|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Dec-12-06 | | ToTheKings: I think his game against Seirawan in 1979 where he plays the white pieces in a french tarrash should definitely be in notable games. That game is awesome in my opinion. Anybody agree? |
|
| Dec-13-06 | | Lt. Col. Majid: <ToTheKings: I think his game against Seirawan in 1979 where he plays the white pieces in a french tarrash should definitely be in notable games. That game is awesome in my opinion. Anybody agree?> No. |
|
| Dec-13-06 | | Karpova: <truthishere: uhm, what the movie, nor noone told you is that deep blue has NEVER been seen in use. Even at the 97 match, no-one saw. Deep blue was never given up to other scientists for inspection, which is odd since half was donated to smithsonian, and usually anything in smithsonian can be used for research, but ibm disallows this. You are all fools if you think deep blue is a ligitimate chess simulator. the sad thing is, ibm refusal to give a re-match shows their guilt. remember the boxer who won a huge fight, then they said his corner man cheted by spiking his water? did this boxer say "whatever, i won, no rematch.."? no, he gave the rematch and annihilated the guy. If ibm and these jack ass programmers are so confident of deep blue, and if they are TRUE scientists, they would agree to a rematch, a final tie breaking re-match, with deep blue OUT IN THE OPEN, so all can see how it is working. Then and only then, will the world see their talentless programmers are hacks and cheaters.> Who was the boxer?
And who should have beaten Kasparov instead of Deep Blue if Deep Blue didn't work? A human being - Kramnik or Karpov (who else would have been capabla of doing that?) or maybe an even stronger chessprogram (incidentally not called <Deep Blue>?)) |
|
Aug-01-07
 | | BishopBerkeley: Joel Benjamin to play Rybka (Computer) at Pawn odds, eight games, two per day Aug. 6 thru Aug. 9: http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybka... Given GM Benjamin's role in developing Deep Blue (Computer) , this should be an interesting contest! (: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)
|
|
| Aug-01-07 | | Strongest Force: Thx for the news, BB. I have tons of respect for Joel however the best two GMs against the engines are Yasser and Roman. |
|
Sep-11-07
 | | cu8sfan: In the ongoing dispute between Joel Benjamin and Sam Sloan (New in Chess magazine 2007#6), Benjamin wrote "Everything I wrote [...] had already been confirmed on the internet". I don't want to be a part of this crosstalk and have no idea about who is right and wrong but maybe it will come as a shock to Mr. Benjamin now if I say that one shouldn't trust things written on the internet. It's just not the most reliable place, you know. |
|
| Sep-11-07 | | Strongest Force: <cu8sfan> What is the beef between Joel and Sam all about? |
|
Sep-11-07
| | cu8sfan: <Strongest Force: <cu8sfan> What is the beef between Joel and Sam all about?> Well, as I said, I'm neither siding nor do I really know who's right and wrong. However, in NiC 2007/4 Joel Benjamin wrote about the US Championship (page 28ff, "Shaba to the Rescue!"). He wrote "... Anderson received much criticism from Sam Sloan, a Board member despite being a convicted felon..." In the newest issue of NiC, 2007/6, Sam Sloan wrote a letter to the editor, telling things from his point of view and demanding an apology from Benjamin. Benjamin replied in the same issue and his reply started with what I quoted earlier. |
|
| Sep-11-07 | | Strongest Force: I know both Joel and Sam fairly well. If one of them was pissed at the other and said something that sounded odd about the other, i wouldn't question it and i wouldn't believe that the oddity wasn't just based on junk from the internet. However, there's some serious freuds happening in NYC that are downright silly when you know how they started. |
|
Sep-11-07
| | cu8sfan: <However, there's some serious freuds happening in NYC that are downright silly when you know how they started.> Lol, not surprising for a city full with Sicilian blood. (-: Just to make this clear, my initial point was not "Joel Benjamin is wrong because he got his information from the internet", it was "If you want a really reliable source of information, don't go on the internet". |
|
| Sep-11-07 | | unsound: <However, there's some serious freuds happening in NYC that are downright silly when you know how they started.> That's a freudian slip. Thankyou, thankyou very much. |
|
| Sep-15-07 | | Cactus: Funny quote of the day! |
|
Dec-03-07
 | | ketchuplover: His "biography" has been released. |
|
| Dec-29-07 | | MrSpock: Overall record: Nigel Short beat Joel Benjamin 5 to 3, with 2 draws.*
Source: chessgames.com |
|
| Dec-29-07 | | MrSpock: Some Logs of the match Kasparow - Deep Blue: http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblu... |
|
| Jan-03-08 | | minasina: 'Rybka (Computer) vs Joel Benjamin II - Match at Draw Odds' (Jan-03-08 ... Jan-06-08)? http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybka... |
|
| Jan-04-08 | | timhortons: [Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2008.01.03"]
[Round "?"]
[White "GM_Benjamin"]
[Black "Rybka(C)"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2575"]
[Opening "Philidor: exchange variation"]
[ECO "C41"]
[NIC "KP.08"]
[Time "11:02:03"]
[TimeControl "7200+0"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Be7 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O c5 8.
Nf3 Nc6 9. Re1 Be6 10. b3 a6 11. Bb2 Re8 12. Bf1 d5 13. exd5 Nxd5 14. Nxd5
Qxd5 15. Qxd5 Bxd5 16. Rad1 Rad8 17. a3 Kf8 18. Bd3 g6 19. Kf1 b5 20. c4
bxc4 21. Bxc4 Bxc4+ 22. bxc4 Rxd1 23. Rxd1 Rb8 24. Rd2 f6 25. Rc2 Kf7 26.
Ke2 g5 27. h3 h5 28. Kd1 g4 29. hxg4 hxg4 30. Nh4 Bd6 31. Nf5 Be5 32. Kc1
Kg6 33. Ne3 Bf4 34. g3 Bxe3+ 35. fxe3 Ne5 36. Bxe5 fxe5 37. Rf2 Rb3 38. Kd2
Rxa3 39. Rf8 a5 40. Ke2 a4 41. Kf2 ♗lack wins 0-1
|
|
| Jan-04-08 | | timhortons: 
click for larger view |
|
| Jan-04-08 | | minasina: LIVE NOW! 'Rybka (Computer) vs Joel Benjamin II - Match at Draw Odds' (Jan-03-08 ... Jan-06-08) http://www.chessok.com/broadcast/li... Click on '2008', then 'Draw odd match' and 'Live' and 3rd game. |
|
| Jan-04-08 | | MichAdams: Not to be confused with Stuart Rachels. |
|
| Jan-04-08 | | Petrosianic: Not by anyone but you, apparently. (!?)
|
|
| Jan-04-08 | | capatal: http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybka... Different version of Rybka will play starting in game #3. |
|
| Jan-05-08 | | timhortons: 
click for larger view 3rd game of benjamin versus rybka match...position after 26....d4 27.Nxh6 sacking rybkas kingside...lolz...no respect to rybka at all...these sac well go down to history...lolz |
|
| Jan-05-08 | | timhortons: 
click for larger view <4th game benjamin versus rybka postion after 139 .Rb1 a draw here means won for benjamin...its a tie now for 2 loss and 2 draw...these game is a draw |
|
| Jan-06-08 | | timhortons: [Event "ICC 3 0"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.01.03"]
[Round "-"]
[White "timhortonsknigt"]
[Black "Great4Me"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ICCResult "Game drawn by repetition"]
[WhiteElo "1556"]
[BlackElo "2919"]
[Opening "Scotch game"]
[ECO "C45"]
[NIC "SO.05"]
[Time "05:36:30"]
[TimeControl "180+0"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Bc5 5. Be3 Qf6 6. c3 Nge7 7. Bc4 O-O
8. O-O d6 9. Re1 Ne5 10. Be2 Qg6 11. Bh5 Qf6 12. Be2 Qg6 13. Bh5 Qf6 14. Be2
Game drawn by repetition
1/2-1/2
<my drawn game with rybka at icc in 3 minute rated game..right in the opening she would lock in for a draw> |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
