chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Efim Geller vs Vasily Smyslov
"G Force" (game of the day Jan-03-2012)
Geller - Smyslov Candidates Quarterfinal (1965), Moscow URS, rd 5, Apr-24
Gruenfeld Defense: Exchange. Spassky Variation (D87)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 42 times; par: 30 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Geller/Smyslov games
sac: 24.Rcf1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-04-12  scormus: <kingscrusher> odd how these coincidences happen, if they are coincidences ....

<27 Kg1> .... I puzzled about this myself. <27 gxh7+> looked the natural move and in fact the engine chose it on shallow search giving a winning edge but only after some slightly messy play. Only with deeper search <Kg1> showed better.

OTB it would have been very difficult even for Geller to see all the continuations, so he may well have played it as prophylaxis against back rank threats, confident that he could afford a tempo. It certainly seems to cut limit B's counterplay possibilities and hence makes the win more straighforward.

Jan-04-12  SChesshevsky: <27 Kg1>

I'm guessing 27.Kg1 was just a move from principle to get the King off the Bishop pin once the Queen moved off the diagonal.

White had such a winning position that the tempo doesn't cost and as I think Fischer said something like it's even worth the tempo because you never know.

I'm surprised Smyslov played a Gruenfeld so poorly positionally. I don't think he could've been very happy with his position after 18.. Qc6 with the Knight out of play and the Q in front of the Bishop on the file opposite the rook.

Jan-04-12  RandomVisitor: After 13.Kh1:


click for larger view

Analysis by Deep Rybka 4.1 x64:

<[-0.18] d=28 13...Qe7> 14.Qd2 a6 15.Bd3 cxd4 16.cxd4 Nxd4 17.e5 Nxe2 18.Qxe2 Qa3 19.Be4 Bd7 20.Bc5 Qa4 21.Bxb7 Bb5 22.Qe4 Qxe4 23.Bxe4 Rac8 24.Rfe1 Rd2 25.a4 Bxa4 26.Bb7 Rb8 27.Be3 Ra2 28.Bxa6 Bb3

Jan-04-12  RandomVisitor: After 17.Qd2:


click for larger view

Analysis by Deep Rybka 4.1 x64:

<[+0.21] d=26 17...Re8 18.Ng3 cxd4> 19.Bxd4 Nc4 20.Qg5 Ne5 21.Bc2 f6 22.Qd2 g5 23.Bb3+ Kh8 24.Rfe1 Rad8 25.Rcd1 h6 26.Qe2 Qc6 27.Qc2 Qc7 28.Be6 Nc6 29.Qb3

Jan-19-12  Whitehat1963: Perhaps the game is too well known, but there's a weekend puzzle after 26...Qd7.
Jan-19-12  Whitehat1963: Or certainly a Sunday puzzle after 23...Rde7.
Mar-08-12  edyedzer: Efim Geller at his prime !!
Mar-08-12  parisattack: This game, with excellent annotations, is featured in McDonald's The Giants of Power Play section on Geller.

McDonald defines Power Play as the confluence of three elements - preparation, psychology, dynamism - then goes on to detail with ten finer points of discussion.

Mar-11-12  Eduardo Bermudez: Spassky referred to this game in summing up Geller: "When Geller was on song, he could crush anyone. And I always admired this thoughtfulness of his-not only the excellently played opening-this goes without saying, but the thoughtfulness of his play after it, the planning. He was a grandmaster of very high class, and he would play one or two games a year which would determine the direction that chess took in this or that opening. Such a game, for example, was his win against Smyslov in the Grunfeld Defence in the 1965 match, where he several times sacrificed his queen."
Aug-30-12  harish22: Yep !!. The depth of Kg1 is stunning. If the k was on h1 then, after Qg4, Qf6 wins due to the back rank threat. This implies that Geller saw the entire combinations and complications while playing 24. Rcf1 or even as early as 21. Qf4
Sep-17-12  Conrad93: 27.Kg1 was played in order that black would create his own doom. In effect, white forced black into zugzwang.

Any move black made after that point was bound to be bad.

Mar-12-13  vikram2791: In the end how does White win?
Mar-12-13  Catfriend: <vikram2791: In the end how does White win?> Well, it depends on what Black does of course. 31..Qxg4 gets him mated 32. Rf8+ Rxf8 33. Rxf8+ Kg7 34. h8=Q#

White threatens 32. Qxg7+ Kxg7 33. Rf7+ Kh6 34. Rf8.

If Black defends by 31..Bd5, then 32. Qxg7+ Kxg7 33. Rf8 Rxf8 34. Rxf8 Kxf8 35. h8=Q+ wins.

Feb-06-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <dyedzer: Efim Geller at his prime !!>

Mmm!
Prime. A big red rosette pinned to the seat of his trousers saying GUARANTEED 100% PRIME SOVIET CHESSPLAYER!

I prefer to say, <at his best>.

Apr-05-14  Nezhmetdinov: I can't remember seeing this game before, it is magic!
Nov-05-14  tranquilsimplicity: This is magic indeed!#
Jan-08-15  Whitehat1963: Mindboggling final combination after 23...Rde7
Oct-18-15  maseras: 13.Kh1 b6?!
(13...Na5! 14.Bd3 f5)
Feb-20-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Because Black's knight is useless on the a-file, White can freely sac a piece and still have the forces necessary to prosecute an attack.
Mar-06-17  clement41: OMG what a mind-boggling Grünfeld! Splendid!
Aug-02-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Geller beat a lot of World Champions.

But so did a lot of players!

The difference is that there is always one game where Geller knocked that Champion right out of the ring! Not just some shilly-shallying positional win....

... A TOTAL <DOWN GOES FRAZIER DOWN GOES FRAZIER> ANNIHILATION!!

Like this one.

Aug-02-17  Petrosianic: Geller beat 8 world champions. Not many people can say that, no matter what the quality of the games. I think the record is 9 (Keres and Korchnoi beat 9, and there are some world champions who would have gotten 9 if not for the fact that they couldn't beat themselves, and so had one less opportunity).
May-23-18  Whitehat1963: Great and extraordinarily complex finish with many possibilities on both sides of the board!
Dec-16-18  Ulhumbrus: According to the general rule a central attack prevails over a king side attack, and one remark on the part of Golombek suggests that it does so every time.

However this time after the central capture 24...Rxe4 it is the king side attack 25 fxg6!! which prevails instead.

One example of what this suggests is that in order to give the rule its rightful value and place one has to know the reasons why the central attack prevails over the king side attack, where it does.

One example of an answer is that if the central attack prevails it does so barely by a tempo.

Thus in this case if Black has lost a single important tempo somewhere White may win instead of Black.

One example of a move which loses a tempo is the move 19...Rad8 if after 20 Bh6 Black cannot follow it by 20...cxd4.

Feb-24-19  Albanius: Geller didn't just beat world champions, he had plus scores against Fischer (+5=3=2), Botvinnik (+4-1=7), Petrosian (+5-3=32), and Smyslov (+11-8=37), and equal scores against Euwe (+1-1) and Tal (+6-6=23). The only champions with plus scores against Geller were Spassky(+6-10=22) Karpov (1-2=5) Kasparov (0-1=3) and Anand (0-1=1), the latter three after Geller's prime. Total +39-36.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
G Force
from The Best Chess Games (part 2) by Dr Esenville
dvilet's favorite games
by dvilet
Ratul's favorite games
by Ratul
Eduardo Bermudez's favorite chess games
by Eduardo Bermudez B.
rbt58's favorite games
by rbt58
100 best games of 20th century by Andrew Soltis
by nakul1964
Game 52: World's Greatest Chess Games- Nunn Emms Burgess
from Short games by masters by rbaglini
Game 99
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by AdrianP
Great win v. the Grünfeld
from refutor's favorite games by refutor
Game 53
from The World's Greatest Chess Games by AndreaCoda
The untouchable queen
from The Application of Chess Theory by Benzol
Geller was the berries!
from Having fun with the QP by yiotta
24.Rcf1 (QRR)
from Alekhine's gun by Penguincw
ultra chess
by rbaglini
Game 99
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by nakul1964
ultra chess
by test 10
10 ... Qc7
from Grunfeld 1st collection by Justs99171
How to play dynamic chess (Valeri Beim)
by hms123
both geller pos over fisch rarebut world class
from jewish playersin chess by gmlisowitz


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC