chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Simon Winawer
Vienna (1882), Vienna AUH, rd 1, Jun-23
French Defense: Steinitz Attack (C00)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Steinitz/Winawer games
sac: 7...Bxf2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-04-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  ksadler: I have been playing through Steinitz's games lately and he played a lot of 2. e5 Repertoire Explorer: Wilhelm Steinitz (white)
Sep-10-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <offramp><It's quite funny to see someone make a two-rook sacrifice and lose really badly.>

Perhaps this should be called the Mortal Game.

<Frankly, these two played the game as if drunk.>

They had just finished a 34-round tournament; I hope they were drunk.

Feb-26-08  Knight13: Steinitz attemps "The Immortal Game" and fails miserably..
Sep-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <offramp>It's quite funny to see someone make a two-rook sacrifice and lose really badly.

Offramp,
This is the only game of the 136 games featured in "Take My Rooks" by Yasser Seirawan and Nikolay Minev (International Chess Enterprises, 1991) where the player sacrificing the two Rooks loses.

Dec-20-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  chocobonbon: <Keypusher> <Perhaps this should be called the Mortal Game.> Funny. You nailed it.
Dec-20-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  thebribri8: White gives away two rooks and loses. Go figure.
Jan-03-09  GlassCow: 17 Qd4 was a clunker. either Nf5 or Nxc8 preserved the initiative and kept winawer in defense mode.
Mar-05-10  Bonifratz: Pretty messy game...
Oct-29-10  4tmac: 2. e5?! f6?! wow! lol (17. Ne4! was probably the last chance to draw as Nf5 is met by Ng6)
Dec-12-11  master of defence: What happens after 7...Qxb2?
Dec-12-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <master of defence> 8.Rb1 and 9.Nb5 crushes.
Oct-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Contemporary analysis suggests 14. exf6, eg 14...gxf6 15. ♗h6+ ♔g8 16. h4 ♕e5 17. ♕xe5 fxe5 18. g4, with a bind.
May-11-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <keypusher:....(The players) had just finished a 34-round tournament; I hope they were drunk.>

Not much of a drinker myself, but after 34 rounds, I could be tempted!

Nov-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karpova: According to Krejcik (his source is the 'American Chess Weekly' 1902) on pages 170-171 of the June 1924 'Neue Wiener Schachzeitung' the following happened:

Some years after this game, the American Mac Connell claimed that Steinitz handed over 1st place with his 2nd rook sacrifice and so they played the following game against each other (moves 1-13 identical with this game):

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "-"]
[White "MacConnell"]
[Black "Steinitz, Wilhelm"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C00"]

1.e4 e6 2.e5 f6 3.d4 c5 4.dxc5 Bxc5 5.Nc3 Qc7 6.Bf4 Qb6 7.Qd2 Bxf2+ 8.Qxf2 Qxb2 9.Kd2 Qxa1 10.Nb5 Na6 11.Nd6+ Kf8 12.Bxa6 bxa6 13.Qc5 Ne7 14.exf6 gxf6 15.Bh6+ Kg8 16.h4 Qe5 17.Qxe5 fxe5 18.g4 Rb8 19.Nh3 Bb7 20.Rf1 Bg2 21.Rf7 Ng6 22.Rg7+ Kf8 23.Rxd7+ Kg8 24.Rg7+ Kf8 25.Rb7+ Kg8 26.Rxb8+ Nf8 27.Rxf8# 1-0

Nov-16-13  thomastonk: <Karpova> The game is already here: J McConnell vs Steinitz, 1886.

Moreover, the following might be interesting, too: http://www.chessarch.com/archive/00....

PS: You often write 'Neue Wiener Schachzeitung', but so far as I can see, the *Neue* has been used only in 1923. What do I miss? Thanks.

Jan-13-14  yureesystem: 18.Qxf6?? is bad because of 18...Qxd6+ winning the knight and preventing mate, black knight goes to Nf5 and wins.
Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: The crosstable for Vienna 1882 has 1-0 for Steinitz, and may need some modification. Is this the right game?
Dec-27-15  thomastonk: <Tabanus: The crosstable for Vienna 1882 has 1-0 for Steinitz, and may need some modification. Is this the right game?> This is the first game of the play-off.
Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <tt> Ah yes, I see now. I wondered why the crosstable has 24 points for =1st, and the standings 23.

Hmm, I'm still not convinced :)

Dec-27-15  thomastonk: <Tabanus: Hmm, I'm still not convinced :)> Hmm, you could possibly take a look at the tournament book(*), pages 409-411. Or you believe me that I have taken a look at it.

<I wondered why the crosstable has 24 points for =1st, and the standings 23.> This is another issue. Noa and Fleissig dropped out at some point, and Steinitz won two games without playing (tournament book, page 405). So, the 23 points in the standings are probably those from the played games.

(*) "Das II. Internationale Schachmeisterturnier Wien 1882" by Ch. M. Bijl, Zurich 1984.

Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Vienna (1882) (kibitz #3)
Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Thanks guys. I suppose it's ok now. Without knowing exactly which games were not played, although that can be figured out perhaps.
Dec-27-15  thomastonk: <Tabanus: Without knowing exactly which games were not played ...> The crosstable in the tournament book contains this information, but uploading a picture somewhere is a violation of the copyright.

The crosstable in the "BCM" 1882 does not help, but fortunately the "DSZ" 1882, page 235 has the crosstable differentiating played and non-played games. A copy can be found at Google books, id zjFCAQAAMAAJ.

Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <The crosstable in the tournament book contains this information, but uploading a picture somewhere is a violation of the copyright.>

You're not under US copyright, but I would assert that "quoting" a crosstable, under US law, would fall under "fair use".

Then again, despite some familiarity with US law and courts, I'm not a lawyer, let alone a copyright lawyer.

Here's a direct link to the DSZ write up on the tournament:

https://books.google.com/books?id=z... (Aug 1882 v37 p232)

The xtab can be found on p235.

Apr-21-17  Saniyat24: Would 21.Qg5+ have helped Steinitz?
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
g46
from Take My Rooks by Minev and Seirawan by Takchessbooks
French Steinitz Attk 2.e5; Dbl R sac gone bad (draw available!)
from 1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear
French Defense: Steinitz Attack (C00) 0-1 What an escape!
from Hammer the 6th Rank (Black hits 3rd Rank) by fredthebear
A double rook sac gone bad 1
from 61_Double rook sacrifices (a1/h1)/[a8/h8] by whiteshark
#21, after 8...Qxb2.
from Instructive Positions from Master Chess by Phony Benoni
A double rook sac gone bad (and he could have drawn!)
from The Best Of The Worst by TheAlchemist
French-cut
by Saniyat24
21
from bell's instructive positions by fastcache
They all can't be winners
from Double Rook Sacrifices by Jaredfchess
(C00) Steinitz Collection
from 97b_French Disasters -Teh Bright Side don't mind by whiteshark
Attacking the King
by biglo
g46
from Take My Rooks by Minev and Seirawan by takchess
Middlegame Combinations by Peter Romanovsky
by hms123
Steinitz Attack
from All Time Greats Play the French w/Black & Win by JoseTigranTalFischer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC