chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Garry Kasparov vs Andre Galle
"My Kind A Galle" (game of the day Sep-11-2015)
World Championship (U17) (1976), Wattignies FRA, rd 2, Jul-??
French Defense: Tarrasch. Closed Variation (C05)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2,465 more games of Kasparov
sac: 29.Rxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-13-05  EnglishOpeningc4: Wonderful endgame play
Aug-28-15  kamagong24: like Alekhine...
Sep-11-15  SimplicityRichard: Kasparov adopts a Capablanca-like philosophy ie. playing the opening and middlegame with the endgame in mind. Simple and elegant!#
Sep-11-15  Paarhufer: Pretty boring.
Sep-11-15  nalinw: At age 13!
Sep-11-15  Abdel Irada: People often find "boring" what they do not understand.

Sep-11-15  bengalcat47: I have to disagree with Paarhufer's remark about the game being boring. This is an impressive endgame win for Kasparov. Many of the great masters have produced wins not with flashy and wild mating attacks but rather precise endgame play!
Sep-11-15  pedro99: Sorry but I agree with Paarhufer. But for the historical interest in Kasparov as a teenager it is low quality chess. The opening was weak. If your opponent riddles himself with weak pawns you don't need to sac pieces. K showed good control in the endgame though.
Sep-11-15  morfishine: A complete waste of time
Sep-11-15  Paarhufer: <Abdel Irada: People often find "boring" what they do not understand.> Very charming!

But you are possibly right! There could have been interesting moments, if the Black player would have tried to fight, say 22.. ♖d5!.


click for larger view

The rook ending after 23.bxc6 ♖xc5 is surely drawn, and 23.♖c1 ♘d4 wins the b-pawn. So, White can try 23.♘xe6 ♖xb5, but this is probably hard to win, because the a-pawn looks very weak.

Sep-11-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: I agree with <Paarhufer> that after 22...Rd5 it looks quite drawish.

And I don't really find the endgame particularly instructive or exemplary.

All in all, this is one more example of a regular game that made it to GOTD solely because the name of one of the players lends itself to word play. Whoever proposed the pun probably found the player Andre Galle and looked for his most famous rival--it was a no brainer.

There is even no reason why this pun should be for a Galle loss as opposed to a win. This pun thing has to go. It makes a few people have some fun while the rest of us look at a game that is often a shot in the dark as far as quality goes. (Most of the time I don't even bother.)

Sep-11-15  kevin86: White's outside passed pawn cooks black.
Sep-11-15  morfishine: <Fusilli> Of course, you are absolutely right...but you are too good for this...They just don't listen to suggestions

*****

Sep-11-15  The Kings Domain: Amusing pun, but a bit on the icky side. :-)

Fine game by the youthful Kasparov. The fire isn't there yet, but the ability to spot the advantage and make use of it is in place.

Sep-11-15  Dr. Overlord: Outrageous pun. The blatant sexism is offending politically correct, sensitive souls everywhere.

I waited for <morphinist> to blow the whistle, but he's getting soft.

I had to step up and do it.

Sep-11-15  dark.horse: When I first heard about remoter passed pawns, I wondered what pawns had to do with motors.
Sep-11-15  rickycota: Game of the day? Really? Very simple, Kasparov wins a pawn, exchanges everything, gets a passed pawn on the A file against pawns on the other side of the board and that´s it.

It´s a nice game, but not game of the day quality. There´s a lot more interesting games.

Sep-12-15  Dr. Overlord: <rickycoyota: It´s a nice game, but not game of the day quality. There´s a lot more interesting games.>

Yes, indeed. How that nice mr. Freeman fellow had the Galle to put this game up as GOTD is beyond me.

Sep-12-15  TheFocus: Any talented teen could have played this game.

Not really impressive.

Sep-12-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <rickycota: ... It´s a nice game, but not game of the day quality.>

There is no requirement that the GOTD is of good quality. All that is needed is to produce a pun, 90% of the time based on the last name of one of the players. I suspect whoever proposed the pun didn't even look at the game. That's why the pun thing needs to go.

Sep-12-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: It's one for the coaches looking for an example of the strength of an outside passer, the ability to visualise and trade down to a simple win.

from here....


click for larger view

....to here.


click for larger view

I'd have no qualms about using this in a beginners primer.

Game of the day?

If it helps drive home some lesson a pupil will never forget then it's perfect for a one in 365 slot.

Puns:

They could have gone here:

A Galle vs M Lacrosse, 2007

and taxed their brains with 'A girl plays Lacrosse.'

Jun-14-16  MrJafari: Powerful visualisation of Kasparov...
Apr-05-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  master8ch: 27.Rd6+ Ke8 28.a4 looks easier.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC