not go home to cover, or is that the centerfielder's job?>

You don't know much about baseball. That's the bat boy's job...

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <td> A favourite play in olden days to go after a pitcher was to bunt between the mound and first, so as to spike the pitcher when he went over to make the play.
Sep-24-11  technical draw: <perfidious> That's uncivilized. Why not just beanball him when he's batting?
Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <technical draw: ... Why not just beanball him when he's batting?>

Reminds me of one of D. Drysdale's saying about intentional walks: "Just hit the guy, why waste 3 more pitches?"

Did you know, IBB counts in your pitch count. But back in the days of Big D, they really didn't care (much) about pitch counts.

Sep-24-11  technical draw: I could never figure out why they have to throw the pitches in an intentional walk. Why not just signal the umpire and the batters takes the base? Anything to quicken the pace of the game.
Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <td> Ask Johnny Bench.

But they do it for the same reason they kick the PAT in football. Besides, an IBB is probably the quickest play in baseball. No pitcher-catcher conferences. No pitcher pawing around the mound and holding the ball until the stars come into conjunction. No batter stepping out to readjust himself after every pitch. Even Mike Hargrove could usually finish an IBB in less than five minutes.

Most important, it provides a crucial break for fans to rush to the fridge and grab another beer.

Sep-24-11  technical draw: <Most important, it provides a crucial break for fans to rush to the fridge and grab another beer.>

Don't change the rule! Don't change the rule!

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: OK, back to serious business here.

First, a stock market tip. Buy champagne futures. With three teams clinching divisions last night, there's bound to be a shortage by Monday.

The divisions are now all decided, and we're down to wild card races and playoff seeding.

AL Wild Card: Boston by 2.5 over Tampa Bay, 3.5 over Angels.

Boston: 6 games left; 3 at Yankees, 3 at Baltimore. Yankees may not be trying their hardest, but the rivalry with Boston is such that they won't roll over and die. Baltimore has been finishing strong.

Tampa Bay: 5 games left; 2 vs. Toronto, 3 vs. Yankees, all at home. May still be in it; the Yankees won't have the motivation against them that they'll have against Boston.

Angels: 5 games left; 2 vs. Oakland, 3 vs. Texas, all at home. Very faint.

NL Wild Card: Atlanta by 3 over St. Louis, 5 over the Giants, and a magic number of 1 over SF. Ain't gonna happen.

Atlanta: 5 games left; 2 at Washington, 3 home to Philadelphia. May be a couple of losses in there.

St. Louis: 5 games left; 2 home to Cubs, 3 at Houston. A hot streak is very possible, but they've been staggering of late.

Seeding: with the Wild Card team almost surely coming for the #1 seed's division, #2 vs. #3 seed becomes important. #2 is home vs. Wild Card; #3 plays at #1.

AL: Detroit and Texas tied, with Detroit holding the tiebreaker.

NL: Milwaukee one game ahead of Arizona, with Arizona holding the tiebreaker.

Sep-24-11  technical draw: To the Yankees I say: Take Boston out now. That way it will put fear into the heart of Tampa Bay and they will be push-overs. If you wait until Boston clinches you will find a motivated Red Sox team and it will be harder.
Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: In California, high-school level, you just tell the ump, and the batter is awarded first base, no need to throw the ball.

(Heavens forbid, you lob the ball to the back stop... Which we've all seen, even in the Big League.)

Sep-24-11  technical draw: <The Marlins' Miguel Cabrera hit an intentional walk pitch thrown by Todd Williams during the 10th inning resulting in a run scored for the Marlins. >

You can swing at intentional walk pitches.

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: As long as you don't step on the plate; that's an automatic out, probably for interference.

That's why the pitches are always WAY out of the strike zone, which can lead to interesting situations. There have undoubtedly been winning runs that scored on wild pitches during an intentional walk. In fact, I seem to recall the Tigers doing it not so long ago. Research!

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Note from <RESEARCH>: You called?

http://seattle.sbnation.com/seattle...

And that's why they play the game.

Sep-24-11  Jim Bartle: I once saw Pete Rose get a hit during an attempted intentional walk against the Giants. It was early in the seaons, Rose turned to the catcher and asked, "Why are you walking a .230 hitter," and he reached out and slapped the next pitch into rightfield. (He was hitting righty.)
Sep-24-11  Jim Bartle: Yankees already up 6-0 on Boston in the second. This washed-up guy Jeter hit a two-run homer.
Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Atlanta seemed to be continuing their moonwalk to the wild card. They lost to Washington, but the Cards were down 1-0 with two out and a runner on in the bottom of the ninth.

The Cubs' closer then proceeded to issue three walks tying the game, and a wild pitch giving St. Louis the win. Two game margin now, and the Giants remain on life support.

<JB> And Boston was using one of their two decent starters. Hoo, boy.

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Gotta love early Fall, college football Saturday, NFL Sunday/Monday night, Baseball, Hockey is around the corner, too bad them basketball brats don't want to play this season.

Just imagine, if you are Detroit, Lions are playing well, Tigers are in the playoffs, Red Wings are looking good as they usually do. U of M and Mich St. are playing. Too bad, the Pistons don't want to join the fun.

I bet <Phony Benoni> is rolling in Beaker Heaven. Now if the economy would do better, in Detroit and US as a whole.

Sep-24-11  Jim Bartle: "The Cubs' closer then proceeded to issue three walks tying the game, and a wild pitch giving St. Louis the win."

They brought back Mitch Williams?

Sep-24-11  Jim Bartle: NBA season is already way too long. Nobody will miss it if they play 60 games instead of 82. They really need to reduce the season to one home game vs. each team, make each game a real event. And give the traveling teams enough rest days.

Then only let 12 teams into the playoffs, give the top four teams a bye for the first round.

This old-timer remembers when only six teams made the playoffs. Of course there were only nine teams in the league.

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: 2/3 of the league made the playoffs? Wow...
Sep-24-11  I play the Fred: <NBA season is already way too long. Nobody will miss it if they play 60 games instead of 82. They really need to reduce the season to one home game vs. each team, make each game a real event. And give the traveling teams enough rest days.

Then only let 12 teams into the playoffs, give the top four teams a bye for the first round.>

Great minds think alike, <Jim> - this is almost exactly how I would run the NBA. The only thing different I would do is keep the schedule unbalanced - 50 games in conference, just 10 against the other conference.

I like championships wherein the finalists didn't face off during the season. Adds a dash of mystery to the event.

<This old-timer remembers when only six teams made the playoffs. Of course there were only nine teams in the league.>

And people think it's too easy <nowadays>!

Sep-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Jim> Your suggestions are reasonable, but do you really think the owners (some, anyway) would go for a plan which eliminates eleven home dates to rake in the coin?

As it stands, if you're a fan of either Knicks or Rangers, I've got a helluva sweetheart deal for you, if you want season tickets!

Up front, besides the expected 41 home dates, you're forced to pay for all your preseason games, as well as the maximum number of possible games in the postseason.

Oh, yes-for any postseason games those teams don't play, you'll eventually get a refund-after the Dolan family has sucked the interest off it all those months.

Don't even get me started on the subject of PSLs in the NFL.......

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 914)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 276 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC