|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Apr-10-16
 | | plang: Does it really make a difference when he resigned? Is this some sort of macho thing? |
 |
| Apr-10-16 | | The Kings Domain: Arguably the two greatest luminaries of the sport going at their best in their prime. The multiple queen ending merely highlights this. This championship match was the Kasparov-Karpov rivalry of its era, and it's no surprise the two K's each had their respective idol in this one of a kind 1927 match. |
|
Apr-10-16
 | | offramp: <The Kings Domain:...it's no surprise the two K's each had their respective idol in this one of a kind 1927 match.> Eh? Who? Say what you mean, dude! |
|
| Apr-10-16 | | AlicesKnight: <The Kings Domain; "... at their best in their prime"> Possibly so generally, though this is the game which Alekhine describes as a 'true comedy of errors' in his notes. He cites 43....Qc6 and 60 ....Rd8 on his part, allowing drawing lines, as well as Capa's 47.Qd7 and 61.a6 missing a draw, among a number of faulty moves. |
|
| Sep-16-16 | | Marmot PFL: <Its probably a bad idea to nominate yourself for an award, but I may as well go ahead and do it. This may be the finest and most thorough job of annotating a chess game anywhere on the Internet. If you know of a better job ... one where the author was at least a Master and spent perhaps 2000 hours (or more) working on the game ... be sure to let me know!! Otherwise, until I see proof of a better job, than I nominate this game as: The Best Annotated Chess Game on the Internet! > yeah sure, 2000 hours is a 8 hour workday, 5 days a week for a solid year (with 2-week vacation), just on one game? |
|
| Oct-01-16 | | devere: <aliejin: The rules of London (unilaterally dictated by the world champion, as was the custom at the time), they were terrible for aspirant. You had to get a lot of money.> This is often-repeated nonsense. In fact the London rules called for a purse that was half what Capablanca himself had raised to challenge Lasker. And quite obviously it also didn't require a return match if the champion lost, as Alekhine did when he played Euwe. Alekhine was a great chess player, but not a great person. |
|
Nov-18-16
| | offramp: Today's title, "Roamin' Orthodox" seems to be a pun on "Roman Orthodox" although I do not know what a Roman Orthodox might be. Is it a font? Great game, though, one of the all-time greats. Capablanca built up a huge position out of the opening. 
click for larger view But he now played 26. Ng4. 26. Nc4! would have been quite a lot better,
After that Alekhine got himself back into the game and went on to win. The kibitzing for this game explains all its fine points, but only read every third kibitz. |
|
Nov-18-16
 | | beatgiant: <offramp>
The obvious interpretation is that Capablanca was the Roman (Catholic) and Alekhine was the (Eastern) Orthodox. But, would chessgames.com make fun of religious designations? Say it isn't so! |
|
Nov-18-16
| | beatgiant: <offramp> Or maybe the Roamin' Orthodox is Alekhine's king's bishop, which "strays" from the Orthodox Defense move (...Be7) and roams from f8 to b4, e7, g5, h6, g7 before finally exchanging on f6. |
|
Nov-18-16
| | offramp: <beatgiant> it could be that this is a QGD Orthodox Defence but it roamed away from the standard lines. There is no Roman Orthodox church or font, or church with font, but there is a <Romanian Orthodox> Church and I've met both of them. |
|
Nov-18-16
 | | kevin86: white will be mated by black's other queen |
|
| Jul-19-17 | | Johnnysaysthankyou: @Allejin, I suspect the opposite. SOMEONE in Argentina had a beef with Capablanca and believed in Alekhine. Who it was, may never be known. |
|
| Dec-05-17 | | Howard: Given the complexities of this game, one wonders what the silicon grandmasters may have found in it, which others may have missed. |
|
| Dec-05-17 | | morfishine: <offramp> Yes, Capa had the opportunity to place a Knight on <d6> which practically forces Black into a defensive exchange sac. For all intents and purposes, Black acquiesces to a desperate defense. But alas, this didn't happen
***** |
|
| Dec-05-17 | | Howard: At what move did this take place ? |
|
Dec-08-17
 | | maxi: Perhaps someone can help me. Where is it that Capa comments on this game? Another thing, I think I remember, but I am not sure, I may be confused, that Capablanca said that he was mystified by losing this game, because in similar positions with the white pawn in f6 he had always won. Is there any source citing this? |
|
Dec-08-17
| | maxi: Alekhine has 26.Ng4, 32.Nf6+, 47.Qd7, and 60.a5 as Capa's blunders. |
|
Dec-09-17
| | maxi: The complexity of the endgame after 39.KxB is mind-boggling. There are so many tactics! No wonder two geniuses like Capa and Alehine had so much trouble with it OTB. |
|
| Mar-24-18 | | Chess for life: Probably my favorite ending to a chess game of all time. |
|
| Aug-24-18 | | WorstPlayerEver: Crucial game, where Capa seems a bit timid:
18. e4 a5 19. bxa5 bxa5 20. e5 Nd5 21. Ne4 Rb8 22. Ned6 Bd7 23. g3 Rf8 24. Bg2 f5 25. Rd3 
click for larger view |
|
| Aug-25-18 | | WorstPlayerEver: 41. Kg1 Rc6 42. Kg2 Qd5+ 43. Kg1 Rb6 44. Re1 Kh7 45. Rc1 Rc6 46. Rb1 Qd8 47. Rb5 Rxf6 48. Rc5 Qd6 49. Qxc4 Qd1+ 50. Qf1 Qxa4 51. Qe1=
click for larger view |
|
| Aug-25-18 | | WorstPlayerEver: PS NB pawn f6 is untouchable:
41. Kg1 Rc6 42. Kg2 Qxf6 43. Qxf6 Rxf6 44. Re8+ Kg7 45. Rc8 
click for larger view |
|
Nov-25-18
 | | whiteshark: <56.Qxc3??>
click for larger view
56...Qf2+ 57.Kh1 Rb8 58.Rb4 Rd8 59.Rb1 Rd2 60.Qxd2 Qxd2 ...that should do |
|
| Dec-26-18 | | DonChalce: i wished i could see Alekhine's notes for this game. if there were any. |
|
| Dec-26-18 | | Howard: Well, the game is included in Volume 2 of Alekhine's famous two-volume work. Kasparov also covers the game in MGP. |
|
|
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing