<<"When I left, I didn't shake anyone's hand for three years. I'd seen what people do and how disgusting they are. I didn't want to touch anyone. I was disgusted by humanity.">

...

She claims that she now suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the things she has seen online.

The case is likely to shine a light on the murky world of content moderation and raise questions about whether people should be doing this kind of work in the first place.

...<<>>>

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology...

Out of the blue yesterday he accused me of molesting a child.>

So <sugardom> said that out of the blue?

Well, a few days ago, out of the blue, you called me an <insane racist>.

What he said.>

LOL. In perusing the individual posting records of some of the most vocal hand-wringers on this subject, we are encountering <lengthy> lists of posts that were deleted—deleted, of course, by that late icon of permissivenes—and my beloved friend—Daniel Freeman.

So spare us the "righteous" indignation—and cry us a river.

I don't do "balderdash". I am the most honest poster on cg.com. Perhaps the most honest on the internet.

Here is the link to what <DWOB> wrote:

Kenneth S Rogoff (kibitz #351165)

Here is the quote:

< Dr Winston OBoogie: < Count Wedgemore: <bobsterman: <TGA> glad to see you back.> Seconded. He is one of the best posters on <CG>.>

You just broke my heart, Wedgie! You're either a BP clone or delusional, y'all know Bob and <thebadalcaholic> are insane racists with a Donald Trump fetish, right? >

Cool it, folks.>

I notice that it really bothers you when the truth about the English convict comes out.

You need to learn to deal with it, though, if you are going to continue to enable him. Not everyone is willing to take orders from you.

Dare I point out the obvious, and remind you that the worst offenders of the rules here have always been the most zealous to blow the whistle on other people? Just saying. If you want to know who I mean, just look at who's been calling for everyone and his brother to be banned since Daniel died.

<So spare us the "righteous" indignation—and cry us a river.>

Anyone ever tell you that you have some serious socialization issues?

<We'll strive to do our level best and faithfully emulate Dan's "permissive" moderation philosophy—as we review the <hundreds> of inappropriate postings which <Dan deleted> from the various models of virtue who are <grousing> about the earth-shatteringly radical changes being made to this community's moderation policies and posting guidelines.>

This is <tpstar> in <ohiochessfan> forum. I appreciate this post of <tpstar> . It is productive.

We all want harmonious , civil conversations on this website. If that is what we want , how can that be had if we insult/defy/challenge admins , if we take aggressive tone with them and if we don't show respect to them!

We want to be respected , we have to give respect too.

I hope we will all listen to what <tpstar> saying in this post.

Thank you.

If you are going to harass a respected long time contributor to this site, then you better have a good reason, and you don't.

What got you so bent out of shape in the first place, was probably the post I wrote here on the member page, that you seem to have deleted. All <OCF> did was quoting that post here: chessgames.com chessforum (kibitz #31138)

.>

1)You did not respond to this post of mine <count wedgemore>.

2)even <tpstar> , who is a close 'friend' of <ohiochessfan> , is urging to stay calm and give admins time to get more and more control of the things.

3)do you not agree with <tpstar> ? Should we not try to deescalate instead of trying to be confrontational?

Thank you.

We'll strive to do our level best and faithfully emulate Dan's "permissive" moderation philosophy—as we review the <hundreds> of inappropriate postings which <Dan deleted> from the various models of virtue who are <grousing> about the earth-shatteringly radical changes being made to this community's moderation policies and posting guidelines.>

People need to pay attention to this.

It's hard to believe anybody could have done this impossible task better than <Daniel>, and it's quite a good sign, and very commendable, that <chessgames.com> is reviewing his past practices.