chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

OhioChessFan
Member since Apr-09-05 · Last seen Nov-12-25
______________ Moves Prediction Contest

<Main Focus>: Predicting how many moves in a game for each pairing.

Chessgames.com tournament page:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Official site: http://

Live games:
http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/

Alternative live games: http://worldchess.com/broadcasts/eu...

***Hall of Fame***
chessmoron chessforum

<Format>:

[player]-[player] [result] [# of MOVES]

==4 Different Scoring Methods==

Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts])

Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts]

Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together]

1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker]

For example:

<Note: Participants 3, 4, and 5 are predicated on nobody scoring an exact as Participant 2 did. If someone hits an exact, the closest score under and over will score the points for second place.>

Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45

Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45
Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44
Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43
Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46

Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever

Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves #

Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves

Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves.

Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves.

Again, the description of Participant 3, 4, and 5 are based on there being no exact prediction as made by Participant 2.

<IF> there is an exact or an under closest, the highest scoring over participant will be 2nd over. The second closest over will be 3rd over. The <ONLY> time there will be a first over is if there is no exact or under winner.

Things To Look At:
1. Game Collection: 1975 World Junior chess championship
2. Ongoing edits Vladimir Ostrogsky
3. Bio Adolf Zytogorski
4. Complete the Olympiad
5. Bio Lorenz Maximilian Drabke

7. Baden-Baden (1870)

11. Karl Mayet
12. Smbat Lputian

Pi Day
rreusser/computing-with-the-bailey-borwein-plouffe-formula">https://observablehq.com/(at)rreusser/...

Pun Index Game Collection: Game of the Day & Puzzle of the Day Collections

>> Click here to see OhioChessFan's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 792 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   OhioChessFan has kibitzed 49347 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-12-25 J Bars vs M Hohlbein, 2024
 
OhioChessFan: Wow, what an amazing game to review.
 
   Nov-11-25 Morphy vs A Morphy, 1850
 
OhioChessFan: From 7 years ago, I stand corrected. 17...Kb1 18. 0-0 and White is crushing.
 
   Nov-11-25 Chessgames - Music
 
OhioChessFan: I promise you that you have nothing better to do for the next five minutes than to listen to this: Liszt-Liebestraum No. 3 in A Flat Performed by Rubinstein https://youtu.be/fwtIAzFMgeY?si=ebV...
 
   Nov-11-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: I guess I'm glad the Schumer Shutdown is over. I can't say it had any impact on my life.
 
   Nov-09-25 Fusilli chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: I found the source of a previous puzzle: https://youtu.be/3XkA2ZoVFQo?si=fGG...
 
   Nov-08-25 B Hague vs Plaskett, 2004 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Morra, Hague Convention, I like it.
 
   Nov-07-25 C Wells vs J Rush, 1963
 
OhioChessFan: "Fly-By Knight"
 
   Nov-07-25 K Hanache vs P Crocker, 2024
 
OhioChessFan: "Not Two Knights, I Have a Hanache"
 
   Nov-05-25 Niemann vs L Lodici, 2025 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: White has three Pawns for a poorly placed Knight. I'd rather have the Knight, but as of move 29, I don't see any particular plans for
 
   Nov-04-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Mike Royko was fantastic. Slats Grobnik was guaranteed to make me laugh myself silly.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Moves Prediction Contest

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-17-06  farrooj: Elvis, Bing Crosby, Groucho Marx and Charlie Chaplin :) (no?)
Aug-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I know Groucho died about the same time as Elvis. Drawing a blank on anyone else.
Aug-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Answer to puzzle of August 7:


click for larger view

By Prokes: White to play and win.

1 Bd5 Ke2 2 e4 Ke3 3 e5 Kd4 4 e6 Kxd5 5 e7 h2 6 e8=Q h1=Q 7 Qa8+

Aug-17-06  YouRang: <farrooj> Correct!! Very impressive! :-)

Other entertainment notables that died in '77:
- Freddie Prinze, Jan 29
- Joan Crawford, May 10
- Ethel Waters, Sep 1

Aug-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Another puzzle by Ladislav Prokes


click for larger view

White to play and draw.

Aug-17-06  YouRang: <OhioChessFan> Looks like: 1. Nd4 Rd8
2. Kg2! (clearance/blocking move)

If 2...Rxd8, then 3. Nf3+ Kg4 4. Ne5+ winning the rook.

Aug-18-06  brankat: <OhioChessFan> I've been a CG.com member for 10 months now, and only today did I find out about L.Stumpers page :-) Impressive! Congratulations. Out of curiosity, where do You get all that stuff? Do You "invent" it, collect it? Keep up the good work!
Aug-18-06  dakgootje: <brankat>Your kidding right? Ah, nah, you probably aren't...
Aug-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Well done, <YouRang> Sort of unusual that the second move is the stunner. <brankat> I don't remember how I found the Stumpers page. When I got there, a couple posts had commented about whether he wrote chess problems. I decided it would be a good place to post some fun things. I started out using only the silly rhetorical questions normally called "imponderables". I have googled "brain teasers" to find most of the Stumpers.
Aug-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: My thoughts on computers having opening books: Way back when, when computers were really awful, the best chess players suffered under the delusion that the computers would never be competitive with them. They were so awful that the programmers used opening books just to get a game going beyond a few moves. The humans agreed, for the same reason. But nobody ever considered whether that was a "fair" thing to do. Since the humans were so much better, it really didn't matter. So the idea of a computer having an opening book was the generally accepted state of affairs without much thought being given to its propriety. Fast forward to the 90's, and the computers were incredibly improved, and challenging the very best of the human world. There was already a historical basis for the computers having an opening book, although there was no philosophical basis. I think it's time to consider the question anew. I am firmly opposed to computers having an opening book for one specific reason. I think it's accurate to define a game of chess as a contest made by 2 individuals making decisions. Each decides what piece to move, where, when. An opening book eliminates the choice from the computer. The computer is not playing chess in the sense of making decisions while in its opening book. There would be absolutely no difference in a GM sitting there with a copy of ECO and making the moves while the computer was turned off. One other reason I oppose opening books is that they are at odds with what people normally think of if you describe a computer "playing chess". I have run into a number of casual chess players who express surprise when they find out the computers are not making the decisions in openings. The average nonchess player surely has the idea that the computer is sitting there, calculating, and DECIDING what moves to play, the whole game. That is still how I perceive a computer playing the game of chess. With opening books and end game databases, I think computers play a pretty good game of something very similar to chess, but not chess itself.
Aug-18-06  YouRang: <OhioChessFan> To clarify, do you oppose the use (by computers) of opening books in general, or only opening books developed by humans?

Put another way, would you allow computers to use opening books that were developed by computers?

Aug-19-06  JoeWms: You posted a nice evolutionary account.

<Way back when ...>

My "remembery" flashed back to a late 70's portable player, the "Boris." It was more toy than player. It had about eight silly non sequiturs it displayed in clumsy dot-matrix letters. "Are you rated?" "You can't be serious!" It had a "book" of sorts -- three or four moves. I was a D player and I usually beat it. After a month of boring chess I handed it off to a neighbor kid.

<...when computers were really awful.>

Aug-19-06  brankat: This contraption would now be worth a fortune in an Antique shop. Just like in a Chess game one needs to plan way ahead :-) I wish I could listen to my own advice.
Aug-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I have heard that 8 track tapes will be the next rage in retro valuables. The problem is that I am still listening to them.
Aug-19-06  Dozy: <JoeWms> <My "remembery" flashed back to a late 70's portable player, the "Boris." It was more toy than player...>

About the same time as that, Joe, I taught a kid to play chess and his proud poppa bought him a chess computer. They were very keen for me to play it but I kept declining until one night they invited me home for dinner. Once they had me in the house there was no escape and I had to play the thing.

I don't know what they were expecting, but it had been programmed with a plaintive, shrill female voice that could say, "I lose" over and over, ad infinitum. I wouldn't let them turn it off but, at least, they didn't ask me to play the thing again!

Aug-19-06  Dozy: Hi <Ohio> sometimes it takes me longer than others to get around to things but I did listen when you told me about Yogi Berra and Joe Garagiola. I've just added a few paragraphs about Joe to my Yogi Berra chess story.

You made one of Yogi's comments ("I didn't say all the things I said") a lot easier to understand.

You can find the correction at http://www.rootyhillchess.org/yogi.... if you want to see it.

Thanks again...

Aug-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <So, if Yogi didn't say the things he said, who was responsible? Take a bow Joe Garagiola. He and Yogi remained firm friends but it was Joe who invented all those Yogi-isms that have become such a fun part of the language. >

<Dozy> Joe Garagiola didn't invent them so much as attribute those already existent sayings to Yogi. That's a very interesting site. The Alekhine story is especially amusing.

Aug-21-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I did have <Twinlark> on ignore. I don't recall why, so I figured it wasn't a big deal and have now removed him from the ignore list. Not sure why my mention of it doesn't show up on <JoeWms> forum, but that's fine.
Aug-22-06  twinlark: I was curious mainly. I couldn't think what happened and trawling through the last month or two of old posts didn't show any clues. Anyway, glad it wasn't a big deal. :)
Aug-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Answer to puzzle of August 17:


click for larger view

White to play and draw.

1 Nd4 Rd8 2 Kg2 Rxd7 3 Nf3+ Kg4 4 Ne5+
If 2...Kg4 3. Nc6 Rxd7 4. Ne5+

Aug-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <8 track tapes > one fun thing i loved to do with record players and spool decks is to play the songs at half or twice the speed.. hehehehe it could make reba mcintyre sound like Jim Reeves or Tex Ritter sound like the Chipmunks...
Aug-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: An amazing problem:


click for larger view

D. Joseph. White to play and win.

Aug-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I see 1. bxa6 then the white h-pawn would be able to Queen first.
Aug-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: 1. bxa6 b5 and eventually Black wins with Qb8+ Interesting line that wasn't part of the solution so I had to work it out. You are on the right track with the Queens on a1 and h8.
Aug-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Hints to puzzle of August 22 **

** **

** **

I'll help the puzzle along by pointing out that h4 doesn't work, because of axb5 and the Black Pawn queens off the a1-h8 diagonal, on b1. Any King move loses because the a Pawn gets to a1 before the h Pawn gets to h8. bxa6 has been shown to lose. That leaves White with a first move of b6+.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 849)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC