< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 42 OF 63 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Mar-19-22
 | | Tabanus: This game, to get Abraham Speyer into the db:
[Event "BCF-ch Major Open"]
[Site "Edinburgh SCO"]
[Date "1920.08.09"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Speyer, Abraham"]
[Black "Heath, Christopher Barclay"]
[Result "1-0"]
[EventDate "1920.08.09"]
[Source "The Observer 15 Aug 1920"]
1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Bf5 3. c4 Bxb1 4. Rxb1 dxc4 5. Qa4+ Qd7 6. Qxc4 Nc6 7. e3 e6 8.
Bd2 Nf6 9. Be2 Be7 10. O-O O-O 11. Rfd1 Qd5 12. Qc2 Rad8 13. b4 Rc8 14. b5 Nb8
15. Ne5 c6 16. Bf3 Qd8 17. bxc6 bxc6 18. Qa4 Qc7 19. Ba5 Qd6 20. Rb7 Qa3 21.
Qxa3 Bxa3 22. Nc4 c5 23. Nxa3 (...) 1-0 |
|
Mar-19-22
 | | Stonehenge: Abraham Speijer is already very much in the db. |
|
Mar-19-22
 | | Tabanus: Thanks <Stonehenge>. I missed that. A Speijer vs C B Heath, 1920 then, and I removed "13th" from BCF-ch Major Open (1920). |
|
Mar-23-22
 | | Tabanus: Why is the following game rejected? There is nothing wrong with it. [Event "British Championship"]
[Site "Stratford-upon-Avon ENG"]
[Date "1925.08.18"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Spencer, Edmund"]
[Black "Price, Hubert Ernest"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[EventDate "1925.08.17"]
[Source "BritBase 23 March 2022"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. O-O d6 5. c3 Qe7 6. d3 Nf6 7. Nbd2 O-O 8. Bb3
Be6 9. Re1 Rfe8 10. Nf1 Rad8 11. Ng3 d5 12. Qe2 dxe4 13. dxe4 Ng4 14. Rf1 Rd7
15. Ng5 Bxb3 16. axb3 Nf6 17. b4 Bb6 18. Nf3 Red8 19. Nd2 Rd3 20. Nf5 Qe6 21.
Kh1 g6 22. Ng3 h5 23. Nf3 Kg7 24. Bg5 R3d6 25. h3 R8d7 26. Rae1 Nh7 27. Bc1 Qf6
28. Qc2 a6 29. Nd2 Rd3 30. Nc4 Ba7 31. Ne3 Bxe3 32. Rxe3 Rxe3 33. Bxe3 h4 34.
Ne2 Qd6 35. Nc1 g5 36. Nb3 b6 37. Nd2 Qe6 38. f3 f6 39. Ra1 a5 40. b5 Ne7 41.
c4 Nf8 42. c5 Rd8 43. Nc4 Nc8 44. b3 Ng6 45. Rd1 Rxd1+ 46. Qxd1 a4 47. c6 axb3
48. Qd7+ Qf7 49. Nb2 Na7 50. Qd3 Ne7 51. Bd2 Ng6 52. Na4 Nc8 53. Bb4 Nf4 54.
Qd7 Na7 55. Nc3 Ne6 56. Ba3 Nd4 57. Nd5 Naxb5 58. Be7 Nd6 59. Bxf6+ Kg6 60. Qg4
Ne6 61. Bxe5 Nc4 62. Bf6 Ne3 63. Nxe3 Qxf6 64. Qf5+ Qxf5 65. exf5+ Kf6 66. fxe6
b2 67. Nd5+ Kxe6 68. Nc3 Ke5 69. Nb1 b5 (...) 1/2-1/2 |
|
Mar-23-22
 | | Tabanus: Cold Response? I'll ask also in CG forum and Bistro. Can't wait too many hours. Wake up. |
|
Mar-23-22
 | | stevemcd87: <Tab> It says it was a dupe to this game -> E Spencer vs H E Price, 1925 . I needed to update the eco for it to display. I'll look into the dupes in Gibraltar Masters (2018) . Perhaps I'll look for the culprit as well <MissS> I haven't had time find out how to resurrect the games yet. I don't have an easy way to revive games that were uploaded after July of last year. I'll let you know when I figure something out. Sorry for keeping you in the dark |
|
Mar-23-22
 | | Tabanus: <Steve> Thanks. |
|
Mar-24-22 | | Z free or die: <<Steve> I don't have an easy way to revive games that were uploaded after July of last year.> This is a matter of some concern. Should get bumped to the top of the list. |
|
Mar-24-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen> Welcome back! I sent another email about an issue related to fixing games with null or odds pgns that wouldn't upload. The last time you also fixed my game that wouldn't upload by swapping in a (000) ECO tag. After checking a sample of odds games already published, I noticed that the ECO tags were "normal" meaning they listed an actual opening- Petroff, Ruy Lopez and so on. So as mentioned before, I have several more <Pollock> odds games to publish, but I would like to know from you first- Should I leave the ECO tag blank as usual, or should I actually enter a (000) ECO tag? Did you come up with any more ideas about this odd state of affairs? |
|
Mar-24-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen>
This is My game that would not publish, and that you fixed by "updating the ECO code." S J Magowan vs W Pollock, 1886 As in the current case of <Tab's> game, you also fixed my upload by swapping in a 000 ECO code. So why is this fix necessary in the first place? The vast majority of odds games have normal ECO tags, not the 000 variant. This looks more like a workaround, as opposed to an actual fix. Anyways I would like to know before uploading more odds games- should I leave the ECO tag blank as usual, or should I put in a 000 tag? It seems to me that getting to the bottom of this problem first would be more optimal than just finding a workaround, especially a workaround that depends on an admin to be involved in repairing it. I am available for unlimited beta testing on this problem. |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | stevemcd87: <Jess>
Main editors now have the ability to update the ECO of ghost games.
One of the reasons for many of our ghost games is because they have an eco of "?".
We can now update it to "000" or "A00" for the game to display.
I've updated this game -> https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... to "000". It had the castling on move 5 as 0-0 instead of O-O, causing the "?" ECO. I'm sure there are more games similar to this. We can then update the eco in the bottom of the page to it's correct eco.
Below is a list of games with "?" ECO's (Ghost Games):
N Vasileisky vs B Zagorsky, 1916
S Lyman vs R Byrne, 1962
Lombardy vs J F Leon, 1962
M Saltzberg vs K Burger, 1962
M Garber vs Paul Fisher, 1962
A Medina Garcia vs L Gilden, 1962
W Addison vs R W Schutt, 1968
W J Adam vs A Dunne, 1979
E Inarkiev vs Vitiugov, 2008
E Inarkiev vs Vitiugov, 2008
A Guerrero Rodriguez vs Jeronimo Hernandez Martinez, 2022
Jesus Amezcua Luria vs Wasdin Antonio Munoz Ricardo, 2022
Frida Santiago Gonzalez vs J A Gutierrez, 2022
Anahi Ortiz Verdesoto vs Miguel Arnulfo Zaragoza Alanis, 2022
Ayleen Maribel Ramirez Toledo vs K Fernandez Rivero, 2022
Zuben Algenubi Jorajuria Mendoza vs E Guevara Sanchez, 2022
J Vega Garcia vs Emilio Au Castellanos Hernandez, 2022
Jose Antonio Garcia de Dios vs Marco Cortes Rodriguez, 2022
Jorge Frank Herrera Aruca vs W Alfaro, 2022
Juan Octavio Ruiz Perez vs Matias Uziel Alvarado Rubio, 2022
Jose Armando Macias Zamora vs Paul Rosales Campos, 2022
Francisco Javier Paredes Guzman vs Abel Justo Davalos Prieto, 2022
David Encinas Varela vs Geovanni Martinez Morales, 2022
Ivan Alonso Limon Olmos vs Rafael Salazar Moreno, 2022
Santiago Zacarias Rodriguez vs R Zacarias, 2022
Jeronimo Real Pereyra vs Miguel Angel Nava Ruiz, 2022
Yahir Alberto Francisco Cruz vs A B Fernandez, 2022
Carlos Sandoval Mercado vs J Martin del Campo, 2022
Algol Jorajuria Mendoza vs Rafael Alejandro Medina Diaz, 2022
Miguel Angel Montes Orozco vs Y Miranda Llanes, 2022
|
|
Mar-28-22
 | | stevemcd87: J Estrada Nieto vs Paul Josue Flores Irurso, 2022
Cristina Ocampo vs J D Gemy, 2022
P Tapie Amione vs L Perez Rodriguez, 2022
Alexander Hernandez vs G Dominguez Aguilar, 2022
M Perez Gormaz vs B Gongora Montes, 2022
A Manjarrez vs J C D Rosas, 2022
R Martin del Campo vs Sion Radamantys Galaviz Medina, 2022
K Frey Beckman vs J F R P Neves Veiga, 2022
R O Perez Garcia vs Tania Miranda Rodriguez, 2022
K Noboa Silva vs Edgar Froylan Luna Javier, 2022
S Pla vs Piero Raul Lopez Padilla, 2022
Mario Andres Fernandez Sanchez vs Felipe de Jesus Torres Rivas, 2022
A F L Gonzalez vs Joshua Ad Avila Rodriguez, 2022
Dylan Isidro Berdayes Ason vs M Herrera Ortiz, 2022
Emmanuel Jimenez Garcia vs E Chinchilla Miranda, 2022
Michel Alejandro Diaz Perez vs Jose Guilherme B Lima Santos, 2022
U Capo Vidal vs Fier, 2022
O G Sanchez Enriquez vs L Ibarra Chami, 2022
Z Corrales Jimenez vs Quesada Perez, 2022
J C Gonzalez Zamora vs R C S Alvarez, 2022
Genaro Alvidrez Aguirre vs Roberto Al Avila Bautista, 2022
Pablo Antonio Fernandez Pozas vs Estefania Benito De Leo, 2022
J W L Valdes vs Albornoz Cabrera, 2022
Cuenca Jimenez vs L Valdes, 2022
O Almeida Quintana vs L de La Fuente, 2022
A Rosell vs J G Cardoso Cardoso, 2022
A Rodriguez Vila vs J Obregon Rivero, 2022
G Vazquez vs S Mareco, 2022
J Cori vs E Cordova, 2022 |
|
Mar-28-22 | | Z truth 000000001: I agree with <JFQ>, who I think is saying that uploads should never fail because of ECO code. <I am available for unlimited beta testing on this problem.> Really? I always thought your guarantee was for a limited lifetime warranty. I know mine is. |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen> that is grand, thank you! So let's say I upload a pgn and it turns into a "ghost game." Is there a place where I will be able to view the "ghost game" so that I can correct it as per your instructions? How will I know it became a "ghost game" to begin with? I won't know it was a "ghost game" to begin with, unless it is not there. So
1. I upload a game
2. Game is not processed, and after re-checking my submitted pgn, and closely examining the "process page" of the upload on the editor page, I determine that the pgn should have been processed- ie, nothing wrong with it. 3. Now, instead of emailing you for help, we now have access to the "ghost game," which we can fix now, thanks to you. Might you please tell me how to find the ghost game if this happens again. Will the editor page show the ghost game to me? |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<z> On the ball as usual! However, HA!
I have now upgraded to "ghost game" member status, meaning that after I die I will become a "ghost person" and haunt this website forever, continuing to beta test, fix ghost games, or email <Stephen> incessantly. |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen>
I am trying to fix a "ghost game" in order to learn how to do it, once I have learned to identify one in the first place. Luckily, you have provided a list of "visible" ghost games. I am trying to swap in the "000" ECO tag on the first game on the list: N Vasileisky vs B Zagorsky, 1916 When I click on it, I go to this page:
=============
Error: Invalid Game ID.
Sorry, the game requested (2092402) is not in our database.
It may have been deleted due to redundancy or inaccuracy. Update ECO
=============
Now I type "000" into the Update ECO box
==================
And now here is the game, BROUGHT BACK FROM THE DEAD: N Vasileisky vs B Zagorsky, 1916 |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
Except there are no moves listed in the game I have resurrected. Also, the Website keeps going offline and then comes back and then goes offline again- which I have confirmed with the "is it down right now" app. Are we under attack? |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen> It's taking over a minute for any page to load now, but I am in the middle of this beta report so I will try to press on- The "fixed game" has no moves, and this is the pgn listed for it now: [Event "Samara tournament"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1916.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "N Vasileisky"]
[Black "B Zagorsky"]
[ECO "?"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "56"]
[Event "Samara tournament"]
[Site "Samara (RUE)"
[Date "1916.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Vasileisky, N"]
[Black "Zagorsky, B"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Source "rusbase"
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.Qe2 Qe7 6.d3 Nf6 7.h3
Nc6 8.Nc3 Be6 9.Ng5 Nd4 10.Qd1 Bb3+ 11.Be3 Nxc2+ 12.Kd2 Nxe3
13.Qxb3 Nxf1+ 14.Rhxf1 Nd7 15.Rae1 Ne5 16.f4 O-O-O 17.Nd5 Qd7
18.fxe5 dxe5 19.Nxf7 Qxd5 20.Qxd5 Rxd5 21.Nxh8 Bb4+ 22.Ke2 Bxe1
23.Rxe1 Kd7 24.Nf7 h6 25.Nh8 Rd6 26.h4 Ke7 27.h5 Re6 28.Ng6+ 1-0 |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen>
Now I used the "Get GID" button on the editor page to call the game back in for repair- I edited the pgn I just posted above, and now the game has a "view pgn" result that is not nonsensical: N Vasileisky vs B Zagorsky, 1916 [Event "Samara tournament"]
[Site "Samara (RUE)"
[Date "1916.??.??"]
[ECO "000"]
[White "Vasileisky, N"]
[Black "Zagorsky, B"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Source "rusbase"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.Qe2 Qe7 6.d3 Nf6 7.h3
Nc6 8.Nc3 Be6 9.Ng5 Nd4 10.Qd1 Bb3+ 11.Be3 Nxc2+ 12.Kd2 Nxe3
13.Qxb3 Nxf1+ 14.Rhxf1 Nd7 15.Rae1 Ne5 16.f4 O-O-O 17.Nd5 Qd7
18.fxe5 dxe5 19.Nxf7 Qxd5 20.Qxd5 Rxd5 21.Nxh8 Bb4+ 22.Ke2 Bxe1
23.Rxe1 Kd7 24.Nf7 h6 25.Nh8 Rd6 26.h4 Ke7 27.h5 Re6 28.Ng6+ 1-0 However, still no moves...
=========
To sum up:
1. When I used your suggested method, typing 000 into the ECO box you provided, I got a game that was visible, but had no moves and had a nonsensical pgn as shown by the "view pgn" button. 2. I re-edited the game from the editor's page with the "Get GID" function, and still got no moves, but I did get a repaired pgn as shown by the "view pgn" button. 3. What next? |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | stevemcd87: <Jess>
Usually if there are no moves, it means something is wrong with the pgn header tags.
I updated the Site tag to have a closing square bracket.
<[Site "Samara (RUE)"]>
It works now |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen> apologies in advance for pressing on- but I know how busy you have been over the past month. Clearly, it is you, and not Sammy Davis Jr. who is now "the hardest working man in show business." But I have a lot of time on my hands, so I would like to log more test results, which you may view at your leisure. I tried to resurrect the second ghost game on your list: S Lyman vs R Byrne, 1962 This time I typed "000" into the ECO correction box, instead of just 000. There was no result at all- the game was not retrieved. Then I typed 000 into the ECO correction box, and the game was retrieved, but again it has no moves. I got the identically nonsensical pgn again after clicking the "view" button: [Event "63rd US Open"]
[Site "San Antonio, TX USA"]
[Date "1962.08.24"]
[EventDate "1962.08.13"]
[Round "11.2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[White "Shelby Lyman"]
[Black "Robert Byrne"]
[ECO "?"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "112"]
[Event "63rd US Open"]
[Site "San Antonio, TX USA"]
[Date "1962.08.24"]
[EventDate "1962.08.13"]
[Round "11.2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[White "Lyman, Shelby"]
[Black "Byrne, Robert"]
[ECO ""]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[Source "63rd United States Open / Jack Spence. Game 147" 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 Ne7 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 b6 7.Qg4 Ng6 8.Bd3 Ba6 9.f4 Bxd3 10.cxd3 Qh4+ 11.Qxh4 Nxh4 12.g3 Nf5 13.Ne2 h5 14.a4 Nc6 15.Kf2 Kd7 16.h3 a6 17.Ba3 b5 18.axb5 axb5 19.Bc5 Ra4 20.Rxa4 bxa4 21.Ra1 Rb8 22.Ra2 Rb1 23.g4 hxg4 24.hxg4 Nh6 25.Kg3 Rd1 26.Bf8 Rxd3+ 27.Kh4 Ne7 28.Bxg7 Nhf5+ 29.gxf5 Nxf5+ 30.Kg5 Nxg7 31.Kf6 Nh5+ 32.Kxf7 Rf3 33.Kg6 Nxf4+ 34.Nxf4 Rxf4 35.Rxa4 Rf3 36.c4 dxc4 37.Rxc4 Rf5 38.Rc5 Rf4 39.d5 exd5 40.Rxd5+ Ke6 41.Rc5 Rg4+ 42.Kh6 Kd7 43.e6+ Kd6 44.Rc1 Re4 45.Kg5 c5 46.Kf5 Re5+ 47.Kf4 Rxe6 48.Rd1+ Kc6 49.Rc1 Re8 50.Kf3 Kb5 51.Rb1+ Ka4 52.Rc1 Kb4 53.Rb1+ Ka3 54.Rc1 Rc8 55.Ke3 Kb2 56.Rc4 Kb3 0-1 |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen> Brilliant! This is why you get the big money. I took a closer look at the pgn for the second game on your list, and only now noticed it lacked a closing "]" on the Source tag. So I brought the game back to the editor page and edited in the correct source tag syntax and got a fully repaired resurrected game: S Lyman vs R Byrne, 1962 |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen> I just resurrected the third game on your list, and it too had the same problem- a missing bracket in a pgn tag: Lombardy vs J F Leon, 1962 So the procedure is
1. Add 000 to the ECO box you provided for us. This will bring the game back to life, but not fix any problems with the pgn. 2. If the game shows no moves, then call the game in to the Editing Page and look for pgn syntax errors. 3. Fix errors
4. Game is now alive with moves and a correct pgn. |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Stephen> All we need to know now is what I originally asked about- how do we find the "visible ghost game" with the repair ECO box in the first place? 1. I try to publish a game
2. It does not process
3. I re-examine the pgn for possible errors
4. If I find none, I now go to the ghost game page with ECO correction box, which is located.... ??? |
|
Mar-28-22
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Finally, for now at least-
What <z> said is an important part of what I originally meant: stevemcd87 chessforum (kibitz #1056) <I agree with <JFQ>, who I think is saying that uploads should never fail because of ECO code.> ===========
Then we wouldn't need a ghost games exorcist eh... |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 42 OF 63 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|