chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Simon Winawer
Vienna (1882), Vienna AUH, rd 1, Jun-23
French Defense: Steinitz Attack (C00)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Steinitz/Winawer games
sac: 7...Bxf2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-10-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <offramp><It's quite funny to see someone make a two-rook sacrifice and lose really badly.>

Perhaps this should be called the Mortal Game.

<Frankly, these two played the game as if drunk.>

They had just finished a 34-round tournament; I hope they were drunk.

Feb-26-08  Knight13: Steinitz attemps "The Immortal Game" and fails miserably..
Sep-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <offramp>It's quite funny to see someone make a two-rook sacrifice and lose really badly.

Offramp,
This is the only game of the 136 games featured in "Take My Rooks" by Yasser Seirawan and Nikolay Minev (International Chess Enterprises, 1991) where the player sacrificing the two Rooks loses.

Dec-20-08  chocobonbon: <Keypusher> <Perhaps this should be called the Mortal Game.> Funny. You nailed it.
Dec-20-08  thebribri8: White gives away two rooks and loses. Go figure.
Jan-03-09  GlassCow: 17 Qd4 was a clunker. either Nf5 or Nxc8 preserved the initiative and kept winawer in defense mode.
Mar-05-10  Bonifratz: Pretty messy game...
Oct-29-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  4tmac: 2. e5?! f6?! wow! lol (17. Ne4! was probably the last chance to draw as Nf5 is met by Ng6)
Dec-12-11  master of defence: What happens after 7...Qxb2?
Dec-12-11  Shams: <master of defence> 8.Rb1 and 9.Nb5 crushes.
Oct-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Contemporary analysis suggests 14. exf6, eg 14...gxf6 15. ♗h6+ ♔g8 16. h4 ♕e5 17. ♕xe5 fxe5 18. g4, with a bind.
May-11-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <keypusher:....(The players) had just finished a 34-round tournament; I hope they were drunk.>

Not much of a drinker myself, but after 34 rounds, I could be tempted!

Nov-16-13  Karpova: According to Krejcik (his source is the 'American Chess Weekly' 1902) on pages 170-171 of the June 1924 'Neue Wiener Schachzeitung' the following happened:

Some years after this game, the American Mac Connell claimed that Steinitz handed over 1st place with his 2nd rook sacrifice and so they played the following game against each other (moves 1-13 identical with this game):

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "-"]
[White "MacConnell"]
[Black "Steinitz, Wilhelm"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C00"]

1.e4 e6 2.e5 f6 3.d4 c5 4.dxc5 Bxc5 5.Nc3 Qc7 6.Bf4 Qb6 7.Qd2 Bxf2+ 8.Qxf2 Qxb2 9.Kd2 Qxa1 10.Nb5 Na6 11.Nd6+ Kf8 12.Bxa6 bxa6 13.Qc5 Ne7 14.exf6 gxf6 15.Bh6+ Kg8 16.h4 Qe5 17.Qxe5 fxe5 18.g4 Rb8 19.Nh3 Bb7 20.Rf1 Bg2 21.Rf7 Ng6 22.Rg7+ Kf8 23.Rxd7+ Kg8 24.Rg7+ Kf8 25.Rb7+ Kg8 26.Rxb8+ Nf8 27.Rxf8# 1-0

Nov-16-13  thomastonk: <Karpova> The game is already here: J McConnell vs Steinitz, 1886.

Moreover, the following might be interesting, too: http://www.chessarch.com/archive/00....

PS: You often write 'Neue Wiener Schachzeitung', but so far as I can see, the *Neue* has been used only in 1923. What do I miss? Thanks.

Jan-13-14  yureesystem: 18.Qxf6?? is bad because of 18...Qxd6+ winning the knight and preventing mate, black knight goes to Nf5 and wins.
Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: The crosstable for Vienna 1882 has 1-0 for Steinitz, and may need some modification. Is this the right game?
Dec-27-15  thomastonk: <Tabanus: The crosstable for Vienna 1882 has 1-0 for Steinitz, and may need some modification. Is this the right game?> This is the first game of the play-off.
Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <tt> Ah yes, I see now. I wondered why the crosstable has 24 points for =1st, and the standings 23.

Hmm, I'm still not convinced :)

Dec-27-15  thomastonk: <Tabanus: Hmm, I'm still not convinced :)> Hmm, you could possibly take a look at the tournament book(*), pages 409-411. Or you believe me that I have taken a look at it.

<I wondered why the crosstable has 24 points for =1st, and the standings 23.> This is another issue. Noa and Fleissig dropped out at some point, and Steinitz won two games without playing (tournament book, page 405). So, the 23 points in the standings are probably those from the played games.

(*) "Das II. Internationale Schachmeisterturnier Wien 1882" by Ch. M. Bijl, Zurich 1984.

Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Vienna (1882) (kibitz #3)
Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Thanks guys. I suppose it's ok now. Without knowing exactly which games were not played, although that can be figured out perhaps.
Dec-27-15  thomastonk: <Tabanus: Without knowing exactly which games were not played ...> The crosstable in the tournament book contains this information, but uploading a picture somewhere is a violation of the copyright.

The crosstable in the "BCM" 1882 does not help, but fortunately the "DSZ" 1882, page 235 has the crosstable differentiating played and non-played games. A copy can be found at Google books, id zjFCAQAAMAAJ.

Dec-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <The crosstable in the tournament book contains this information, but uploading a picture somewhere is a violation of the copyright.>

You're not under US copyright, but I would assert that "quoting" a crosstable, under US law, would fall under "fair use".

Then again, despite some familiarity with US law and courts, I'm not a lawyer, let alone a copyright lawyer.

Here's a direct link to the DSZ write up on the tournament:

https://books.google.com/books?id=z... (Aug 1882 v37 p232)

The xtab can be found on p235.

Apr-21-17  Saniyat24: Would 21.Qg5+ have helped Steinitz?
Mar-08-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: The <(Philadelphia) Times> of August 6th 1882, p.7, reveals that McConnell's discovery had been foreshadowed by Sigismund Hamel.

<Mr. S Hamel, a German analyst, resident in Nottingham, England, has made a searching analysis of the first game in the "tie" match at Vienna between Steinitz and Winaver [sic], and proves that Steinitz could have won the game and thus secured the first prize. Mr. Hamel says: It will undoubtedly be a surprise, to even the distinguished combatants themselves, to learn that Winaver's combination, beginning on the seventh move and subsequent capture of the rook, is highly dangerous.>

Hamel's analysis is given thus (slightly edited):


click for larger view

<14. exf6 gxf6 <best> (14... Qxf6 15. Bg5) 15. Bh6+ Kg8 16. h4 <This is the important move of Hamel's analysis.> Ng6 (16... Nd5 17. Rh3 <wins>) (16... Qe5 17. Qxe5 fxe5 <wins>) (16... Qf1 17. Ne2 Qxh1 18. Nf4 Qxh4 19. Nf5 Qg4 20. Qxe7 Bb7 21. Nd6 <winning Queen or mate>) 17. Ne2 Qxh1 18. Qc7 Bb7 <best> (18... Nf8 19. Qd8) 19. Qxb7 Rd8 20. Qc7 Rf8 <White mates in three moves.>>

Hamel's chess column in the <Nottingham Daily Express> (which ran c.1871-c.1884) is the obvious source.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
French Steinitz Attk 2.e5; Dbl R sac gone bad (draw available!)
from Fredthebear Met the New Kid In Town by fredthebear
g46
from Take My Rooks by Minev and Seirawan by takchess
A double rook sac gone bad (and he could have drawn!)
from The Best Of The Worst by TheAlchemist
French Def: Steinitz Attack 2.e5 f6 (C00) 0-1 What an escape!
from French Cut 21+ by fredthebear
French-cut
by Saniyat24
Playoff Match: Game 1, June 23rd
from Vienna 1882 by suenteus po 147
(C00) Steinitz Collection
from 97b_French Disasters -Teh Bright Side don't mind by whiteshark
Steinitz Attack
from All Time Greats Play the French w/Black & Win by JoseTigranTalFischer
They all can't be winners
from Double Rook Sacrifices by Jaredfchess
Attacking the King
by biglo
French Steinitz Attk 2.e5; Dbl R sac gone bad (draw available!)
from Attacks a2/a7, b2/b7 and c2/c7 ECO C by FTB by Del ToRo


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC