Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921), Havana CUB, rd 9, Apr-06
Tarrasch Defense: Prague Variation (D33)  ·  1/2-1/2


Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [8854 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Capablanca/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-24-06  Ulhumbrus: One meaning of 17...Re8 playing the King's Rook to a blocked e- file is that the e- file isn't going to stay blocked. Black intends to unblock it by ..Be6-g4 and then to double the rooks on the e- file against White's backward e- pawn.
Nov-26-06  theprohpecy17: Einteresting game! *rubs chin*
Mar-02-08  Knight13: I agree with Capablanca that 21...h5 is better. White's kind of tied down, so why just give up so easily with ...Bxf3 ??
Mar-02-14  Everett: Looks like a Petrosian-Spassky game from 1969. BTW, comp says very small advantage for black with either the text or 21..h4
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: In the year 1921 could anyone beat Capablanca? No, not even the great Lasker!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: In the final position, after 21...Bxf3:

click for larger view

This note appears:

<"Black could have tried to keep up the attack by playing h5. The text move simplifies matters and easily leads to a draw. 22.Nxf3 Re4 23.Rc4 Qe6 24.Nxd4 Nxd4.">

This sounds to me as if the three moves given by Capablanca at the end of the note could actually be part of the game rather than just a possibility. "AMerican Chess Bulletin> *April 1921, p. 75) presents them as actually played moves.

It's possible that whoever submitted a game made an error in transcribing Capablanca's annotations, and included the moves as part of a note rather than the finish of the game. Can anybody shed some light on this?

Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: Yes <PhonyBenoni> this is apparently what happened. Alternatively, there could have been a problem during the upload that caused the remaining moves (22-24) to be treated as a comment by the parser. Usually, this stems from a missing period in the comment or improper use of a bracket.

Regardless, the moves 22 to 24 should be added to the score. The submitter most likely got the score and notes from Capablanca's book on the 1921 and 1927 matches (Dover edition p.19-20). That note is present, but moves 22 to 24 are part of the actual score.

In addition to ACB (and of course, the Capablanca book), other sources also give the complete game through 24 i.e. BCM and the Khalifman/Yudasin book on Capablanca (Vol 1) to name just two.

I'll submit a correction slip.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

"I had never seen this variation [10...d4] before and I therefore thought for a long time in order to make up my mind as to whether I should play Bxf6 or Ne4."

Capablanca did have this (Black to play)

click for larger view

As White in Capablanca vs Olland, 1919 which Lasker may have known about and 10...d4 was Lasker prep. (there is also another simul game with Capa as White but I'd doubt Lasker saw that.)

However if it all depends if Lasker saw the correct score in the Olland game. See Capablanca vs Olland, 1919 (kibitz #2)


NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Capa's games with annotation
by johncross
by 67JediChessMaster
Capablanca vs Lasker WCM 1921
by ilcca
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
brainiac9129's favorite games
by brainiac9129
QGD - Tarrasch
from wals by wals
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu
from Match Lasker-Capablanca by Nobis
April, p. 75 [Gae 74 / 3889]
from American Chess Bulletin 1921 by Phony Benoni
Match Capablanca!
by amadeus
Game 9, Capablanca leads 5-4 (1-0)
from 1921 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Capa's games with annotation
by brucemubayiwa

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC