chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Moheschunder Bannerjee

Number of games in database: 478
Years covered: 1849 to 1860
Overall record: +134 -302 =42 (32.4%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Giuoco Piano (105) 
    C50 C53 C54
 Philidor's Defense (26) 
    C41
 Petrov (24) 
    C42 C43
 King's Indian Attack (22) 
    A08 A07
 Reti System (9) 
    A06 A04
 Caro-Kann (8) 
    B10
With the Black pieces:
 Petrov (58) 
    C42
 King's Indian (39) 
    E76 E77 E61 E90 E71
 Pirc (38) 
    B07 B09
 Evans Gambit (23) 
    C51 C52
 Queen's Pawn Game (18) 
    D00 A45 A46 A40 E00
 Philidor's Defense (14) 
    C41
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Moheschunder vs Cochrane, 1851 1-0
   Moheschunder vs Cochrane, 1854 1-0
   Cochrane vs Moheschunder, 1855 0-1
   Moheschunder vs Cochrane, 1853 1-0
   Moheschunder vs Cochrane, 1850 1-0
   Cochrane vs Moheschunder, 1854 0-1
   Moheschunder vs Cochrane, 1856 1/2-1/2
   Moheschunder vs Cochrane, 1850 1-0
   Cochrane vs Moheschunder, 1854 0-1
   Moheschunder vs Cochrane, 1855 1-0

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   A History of the King's Indian and the Pirc by kenilworthian

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Moheschunder Bannerjee
Search Google for Moheschunder Bannerjee

MOHESCHUNDER BANNERJEE
(born 1800) India

[what is this?]

Moheschunder Bannerjee, born around 1800 near Calcutta, India.

Given as just Moheschunder by John Cochrane, his name is sometimes given as Moheschunder Bonnerjee, Bonnerjee Mohishunder, or Mahesh Chandra Banerjee.

Philip Walsingham Sergeant described him as having been as of 1848 <a Brahman in the Mofussil-up country, as we might say-who had never been beaten at chess!> Hundreds of his games survive through the writings of John Cochrane, who regularly played him between 1848 and 1860, during Cochrane's tenure at the Calcutta bar.

Moheschunder originally played traditional Indian chess, in which pawns did not have the option of moving two squares from the starting row and pawns would promote to the piece of the square reached. He probably learned Western rules after contact with Cochrane and other Europeans. Cochrane is quoted in a letter written by a member of the Calcutta Chess Club, appearing in the Chess Player's Chronicle in 1850:

The only player here who has any chance whatever with Mr Cochrane, upon even terms, is a Brahmin of the name of Moheschunder Bonnerjee. Of this worthy, Mr Cochrane has himself remarked that he possesses as great a natural talent for chess as any player he ever met with, without one single exception. (1)

"Mohoschunder Bonnerjee is Brahmin of considerable chess skill, engaged at an annual salary to play in the Calcutta Chess Club. We are sorry to hear, through recent communication from Mr Cochrane, that indisposition has for some time incapacitated Mohoschunder from pursuing the game" (2)

"... The Calcutta Chess Club now numbers some forty members, and boasts the honour of having Mr. Cochrane for its president. The only player here who has any chance whatever with Mr. Cochrane upon even terms is a Brahmin, of the name of <Moheschunder Bonnerjee>. Of this worthy, Mr. Cochrane has himself remarked that he possesses as great a natural talent for Chess any player he ever met with, without one single exception! This is high praise, but not at all extravagant, when all circumstances are known and considered.

Until the early part of last year, Moheschunder had never been twenty miles from his native village in the Mofussil, as the interior of India is designated. He had never played with a really good player, and was scarcely acquainted with all of the European rules of the game. From long-continued and uninterrupted success he had become desperately self-sufficient, and obstinately addicted to certain faulty styles of opening, of which, indeed, he is not even now cured.

The introduction of Moheschunder was in this wise. A member of the Calcutta Chess Club, during a Mofussil pilgrimage in the autumn of 1848, heard of the fame of this local Philidor, and learning further that the Mofussil champion had never been beaten,' he rejoiced exceedingly in the prospect of beating him soundly. This expectation was not destined to be fulfilled, for our Brahmin triumphed. The discomfited clubman thereupon brought him down to Calcutta, and requested Mr. Cochrane to take him in hand. Now Moheschunder had never even heard of Cochrane, nor, for that matter, of Ruy Lopez, Philidor, La Bourdonnais, Macdonnell, or Staunton. At this time, in truth, Moheschunder was under very strong impression that some Mookerjee or Chatterjee resident in the district of Berhampore or Burdwan was incomparably the best player in the known world next to himself. It was not until he had been well beaten six games or so, off hand, that the idea began to dawn upon him that he might possibly be mistaken, and at last he solemnly pronounced his successful opponent to be ‘Shatan' (the Devil - e.d.) himself and no other. Since that period Moheschunder has been appointed a paid attache of the Club. He much improved, and frequently wins of Mr. Cochrane when playing on even terms. His sight of the board is extraordinary; he plays with marvellous rapidity, and rarely makes an oversight or mistake. (3)

Playing Style

Moheschunder favored defenses, unusual in the West, that involved fianchettoing his bishops. The Indian Defenses, such as the King's Indian and Queen's Indian, are named for Moheschunder and his countrymen. Both involve advancing pawns one square, as in Indian chess, rather than more traditional defenses like 1.e4 e5 and 1.d4 d5. Sergeant wrote in 1934 (algebraic notation substituted for Sergeant's descriptive notation),

The Indian Defences by g6 coupled with d6, or b6 coupled with e6, were largely taught to European players by the example of Moheschunder and other Indians, to whom the fianchetto developments were a natural legacy from their own game.

"This eminent player, unlike his countrymen generally, does not rigidly adopt system of close tactics. Many of his games in the collection before us are begun in the European rather than in the Oriental style, and he appears to be as much home in the one as in the other." (4)

Among other innovations, Moheschunder played the first known Gruenfeld Defense in Cochrane vs Moheschunder, 1855, 67 years before it was "introduced" in Alekhine vs Gruenfeld, 1922.

Game at odds

Mr Morton (formerly of the Calcutta Chess Club) vs Moheschunder

(Remove Black's <f> pawn)

1. e4 ... 2. d4 d6 3. Bc4 g6 4. h4 Bg7 5. h5 Nf6 6. hxg6 hxg6 7. Rxh8+ Bxh8 8. Nc3 c6 9. f4 d5 10. exd5 Nxd5 11. Nxd5 cxd5 12. Bd3 Kf7 13. Be3 Nc6 14. c3 Qb6 (Bf5!) 15. Qc2 Nd8 16. Nf3 Bf6? (Bg7) 17. Bxg6+ Kf8 18. 0-0-0 Bg4 19. Ne5 Bxe5 20. fxe5 Bxc1 21. Bh6+ Kg8 22. Qf5 1-0" (5)

Notes

(1) Philip W. Sergeant, A Century of British Chess, David McKay, 1934, pp. 68-69; Wikipedia article: Moheschunder Bannerjee; http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/....
(2) Illustrated London News, Saturday 10th January 1852, p. 11.
(3) Illustrated London News, Saturday 12th October 1850, p. 11.
(4) Illustrated London News, Saturday 28th August 1869, p. 24.
(5) Illustrated London News, Saturday 7th April 1855, p. 10.

Last updated: 2024-10-20 21:14:41

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 20; games 1-25 of 478  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Moheschunder vs Cochrane 1-0231849CalcuttaC50 Giuoco Piano
2. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0291850Casual gameC42 Petrov Defense
3. Moheschunder vs Cochrane 0-1201850Casual gameC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
4. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0521850Casual gameC45 Scotch Game
5. Cochrane vs Moheschunder  1-0301850Casual gameC21 Center Game
6. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0491850Casual gameB06 Robatsch
7. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0401850Casual gameC42 Petrov Defense
8. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0251850Casual gameB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
9. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0341850Casual gameB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
10. Cochrane vs Moheschunder  0-1491850Casual gameC21 Center Game
11. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 0-1371850Casual gameB09 Pirc, Austrian Attack
12. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0191850Casual gameB07 Pirc
13. Cochrane vs Moheschunder  1-0441850Casual gameC21 Center Game
14. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0181850Casual gameE61 King's Indian
15. Moheschunder vs Cochrane 1-0291850Casual gameA07 King's Indian Attack
16. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0291850Casual gameC42 Petrov Defense
17. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0231850Casual gameC44 King's Pawn Game
18. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 0-1321850Casual gameC44 King's Pawn Game
19. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 0-1391850Casual gameB07 Pirc
20. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0191850Casual gameC45 Scotch Game
21. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0311850Casual gameC21 Center Game
22. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0201850Casual gameC42 Petrov Defense
23. Cochrane vs Moheschunder 1-0431850Casual gameC42 Petrov Defense
24. Moheschunder vs Cochrane ½-½501850Cochrane - MoheschunderA07 King's Indian Attack
25. Moheschunder vs Cochrane 0-1381850Casual gameB40 Sicilian
 page 1 of 20; games 1-25 of 478  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Moheschunder wins | Moheschunder loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-06-07  Benzol: And is Moheschunder also the same player?

If this is so is his name Brahmin Moheshunder Bonnerjee ( or Bannerjee )?

And a note from the introduction to Ray Keene and George Botterill's book on the Modern Defence

"Moreover, there exist records of a game Cochrane - Moheshunder Bonnerjee, Calcuta 1847, which commenced: 1.P-K4 P-Q3 2.P-Q4 N-KB3 3.B-Q3 P-KN3, although this quickly transposed into a rudimentary form of the King's Indian Defence."

The mystery deepens!

May-25-08  Karpova: More on him:

<The following appeared on pages 68-69 of A Century of British Chess by P.W. Sergeant (London, 1934):

‘Cochrane had gone back to India, and in 1848 we hear of him, as president of the Calcutta Chess Club (in the foundation of which he was largely instrumental), still seeking for opponents out East capable of testing the skill which he had so worthily proved in the West. One was at last found. A member of the club in the autumn of 1848 heard of a Brahman in the Mofussil – up country, as we might say – who had never been beaten at chess. He found an opportunity of meeting him, played him, and lost. It was stated that the man, “Moheschunder Bonnerjee, a Brahmin”, of about 50, hardly knew the European rules of chess; yet his play was presumably under European rules.

Delighted with his find, the Calcutta member took him back with him, and passed him on to Cochrane as an opponent. Cochrane beat him, but was sufficiently impressed with his skill to have him engaged as “a paid attaché” of the Chess Club, where he improved wonderfully. In the [Chess Player’s Chronicle] for 1851 are published some games between Cochrane and Moheschunder; and “the Brahmin” figures as a player in various collections of games. The Indian Defences by P-KKt3 coupled with P-Q3, or P-QKt3 coupled with P-K3, were largely taught to European players by the example of Moheschunder and other Indians, to whom the fianchetto developments were a natural legacy from their own game. The fondness for them of the present Indian champion of British chess, Mir Sultan Khan, is well known. But they are now so widely popular that Dr S.G. Tartakower was able to declare, some years ago, that “today fianchettos are trumps”. A sequel hardly to have been anticipated from the discovery of Moheschunder in the Mofussil.’

Sergeant’s information was largely based on a letter from a member of the Calcutta Chess Club on pages 318-319 of the 1850 Chess Player’s Chronicle, which included the following:

‘The only player here who has any chance whatever with Mr Cochrane, upon even terms, is a Brahmin of the name of Moheschunder Bonnerjee. Of this worthy, Mr Cochrane has himself remarked that he possesses as great a natural talent for chess as any player he ever met with, without one single exception.’>

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... (C. N. 5590)

<Benzol>

Edward Winter also mentions these different spellings (Mahescandra, Moheschunder and Mohishunder) seeking further information.

May-26-08  Benzol: <Karpova> Thanks.

:)

Dec-06-09  JonathanJ: that is a lot of old games right now. <chessgames.com> where are they from?
Jan-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: The term "Indian" in openings such as the Queen's Indian and the King's Indian comes from Indian chess in which the pawns can only move one square on their first move.

So when players open by moving their pawns one square they are playing opening moves that are common in Indian chess. Hence the term "Indian."

Examples are g6 in the King's Indian and b6 in the Queen's Indian.

Feb-29-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: The only player he played was Bonnerjee Mohishunder! 448 games!

Not even Kasparov-Karpov can match (currently trailing by 247 games)!

Apr-13-12  King Sacrificer: Only one page of kibitzing? I wish we had more information about this man. The story about Cochrane and Mohishunder is charming. Cochrane must have been very surprised when he saw the opening.
Jun-15-12  waustad: It is interesting how other chess-like games have influenced western chess. I think it was Alexander Morozevich who talked about how much he learned when training with Wang Yue, since the Chinese way of thinking about chess has been influenced so much by Chinese chess. I think I have the players right. My source may be Ian Rogers commentary, I'm not sure. There is so much chess on, it is hard to keep track.
Aug-01-12  BadKnight: Surprising that I never heard of this guy before. I accidentally stumbled into this page while I was digging deep into the Cochrane gambit.

Mahesh Chandra Banerjee is likely to be the right name of any person originated in Calcutta/Kolkata.

Banerjee is a common surname, it is the british adaptation of the native surname Bandyopadhyay [don't try to pronounce it unless you are a native speaker].

There are many other similar adaptations:
Bandyopadhyay = Banerjee
Chattopadhyay = Chatterjee
Mukhopadhyay = Mukherjee

etc.

Bonnerjee does not seem to be exactly right. Its most likely a mispronunciation from a non native speaker, or just a simple spelling mistake.

Middle name: Chandra/Chandur = Chandra sounds native, so i would pick Chandra. In some other Indian provinces it might be pronounced as Chander, but in Calcutta its always Chandra.

Mahesh is a common name, so no confusion there.

And by the way, Calcutta is british ataptation of the native term Kolkata.

Aug-01-12  BadKnight: One more thing, instead of Mahesh Chandra, Mohishundar could be the first name, but Mohisundar is quite different from Mahesh Chandra. A native speaker from calcutta would not confuse Mohisundar for Mahesh Chandra.
Sep-30-13  Conrad93: He played the first King's Indian and Nimzo Indian.

He contributed more to chess than most World Champions.

Oct-01-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <<BadKnight: ...Mahesh Chandra Banerjee is likely to be the right name of any person originated in Calcutta/Kolkata.

Banerjee is a common surname, it is the british adaptation of the native surname Bandyopadhyay [don't try to pronounce it unless you are a native speaker].

There are many other similar adaptations:
Bandyopadhyay = Banerjee
Chattopadhyay = Chatterjee
Mukhopadhyay = Mukherjee...

Bonnerjee does not seem to be exactly right. Its most likely a mispronunciation from a non native speaker, or just a simple spelling mistake.

Middle name: Chandra/Chandur = Chandra sounds native, so i would pick Chandra. Mahesh is a common name, so no confusion there.>

BadKnight: One more thing, instead of Mahesh Chandra, Mohishundar could be the first name, but Mohisundar is quite different from Mahesh Chandra. A native speaker from calcutta would not confuse Mohisundar for Mahesh Chandra.>

These two posts, from a native speaker (I assume!) and therefore an expert, are very enlightening.

His opinion is that
<Mahesh Chandra Banerjee> is most likely this player's name, but he adds that <Mohisundar Bannerjee> is also possible. Occam's razor would suggest the latter. After all, British Indians like Cochrane were not totally ignorant of Indian culture and we can assume that Cochrane was <close> to the Indian's real name.

Jun-05-14  Chessinfinite: < Cochrane were not totally ignorant of Indian culture and we can assume that Cochrane was <close> to the Indian's real name. >

Cochrane would not know anything about the origins of Indian names.

It looks like <Mahesh Chandra Bandopadhay> was the real name of the player. Rest all are derived from people who couldd not spell he real name.

Jun-05-14  NeoIndian: <Mahesh Chandra Bandopadhay> (Bandopadhyay)is correct. I confirm as a fellow Bengali. As for Indian systems in the days of old, as you probably know, pawns did not have the option of moving two squares from the starting row and pawns would promote to the piece of the square reached. Also Indian chess rules did not have castling, but an unchecked king could execute a knight's move once during a game. But at the start of the game, both players had the option of playing *two* legal moves, but not move the same pawn two squares. So can you guess the overwhelmingly popular way to open a game? g3 followed by Bg2! Less popular were any of the central pawn moves followed by bringing the Knights out. Games were slow and maneuvering, and conflicts arose only in the latter stages. Also, they did not like to keep their king in the centre, and so carried out a complicated series of moves (move the bishop, move the knight, move the rook, move the king) to bring the king to g1 or h1. Curiously, queenside castling was not known.

The most interesting thing is that these arcane rules are still followed in the remotest regions of my country, far away from the cities and towns, where internet and television are not so pervasive. I myself have played in this way in my childhood (that would be early 1990s); before learning the rules of modern chess.

Jun-05-14  NeoIndian: Amusingly, Mohishunder, or Mohisundar, as it will probably be spelled by a Bengali, is also a perfectly acceptable Bengali first name, and not just a distortion of another name. This may also have caused some confusion.
Jun-28-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Chessinfinite: <...a native speaker (I assume!) and therefore an expert, are very enlightening. His opinion is that <Mahesh Chandra Banerjee> is most likely this player's name, but he adds that <Mohisundar Bannerjee> is also possible. Cochrane was not totally ignorant of Indian culture and we can assume that he was <close> to the Indian's real name. >

Cochrane would not know anything about the origins of Indian names.>

I am surprised at that. Cochrane was a barrister who spent 45 years in India, so his total ignorance is baffling.

Apr-04-16  waustad: If a player should be the person involved in a GOTD called "Indian Defense" it most certainly be he. His games are the reason they are called Indian Defenses.
Feb-04-17  The Kings Domain: Interesting player, so it's from him and his fellow Indian boardsmiths that the Indian openings hail from. Sultan Khan certainly had a predecessor.
Feb-04-17  ughaibu: <at the start of the game, both players had the option of playing *two* legal moves, but not move the same pawn two squares>

Bangkok taxi drivers have this rule for makruk, too.

Feb-11-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <The Kings Domain: Interesting player, so it's from him and his fellow Indian boardsmiths that the Indian openings hail.>

Was he really a boardsmith? I would like to see some of his work. I tried it myself for a short while but it was very difficult.

Sep-05-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: < British Indians like Cochrane were not totally ignorant of Indian culture and we can assume that Cochrane was <close> to the Indian's real name.>

My knowledge of Indian onomastics is limited, but I'm familiar with the hash that the British made when anglicizing native Irish place and personal names. And that was in 7 or 8 centuries of close contact. One can't imagine that, after barely 100 years, they did much better with Bengali names.

And that's allowing for the quote from William Jones at the end of the 18th century, that Sanskrit was "more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin" - which gave rise to Indo-European Philology.

Jun-08-18  takchess: https://tartajubow.blogspot.com/201...
Jun-29-18  The Kings Domain: Fascinating figure in the history of Chess. Sultan Khan definitely wasn't the first.
Dec-12-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Neo: and pawns would promote to the piece of the square reached. >

What happened when a King Pawn promoted?

Dec-12-20  Z4all: To flush out <NeoIndian>'s informative post, here's Wiki's take on the rule differences:

<

- King cannot move unless a check is given at least once.

- When only the king and pawns are left in play, the opponent may not give check, but they can win by stalemate, variants of this include the check being allowed but the capture of last pawn being disallowed (resulting in a draw).

- The two-step initial pawn move is absent in Indian chess; thus, en passant is also absent.

- Normal castling with rook and king is absent. The king can make a knight's move once in a game, known as Indian castling.

- On reaching the opposite end of the board, pawns promote to the piece of that square. If it promotes at the initial king's position, it promotes a queen.

- Underpromotion is not permitted.

- The last piece remaining may not be captured, variants include the capture being allowed if the last piece is not a pawn.

>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India...

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC