chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Magnus Carlsen vs Peter Leko
Pearl Spring Chess Tournament (2009), Nanjing CHN, rd 1, Sep-28
Scotch Game: Classical Variation (C45)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 31 times; par: 66 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Carlsen/Leko games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-29-09  whatthefat: <she must be paid in the lemon from the tree!>

Something lost in translation? Does anyone here speak idiot?

Sep-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Why, it is quite simple, and very eloquent!

The tree, is the symbol/meaning of knowledge, ala Adam/Eve and Bible, however the lemon, is often represented as a sour/bitter fruit.

Quite unlike the apple that we all know of, hence; therefore, quite logically (If you are an honour graduate of the Vulcan Academy, like moi!)

Q.E.D. Mate in 2...

Sep-30-09  shakespeare: <It looks like Carlsen got away with one here. IMO it really looked like he sort of botched the opening by letting the e4 pawn fall that early>

definitely no mistake to do so - if you look at the position 4 moves later, with the enormous space advantage he gained - seems to be a good idea to sac e4...

Sep-30-09  zarg: <Kingscrusher>
Thx for your video analysis of the game!
Oct-01-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  kamalakanta: It seems to me that 31...Bf3 is a mistake, while 31...Qg6 is more precise, not allowing White to play f5 without at least losing a pawn.
Oct-01-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  kamalakanta: ...but it is answered by 32.Qe4, Bf5+ 33.Qg2, and the attack is neutralized...
Oct-03-09  felixd: Pfiou! A very complicated game!
Oct-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  kamalakanta: <jessicafischerqueen: For all those who don't know- CG.com pays the Master Commentators- which is one of the reasons we get such high quality choices, such as <Nigel Short> and <Natalia>.>

<Given this fact-->

<For a person who is TOO CHEAP TO BUY A MEMBERSHIP and support this great website- such as <Aiuta the Ungrateful Patzer-King>- to gratuitously insult the Commentators- is simply grotesque.>

<I advise all to put this Troll on permanent ignore. Why not? Nothing to lose, everything to gain.>

Could not agree more. I haven't seen one comment from this person, but will put in ignore-list if I do...does this troll go by any other name?

Oct-06-09  Ulhumbrus: After 15 d5 Black will get into trouble if his c pawn remains backward. However upon an immediate 15...c5, 16 dxc6 uncovers an attack upon the d6 pawn. This suggests 15...Rd8! defending the d6 pawn and so preparing the advance ...c5.

19...b5 is a sign of trouble, because after this move all of Black's Queen side pawns are exposed to attack.

Oct-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: It's probably been mentioned, but 23...Ng8 allowing 24.Rc6 caused serious problems, though black seemed to have a difficult position already.
Nov-21-09  cornflake: 19.Qb3! must have been an unpleasant move for Leko to see. After this move what does black do about b7 and the bind on c7? 19...b5 just weakens a6 and creates an easily exploitable hole on c6. Moreover, Black's counterplay on the kingside doesn't seem like it's enough to provide compensation.
Dec-05-09  Mr. Fahey: What an interesting game AND excellent commentary by Kingcrusher, an amusing fellow I might add. Thank you jessicafischerqueen for the link. And thank you all for help with elevating my own instruction for my students at the Lowell High School Chess Club, in SF. BTW, IM Dmitry Zilberstein volunteers each year to do a 25-30 board simul at Lowell, where I teach math. After 50 years of playing tournaments and 25 years coaching, the learning tools and tech combined w/young talents like yourselves is an inspiration. Thanks again.
Dec-21-09  aazqua: Comments such as these are just ridiculous:
<It looks like Carlsen got away with one here. IMO it really looked like he sort of botched the opening by letting the e4 pawn fall that early>

Uh no. I suspect that the world's strongest player didn't screw up his opening preparation at move 10. It's unusual for these guys to be out of book before 15 or 20 and you can be assured that they aren't casually overlooking dropped pawns in the opening.

Interesting matchup. Leko won the first four decisive games but Carlsen won the next five. I don't like Leko's chances going forward.

Dec-21-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Carlsen points to 13...0-0 as inaccurate in his notes.

A later game, Nakamura vs Grischuk, 2009 went 13...Bh3 14 Bf3 Qf5 15 Re1 d5 16 Qb3 0-0 17 Nc3 Bg4 18 Bxd5 = which keeps White from getting such a big space advantage

Dec-30-09  hand banana:


click for larger view

this position after 15.d5 is what carlsen was aiming for. he analyzed it beforehand, as i just read in chessbase magazine.

Dec-30-09  davegras: Questions for Chessgames or anybody: Why aren't there posted elo ratings on the scorecards? I notice that from time to time.
Dec-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <davegras> This game was a Live Event on site, which typically go straight into the database (with ratings as "?") compared to other gamescores where the PGN is uploaded in full. Sometimes the Administrators go back and insert their ratings for historical purposes, but only if they have time. =)
Dec-30-09  davegras: <tpstar> Thank you for the explanation!
Sep-29-10  morphy2010: f5!! strong move and decisive
Dec-21-10  anandrulez: Rybka vs Deep Sjeng, 2010

Sjeng improves with Bh3 , idea open the bishop and not castle early and make the bishop useless for sometime .

Dec-21-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Sjeng improves with [13...]Bh3>

Kramnik already did it in 2001 (Morozevich vs Kramnik, 2001)... Nakamura vs Grischuk, 2009 (played a short while after Carlsen vs. Leko) also ended in a quick draw after this move. A major improvement for Black, of course, is that after the forcing sequence 13Bh3 14.Bf3 (defending against mate on g2) Qf5 15.Re1 d5 White doesnt get to play the space-gaining d5 himself - note that an immediate 13d5? Would be bad because of 14.Bd3.

Dec-21-10  anandrulez: Eyal : Great , you are updateed with openings :) . It appears that Rybka just follows the game Moro Kramnik and then black seizes the initiative ! Wonder why Leko chose a inferior 0-0 - maybe just outprepared by Carlsparov ?
Dec-21-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Wonder why Leko chose a inferior 0-0 - maybe just outprepared by Carlsparov ?>

I suppose he was either caught unprepared or lacked the self-confidence to play ...Bh3, thinking that "Carlsparov" must have prepared something against it (this was very shortly after Carlsen's cooperation with Kasparov was announced, and the Scotch is known to have been one of Kasparov's openings...).

Feb-26-11  notyetagm: Carlsen is just so @#$%* good.
Jun-23-12  Naniwazu: <Wonder why Leko chose a inferior 0-0 - maybe just outprepared by Carlsparov ?>

LOL! So funny!

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 15)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Pearl Spring Chess Tournament 2009 Rd.1
from Favorite Games from (2009) by wanabe2000
marassek's favorite games
by marassek
outplayer's favorite games III
by outplayer
Pearl Spring 09: Leko outplayed in the Scotch
from Mozart of chess by zarg
Scotch Game
by KingG
Deeply analyzed game
from Scotch by Modern Players by alligator
Nanjing 2009
from # Greatest Tournaments 2009 by Qindarka
Kasparov's Apprentice
from The Carlsen Chronicles Part I - Wonderboy by MoonlitKnight
Nr vann MC. Taktik mittspel
from Paul Martin's favorite games by Paul Martin
Game 53
from studiare scacchi con Magnus Carlsen by mariofrisini
Game collection: 101
by cgrob
Not Duct Tape, Not Beer, Not Irish Either
by fredthebear
Sink
by Sink
Magnus taking Leko down demolition road
from Magnus- the teenager collection by hardliner
scotch game
from benjobench's study game's by benjobench
Game 53
from Fighting Chess with Magnus Carlsen by alip
C45 1-0 44
from Carlsen Cranks Up Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 53
from Fighting Chess with Magnus Carlsen by jakaiden
Lk vs. Carlsen
by Method B


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC