chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

register now - it's free!
Richard Reti vs Akiba Rubinstein
"Reti to Roll" (game of the day Sep-25-06)
Karlsbad (1923)  ·  Zukertort Opening: Queen Pawn Defense (A06)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 64 times; par: 88 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 20 more Reti/Rubinstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-23-10  Eric Farley: This is wrongly called a King's Indian Attack game. There's no e4 by white. As a matter of fact, white only moved the e-pawn at move 37 and even so it was to take the rook on d3. This is a Reti-Barcza. ( Nf3,g3,c4). If there's a d4 then it's a Catalan
Jul-22-11  SirChrislov: A triumph of hypermodernism. -R. Fine
Sep-18-11  Xeroxx: brilliant game
Sep-18-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <IMlday: ...Reti's Opening appeared weird to supreme classicist Rubinstein: "The stupid double hole variation" he supposedly called it.>

This statement, or something on those lines, was definitely made, but I thought it was Richard 'The Fifth' Teichmann, another player of marked classical style, to whom it was attributed.

Can anyone clarify this? <FSR>? <jess>? <TheFocus>?

Dec-21-11  Eric Farley: This is not the KIA! The KIA is characterized by an early e4. An early c4 makes the opening a RETI, or maybe a transposition to the ENGLISH. An early d4 makes the opening a CATALAN or a GRUNFELD reversed.
Dec-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Beautiful game. I especially liked 33.Qxb6!
Feb-17-12  King Death: This is the one of the nicest examples of an in between move I've ever seen with Reti cleverly throwing in 34.c5.
Jan-10-13  Everett: The nomenclature can be a funny thing in chess, of course we all know that... but even the KID does not necessarily have a pawn on e5, so why must the KIA have a pawn on e4?

Take this game, for instance, much like a KID but than quite like a Benoni.

I Aloni vs Bronstein, 1956

And this: ..c5 is often played long before ..e5 vs the Saemisch. Averbakh vs Spassky, 1956

So... relax. The King's House of Nf3, g3, Bg2 and 0-0 is a King's Indian Formation. Afterwards it can morph into something more specific (like Radjabov's follow-up of d4 before e4 Radjabov vs Aronian, 2009), but the initial name is not wrong.

Jan-18-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <why must the KIA have a pawn on e4?> Because it simplifies the opening classification. After 1.Nf3, White may subsequently play for a central pawn break with c4, d4, or e4. In general the e4 systems are the King's Indian Attack (except for early e4 gambits, eg the Lisitsyn Gambit, 1.Nf3 f5 2.e4); the c4 systems are a Reti, sometimes an English; and the d4 systems may transpose to various Queen Pawn openings, or to the Reversed Gruenfeld or Neo-Gruenfeld. There are other possibilities, of course, eg a Nimzo-Larsen with 2.b3. And with so many possible transpositions, it is not surprising that opening nomenclature is confusing.

But this is a Reti System - or Reversed Benko/Benoni, at least to my eyes. I've often played this kind of thing as White. Calling it a Zukertort opening - which usually refers to 1.Nf3 and no more - is not particularly helpful.

As an example of transpositional possibilities, I've had games go 1.Nf3 (Reti? Zukertort?) ...f5 (Dutch?) 2.e4 (Lisitsyn Gambit) ...e5 (no, a Latvian!). In such cases the later position is canonical.

Jan-18-14  Wyatt Gwyon: Going over games like this and Capablanca's classic 1914 win over Nimzowitsch (Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1914), I'm surprised that the Benko Gambit was not developed much earlier than it was.
Jan-18-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Wyatt Gwyon> -- < I'm surprised that the Benko Gambit was not developed much earlier than it was.>

In a sense, it's not so surprising. If the basic gambit idea was thought to be just playable for White, it must have seemed very risky for Black.

Full development of the Benko had to wait for the idea that a gambit could be positional, and not just a tactical prelude to an attack.

Jan-18-14  RedShield: I discern 4 reasons:

i)smaller pool of players good enough to establish theory;

ii)lower frequency of games between said players;

iii)slower rate of information transmission impeded the development of theory;

iv)chess theory preoccupied with development of all the other openings.

Apr-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  hudapri: The classic delayed reversed Benko.
Apr-28-17  JimNorCal: <perfi>: This statement, or something on those lines, was definitely made, but I thought it was Richard 'The Fifth' Teichman

Yeah that's what I always heard, too

Apr-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <JimNorCal & Perfidious>

William Napier's book, "Paul Morphy and the Golden Age of Chess", includes a chapter on Teichmann, titled "Teichmann Nuggets", in which Napier stated Teichmann acquired the nickname, "Richard the Fifth", from the frequency in which he finished in 5th place in tournaments.

A review of Teichmann's career, in which I may have missed a few of his tournaments, I noted 5th place was a frequent finishing place for Teichmann:

Monte Carlo 1903 - 5th
Vienna 1903 - 5/7 - with (Maroczy & Mieses)
Ostend 1905 - 5/6 - with (Marco)
Ostend 1906 - 4/6 - with (Bernstein & Burn)
Vienna 1908 - 5th
Prague 1908 - 5th
Hamburg 1910 - 5th
Pistyan 1912 - 4/6 - with (Duras & Schlechter)
Budapest 1912 - 5/6 - with (Vidmar)

Apr-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: OMG this is an AWESOME GOTD pun!!!

2006 was part of "the good ol' days" on cg.com, when puns didn't stink.

Only one man's opinion

Apr-28-17  JimNorCal: <P+2>: It's not "the Fifth" being referred to. It's the "double hole" description's author that we're trying to ID
Apr-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <JimNorCal> Sorry about my error. In checking Golombek's book, "Reti's Best Games of Chess", Chapter V, The Reti Opening, 1923-1924, it is stated that Teichmann, shocked at the twofold fianchetto, referred to it as the stupid double-hole variation.
Apr-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  MJCB: Why not 41... RxR; 41. PxR, Kd7? Black king is in the "b" pawn square, while white king seems too far from the "a" pawn. I am sure Reti and Rubinstein saw something else beyond this, but I am not sure what. Any help for enlightment is appreciated.
Apr-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  MJCB: Sorry, I meant to start the sequence by black on move 40
Apr-29-17  JimNorCal: Thanks, <Pand2>. A real pleasure to have you and your library willing to confirm aging memories :)
Apr-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Ageing, he says? Dang, mah memory is jest old! (laughs)
Apr-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Boomie: <MJCB: Why not 41... RxR; 41. PxR, Kd7?>

White has 42. e5-e6 and the black king can't stop both pawns. One of them will queen in time to stop the black passer. Notice the subtlety of 41...Kd8, which avoids the e6 check. But white has enough time anyway.

Apr-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  MJCB: Thanks Boomie, went through your idea and it is quite amazing - you are right, it wins. Subtle chess is quite pleasant to watch!
Apr-30-17  morfishine: The problem with opening nomenclature is some "openings" are based on White's move order, while others are based on Black's. Thats where the problem starts. Chess would do itself a big favor by simplifying the naming procedure.

Further muddying the waters is that some openings have the simplest of names, "Modern Opening" for example; Others are named after cities, "Budapest Opening" for example; while others are named after people, "Pirc Opening" for example. No wonder people argue over what particular opening a game starts with: There is no basis to begin with

Finally, chess hasn't even settled on whether an opening is based on what move came first, or what was transposed into. As for me, I could care less if a game transposed into a Schevingen when the opening was a Najdorf. In my eyes it was, is and will always be a Najdorf.

And double-finally, there are those "irregular" openings. Couldn't we at least give these "irregular" openings some sort of name? The term "irregular" is somewhat laughable in that this assumes the other openings are "regular"!? This can hardly be the case what-with the chaos that exists in trying to name chess openings

*****

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Reti wins with the Reti/English Reti Lines
by EnglishOpeningc4
shalgo's favorite games
by shalgo
Morphischer's Favorite Games
by Morphischer
Game 35
from Richard Réti's Best Games by Golombek by suenteus po 147
maxruen's favorite games
by maxruen
Game collection: KIA
by chessbuzz
Reti was born in 1889 at Pezinick ,CzechoSlovakia, His prematur
from muayad ali's favorite games by muayad ali
game 56
from Richard Reti's Masters of the Chessboard games by Takchessbooks
Dustin J.'s favorite games
by Dustin J.
Chess as an art form. Part 1
by hatter81
Karlsbad 1923
by suenteus po 147
franskfranz's favorite games as white
by franskfranz
The Strategical Points: The pieces in a Forward Position (P-25)
from Modern Chess Strategy III by Ludek Pachman by Bidibulle
Rubinstein again
from Great masters losing by WhiteRook48
positional
by old coot
ray keene's favorite games
by ray keene
Mil y Una Partidas 1914-1931
by K9Empress
Reti wins with the Reti/English Reti Lines
from Ready or kNot by fredthebear
September 25: Reti to Roll
from Game of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
uhialfil's favorite games
by uhialfil
plus 60 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC