Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Wolfgang Uhlmann vs Heinz Liebert
"Liebertarian" (game of the day Jul-07-2013)
It (1976)
English Opening: Symmetrical. Rubinstein Variation (A34)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 23 times; par: 37 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Uhlmann/H Liebert games
sac: 25...Rxd2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-22-03  FeArMySkiLLz: <Bears092> Its was a people make All the time
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: <FeArMySkiLLz>: I don't believe that 27.Qxe2 was a mistake. Uhlman almost certainly saw what was coming, but he was lost anyway (e.g. 27.h4 Nh3+ 28.Kh2 Qxf1 29.f3 Bxf3) and decided upon what he thought was an artistic finish.

<Bears092: "How can allowing your opponent to mate while down down the exchange and a queen undermine the beauty? Sheer madness.">

The ALLOWING is what undermines the beauty. Surely a forcing combination is, all other things being equal, far more beautiful than a sequence that isn't forced. As it stands the game ends with White PURPOSELY making the WORST move available (27.Qxe2), because it leads to a prettier finish than a better, but nonetheless losing move like 27.h4. What undermines the beauty is the precise fact that 27.Qxe2 is bad and unnecessary. This is why White should have just resigned.

And how can resigning in a position in which the opponent's Queen and Knight are hanging not be beautiful? Sheer madness.

Premium Chessgames Member
  thesonicvision: that's genius.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dick Brain: This problem isn't too tough if they tell you white to play and win. I'd miss it otherwise though.
Nov-22-03  dalilama: yea dick brain, it was so easy to see whites win here right? I mean just look at how white dominates the game...
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Sudden death
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dick Brain: Ah dalilama yeah I meant black to play and win. That would be even better.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Catfriend: <Eggman> Surely a quiet, non-forced move that wins 100% nontheless is better than a forced one-lined attack!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Catfriend: <IMO> at least of course.. And if you"ll remember Taimanov vs Petrosian, 1953 ,♔f2!! is extremely appealing, isn't it?
May-14-09  WhiteRook48: 27 Qxe2?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Wyatt Gwyon: Black's 25th move would make a nice Wednesday or Thursday puzzle. Nice combo.
Jul-07-13  wingpawn: Wow! White pieces never came out on time to do anything meaningful - especially his c1-Bishop. This attack was classy, though it was provoked by pointless White maneuvers starting with 7. ♕a4?. The final position reminds me of another brilliant game: Kotronias vs D King, 1990
Jul-07-13  erimiro1: <aulero: Liebert played like Morphy> Yes indeed. Amazing how Uhlmann was paralyzed in most of the game. It seems that the concept of the pressure on c5 pawn, using the bishop on g2 as an X-RAY weapon was a result of a misjudgement. 10. b4 was horrible, and the white queen started to tour the world, while the black bishops started to show their power. Great game.
Jul-07-13  moi: <drunkenknight> 16 Qxb8 ? Bb7 17 Qxf8+ Kxf8 because black has a huge attack against the white king (bishop+queen battery, black bishop and the f,g and h pawns!)
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Libertarian:

1. a person who advocates liberty, especially with regard to thought or conduct

2. a person who maintains the doctrine of free will

Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: The idea that Uhlmann deliberately allowed his opponent to finish with a pretty mate doesn't really ring true. I've been an Uhlmann fan for years -- I got my basic French + English repertoire from him -- and he was always a tough competitor. I suspect that he was concentrating on the danger of ...Nf3+ and simply missed the mate on h3.

Incidentally, the strongest reply to 27.h4 is ...Nf3+.

Jul-07-13  vsiva1: clean hole for Black's queen-bishop to attack White's King is a issue when White losses his king-bishop. It requires extra efforts as I have faced in my games. Whole issue is this, through attacking Rook, then making white to loose his king-bishop and finally winning.
Jul-07-13  backrank: Another rather unknown old favorite of mine, which now finally has become GOTD.
Jul-07-13  Abdel Irada: In which a bottle of ketchup thrashes a gang of wolves. ;-)

Incidentally, I disagree with <Domdaniel>. Allowing so simple a mate strikes me as a way of resigning in a hopeless position while allowing one's opponent the glory of a pretty combination. Surely so strong a player is unlikely simply to have overlooked it.

In a G/90 game against a 2150ish player 14 years ago, much the same situation arose. I don't think my opponent overlooked the mate (which used exactly the same mating pattern); he allowed it to happen because the alternative was mere torture.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: Anyone ever ask Uhlmann whether he allowed himself to be mated deliberately? Even world champions have been to overlook mates in one.
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Yeah, Kramnik's loss to Deep Fritz came to mind. I could miss this once since I have a strange blindness sometimes to pieces a long way from the action, and could just forget about the a8 Bishop over in another county.
Jul-08-13  Abdel Irada: <the a8 Bishop over in another county.>

That bishop, staring balefully across the county line, could never have left Uhlmann's mind in such a situation. I suppose it's conceivable that he focused so intently on the ...Nf3 threat that he forgot that the knight could also go to h3, but this too seems unlikely.

To me his move spoke in clear tones of the old sportsmanship, most prevalent in the 19th century, when players who found themselves lost after a brilliancy would on purpose permit the intended victory in its most dramatic and picturesque form as a sort of tribute to their opponent's ingenuity: a matter of noblesse oblige.

That, at least, is what I like to think Uhlmann did here.

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White has gained a queen...oops!
Mar-25-17  bkpov: What about 27. f3
Aug-12-17  ALKINAN: < bkpov: What about 27. f3> you cant See Nh3+ Qxf1+ Nf2#
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
25) . . . Black to move
from Wednesday by Arcturus
from Checkmates 19+ by fredthebear
Nice end!!
from Stunners by Trigonometrist
Game 204 in Chess Informant Best Games 201-300
from PM Joins the Under 30 Crowd@Fredthebear's Place by fredthebear
Nice end!!
from Stunners by xajik
Volume 21 - 4th Place - 42 pts.
from Chess Informant: 640 Best Games - Part 3 by TheAlchemist
by obrit
apexin's favorite games
by apexin
Chess Informant Best Games 2
by koinonia
DrChopper's good games 3
by DrChopper
The long diagonal
by beatgiant
Ok, take the Q if that makes you happy.
from Web of Deceit by sevenseaman
Chess Informant Best Games 2
by Olanovich
Black to play after 25. Qe3
from's Daily Puzzles by Minor Piece Activity
Rook Sacrifice for Checkmate
from Teaching Moments in Chess by kdogphs
sudden death
from kevin86's favorite games by kevin86
Attacking the King and the Kings of the attack.
by syracrophy
from Checkmates 18+ by Kasputin

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC