chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

The Caissars
Member since Dec-28-12
Welcome to << The Caissars >>

From Wednesday April 15th to Wednesday April 29th we will be collecting votes for the 2019 Chessgames Caissars.

Our automated Caissar voting booth will allow all Chessgames members to vote for the games, members, collections, avatars, players, and moves that really made 2019 a year to remember.

To vote, visit Caissars Voting Page. (You must be a registered member.)

<BEST AVATAR> — Who has the prettiest avatar?
<BEST USERNAME> — The best screen-name.
<MOST HELPFUL> — The one who is always there when you need them.
<MOST CONSTRUCTIVE> — The one who contributes the most to CG.
<FUNNIEST POSTER> — The one who always makes you laugh.
<BEST POST> — The best chess-related post.
<BEST OFFTOPIC POST> — The best post unrelated to chess.
<BEST GAME COLLECTION> — The best game collection.
<MOST INFORMED> — The one who's got all the facts at their fingertips.
<BEST HISTORIAN> — The King of the Biographer Bistro.
<PLAYER OF THE YEAR> — The chess player of note this year.
<BEST PUN> — The most laugh (groan) inducing pun.
<GAME OF THE YEAR> — The best game of 2019.
<MOVE OF THE YEAR> — The most amazing move of 2019.

Everybody is invited to come here and cast your votes on these categories. For more information, see the post The Caissars chessforum (kibitz #2274).

Chessgames.com Full Member

   The Caissars has kibitzed 109 times to chessgames   [more...]
   May-03-20 The Caissars chessforum (replies)
 
The Caissars: Thank you for participating in the 2019 Caissars! We apologize for the very delayed start, which probably contributed to the difficulty of selecting deserving candidates, and will do our best to run the Caissars at the beginning of January in the future. <And now here are ...
 
   Jan-17-18 Carlsen vs Kramnik, 2018 (replies)
 
The Caissars: It’s not too late to cast your votes at our Caissars Voting Page for the best chess/Chessgames of 2017. We’ll announce the winners shortly after this game.
 
   Jan-13-17 So vs Carlsen, 2017 (replies)
 
The Caissars: <OFF TOPIC> For those who haven't voted in our annual award ceremony, the Caissars, be sure to visit the Caissars Voting Page and cast your vote for the best chess of 2016.
 
   Jan-02-15 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
The Caissars: ♖ NOTICE ♖ It is an annual tradition of Chessgames to begin the new year looking back at the previous. We're celebrating 2015 as we salute 2014, and offer these 14 categories available for awards: 2. Best Username 3. Most Helpful 4. Best Post 5. Funniest ...
 
   Jan-02-15 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
The Caissars: ♖ NOTICE ♖ It is an annual tradition of Chessgames to begin the new year looking back at the previous. We're celebrating 2015 as we salute 2014, and offer these 14 categories available for awards: 2. Best Username 3. Most Helpful 4. Best Post 5. Funniest ...
 
   Jan-17-13 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
The Caissars: You folks have won two Caissars this year: "Most Productive" and "Best Historian(s)". Congraulations; the CG community does not overlook your valiant contributions.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 79 OF 89 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Also, it seems it's not possible to cancel a vote; I can change my votes, but I can't remove my votes.

I couldn't even cancel a rejected test vote; the software remembered it and kept rejecting it over and over again - despite all my attempts to remove it - until I replaced it with a vote it didn't reject.

Jan-10-17  zanzibar: This new setup doesn't look nearly as fun.
Jan-10-17  zanzibar: You're also missing a category

<Best Vandal>

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I would suggest for the votes where a user will be the winner, then having a default script of:

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

already preloaded and just having the voter fill in the name would preclude a lot of problems.

<zanzy> true, and <Best Fanimrod> would be another.

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Someone is getting mucho nominated:

http://cdn.cutestpaw.com/wp-content...

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: Hmm, if it was preloaded, the program would be trying to count it, and most likely user "nameless" would win every username-based category, whether he exists or not. ;) But giving copy-pasteable "example" lines of the correct format below all the voting boxes could be a very good idea.
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: With the example name being <Annie%20K.>?
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: Actually, a nonexistent example might be best - then these can be easily recognized and automatically discounted in the final tally. :)
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: User: example
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: No way!

User: noway

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <WannaBe: <I was able to submit a name for all the categories, without having to vote to anyone. (Or my submission automatically count as a vote?)>>

Yes, a submission is a vote.

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Wrong! Wrong! Your submission has the wrong url format! Go back to meme school, chesshead!
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: That's the response I got when I voted for Perfidious.
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  The Caissars: A few comments:

First, the fact that it requires some savvy to form the URL properly is a <feature> and not a problem. If every Tom Dick and Harry could add new selections we'd probably be scrolling past 1000 avatars by now.

Next: If you can't figure out how to put a URL in for a candidate you think should be on the list, come here and just say "I think so-and-so should be on the list." Somebody else will surely either vote for them or at least give you the proper URL so you can.

Also: I know that if you vote for a bad URL it doesn't let you just "white it out" — you have to replace it with one that works. So do that, replace it. In the meantime it's not hurting anything (except your eyes when it scolds you in red monitor-ink.)

Finally, I know that there is a dearth of error-trapping in this software. It only took a day to write the software and another day to code in rudimentary error-trapping. It would take another week to make truly robust error checking. It would take another month to make it so bulletproof that the sharpest members here couldn't find an error after trying their hardest.

I'm sure nobody is trying to intentionally sabotage anything, but if it came to that, it's easier for me to block a member than it is to write another 1000 lines of error-checking code.

It reminds me a little bit of the very first game against Arno Nickel, where people would vote for moves like <1. aRN0-bad>. Just laugh and move on.

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan:  
< It reminds me a little bit of the very first game against Arno Nickel, where people would vote for moves like <1. aRN0-bad> >

Too bad we didn't have a category for <Move of the Year> then. That would have won in a landslide.

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <... at least give you the proper URL so you can.>

Not unless CG.com converts it from URL to user-friendly reading format. Example, if I want to nominate/vote for Best Avatar: User: offramp

That really isn't any more helpful than try to explain how to copy/paste it into the TextBox input/entry. =))

But if I use Unicode for the first 'h' of http, I get: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessuser?unam- e=offramp

And I have no idea where or how that "uname" got butchered to pieces.

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Oh, right, I remember now, length of contiguous string...
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <WannaBe: Oh, right, I remember now, length of contiguous string...>

Yup; but if you use Unicode for any letter in that URL <other> than the first 'h' of http (or the last 'p' of offramp), the link will display correctly; as long as you manage to prevent <cg>'s software from recognizing it as a URL, that is.

That's because any string with Unicode in the middle of it is exempt from the 47-character limit! There's actually a good reason why: it's so Cyrillic text can be displayed reasonably on Chessgames. Every Cyrillic letter - for example &#1092; - needs a seven-character code, which means that normal seven-letter Cyrillic words would hit the 47-character limit without this exemption; worse yet, they'd do so in the middle of a character code.

Of course, that problem could have been solved in other ways (CG could have written a bit of code to count how many actual letters a string had); but they chose a very simple and effective solution that, as a side effect, offers us this workaround.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessuser?uname=offramp

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Thanks <Switch>, I'll try to remember that! =))
Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: I removed a number of test votes for <The Caissars>. As a rule, please don't vote for any CG related account (Chessgames Bookie, The Caissars, Daniel Freeman, chessgames.com, etc.)

This isn't modesty; quite the opposite. I'm afraid that if we allow for that I'll sweep a bunch of categories.

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: That was me, I was merely doing some 'soft' testing... =)
Jan-10-17  zanzibar: BTW- I guess the two-stage process isn't two stages anymore?

There used to be a phrase for nominating candidates, and a separate phrase for voting. The nomination process seems unclear to me, if it even still exists.

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <The Caissars: The nomination process will be entirely eliminated.>

The Caissars chessforum (kibitz #2076)

Jan-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <zanz> the nomination stage has been eliminated; there's only voting, and you have a week to think and re-think who you want to vote for, first for this group of categories, and next week the other group. :)
Jan-10-17  zanzibar: <switch>,<ak> thanks.

I would have put a notice about the change on this page,

Caissars Voting Page,

myself.

Seems a pain to have to read about changes to what was a familiar process. I guess (again w/o reading, but intuiting) that we can only get one vote.

I miss the idea that people could nominate more than one person, even though they perhaps know who they will vote for. This seemed like a good way to acknowledge more than just one person.

I guess it's the winner-take-all attitude is very popular these days.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 89)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 79 OF 89 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC