chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Grischuk vs Boris Gelfand
World Championship Candidates Final (2011), rd 5, May-24
Queen's Gambit Declined: Harrwitz Attack. Two Knights Defense Blockade Line (D37)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 70 more Grischuk/Gelfand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <Domdaniel: "All the tired horses..."

Obligatory Dylan quote.>

A very nice little underrated tune.

Happy Birthday Bob !

May-24-11  haydn20: If Black swaps these N's his problms are over I'd think.
May-24-11  libertyjack: Draw agreed.
May-24-11  uscfratingmybyear: <Domdaniel> CLANG, CLANG, CLANG! Line of the day on Dylan's 70th.
May-24-11  Chris00nj: For what it's worth, Pocket Fritz 4 gives the position a 0.00
May-24-11  Chesschatology: All roads lead to Rome, and by Rome I mean "a draw". Annoying- Grischuk overlooked a simple tactic in a very strong position- he was lucky it didn't turn out worse for him.
May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: -

And in the meantime they play a christmas song in Kazan ;)

May-24-11  lost in space: Yeah, draw agreed; but I can live with draws if they are not grandmasterdraws or draws agreed with a lot of play remaining on the board (like the 2 last games)

This here was a fine and nice game.

May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Did Gelfand defend coolly and then take his chance to break out, or did Grischuk fluff it? His 18.Na4 doesn't look like a great idea, and then he missed 22.Bg4? e5!
May-24-11  BobCrisp: @#$% <Dylan>!
May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Not *everyone* named Bob is a nutter.
May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: In fact, Nigel Short used to call Gelfand 'Bob'. Some people just have Bobness.
May-24-11  Ulhumbrus: Back again, with a mug of tea. It seems that Grischuk did not in fact manage to do much with his Knights. On 39...bxc6 40 Rxb8 Bxb8 White's d4 pawn is potentially vulnerable to attack from Black's Bishop, but I assume that this is not enough to enable Black to win, and that this is why Gelfand has agreed to s draw.
May-24-11  BLarsen1967: will Bob Gelfand paint his Masterpiece tomorrow??
May-24-11  Wyatt Gwyon: So when does the excitement start?
May-24-11  OneArmedScissor: Grischuk will play a King's Indian and win
May-24-11  ajile: <Wyatt Gwyon: So when does the excitement start?>

Probably not until at least the rapids.

May-24-11  Marmot PFL: <Did Gelfand defend coolly and then take his chance to break out, or did Grischuk fluff it? His 18.Na4 doesn't look like a great idea, and then he missed 22.Bg4? e5!>

White spent so much time preventing black's plan that he didn't do anything active himself until after trades had reduced the position to a draw.

May-24-11  Caissanist: <Wyatt Gwyon: So when does the excitement start?>

a) Tiebreaks, or b) when you start following other chess events. The Capablanca Memorial in Cuba, which finished a couple of days ago, was pretty excit, and no doubt would have been a lot of fun to follow had there been a live feed. Ivanchuk and Le Quan Liem tied for first, and Ivanchuk's last round win over Le was enjoyable and instructive. Ivanchuk is also a better chess player than either of these guys, though unfortunately he lacks their psychological discipline and stability, or perhaps their pragmatism.

May-24-11  AVRO38: I like this game. It's a clear demonstration of classical chess.
May-24-11  polarmis: <Domdaniel: Did Gelfand defend coolly and then take his chance to break out, or did Grischuk fluff it? His 18.Na4 doesn't look like a great idea, and then he missed 22.Bg4? e5!>

In his video later in the day Sergey Shipov thought 18. Na4 (heading for d3) was actually the best option - otherwise it's hard to stop Black's counterplay. After that instead of the bishop going via f5 to h3 (or g4), it's better to go via f1.

My final version of Shipov's commentary is here:

http://www.chessintranslation.com/2...

May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: At least it was a more interesting battle than the previous two games.
May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: agree <Peng>, i thought 1/2 right after the queen exchange but they keep on pounding --- that's the right attitude!

nice game by Alex and Boris..

May-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: from TWIC..

Grischuk

It was an interesting game, white had a big space advantage but black had a lot of different types of break-throughs mostly it's e6-e5 of course but also sometimes sacrificing the bishop on f4 was interesting.

As it happened I probably didn't play in the most precise way. and let black achieve this e6-e5 after that my advantage was just symbolic and nothing happened from it.

Gelfand

I got a slightly passive position but then I manoevered all my pieces to the best possible squares in this position and after black managed to get in e5 the main problems are in the past. I have to play accurately of course, Qc8 is an accurate move but basically that's it.

http://www.chess.co.uk/twic/chessne...

May-25-11  picard: 23. dxe5! try that one on.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Grischuk!
by amadeus
Match Gelfand!
by amadeus
Game 67
from Understanding Chess Middlegames (Nunn) by isfsam
Game 67
from Understanding Chess Middlegames (Nunn) by Qindarka
liberating moves
from 00 Nunn Middlegames by cgrob
First 500 cbs ticket to win (profited 205)
from Penguincw Games by Penguincw


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC