chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Richter-Veresov Attack (D01)
1 d4 d5 2 Nc3 Nf6 3 Bg5

Number of games in database: 471
Years covered: 1889 to 2014
Overall record:
   White wins 32.5%
   Black wins 36.7%
   Draws 30.8%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Anthony Miles  11 games
Savielly Tartakower  10 games
Carsten Hoi  10 games
Jan Smejkal  4 games
Bent Larsen  4 games
Larry Christiansen  4 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Miles vs C W Pritchett, 1982
K Richter vs Baratz, 1931
Bisguier vs J Sherwin, 1954
Miles vs Hort, 1982
R Reynolds vs Nunn, 1987
Saemisch vs Tarrasch, 1925
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 19; games 1-25 of 471  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Gunsberg vs Burn  ½-½42 1889 BreslauD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
2. Von Popiel vs G Marco  0-130 1890 Kolisch MemorialD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
3. Marshall vs W Napier 1-054 1897 Ch CityD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
4. Breyer vs Loman  1-035 1913 ScheveningenD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
5. Breyer vs Bogoljubov 0-127 1914 MannheimD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
6. G Dodds vs W E Mason  0-134 1914 NZL-chD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
7. Opocensky vs F Schubert  1-027 1919 UJCS-4.KongressD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
8. Mieses vs P F Johner  1-049 1922 11, Teplitz-Schonau it GERD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
9. Mieses vs Saemisch  1-041 1922 13, Teplitz-Schonau it GERD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
10. M Golmayo De La Torriente vs Alekhine ½-½77 1922 MadridD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
11. Tartakower vs Reti  ½-½21 1922 ViennaD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
12. Tartakower vs Gruenfeld ½-½18 1922 Grünfeld - TartakowerD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
13. Tartakower vs Spielmann  ½-½54 1923 CopenhagenD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
14. Tartakower vs A Pokorny  ½-½65 1923 Maehrisch - OstrauD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
15. Saemisch vs Tarrasch 0-127 1925 Baden-BadenD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
16. A Becker vs B Moritz  ½-½92 1925 BreslauD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
17. Tartakower vs S Takacs  ½-½37 1927 KecskemetD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
18. Y Vilner vs A A Smorodsky 1-023 1927 USSR ChampionshipD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
19. Tartakower vs G A Thomas  1-053 1927 Hastings 1926/27D01 Richter-Veresov Attack
20. Tartakower vs G Norman  ½-½23 1927 Hastings 1926/27D01 Richter-Veresov Attack
21. J Schulz Sr vs E Steiner  0-138 1928 OlympiadD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
22. Tartakower vs Colle  ½-½51 1929 BudapestD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
23. K Richter vs H Wagner  ½-½30 1930 Swinemuende GERD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
24. Weenink vs Kashdan  0-139 1930 Hamburg ol (Men)D01 Richter-Veresov Attack
25. B Kostic vs L Asztalos 1-039 1931 BledD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
 page 1 of 19; games 1-25 of 471  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-14-04  Catfriend: We all:) Well, most of us! Patzer is a very weak player
Feb-14-04  marcus13: You don't seem to be a Patzer.
Feb-15-04  PaulKeres: <marcus13: You don't seem to be a Patzer. > Sorry for the confusion over the Patzer thing. It is easy to appear better than you are with big words, believe me I am a Patzer, but thats Ok. I'm a little confused by your profile, are you French, or do you like playing the French opening? As for this opening, I like the element of surprise in 2. Nc3, exactly because one is not expected to block the c pawn, but followed with 3. Bg5, it seems you get quite a different game.
Feb-15-04  Catfriend: I know I AM a patzer for sure! and agaisnt the french it's nice to play 3.♗e3!?
Feb-17-04  PaulKeres: < Catfriend: I know I AM a patzer for sure! and agaisnt the french it's nice to play 3.e3!? >. You mean after the standard mainline 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 I guess. How did we get into all this French talk from the Sicilian anyway? Have I missed something / some kibitzers elsewhere?
Mar-28-04  ruylopez900: This seems a little weak since Black blocks in his c-pawn. I would suggest the following line 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 c6 and then playing out some pieces...make him pay for that blocked c-pawn!
May-07-04  morphyvsfischer: After 3...Nbd7! (...Bf5 is more natural, but 4 f3 makes Black lose some time while White makes his center and gets a slight plus), The agressive line (4 f3) was slaughtered by Tal (see an Alburt vs. Tal game), and the positional line (4 Nf3) gives Black a microscopic edge because of the blocked c pawn. One line I like is 4 Nf3 g6 5 Qd2 (White wants the pawn at e4, so he tries to delay e3 as much as possible. Queenside Castling is also where the king should head) Bg7 6 0-0-0 0-0 7 e3 b6! (this is mainly to prepare ...c5, not fianchetto the Queen Bishop. If possible, it belongs on e6.) 8 Bd3 (Be2 is possible, but this makes more sense, preparing e4) c5 9 e4 e6 and Black has a slight plus with his better placed pieces and better hold on the center while White's dark-squared Bishop is going to be missed on the Qside.
May-08-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <morphyvsfischer> Great analysis! It's worth pointing out that 10. e5 needs to be met with 10 ... cd - 11. exf6 dxc3 12. Qxc3 Bxf6, or 12. fxg7?! cxd2+ 13. Rxd2 f6 14. gxf8=Q+ Qxf8 with R&B for Q&P. But how should Black handle 10. ed and the Nf6 is now pinned? 10. ed cd 11. Nxd4 e5 12. Nc6 looks very good for White (12 ... Qc7 13. Nb5; 12 ... Qe8 13. Rhe1). Here's that Tal game: Alburt vs Tal, 1972
Nov-15-04  joeyam30: win29.3%??!
Dec-22-04  zorro: Can Anyone help me out with this...Thing? Especially 3...Nbd7 4. f3 lines. <morphyvsfischer> I would hardly say that <The agressive line (4 f3) was slaughtered by Tal> since 8. ef6 doesn't seem White's best. Morozevich played this line more than once in the '90s going 4. f3 c6 5. Qd2 instead of 5. e4 leaving the possibility of e3 open. What do you think is best response to 4. f3 for black, 4...c6, 4...c5 or 4...e6? Thank you!
Jan-12-05  MidnightDuffer: It looks like an awesome layout; but look how often White Loses above? I had to check out the percentages, when a review at amazon for Gufeld's book on this says it only wins 25% of the time (with the book stating this)! Spassky played it and I've seen two of his successes; but if this is the winning percentage; who might use it?

Then again, maybe a lesser used line, means it was not played by true proponents of the system.

Jan-16-05  Rosewood: I've played both sides of the Veresov opening 3 wins with White and 7 wins with black and 2 draws in tournament.

I'd rather be on the blackside of the Veresov :) all possible replies he's just fine and can equalize anything white can muster.

Sep-02-05  Capafan9: Personally I have always liked the black side of this opening, and i do play the trompowski on a rare occasion. I really dont like the Nc3 move first because it blocks the c-pawn. In my opinion this is a worse form of the trompowski because whites options are far less numerous involving the movement of the c pawn. And i sometimes prefer nbd2 in some lines of the trompowski but that is just my opinion, and id really appreciate some concrete analysis from someone more familiar with this position.
Jan-02-06  morphyvsfischer: <zorro> I like 4 ...c5 better now, as it doesn't allow White to grab all the center for himself, and after 5...cxd4, Black can play ...e5 depending on White's 5th move.

However, 3...c5!? seems to be a very ambitious try, and my personal favorite. 4 Bxf6 gxf6 5 e4 seems forced, due to Black wanting to get an improved version of 4...c5, as the knight can go to c6 now.

Refuting my old analysis: the queenside is not a good place for the king. Ever notice that Black's play almost always seems to come over there? Also, Bd3 and Nf3 can be met by ...cxd4 and ...e5! if White played e3, gaining the advantage.

All in all, Black has several good replies to the Veresov (and doesn't need to have much theroetical knowledge, as even 3 ...Bf5 seems to be fine for Black), and as such the Trompowsky, the Torre, and the London System (Bf4) seem better ways of avoiding the main line Indians (the London in particular causes me a few problems).

Feb-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Lampshadow: I have just recently started to play this opening and one thing I like about it, is that it is rather transpositional. It can easily transpose into French or less easily into Caro-Kan or Pirc (if Black plays 1...Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.d4 etc.) I used to be a e4 player and these were the only openings I liked to play against. ruylopez900 suggested the following line: 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 c6, but then white can transpose to Caro-Kan with 3.e4.

My first try with Veresov was against a 2200 player and it started like morphyvsfischer suggested, that is 1 d4 Nf6 2 Nc3 d5 3 Bg5 Nbd7 4 Nf3 g6 5 Qd2 but here my opponent played 5...Ne4! which I think is the best move. After 6 Nxe4 dxe4 I had to retreat my knight back to g1 and eventually lost the game (7 Ne5 is dubious because of 7...Nb6 and the knight on e5 is trapped altough it might probably be saved with 8 a4). I have since played it in 3 other games and won all them, one transposed into French, another into French-like position and the third was something irregular.

Feb-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  redlance: Jude Acers,plays this opening 24-7,
at his table in New Orleans
Mar-06-06  LluviaSean: Wow...please play this opening against me when white!!
Mar-07-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chnebelgrind: A nice game with this opening was played by Smerdon against Lane in the Australian Championship 2006. See http://www.ozchess2006.com/results.... (Championship --> pairings --> round 7 -->view games)
May-05-06  DeepBlade: interresting piece of information.

The Richter-Veresov Attack is a chess opening. It is characterized by the moves 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bg5 (see algebraic notation).

Along with the Colle System and Torre Attack, the Richter-Veresov attack is one of the more common branches of the Queen's Pawn Game. After the Black reply 3...Bf5, <the German master Kurt Richter>, after whom the opening is half-named, <usually replied 4.f3>, hoping to build up a large pawn centre. <Soviet player Gavril Veresov>, on the other hand, usually <played 4.Bxf6>, damaging the Black pawn structure. Today, these two variations are known as the Richter Variation and Veresov Variation respectively.

The opening has never been very popular at the top level, but various prominent players have employed it occasionally. In 1959, for example, David Bronstein played the Richter Variation against Veresov himself; the game was drawn in 16 moves.

The more famous Ruy Lopez opening looks like mirrored Richter-Veresov Attack. Of course, since the d-pawn is protected from the start by the queen, the dynamics of play are quite different.

Source: Wikipedia

May-21-07  ongyj: <Lampshadow>I've been looking into this opening recently, and I'd like to recommend the simple 4.Qd2[For 0-0-0 as soon as possible] or 4.f3[To possibly save the dark Bishop and put a foothold on e4.]
May-21-07  ongyj: Against 3...Bf5 4.Qd2 looks fine. Of course White doesn't try to play e4 at all cost, but "act according to the situation" and retain castling possibilities on both sides. Say 4...Nc6[Are both players playing 0-0-0 ?] 5.e3 and now if 5...Nb4 White has 6.Bb5+ Though of course 5.e3 can't save the dark suqare Bishop if Black plays 5...a6
Nov-02-10  meppi: c pawn schmee pawn the veresov is fine. the knight will move eventually and then white will play c4 if they want to
Dec-12-10  jackpawn: It's interesting that Tony Miles played the Veresov 13 times in 1982 with very good results. Drew against world class players and crushed minor masters. Wonder why he stopped.
May-27-12  Zahodjakin: I agree with Meppi. White has the first move advantage, so while it's probably bad (and known to be bad) for Black to block the c-pawn in the lines of the Queen's Gambit, and to a lesser extent in other Queen Pawn Openings; here White can easily make some such move as "Ne2" or other good Knight move, and simply play "c4" without having lost anything, except the move he was up anyway. White is fine in this line. Can he hope for an advantage against best play (3...Nbd7!), probably not, but White's line is still sound. It's not losing and if it is, to what?
Mar-02-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: There is a decent amount of literature on this opening system -

Adams - Richter-Veresov System
Bellin - Queen Pawn Veresov
Davies - The Veresov
Gufeld - Richter-Veresov System
Jacobs - Watch Out! Veresov's Opening
Lakdawala - A Ferocious Opening Repertoire
Russell - The Veresov System
Smith / Hall - The Veresov Attack (1994)
Smith / Richards - Veresov Opening (1984)

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies