Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

register now - it's free!
Paul Morphy vs Louis Paulsen
"Morphy's Law" (game of the day Apr-20-12)
1st American Chess Congress (1857)  ·  Sicilian Defense: Paulsen-Basman Defense (B40)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 73 times; par: 62 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Morphy/Paulsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-21-13  Conrad93: Perifidious, stop with the sarcasm.

Do you also hold Greco in high regard just because his opposition was crap?

Let's be honest. Morphy is highly overrated. Fischer was not too smart by putting him in the top.

The discussion is not chess related anyway. It's just based on common-sense, which is what many Morphy fans seem to lack.

Sep-25-13  Wyatt Gwyon: Paul Morphy is possibly only a 1900 player by today's standards? lmao.
Sep-25-13  Conrad93: Wyatt, these type of combinations are not beyond a very good 1800+ rated opponent.
Sep-25-13  Jim Bartle: Listen, I set my computer program to "Morphy style" and I beat it. So how strong could he have been?
Sep-25-13  Wyatt Gwyon: I'm a pretty decent 1800 player myself. I'd consider it an accomplishment to simply not suffer a miniature loss to Morphy. You do realize there's more to it than just hitting a combination, right? Now, explain what you understand that Kasparov, Fischer, Smyslov, etc. do not.
Sep-25-13  Conrad93: I understand that it was remarkable for it's time, but typical in this day and age.

It has lost it's lustre.

The greats are just repeating what everyone else had said.

Like I said, they are biased.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I was expecting 17.Bxh5.
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: <Conrad93>, with all due respect, Reti, Euwe, Smyslov studied thousands of games, while Kasparov and Fischer studied tens of thousands of games. In chess, that makes you a historian. Kasparov has written a book or two with the title On My Great Predecessors.

You've written, "Like I said, they are biased." What proof can you offer in support of this claim? Indeed, I've written before that I want to know what you know, and I still want to know. GMs and World Champions look at the same games as you and say Morphy was one of the greats. It just seems like common sense to conclude that they must know something. If you know something they don't, I'm still willing to look at it.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Paulsen's play is pretty baffling at times in this game. He has the good idea of putting a pawn on f4. This stops white playing f4 in support of the pawn on e5.

Morphy plays 13.Ne4. Now Paulsen could have played 13...Ng6 and annihilated the pe5, then followed up with ...Bc7 to get rid of the white bishop on d6.

Instead he plays another reasonable move to get rid of that bishop: 13...Nf5.

Morphy responds with 14.Bh5. The obvious answer to that is to continue with 14...Nxd6. White would play 15.Nxd6, but then black would play a later ...Bc7 (after ...Rf8), ...Qg5, ...b6 or ...b5, ...Bb7 and things are looking okay.

Sep-30-13  Conrad93: Steinitz is greater than Morphy. And he lived in the same time period.

Morphy was a great player, but he doesn't deserve to be in the top ten list.

Sep-30-13  SimonWebbsTiger: And Conrad goes on...!

I would rather be treated by a doctor today than Hippocrates. Hippocrates' book on medicine is still a Classic because his observations are still true even though he had no clue about bacteria, viruses, etc.

A helpful analogy, I hope.

Sep-30-13  Conrad93: Not really.

It's a poor analogy, because chess and medicine are not even closely related.

Premium Chessgames Member
  drleper: The following is a public service announcement to members regarding Conrad93:

Yup, take care!

Sep-30-13  Conrad93: "It is, of course an improper argumentum ad hominem (personal attack), when you accuse a user of being a troll just because you don't like what they are saying or the way they are saying it. Don't accuse someone of being a troll just to dismiss their argument. Just because you disagree doesn't necessarily mean the user is trying to be disruptive, so it is necessary to measure the suspected troll against the description given above."

I don't fit any of those descriptions.

Oct-01-13  SimonWebbsTiger: Conrad is still here to learn, folks!

Morphy was playing good chess before the "Scientific" analysis of chess elements by Steinitz.

Capa remarked the combinations blind people to Morphy's positional flair.

Hippocrates belongs to a long line of thinkers that saw further and deeper. We see more because we stand on their shoulders, as it was put (about Newton) by Einstein.

Oct-01-13  Jason Frost: <Conrad93> Benign question, are you actually Conrad Holt? I don't think I've ever seen you claim to be in a post and it's not listed on his player page, though you obviously want people to assume it given your name?
Premium Chessgames Member
  drleper: <Conrad93> I won't reply any more, but your latest stream of posts (on various pages) look like trolls to me :) Adios!
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: I'm making a game collection and the game's must meet two 'categories'? ..

1) Be played by a player regarded by the majority of chess historians and fans as being in the top 50 of all time.

2) Be as 'unknown' as possible! A little gem that most regular fans (like me! ) won't have heard of or come across before.

I think this game fits into that, so someone tell me if I'm wrong? I've not heard of this game before and stumbled across it. I think it fits my categories well, and this is the only collection I'll make you'll be pleased to know, so I intend on making it good. Anyone reads this, be it today or in a year, and they know of any others of these type of games, please say....

Btw.. After 8 moves this reminds me of some kinda reversed Caro Kahn!!

Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: This is sheer genius from 'Morphine', but even I could see 25...Nxf6 was a crazy move! Stupid! I could well be wrong as I haven't looked at this game with an engine yet, and I've only flipped through the game twice although I can obviously see black was in Big trouble by that point. Makes me think what GM Gormally (sure that's his name? ) said about him being better than GM'S from a 100 years ago is *slightly* true.
Nov-30-13  Wyatt Gwyon: <MakFinan> What you have to keep in mind is that Morphy was playing possibly at a 1900 level by modern standards, according to one of's top experts.
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: Then I have to say I strongly disagree with that expert then! You must be on about Mr Gormless? Lol 😃
Jul-18-15  pericles of athens: "Morphy was a great player, but he doesn't deserve to be in the top ten list." Hilarious! I got a hearty laugh out of that! Thanks Conrad!
Jul-18-15  thegoodanarchist: In 1857 Morphy won the First American Chess Congress with a dominating performance.

This success was followed by a European trip where he met and triumphed over most of the prominent masters of the period, namely Adolf Anderssen whom he defeated +7 -2 =2 (see Anderssen-Morphy (1858)), Loewenthal in Morphy-Loewenthal (1858) and Daniel Harrwitz in Morphy-Harrwitz (1858).

Mikhail Botvinnik wrote of his influence: "His mastery of open positions was so vast that little new has been learned about such positions after him."

Does this sound like a 1900 player to anyone, other than Conrad?

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Wyatt Gwyon: <MakFinan> What you have to keep in mind is that Morphy was playing possibly at a 1900 level by modern standards, according to one of's top experts.>

Yeah, on the best day of his life.

Some of what <donkrad> posts has a tinge of humour about it, so earnest does he appear in his belief that a good many top players of past and present are found wanting.

Jul-18-15  zanzibar:
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

100% Cotton Chess Puzzle Shirt
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Game 9
from gmram by chessbuzz
1.e4 c5 2.d4
from Morphy plays openings other than 1.e4 e5 by Fischer of Men
Morphy: A Modern Perspective
by monkeysbum
other good games
by sk.sen
April 20: Morphy's Law
from Game of the Day 2012 by Phony Benoni
game 9
from GM RAM Game Selection by takking
lis great games
by gmlisowitz
Final Match, Round One
from New York 1857 by suenteus po 147
New York USA-ch 4th match 1857
from Interesting Games from partien by partien
Morphy crooks a piece
from Morphy's masterpieces by kevin86
by Pragmatist
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen-Basman Defense (B40)
from Big Doc's favorite games by Big Doc
The Giants of Power Play by Neil McDonald
by hms123
Game 1
from Louis, guard that Q3 square! by Calli
Paul Morphy's Best Games
by KingG
Morphy Favorites
by chocobonbon
gm ram games
by chessloser68
Mendrys' favorite games
by Mendrys
Morphy Chess Masterpieces
by nuts
by djangsan
plus 12 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2016, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies