Why differ at all? It is 'European Team Championship (Women) (2021)', case closed.

That's (just) for looking up the tournament here and the consecutive naming represented exactly that; not so much a marketing title (taken on third party platforms), nor anything that 'breaks' the very own CG template for this event for years.

European Team Championship (Women) (2019)

European Team Championship (Women) (2017)

European Team Championship (Women) (2015)

European Team Championship (Women) (2013)

Unrelated

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4o...

<Tab> I let <Caisso> know of your request. He will be handling all tasks related to events(minus live events):
- Creating Event
- Adding games to event
- Adding event to "New Events" section
- etc...

With time, I'm sure he will. The events should be up-to-date now.

<Stephen> That is fabulous news.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che...

Here's another example which lays clear the problem:

Leonhardt vs F Brown, 1904

Trying to upload a photo of Alexander Eltsov and I keep getting:

<Service Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

Apache/2.4.41 (Ubuntu) Server atwww.chessgames.com Port 443>

<MissScarlett>

This information on "fair use" should be in play for us, I believe. Especially if you include the name of the actual copyright holder, or at least the source of the photo, in a caption under the photo. This is a feature <Stephen> has included in the new service.

https://www.multiplechronicconditio...

Requested 1 hour (240 fuel) analysis of this position:

Opening Explorer

My <RECENT ANALYSES> page shows the request with a <1.0 hour evaluation.>:

★ Requested 2021-11-19 09:33:32.
[ view in the Opening Explorer ]
1.0 hour evaluation.

When you actually look at the analysis, it only gives this

<1) +0.38 (27 ply) 8...Nc5 9.Qc2 >

and at the bottom of the page shows
only <1.0 minute analysis by Stockfish 11 v064> 1 minute of evaluation.

'This information on "fair use" should be in play for us, I believe.'

CG.com (Chessgames Services LLC, guess the C) is equated to a scholar legal body now? Paying premium fees will enable me to become a state-certified 'historian'? Here I'm fairly certain to assume you are joking, right?

Had high hopes that would be it for the weekend (tried to check on updates considering the code base and upcoming world championship) instead it escalated quickly:

'Trying to upload a photo of Alexander Eltsov ...'

'<Stephen> Yes photo now uploading fine, thank you!'

Not fine at all.

You did not label (until the time of this writing) the image (why) and it's not even the player in question far from it. Any idea how this can happen -- kind of speculative on my part to assume you had no clue what you were doing (no Russian language skills, not checking dates/calendar related witchcraft, not paying attention to any context)?

Assuming (from your modus operandi in the past) you basically just looked up the copied Cyrilic name given in the Russian wiki (by the way an entry that has no image of him) from the existing CG bio. Then went straight to the image search portion of your preferred search site (in this case Google). Blind picked the first hit (comparing the image files one on one) and uploaded it again without labeling or giving any credits. Already very dramatic long 2-3 minutes have past for all of this - depending on your upload speed. Important spending at least ten times more networking to tell everyone (at least one admin forum) unasked of your 'hard work' and suffering. Fine with me, as long as there is no damage done to the database everyone is entitled to use the site to their weird best interests.

Explain

https://soldat.moypolk.ru/soldier/e...

(in Russian)

Take all this as education free of charge. Would be great to see (far) better work ethics especially with such delicate (you need a professional to decide each case, no amateurs; Alan McGowan, no alias, author/publisher himself as possible exception - would be interesting to hear who had the last say on his own works before they get launched) features in the future.

There were good (avoiding expensive) reasons all public uploads had to pass the very owner's desk first in the past 15+ years. No serious online outlet will voluntarily allows bored randoms to put their business in jeopardy for a cheap devil's bargain to save some minutes per workday in exchange for content stikes fought on US soil.

That's too deep of a sac and hopefully calculated to the end. I doubt a lot of thought was 'wasted' on this decision anyways

'.. it's a great new feature and I hope it continues on eh.'

Peak CG, the only one smelling danger/showing a backbone (in written form, on several other features he also gave glipses of becoming serious between the lines) is MS (all while having fun using a community feature for his personal leisure). Truely enviable mindset by everyone else involved.

Unrelated

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b7...

<Stephen>

I wish you guys would finally fix <Olga> so that it can read the basic script conventions of annotations. For example, <pgn4web> can perfectly display the annotations to the following game, but as usual <Olga> makes a hash of it. Why is <Olga> still the default viewer when even the developers themselves have abandoned their own project?

<Olga> cannot display the basic annotation script here, but <pgn4web> can: S Kotlerman vs Bronstein, 1939

And someone should learn JFQ -- who has slandered the developer of Olga publicly several times by now, better manners and a basic understanding of the PGN format. Many tried, nobody succeeded for years.

Instead of 'complaining' about the viewer and even more a formerly hired freelance developer how about you cleaning your friggin gamescores directly copied from Rubase beforehand?

Then it's always the others, not the person who is totally overstrained with the tasks at hand.

'The default <Olga> viewer is a gigantic piece of bloated crap code that is incapable of doing the job.'

S Kotlerman vs Bronstein, 1939

The only one incapable of doing the job -- in this case maintaining PGNs on a chess website is you. Kids in my club spotted the 'problem' while copying their own games into our database. And as someone who has never ever written a single line of code or ever worked in the field I find it very tiresome to have you commenting on 'bloated code'. Copying left, right and center all day long taking merrits of the authors without consent and then have the guts to trashtalk e.g. an former employee of CG.com. Someone you had no problem smear huge amounts of honey around his mouth as long as he had a position of 'power' (similar to 'Steve' who will have a great time and honor reading about your verdict of his work here someday).

If you have a personal problem with 'Olga Man' (this is maybe the fifth malice posting about him) why not try to contact him in person talking to his face? I am sure you will be able to 'Google search' his whereabouts. Well I just did, while considering myself not half the 'genius' you're painting yourself. He has a real name out there and is trying to make a living in a field where reputation is key. Your stupid comments on a public forum high in the rankings will make his work (possible income) worse in the near future.

Are you capable of understanding the severity of the consequences or do you even care (making others miserable)?

@Tab

I briefly checked the player's his short life and career as outstanding (several good placings) youth player and for now will follow his wiki '64 — шахматно-шашечная газета' magazins a starting point for better results. No time going through military records, local papers, russian forums or such to get the full 'picture' about this young man.

Maybe JFQ can help you out? In the meantime the pic is still up, indicating she is very busy 'working hard' while making this database better, not worse.

Always eager to learn the in and outs of the proper streamlined two word Google search -- no additional operators, in the hands of such a talented data harvester.

But first the queen wants her wish ('decoy') to be granted, coming up with non existing urgent priorities. Mere mortals back in line, please :-)

Unrelated

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W03...

(quality of a simple search, first hit - amazing)