chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Chigorin vs Emanuel Lasker
St. Petersburg (1895/96), St. Petersburg RUE, rd 3, Dec-17
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense (C52)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 51 times; par: 31 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Chigorin/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-28-05  Karpova: Impressive play by Lasker. First he repels white's attack then finishes him off with a brutal counterattack.

i wonder what chigorin had in mind playing 25.qa2

Feb-04-06  CowardlyKnight: I imagine he was thinking of something in the lines of 26. Nxd5 Qxd5 27. Rxc4 Rg7 28. Rc1.
Oct-19-06  extremepleasure: Wasn't 13.Qa4 much better than 13.Qe2?
Oct-19-06  FHBradley: It certainly looks so: 13.Qa4 Nc5 14. Qxc6+ Bd7 15.Qd5; and it looks pretty drawish: 15...Be6 16. Qc6+ Bd7; but such continuations are not what Tchigorin was after when he settled for the Evans gambit.
Nov-08-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: And he didn't even bother to castle...
Jan-06-08  JimmyVermeer: According to Staunton's Chessplayers' Handbook, Lasker's 5th move was Ba5, not Bc5. Can anyone confirm which is correct?
Jan-06-08  paladin at large: According to the Weltgeschichte des Schachs, Lasker (Vol. 11) and GM Soltis "Why Lasker Matters", the move Bc5 is correct. (Petersburg, 3rd round, 17 Dec 1895)
Jan-06-08  JimmyVermeer: No wonder Staunton got it wrong - he died 21 years before this game was even played, so how could he have known what the moves were going to be? He doesn't give the date, so maybe it was another Tchigorin vs. another Lasker, and every move was identical except that one. A more plausible theory is that Staunton's book was edited some time afterwards and the new writer was careless in copying down the moves.
May-28-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: This tournament was a clash of generations (23-year-old Pillsbury and 27-year-old Lasker against 45-year-old Chigorin and 59-year-old Steinitz) but also a clash of openings. Chigorin tried the Evans Gambit four times in this tournament, scoring a draw, two losses and a lone victory when Steinitz blundered in a winning position. Chigorin only dabbled in the Evans after this tournament, and after a famous loss to Pillsbury at London four years later he abandoned it altogether.

Chigorin vs Pillsbury, 1899

Jun-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: The position after <25.Qa2>


click for larger view

is on Madagascar miniature sheet no.1810

Mar-13-10  Ulhumbrus: 23...c4 answers the threat of 24 Qe2 which will otherwise fork the B on e6 and the pawn on a6.
Jun-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <keypusher: ... Chigorin tried the Evans Gambit four times in this tournament, scoring a draw, two losses and a lone victory when Steinitz blundered in a winning position.>

I have not find the Chigorin-Steinitz you reference in the database; is it here?

Jun-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Gypsy> Chigorin vs Steinitz, 1896

Were you searching for it as an 1895 game?

St. Petersburg 1895-96 (1895)

Jun-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Phony Benoni> Thx friend!

<Were you searching for it as an 1895 game?> Yup, that was the problem.

Jul-11-13  master of defence: Why not 18.Qxg7?
Jul-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <master of defence: Why not 18.Qxg7?>

If <18.Qxg7 Kd7>, then White is still a pawn down and soon will be on defensive. (i) Immediately, White needs to deals with the pinned unprotected knight on c3. (ii) Black K is safe on d7, while White K is safe no more on the account of the open g-file.

Jul-15-13  RookFile: This is one reason why Lasker was stronger than Steinitz. Lasker had a defense to the Evans Gambit, while Steinitz routinely get slapped around.
Jul-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <RookFile> Out of curiousity, I checked Steinitz's record in the Evans Gambit, (with White and Black) seeing as you say he got "slapped around." Out of the 48 games in the database, Steinitz won 24 games, lost 14, and drew 10.

With Black, he won 16 games while losing 13.

Maybe you need to revise your talking points?

:-)

Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: I had to delete my prior post.

Mea culpa.

There are two ECO codes for the Evans Gambit. (C51 C52)

Lasker has <16> games in the database with the Evans.

The overall totals are: 9 wins 6 losses 1 draw.

With White: 4 wins 3 losses 1 draw

With Black: 5 wins 3 losses 0 draws

Jul-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Steinitz overall record with the Evans Gambit (C51 C52):

52 wins 25 losses 17 draws.

With White: 19 wins 3 losses 1 draw.

With Black: 33 wins 22 losses 16 draws.

Jul-16-13  JoergWalter: Sreinitz considered the Evans as a real challenge.
Aug-27-13  jerseybob: I remember George Koltanowski showing this game on his late-60's TV show. Lasker's play seemed effortless and magic; of course it was neither, but Kolty made it seem so.
Nov-18-14  Ke2: this is the "bust to the evans gambit", or at least this particular move order (6.d4 is better than 6.O-O)
Dec-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <CowardlyKnight: I imagine he was thinking of something in the lines of 26. Nxd5 Qxd5 27. Rxc4 Rg7 28. Rc1.>

Unfortunately Black has 27....Qxg2#. :-) But of course you're right, Chigorin surely had something like that in mind.

Dec-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < playground player: And he didn't even bother to castle...>

I am no chess master, but isn't 22...O-O-O considered castling?

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 43
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Tras "Mis Geniales Predecesores"
by SANTAFERENO
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Game 43
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by StoppedClock
15
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
Death knell of Romantics: Lasker's defense to the Evans Gambit
from Fire Baptisms by Nasruddin Hodja
Defensive Masterpieces (under construction)
by sleepyirv
Game 43
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Game 55
from World Champion - Lasker (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Game 43
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Grizmors
L2.1
from How to Defend in Chess by Colin Crouch game coll by tak gambit
GTM EVANS ACCEPTED 0-1
by gambitfan
Game 43
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by isfsam
First Cycle, Game 5 (December 17, 1895)
from St. Petersburg 1895-96 by keypusher
Defence
from 30 Moves Or Less by jgrob12
Game 17
from Greatest Opening Ideas (Scheerer) by Qindarka
More Evans Gambit games
by mattb2jp
15
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense (C52) 0-1Black owns the open lines
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense (C52) 0-1Black owns the open lines
from Captain's Crunch Munched by Fredthebear by fredthebear
plus 35 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC