chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Adolf Anderssen vs Wilhelm Steinitz
Anderssen - Steinitz (1866), London ENG, rd 1, Jul-18
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Paulsen Variation (C51)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Anderssen/Steinitz games
sac: 21.Rxc6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-15-06  Steppenwolf: 19. Nxc6 starts a nice combination. BOUM! Steinitz learn a valuable lesson in tactics!
Feb-15-06  Boomie: In CGs database, excluding the casual game, Morphy beat a younger Anderssen 11-3-1. Steinitz record against Anderssen is 16-12-1. Steinitz importance to theory cannot be over estimated. But Morphy was a better chess player by virtue of a mind perfectly suited to the game.
Feb-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Having played both, did Anderssen ever comment on who was better?
Feb-16-06  Boomie: Some notes from the wonderful site at http://batgirl.atspace.com/morphybi....

After their match in Paris, Anderssen said "Morphy is too strong for any living player to hope to win more than a game here and there."

According to Edge, "On the morning previous to his departure he (Anderssen) said in my hearing: - "I consider Mr. Morphy the finest chess player who ever existed. He is far superior to any now living, and would doubtless have beaten Labourdonnais himself. In all his games with me, he has not only played, in every instance, the exact move, but the most exact. He never makes a mistake (Morphy, present, here quietly smiled); but, if his adversary commits the slightest error, he is lost."

I haven't tracked down Anderssen's comments about Steinitz yet. Anderssen was a kind and generous man and probably also has some glowing remarks about Steinitz.

Sep-27-07  RookFile: There's another possibility: Anderssen was stronger than Steinitz too. Why not? A past his prime Anderssen put 11 wins up on the board against Steinitz's 13.
May-08-09  Fanacas: If i am correct when anderssen was gonig to play morphy at first he didnt expect first from him so he was ill prepared but even if he did morphy probaly still would have won but less convincing i think.
Mar-08-10  donehung: /Boomie\ Nice link thx. But did you realize the gamescore of the first game of the match is wrong? They have Morphys 27th as Qf3 which would be a gross blunder!? I had to come back to cg.com to double check and morphy actually played Qc6 i believe.
Mar-08-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <tamar: Having played both, did Anderssen ever comment on who was better?>

According to a book about the 1894 WC match, after his 1866 loss Anderssen said Steinitz was better. <In 1862 Anderssen told Steinitz he was no Morphy; in 1866 he put him far above Morphy.>

http://books.google.com/books?id=Gb...

But I haven't seen an original quote.

Mar-08-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: "I knew Paul Morphy. Paul Morphy was a friend of mine. You, sir, are no Paul Morphy."
Mar-08-10  psmith: Consider that Steinitz reigned as world champion in the world of Chigorin, Zukertort, Blackburne as well as Anderssen. Which of Morphy's opponents other than Anderssen could equal those players -- all of whom Steinitz beat at match play?
Mar-08-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <psmith> Great observation. The answer is no one in Anderssen's era was as strong as Steinitz' opponents. The only ones to compare would be Bird and Paulsen. Paulsen beat Anderssen also.
Mar-08-10  Petrosianic: That is an interesting question. Apart from Anderssen, who was Morphy's strongest opponent? Some might say Staunton, who he played the 2 consultation games with, but I've always thought Staunton overrated (mostly by himself). I'd say Morphy's second toughest opponent was Harrwitz.
Mar-08-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  NM JRousselle: Morphy had trouble with Barnes.
Mar-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <NM JRousselle: Morphy had trouble with Barnes.>

But no one else did.

Mar-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: many thanks <keypusher> for that link to the Steinitz-Lasker 1894 book.
Mar-10-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <tamar> You're most welcome!

I should add that Morphy didn't have <that> much trouble with Barnes -- their final score was 19:8 I think. Less one-sided than many of Morphy's scores, but still...

Jan-31-12  Knight13: 12...c6 is an improvement over ...c5 that Steinitz used to play against Anderssen. 18...Rh5 is better than ...Rf6.
Jun-17-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Knight13> <18...Rh5 is better than ...Rf6.>

No, 18...Rh5 is answered by 19.g4. If 18...Rd4, then 19.Qe2 and the Rook position has no use; 18...Rf7 is answered by 19.Ng5, and after 19...Rf8 20.N4e6.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Paulsen Variation (C51)1-0
from vaskolon's with sacrifices Mr. ANDERSSON by vaskolon
+6 -8 =0 vs. Steinitz (London, 1866)
from Match Anderssen! by amadeus
London Match, Game # 1
from WCC Index [Anderssen - Steinitz 1866] by Benzol
decebalus' favorite games
by decebalus
+8 -6 =0 vs. Anderssen (London, 1866) - top5
from Match Steinitz! by amadeus
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Paulsen Variation (C51) 1-0
from vaskolon's PAUL MORPHY'S GAMES by vaskolon
The Hardest Wins
by crwynn
+6 -8 =0 vs. Steinitz (London, 1866)
from Match Anderssen! by chessgain
0 Anderssen-Steinitz 1
from World Championship Matches by Tobias


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC