chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Siegbert Tarrasch vs Fred Dewhirst Yates
"Pride and Prejudice" (game of the day Nov-25-2011)
Hamburg (1910), Hamburg GER, rd 14, Aug-03
Queen Pawn Game: Symmetrical Variation (D02)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 6 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Tarrasch/Yates games
sac: 19...Nxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-18-06  Resignation Trap: According to Thomas F Lawrence this game was "a credit to British Chess." It gave particular satisfaction at the time, as Dr. Tarrasch had adversely criticised the inclusion of the youthful Yates in the Hamburg tournament.
Jan-26-09  WhiteRook48: Tarrasch got Tharrasched
May-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I ran it through Fritz and he says 19...Rc1 is the blunder. Rd1 or Nf3 is much better. Ashamed to say it took me a while to figure out why. 22..f4 is much better for Black. 23. Rc2 holds on a little longer for White.
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Puzzled by the pun?

This was Yates' first important international tournament. Tarrasch had objected to his inclusion, feeling he wasn't strong enough for the event.

Objectively, Tarrasch was probably right. Yates finished dead last by 2.5 points and won only one game.

This one.

Nov-25-11  sevenseaman: Looks like Yates showed enough pride to put Tarrasch's prejudice in perspective.

Good enough to beat the strongest player. Yates has indeed scalped some marquee names.

Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Well, <sevenseaman>, Yates was one of those erratic ones; his opponents always had to cross their fingers and hope he would not have one of his "best-player-on-the-planet-for-the-next-six-hours- " days.
Nov-25-11  PaulLovric: <Benzol> Tarrasch seems behind very early and gets constantly smashed by Yates in every move, like a boss
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  piltdown man: He was a great player on his day, Mr Yates. But very inconsistent.
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: 17.Qa1 looks like a Reti-type move. It didn't work out too well, although White would still have been OK if he'd played something stronger on move 19.
Nov-25-11  Llawdogg: Wow! Beautiful knight sacrifice!
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Great idea to sac the ♘. Looks like white is going to lose a piece. The bishop is attacked 3 times and only defended twice. If 34.♔c3 then 34...♗xd4+ 35.♔b4 ♗xa1 36.♖xe4 g5 is winning.


click for larger view

Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: The Doctor liked it to talk pretty big.
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: If you're not familiar with Yates' chess, you <MUST> look at this game, and I do mean <MUST>:

Alekhine vs Yates, 1923

Nov-25-11  Pepperpot: I'm having a hard time picturing <Tarrasch> as <Mr Darcy>, let alone <Yates> as <Elizabeth Bennet>; this is wrong on so many levels.
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <Phony Benoni:> Thats amazing. How do you know these things?
Nov-26-11  Pepperpot: When asked his opinion of <Yates>'s chess, <Tarrasch> returned, <Barely tolerable.>
Nov-26-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <HeMateMe: Phony Benoni: Thats amazing. How do you know these things?>

I'm old.

Nov-26-11  King Death: < Phony Benoni: <HeMateMe: Phony Benoni: Thats amazing. How do you know these things?> I'm old.>

That's good. I'll have to remember it.

Nov-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The bishop will go-but black must beware of 34 ♖c8?! ♕xd4+?? 35 ♕xd4 and wins!!
Dec-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Tarrasch's Reti-like setup with 19.Rc1 would not be so bad if it would not have a big tactical hole in 19...Nxe3! On the other hand, Yates missed immediate win after 22...f4!
Dec-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: But Tarrasch also played some very beautiful combinations, and some great chess games. I played 100 of his ages over. They are some of the best by a Master I have ever played over. I preferred them to Alekhine's games. In fact I thought his play was better than Alekhine's (overall). In his time, at his best he was the best player (as far as is known).

But Yates also, at his best played some nice combinational games it seems!

Jun-20-13  Monocle: Funny how often this story recurs in chess history - a player objects to the inclusion of another in a tournament, on the grounds of playing strength, and then proceeds to lose against the supposedly weak player they objected to. Tarrasch and Yates, Bernstein and Capablanca, Becker and Menchik... I wonder how many other examples there are.
Jun-21-13  RookFile: Why would you object to a weaker player anyway? I would like the idea of fresh meat, an easy point, if that was the reality.
Jun-22-13  Monocle: The trouble with the idea of it being an easy point, is that all the other players get the easy point as well, so it doesn't affect the tournament standings and really all you've done is wasted a day. Chess takes a lot of energy, so who wants to waste energy on a weak player when they need all their energy to somehow squeeze an extra half-point out of Schlecter in the next round?
Sep-11-18  Howard: Good point! On the other hand, some players may argue that having an "easy point" can be the rough equivalent of a rest day.

One of the most blatant examples I've ever seen of an "easy point" was Sharizi (sp) being in the 1984 US championship. Out of 17 games, he drew but ONE! And Peters beat him in just five moves!!!

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
harika oyunlar
by levent71
Tarrasch didn't want him to participate - here's the reason
from Frederick Dewhurst Yates - Remarkable games by Nimzophile
More favorite games
by Fluxcapacitor
#198 - Yates defeats critic
from "Wonders and Curiosities of Chess" - Pt 1 by GrahamClayton
[Game 26] Remarkable Games and Their Stories, p. 115
from The Fireside Book of Chess by Phony Benoni
November 25: Pride and Prejudice
from Game of the Day 2011 by Phony Benoni
Game 84
from Wonders and Curiosities of Chess (Chernev) by Qindarka
One-Hundred-and-One of my Best Games of Chess
by Resignation Trap
yatutahtetam's favorite games
by yatutahtetam
Las Mil y Una Partidas (1001 Chess Games)
by K9Empress
PRiDe & PReJuDiCe
from ViGHeNZ #a by ViGHeNZ
Tarrasch didn't want him to participate - here's the reason
from Frederick Dewhurst Yates - Remarkable games by Karpova


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC