chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Friedrich Saemisch vs Antonio Angel Medina Garcia
Madrid (1943)
Queen's Gambit Declined: Albin Countergambit. Alapin Variation (D08)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Alexander Alekhine.      [77 more games annotated by Alekhine]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 589 more games of Saemisch
sac: 18...Nf4+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
    [help]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-23-03  Helloween: This one was pretty simple to see. White's forces' dispersion on the Queenside combined with the tripled f-pawns makes his position indefensable. Note that rejecting the Knight sac with Kh1 or Kg1 loses quickly to 19...Qh3.
Oct-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Insufficient is 19.♖g6+? ♔h1 20.♕h3 ♖g1 21.♖h6 ♖g2
Oct-23-03  Helloween: Yes, Rg6+?? throws the forced mate away and I doubt anyone who played Nf4+ would blunder that terribly on the next move.

Also, note that 20.h4 doesn't work due to 20...Qg6+ 21.Kh3 Be7 with mate to follow.

Oct-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <I doubt anyone who played Nf4+ would blunder that terribly on the next move.> Hehe you don't know me very well ;-)

By the way I got my numbers all screwed up in that line so let me restate: <Insufficient is 19...Rg6+? 20.Kh1 Qh3 21.Rg1 etc.>

Oct-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: If 19.Kh1 Qh3 20.Rg1, then 20...Qxh2+! 21.Kxh2 Rh6#.
Oct-23-03  mrvertigo: what is White's weakness here? Usually with an early 1900 game you're thinking 'oh my god he did that'. Running through this game fast, white just seems a bit lazy, but some sharp moves are thrown in
Oct-23-03  MoonlitKnight: White tried to nurture his king-side attack with 17.♘b3?, but after 17...♖d6! realized that he first needed to protect his own monarch, and withdrew his knight back to d2. His 17th and 18th move were thus completely wasted in a critical phase of the game, and black's attack now unstoppable.
Oct-23-03  myratingstinks: Hey hun, gimme a samisch!!! Dont forget the mustard!! jk ;)
Oct-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: a nice combination! Wasn't Samisch the loser of Nimzo's zugzwang game?
Oct-23-03  eainca: I love it when pawns are all in a row!!!
Oct-23-03  sleepkid: kevin: Samisch lost many beautiful games. Please see some of the comments here: Friedrich Samisch
Oct-23-03  drukenknight: I agree 15 NxN was better but 14 Qxa7 would have been spectacular
Oct-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Samisch played well through most of this game, but blunders and loses with 18. Nd2?? However, he also had opportunities to improve earlier.

More flexible (and more popular with today's stronger players) than 5. Nbd2 is the immediate 5. g3 as in Shabalov vs G Sagalchik, 2003 or Enrique Scarella vs G Sagalchik, 2003 or Bosboom-Lanchava vs Pokorna, 2003 or Tiviakov vs G Ligterink, 2001 or Van der Wiel vs Tiviakov, 2001 or Tiviakov vs Brenninkmeijer, 2001

Still Samisch's play is OK for the first 14 moves, although 9. a3 may not be the best move. Worth considering are 9. Ng5 as in Hort vs B Gasic, 1972 or 9. Qb3! as in Smyslov vs Smederevac Petar, 1966 Note that Fritz 8 gives white a clear advantage after 9. Qb3! Be7 10. Qxb7 Rb8 11. Nxd4 Rxb7 12. Bxc6 Nxe5 13. Bxd7+ Kxd7 14. Rd1 Rd8 (+1.25 & 14/40 depth & 661kN/s)

Validating the soundness of Samisch's play through the first ten moves is Euwe vs B Kostic, 1952 after which Samisch is into unexplored territory.

Fritz 8 prefers 12. Qa4 (+1.34 & 14/14 depth & 664kN/s) with a clear white advantage.

White can also improve with the immediate 13. Bxd4 (+0.66) with a slight white advantage, according to Fritz.

Perhaps better than 15. exf3 was 15. Nxf3, after which black can only equalize and hold the position with 15. ..Bc5 (-0.06 @ 13/47 depth & 665kN/s).


Samisch should have played 17. Ne4! to maintain a slight advantage (+0.31 @ 14/43 depth & 649kN/s). Note that this move provides better control of the center, does not obstruct his pieces and denies black the strong 17. Rd6! As such 17. Ne4! was probably white's last chance to secure an advantage.

Obviously 18. Nd2?? throws away the game after black's reply. Relatively better was 18. Bc1 leading to only a slight black advantage per Fritz 8 (-0.28 @ 14/53 ply & 665kN/s).

Oct-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <drukenknight> After 14. Qxa7 Qh3 15. Qa8+ Kd7 16. Qxb7 Bxf1 17. Rxf1 Qe6 18. Nxd4 Qb6, black holds the advantage according to Fritz 8 (-0.81 @11/43 & 663kN/s).
Oct-23-03  drukenknight: So that line is razor sharp and very close to even? IT would have been fun to see them find all those moves huh?

Even if he didnt want to play that line, he could have seen the first few moves and reasoned that if white had that sort of possibility with his queen imagine what black has? and use that to judge his own defensive moves.

Oct-23-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <More flexible (and more popular with today's stronger players) than 5. Nbd2 is the immediate 5. g3> A cheap trap is 5.Nbd2 Bf5, because if White plays automatically with 6.g3? he is immediately embarassed by 6...Nb4!
Oct-24-03  drukenknight: cute trap. I try to do that whenever I get the B to f5. which is like never.
Oct-24-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Sneaky> 5. ..Bf5 may have potential beyond the trap line you mention above, as in the pretty black wins with it in Samisch vs Richter, 1941 and Finn vs Palmer, 1903

White's best response to 5. ..Bf5 (according to Fritz 8) is 6. Nb3! as in Finn vs Palmer (see Kibiting to that game above), leading to a white advantage.

Oct-24-03  AdrianP: <kevin86> <a nice combination! Wasn't Samisch the loser of Nimzo's zugzwang game?> indeed, he was... this is the game Samisch vs Nimzowitsch, 1923
Mar-05-10  rapidcitychess: I have recommended the Albin but never been able to get the courage to use it.:D
Oct-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: "Funky Cool Opening, Medina"
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Improvements on Samisch's play in the Albin-Counter Gambit.
from Opening Gambit Ideas by patzer2
THIS WAS A GREAT GAME
from chesswarmup's favorite games by chesswarmup
QGD Albin Countergambit. Alapin Var (D08) 0-1 Triple f-pawn
from Black B Gambitz by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Modern Chess Miniatures Compiled by Benzol
by fredthebear
QGD Albin Countergambit. Alapin Var (D08) 0-1 Triple f-pawn
from 19 and Under League Excludes Fredthebear by fredthebear
Improvements on Samisch's play in the Albin-Counter Gambit.
from Opening Gambit Ideas Compiled by patzer2 by fredthebear
alekhine comments
from taofelix's favorite games by taofelix
98_D08-D09_Albin Counter Gambit
by whiteshark
Game 89
from 107 Great Chess Battles: 1939-45 Alekhine by nakul1964
Modern Chess Miniatures
by Benzol
Albin Aggression
by nakul1964
randejong's favorite games
by randejong
Game 89
from 107 Great Chess Battles: 1939-45 Alekhine by nakul1964
a variation of smothered mate-pawns kill white
from kevin86's favorite games by kevin86
Game 89
from 107 Great Chess Battles: 1939-45 Alekhine by mjk
QGD Albin Countergambit. Alapin Var (D08) 0-1 Triple f-pawn
from g-pawn/file demolitions grapple w/Fredthebear by fredthebear
alekehine notes
by zakir
Albin Aggression
by schnarre
19 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection IV by wwall
98_D08-D09_Albin Counter Gambit
by nakul1964
plus 1 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC