Proving that artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity!

AI will reach an IQ of 10,000 in the upcoming years.

I suggest this to be chessgames.com Quote of the Day: "The parameters θ of the deep neural network in AlphaZero are trained by self-play reinforce- ment learning, starting from randomly initialised parameters θ. Games are played by selecting moves for both players by MCTS, at ∼ πt. At the end of the game, the terminal position sT is scored according to the rules of the game to compute the game outcome z: −1 for a loss, 0 for a draw, and +1 for a win. The neural network parameters θ are updated so as to minimise the error between the predicted outcome vt and the game outcome z, and to maximise the similarity of the policy vector pt to the search probabilities πt. Specifically, the parameters θ are adjusted by gradient descent on a loss function l that sums over mean-squared error and cross-entropy losses respectively, (p,v)=fθ(s), l=(z−v)2 −π⊤logp+c||θ||2 where c is a parameter controlling the level of L2 weight regularisation. The updated parameters are used in subsequent games of self-play."

Well, there are books out there to train yourself. to break 150 in an IQ test just requires a good memory....

That notion of "Absolute IQ" in the paper you cited seems suspect to me, because IQ is generally supposed to be measured as a function of age, which means that the average 6-year-old will always have an IQ of 100.

By this, a 6-year-old has an "absolute IQ" (that is, measured as if he were an adult) of 30.

?????

Not only are 6-years-old incapable of reading the instructions of standardized test for adults but the extrapolation of IQ to computers seems absurd because computers have nothing like "age" so the whole approach seems misguided to me

Yes, he was not very precise in his statement. and then who wants/needs/whatever compare a 6 year old to a 20 year old? Like *we* all know that for instance the ability for logical thinking is developed after puberty and that there are some early talents and some who will never learn it.

The original IQ tests were devised to detect mentally disabled children. This is why it was defined through age.

*****

I guess that help you a lot.

Ah yes. I am 61 now. what would that result in?

I guarantee you no supercomputer will understand that question. You can say, well it's culturally biased but exactly what culture does a computer have? To eliminate the "humanoid-bias" you would have to ask questions like "What is the cube root of 17 divided 96?", but that's reducing the whole notion of human intelligence to the level of a pocket calculator!

Has anyone heard any news about A0 since this match?

And when you're through reading them, please explain them to me in terms that I might be able to understand.

Decades of mental decline. I'm right behind you.

Good to hear that I have followers ...

AlphaZero (Computer) (kibitz #78)

But, as a "reward" for beating me, you get to explain the paper to me. :-)

Needless to state I had to prevail ☺

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.