chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Fyodor Ivanovich Dus Chotimirsky
Moscow (1925), Moscow URS, rd 13, Nov-26
Spanish Game: Closed Variations (C84)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 79 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Lasker/Dus Chotimirsky game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-21-02  ughaibu: Further to the discussion on the Bronstein vs M20 thread about the defensive play of Lasker compared to that of Petrosian, here is an example of Lasker winning from an apparently hopeless position.
Dec-21-02  ughaibu: Yes, I cant recall anything remotely like this from Petrosian.
Dec-21-02  PVS: Neither can I, although I am probably less familiar with Petrosyan's winning games than with those of any other champion save Euwe. He did not escape hopeless positions so much as play ultra-sound, ultra-quiet positional play until his opponent overreached. Lasker seemed to get into bad, or least odd, positions in the opening, which Petrosyan was not known to do at all. Both were great defensive players, but Lasker was so much more.
Jan-02-05  ArturoRivera: Lasker had better defense than Petrosian???, i dont think so
Jan-02-05  kostich in time: Laskers greatest strength in defense was what his bewildered contemporaries called his "staying power"...his ability to hang on in seemingly hopeless, passive positions, and find a way to win.Here is a case in point. After the 33rd move, white seems lost. He is,in effect playing a whole piece down..his "spanish" bishop entombed. But Lasker finds a way to win. By seeming magic, hegets a Passed d-pawn.
Jan-02-05  Granite: I disagree with your assessment of Lasker's position after the 33rd move, it in fact looks to me as though white is winning in that position. Black's weak f and d pawns are juicy targets, and black is still a long way from making a passed pawn. White quickly cashes in his central pawns for a passer, and it proves decisive.
Jan-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Granite>:
<looks to me as though white is winning in that position> I'm not totally convinced. How does White hold this advantage after, say, 36...Nf7?
Jan-02-05  aw1988: I think if Lasker faced a not overly-reckless player in today's modern age, the way he plays, he would certainly lose.
Jul-12-05  ughaibu: How about 37.Nc1 in answer to Nf7?
Jul-12-05  Anastasia: my opinion: 36..Nf7 37.Nc1 Be5. once the dark bishops go, the black knight can get to strong square d4, defending f5 & b3 and blockading d3... black will win on the q side
Jul-12-05  ughaibu: It's interesting, 38.g3 still looks complicated eg 38....Bf4 39.f4 Nd8 40.d4 Rc4 41.Nb3 or 38....Nd8 39.d4 d4 40.Nd3 etc.
Jul-12-05  Anastasia: ok, but g3 weakens f3, so i would guess 36..Nf7 37.Nc1 Be5 38.g3 Ng5
Jul-12-05  ughaibu: Yes, that looks strong.
Dec-03-05  Resignation Trap: Lasker finally evened his personal score against Dus-Chotimirsky... after 16 years! See: Dus Chotimirsky vs Lasker, 1909 .
Dec-03-05  Boomie: Uncle Fritz seems to "think" that black is winning after 33. Bc1. For example:

33. Bc1 Bxb2 34. Bxd6 Be5+ 35. Bxe5 Nxe5 36. Re1 Nc6 37. Re6 Ra8 38. Rd6 Nd4 39. a5 Ba4 (-2.12/14)

Dec-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Boomie>
What does Fritz "think" if White plays the counterattack as in 33. Bb1 Bxb2 <34. Ne3> instead? Then if 34...Be5 35. Bxe5 Nxe5 36. Nxf5 looks fine for White.
Jan-27-07  morphyvsfischer: Where was Lasker the first 31 moves of the game? Good example of finding counterplay in atrocious positions (behold, the b1 bishop). Um... White went awry on moves 13 and 14, and should have preffered Ng3. 18 a4? is just bad. 23...f4 24 Bxf4 Nd4 25 Bxh6! forces 25...Bxh6, since 25...Nxc2? loses to 26 Qg6+ Kh8 27 Re4.

27 f3 is unfortunately necessary.
28 b3 is expunged by ...exf4 29 Bxf4 Nd4 threatening Nxc2 and Ne2+

32 Bb1 Ne5 forces white to give up his only good piece to save the a4 pawn, the f4 bishop.

Black begins to screw up with 34...Bg6? 34...Bd7! keeping an eye on a4 but also defending f5 is necessary. Then...Nf7 and plunking a rook on e8 screws Lasker. Black also seems to hurry to win the a4 pawn and b1 bishop, as ...Nf7 kills all counterplay. On move 38, Black's win is gone.

38...Ra5 is better defensively, as the b1 bishop is worthless. 39...Rxb1 40 Bxe5 Be8 41 Re2 wins.

White's 40th move threatens 41 Bc2 Rxd1 42 Bxb3+ and then Bxd1. Why free this bishop, black?

41...Ra5 42 Re7 Nf8 is last chance for Black.

42...Rxb1 43 Rxd7; 43...Rxb1 44 Bxd4 Ne6 45 d7 Nd8 46 Re8+

Ugh... Chotmirsky must have felt like crap for the rest of his life after losing THIS. Lasker's optimism is legendary, though.

Jan-06-17  Howard: Steven Giddons analyzes this Lasker-turnaround in one of his books---just came across it last night.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Moscow 1925
by suenteus po 147
31. ...b3
from Endgames for Pure Pleasure by Patca63
sokram's favorite games
by sokram
Game 7
from 50 Essential Chess Lessons by howardb86
Game 7
from 50 Essential Chess Lessons by FLAWLESSWIN64
Defending hopeless position
from Instructive games by zalmkleurig
vikinx's favorite games
by vikinx
lasker best games
by brager
Steve Giddins' 50 Essential Chess Lessons
by Cannon Fodder
Closed Ruy Exemplars
by JamesDoyle
31. ...b3
from Endgames for Pure Pleasure by Timothy Glenn Forney
Game 7
from 50 Essential Chess Lessons by MSteen
33...Bxb2 34.Bxd6 Rb6 35.Bf4 Nf6 likely won
from Lasker's Great Escapes by Calli
Game 7
from 50 Essential Chess Lessons by Ercan
Moscow 1925
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Chess Strategy Book by A.Romero
by Simon Bolivar
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
Selected Lasker
by LaBourdonnaisdeux
Easy Dus it! Selected Games of Dus-Chotimirsky
by Resignation Trap


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC