chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Branko Damljanovic vs Efim Geller
Kostic Memorial (1987), Vrsac YUG, rd 5, Oct-??
Formation: King's Indian Attack (A07)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2,493 more games of Geller
sac: 35...Rd4+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "A07"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Happy Boxing Day. It's midnight, and I gotta get up early in the morning.

I haven't solved a Monday puzzle (or any POTD for that matter) in a while, so hoping I still retain some puzzle solving ability.

I came up with the solution of 35...Rd4+ 36.Qxd4 Ne6+. Being up the exchange and a pawn should be enough to win for black.

And Happy Belated Christmas to all.

(wut)

Dec-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Winning the queen is easy enough: 35. .Rd4+ 36.Qxd4 Ne6+. And it looks even better than that, since White won't be able to win a knight afterward:

37.Ke4 Rxg4+

37.Ke3 Re1+ 38.Be2 Rxe2+ 39.Kxf3 Nxd4+

Dec-26-17  NBZ: The two knights triumph! A nice game by Geller well past his prime.

At first Kg3 looks like a blunder, allowing the combination in the game, but the position was already hopeless with Rh8+ looming. Earlier Geller had played the nice and very patient 32. ... g6 and 33. ... Kg7, setting up these ideas, whereas patzer me would have probably rushed in with 32. ... Rdd1.

Dec-26-17  NBZ: <Phony Benoni> 37. Ke3 Re1+ 38. Kd2 lets White get away with it.
Dec-26-17  SpamIAm: <PhonyBenoni>- in your second line white can play 38.Kd2, no?
Dec-26-17  SpamIAm: <NBZ> just beat me to it...
Dec-26-17  pkkandel: <PB> After 37...Re1+ white responds with 38.Kd2
Dec-26-17  zb2cr: Okay, Black plays 35. ... Rd4+. White must take with the Queen, 36. Qxd4. Well, 36. Ke3, Rxc4 is possible but clearly fatuous. Black is then up by a full Rook.

But after White captures on d4 with the Queen, he's set up for a Knight fork 36. ... Ne6+; 37. Ke3, Nxd4; 38. Kxd4, Rxg4+ and Black will be up by the exchange and 1 P.

Dec-26-17  stst: 35..............Rd4+
36.QxR (forced, else K moves ==> 37.RxQ)
...... Ne6+ forks K & Q
37.K moves, NxQ
Rest easy for Happy Holidays!!
Dec-26-17  lost in space: 35...Rd4! and it is over.

Mainz line is 36. Qxd4 Ne6 37. Ke3 Nxd4 38. Kxd4 Rxg4+ and at the final end (Pf3 will fall after 38. Ke3) Black is up a pawn and a quality.

Dec-26-17  Sniffles: Ironic. I was just studying a poison rook of Fischer. Quite a bit more subtle than this one though.
Dec-26-17  Patriot: I agree it's winning and I would play this line as black, but as white I would need to see more proof.
Dec-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Phony Benoni> After 35...Rd4+ 36.Qxd4 Ne6+ 37.Ke3, your suggestion 37...Re1+ would be a blunder in light of 38.Kd2.
Dec-26-17  agb2002: Black has two rooks, a knight and a pawn for the queen and a bishop.

Black win decisive material with 35... Rd4+ 36.Qxd4 (36... Ke3 37.Rxc4 + - [r+n+p vs B]) 36... Ne6+ 37.Ke3 (37.Ke4 Rxg4+) 37... Nxd4 (37... Re1+ 38.Kd2) 38.Kxd4 Rxg4+ 39.Ke3 f5 40.Kxf3 Kf6 - + [r+p vs B].

Dec-26-17  morfishine: <35...Rd4+> and White wins

*****

Dec-26-17  Mayankk: Rd4+ is easy enough to spot.

The question is if White could have had a better game had he not decided to exchange off his rooks for the Queen. With the two rooks gone, rest of the game seems quite forcing for Black...

Dec-26-17  patzer2: An easy Knight Fork combination with 35...Rd4+ 36. Qxd4 Ne6+ solves today's Tuesday puzzle.

White's decisive mistake was 27. e5? allowing 27...Nxe5 -+ (-5.08 @ 29 ply, Stockfish 8). Instead, 27. f3 Ne5 Qe2 ∓ (-0.85 @ 32 ply, Stockfish 8) gives White a fighting chance.

Early in the game, instead of chasing the Bishop with 10. g4, our Opening Explorer indicates White has had more success by developing with 10. b3 as in White's win in V Laznicka vs J Duda, 2014.

Dec-26-17  Cheapo by the Dozen: Queen vs. pieces positions are inherently unstable in terms of material.

So yes, winning modest additional material and simplifying at the same time is a worthy puzzle-solving win.

Dec-26-17  BOSTER: Geller was the great tactician. So
combo'd begin in move 29...
Dec-26-17  jdc2: What The Patzer Saw: 35...Re8, threatening Nh3 mate, so 36. Be4 RxB+, not realizing the black king can take the pawn on f3 after the knight moves....
Dec-26-17  AlicesKnight: 35.... Rd4+ drags the Q one square closer to the K - for the N fork 36.... Ne6+ leaving Black the exchange up and more to come.
Dec-26-17  FlashinthePan: The final combination was obvious. Much harder to see OTB was that exchanging the queen for the two rooks would force the win for Black.
Jul-09-22  Messiah: Very nice and merciless finish by Geller, it's a pity he never made it to the World Champion throne.

(feel free to ban me if this comment is an obvious and gross violation of any of the posting guidelines)

Jul-09-22  stone free or die: Medic! Medic!
Jul-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: Geller had a good record against Botvinnik and would probably have beaten him in 1963. His friendship (or his deal?) with Petrosian let him down, perhaps.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC