chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Chessable Masters (2020)

  PARTICIPANTS (sorted by highest achieved rating; click on name to see player's games)
Magnus Carlsen, Fabiano Caruana, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, Hikaru Nakamura, Ding Liren, Alexander Grischuk, Anish Giri, Teimour Radjabov, Ian Nepomniachtchi, Pentala Harikrishna, Vladislav Artemiev, Daniil Dubov

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Chessable Masters (2020)

The Chessable Masters was a 12-player online super-tournament taking place on chess24 from 20 June to 4 July 2020, with a rest day on 24 June. The 3rd event in the $1 million Magnus Carlsen Tour, it had a $150,000 prize fund with $45,000 for 1st place. The winner would qualify for the $300,000 Grand Final in August. The event featured the world’s top six players, eight of the top 10 players, six of the World Championship candidates (plus Radjabov), Lindores Abbey Rapid Challenge (2020) finalists Dubov and Nakamura, and Tour debutants Harikrishna and Artemiev. In the preliminary round robin stage (20-23 June) the Group A and Group B players played each other twice in Rapid chess, with the Top 4 in each group going forward to the knockout stage. Tie break: 1) direct encounter, 2) number of wins, 3) Sonneborn-Berger score, 4) Koya coefficient. Time control: 15 minutes for all moves, with 10 seconds added per move from move 1. No draw offers allowed before move 40. The tournament was sponsored by chessable.com. Chief arbiter: Panagiotis Nikolopoulos.

After four days, Dubov, Harikrishna, Radjabov and Vachier-Lagrave were eliminated from the competition:

Group A (20 & 22 June) Group B (21 & 23 June) 01 02 03 04 05 06 Pts 01 02 03 04 05 06 Pts 1 Carlsen ** ½½ ½1 ½½ 01 1½ 6 Giri ** ½1 ½½ 1½ ½½ ½½ 6 2 Artemiev ½½ ** ½½ ½½ 10 11 6 Ding Liren ½0 ** ½1 ½½ ½½ ½1 5½ 3 Nakamura ½0 ½½ ** ½½ ½1 ½½ 5 Nepomniachtchi ½½ ½0 ** 01 1½ ½1 5½ 4 Grischuk ½½ ½½ ½½ ** ½½ 01 5 Caruana 0½ ½½ 10 ** 1½ 01 5 5 Dubov 10 01 ½0 ½½ ** 1½ 5 Radjabov ½½ ½½ 0½ 0½ ** ½1 4½ 6 Harikrishna 0½ 00 ½½ 10 0½ ** 3 Vachier-Lagrave ½½ ½0 ½0 10 ½0 ** 3½

In the knockout stage each match consisted of up to three mini-matches, and the winner of two such would advance. The mini-matches consisted of four 15 + 10 Rapid games, and if necessary two 5 + 3 Blitz tiebreak games, and if still necessary an Armageddon game where White had 5 minutes to Black's 4 but a draw counted as a win for Black. Magnus Carlsen won the event by beating Giri in the two first mini-matches of the final:

Quarterfinals 25-29 June Semifinals 30 June - 2 July Final 3-4 July

Carlsen 11½- -- - / ½11- -- - / ---- -- - 2 Caruana 00½- -- - / ½00- -- - / ---- -- - 0 Carlsen 10½½ ½1 - / 1½1- -- - / ---- -- - 2 Ding Liren 01½½ ½0 - / 0½0- -- - / ---- -- - 0 Ding Liren ½1½½ -- - / ½0½1 10 0 / ½11- -- - 2 Nakamura ½0½½ -- - / ½1½0 01 1 / ½00- -- - 1 Carlsen ½1½0 ½1 - / 1½½½ -- - 2 Giri ½0½1 ½0 - / 0½½½ -- - 0 Giri ½½½½ ½½ 1 / ½1½1 -- - / ---- -- - 2 Grischuk ½½½½ ½½ 0 / ½0½0 -- - / ---- -- - 0 Giri ½1½1 -- - / ½0½½ -- - / 01½½ ½1 - 2 Nepomniachtchi ½0½0 -- - / ½1½½ -- - / 10½½ ½0 - 1 Nepomniachtchi 1½1- -- - / ½11- -- - / ---- -- - 2 Artemiev 0½0- -- - / ½00- -- - / ---- -- - 0

Official site: https://explore.chess24.com/tour/ch...
Regulations: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/...
Chess-Results: http://chess-results.com/tnr529081....
Chess.com: https://www.chess.com/news/view/car...
ChessBase: https://en.chessbase.com/post/magnu...
chess24: https://chess24.com/en/read/news/wo...
Chess24: https://chess24.com/en/watch/live-t...
chess24: https://chess24.com/en/watch/live-t...
chess24: https://chess24.com/en/watch/live-t...
TWIC: https://theweekinchess.com/chessnew...
Wikipedia article: Chessable Masters

Previous Magnus Carlsen Chess Tour event: Lindores Abbey Rapid Challenge (2020). Next: Legends of Chess (2020)

 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 126  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. V Artemiev vs Harikrishna 1-0402020Chessable MastersA33 English, Symmetrical
2. Dubov vs Grischuk  ½-½422020Chessable MastersD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
3. Nakamura vs Carlsen  ½-½732020Chessable MastersB30 Sicilian
4. Harikrishna vs Carlsen 0-1852020Chessable MastersB33 Sicilian
5. Grischuk vs Nakamura  ½-½362020Chessable MastersC67 Ruy Lopez
6. V Artemiev vs Dubov 1-0302020Chessable MastersD02 Queen's Pawn Game
7. Dubov vs Harikrishna  1-0602020Chessable MastersE15 Queen's Indian
8. Nakamura vs V Artemiev  ½-½152020Chessable MastersD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
9. Carlsen vs Grischuk  ½-½542020Chessable MastersE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
10. Nakamura vs Harikrishna  ½-½602020Chessable MastersA07 King's Indian Attack
11. Carlsen vs Dubov 0-1462020Chessable MastersA46 Queen's Pawn Game
12. Grischuk vs V Artemiev  ½-½462020Chessable MastersD52 Queen's Gambit Declined
13. Harikrishna vs Grischuk 1-0282020Chessable MastersC53 Giuoco Piano
14. V Artemiev vs Carlsen  ½-½782020Chessable MastersA06 Reti Opening
15. Dubov vs Nakamura  ½-½442020Chessable MastersE06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
16. Caruana vs Ding Liren ½-½442020Chessable MastersE46 Nimzo-Indian
17. Nepomniachtchi vs Radjabov 1-0572020Chessable MastersE17 Queen's Indian
18. Vachier-Lagrave vs Giri  ½-½322020Chessable MastersA02 Bird's Opening
19. Ding Liren vs Giri  ½-½372020Chessable MastersA20 English
20. Radjabov vs Vachier-Lagrave  ½-½602020Chessable MastersD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
21. Caruana vs Nepomniachtchi 1-0642020Chessable MastersA22 English
22. Nepomniachtchi vs Ding Liren  ½-½472020Chessable MastersD39 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin, Vienna Variation
23. Vachier-Lagrave vs Caruana 1-0502020Chessable MastersD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
24. Giri vs Radjabov  ½-½452020Chessable MastersA90 Dutch
25. Vachier-Lagrave vs Ding Liren  ½-½542020Chessable MastersA20 English
 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 126  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-10-20  Pedro Fernandez: My dear <Aylerkupp>, of course I'm very content with Nana. Indeed she does not know all of my personal decisions, even Andreína. But look at this: Incompetence, corruption including the military high command, support for drug trafficking and terrorism, crime, communism, the presence of the Cuban, Russian and Iranian military and immense Russian military aircrafts, at the cost of the great difficulties our people are going through, being this country one of the richest countries in the world: oil, gold (5 grams per ton of rock!), diamonds, bauxite, iron, uranium and an immense tourist future. Our natural resources are for our countries in America (excluding Cuba and Nicaragua), not for communist or terrorist countries, Mr. Churchill was a wise man.
Jul-10-20  Sokrates: <AylerKupp>

You seem to have a different interpretation of "domination" than the one I used. My observation and statement is contextual with the OP's suggestion that Carlsen might be as dominating today as Kasparov was in his time (cf. quote below).

He was talking about a world champion's domination over his contemporaries, and so was I. Karpov was indeed dominating his contemporaries - right up to the point in the first match with Kasparov, where his ressourses were emptied and the match had to be cancelled, since Karpov's health was at stake. As Timman writes in his book, Kasparov took lessons from Karpov in this painfull first half of their first match and improved his game immensely before meeting Karpov again in their second match.

This kind of domination is very rare in the history of chess, since a clear gap between the champ and ALL the other players rarely occurs.

One could argue that it has never happened, since all world champions had opponents they couldn't dominate at all times. But if we bend the strict demands a bit there were champions who seemed invincible in some periods during their reign. The famous trio, Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine, all had such periods.

In recent times such supremacy is much more difficult to obtain, partly because there are many more competitors in the game, partly because the upper 20 has a much higher general level than those in the time and age of the trio.

You could argue (as you do) that Karpov and Kasparov were equally strong for a long mutual period, so if one wants to claim that Kasparov dominated his contemporaries, one should perhaps make a note that at least in the first half of his reign, he was not dominating according to the strict definition - Karpov was on par with him.

A couple of years ago Carlsen was in a weak period and it was interesting to observe that his challengers sensed that weakness and began to play him with more self-confidence. When he raised his game and had a half year's streak of victories, he sort of came back to the former glory, the halo of which he has polished successfully in the recent online tournaments.

Which, I assume, made the OP write this:

<Keyser Soze: ... Personally I think Magnus is probably more dominant than Kasparov already. Or almost there..>

Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: Quiz of the day.
Excluding exhibitions, training and simuls; Who was the latest born player Fischer ever faced?
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Mecking.
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: I believe that to be correct.
Let's up the ante. Who was the latest born player Fischer lost to?
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Kovacevic.
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: The answer to the next question is Acevedo.
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: <MissScarlett: Kovacevic> I think that's incorrect.
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Is it Acevedo?
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: Gheorghiu vs Fischer, 1966
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Gheorghiu
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <beatgiant> So that makes it five. In twelve years. Let's compare it to now. The latest born Candidate so far is Alekseenko (born in 1997), so let's take the years 1985-1997.

The players of this patch of birth years who played in the Candidates:

1. Carlsen (born 1990, played in the Candidates in 2007 and 2013, became world champion)

2. Mamedyarov (born 1985, Candidate 2011)

3. Radjabov (born 1987, Candidate 2011 and 2013)

4. Andreikin (born 1990, Candidate 2014 and 2020)

5. Karjakin (born 1990, Candidate 2014, 2016, 2018, challenger 2016)

6. Giri (born 1994, Candidate 2016 and 2020)

7. Caruana (born 1992, Candidate 2016, 2018, 2020, challenger 2018)

8. Nakamura (born 1987, Candidate 2016)

9. Ding (born 1992, Candidate 2018 and 2020)

10. So (born 1993, Candidate 2018)

11. Nepomniachtchi (born 1990, Candidate 2020)

12. Vachier-Lagrave (born 1990, Candidate 2020)

13. Wang (born 1989, Candidate 2020)

14. Alekseenko (born 1997, Candiadate 2020)

And this generation's time is not yet over, expect one or another name to be added to that list later. The <Candidates 2020> alone have more players born in 1985-1997 that the <entire history> produced for players born in 1938-1950.

Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <alexmagnus>
It's hard to compare a period of time today with a period half a century ago, because there are major differences in the number of people playing chess and the available qualification paths into the Candidates.
Jul-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <alexmagnus>
Also the frequency of the Candidates.
Jul-11-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <#ChessableMasters is sadly over, but there is a lot more to come soon with #Legends4ever starting July 21st with Carlsen, Giri, Ding, Nepomniachtchi and Svidler currently confirmed. And with the Grand Final on August 9th there will be some nice surprises :)>

https://twitter.com/TarjeiJS/status...

Same old....by legends I thought they meant old-old.

Jul-11-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Sokrates> You seem to have a different interpretation of "domination" than the one I used.>

Perhaps.

How's that for a short post for a change. :-)

Jul-11-20  Sokrates: <AylerKupp>. That may be your post of the year! Be proud! :-)

Do you know the story about the shortest known correspondance in the world?

French author Émile Zola had published a book and was anxious to hear from the publisher about the reception and the sales. So he sent him a letter with only this:

?

Shortly after, he received a response from the publisher with this:

!

Jul-11-20  Clemens Scheitz: I wonder if Monsieur Zola would have been happier receiving this:

$

instead of just :

!

...anyhow, my dear Cuban and my dear Dane, you never fail to enlighten and entertain. Thank you guys.

Jul-11-20  Sokrates: Thanks, dear Clemens,

You know, a hedonistic American would probably prefer the "$", but a French gentilhomme of the artistic class would feel sufficiently rewarded by a "!". Just ask a Frenchman! :-)

How are you these days, btw?

Jul-11-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: That legend is usually attributed to Victor Hugo, regarding Les Miserables.
Jul-12-20  Sokrates: <OhioChessFan: That legend is usually attributed to Victor Hugo, regarding Les Miserables.>

I stand corrected. You are absolutely right. Erosion in my old memory hard disc :-) Thanks, <OCF>!!

Jul-12-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: No worries. I read one version attributed to Dumas/The Count of Monte Cristo, and Oscar Wilde is also often cited. I'd guess it's apocryphal.
Jul-12-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Also the frequency of the Candidates.>

As I said, Candidates 2020 alone has more payers from the 12 years. So, we don't even need to compare more than one tournament.

As for different qualification path. It is different, but the result is the same - 8 players.

Jul-12-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <alexmagnus>
But we do not know who those 8 players would have been in, say, the 1970s if we had the current conditions in place then. Another example of different conditions today is the relatively higher importance of speed chess, which I think favors younger players.

That is why I stand by my original point. It's a lot more convincing to compare nearby historical periods with each other, than those that are separated by a big gap.

Jul-12-20  Clemens Scheitz: Hej Sven,
I'm doing fine in general, but since you asked I should tell you that my main problem is with women - in particular my wife and her two beautiful sisters. There are some feminine characteristics of them that I love (much more than I should) and at the same time there are aspects of their way of thinking and their view of reality that I profoundly dislike, so there is this awful tension and unrest in my heart... I flirt, compliment and flatter them when I text them, but on the other hand I avoid at all cost any family parties in order not to see them...silly and immature I know, but a problem for me nonetheless. Any advice ? I've heard that the best counselors in the world come from Copenhagen...Now you are probably sorry you asked...Now, to keep this related to our beloved game I would add that they do not play chess. Thanks, and I hope you are doing okay as well.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC