chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Frank James Marshall vs Harry Nelson Pillsbury
Cambridge Springs (1904), Cambridge Springs, PA USA, rd 2, Apr-26
Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 65 times; par: 35 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Marshall/Pillsbury games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <onedog: I may not be a chess master, but I am an expert in the English language, so if, as you claim, you intend or intended to write a book on this or any other subject, I seriously suggest you polish up both your grammar and your vocabulary - assuming you intend to write in that language.>

My eyes are bleeding after reading this run-on sentence. An expert?

Apr-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <onedog> should learn the proper use of punctuation.
Apr-03-14  landogriffin: @ <patzer2> thanks a lot for this, although I think you are giving me more credit than I deserve! :)
Apr-03-14  LIFE Master AJ: <off> As your handle implies, you are simply "OFF." (center)
Apr-03-14  LIFE Master AJ: off target
Apr-03-14  LIFE Master AJ: ... and just about everything else as well.
Apr-03-14  PJs Studio: Boy. You guys take this analysis to extremes!
Apr-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <PJs Studio: Boy. You guys take this analysis to extremes!>

Chess players can analyse anything; you should see my brilliant and scathing criticism of <Zukertort's headstone> at Johannes Zukertort.

Apr-03-14  onedog: OhioChessFan: My eyes are bleeding after reading this run-on sentence. An expert?

Yes, my dear, an expert. Just because a sentence is long, doesn't make it a run-on sentence. Check your grammar. I know you belong to the three-second attention span generation, but does that mean you can't follow a sentence of more than ten words, even with punctuation there to help you? Poor you.

Apr-03-14  onedog: TheFocus: please point out one punctuation error in one of my kibitzes. I would love to learn the error of my ways from you.
Apr-04-14  LIFE Master AJ: <My eyes are bleeding after reading this run-on sentence. An expert?>

I almost lost control of my senses (and some other faculties) ... after reading this. ROFL!!!!!

Apr-04-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <onedog: TheFocus: please point out one punctuation error in one of my kibitzes. I would love to learn the error of my ways from you.> I have not seen any errors in the posts of yours that I have read.
Apr-04-14  LIFE Master AJ: I would bet he's a dog catcher ... pretending to be a rocket scientist.
Apr-04-14  schweigzwang: Oh the irony.
Apr-04-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <onedog> <TheFocus><please point out one punctuation error in one of my kibitzes. I would love to learn the error of my ways from you.> From <Simon Kim Williams vs The World>: <I believe white is far from lost, in fact I think those who think we are winning might be a little optimistic.>

You might want to buy a semi-colon to place after "far from lost,". Or a period instead of a comma. You could also have placed a comma after: "in fact".

This would have looked better: <I believe white is far from lost; in fact, I think those who think we are winning might be a little optimistic.>. Or this: <I believe white is far from lost. In fact, I think those who think we are winning might be a little optimistic.>

In your run-on sentence, you should have used a semi-colon (again). I will leave it to you to figure out where.

Jun-09-14  Castleinthesky: Despite all the mindless blather below, this is a great game in the truest sense of the Romantics.
Dec-13-14  TheBish: Yes, thank you Castleinthesky! This is supposed to be a forum for discussing the above game (or so we would be led to believe, if we believe the rules and guidelines of CG.com). And this is a classic game, so it's a shame to play over it and expect to see some great analysis or historical insight or whatnot -- and have to wade through so much ego jousting! That and idle chat seem more appropriate in Kibitzer's Cafe. (Why does that sound familiar?)
Sep-21-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: No modern player of the Pirc would play 8..e6? (or 7..Nc6?! either) - still a nice attack by Marshall.
Dec-18-17  The Kings Domain: Sterling attack by Marshall and a neat finish, more so considering who he vanquished.
Dec-18-17  Granny O Doul: Sorry I'm late, but I see nothing wrong in onedog's sentence on this page. I do agree the old example could have been better punctuated. It is quite a bold dare to volunteer one's whole history of kibitzes to grammatical and orthographical scrutiny.

As for this game, Black's ...Nc6 looks too committal. Were it part of a plan to pressure White's center with ...Bg4 or to hunt down White's light bishop with ...Nb6 and perhaps ...Na5, it would have made more sense. Castling instead looks better.

Ok, I'm only reading plang's note now. I agree with him.

Sep-20-18  RookFile: Black may already be lost after 8...e6. 7....Nc6 was inaccurate too. More natural and active is 7....Nxc3 8. bxc3 c5.
Sep-20-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: "Castling into it"! Instead of 17...0-0, how about 17...Bd7 18. Rf2 0-0-0 19. Raf1 <h5>, with counterplay (20. Nxf7 Nxf7 21. Rxf7 Qg5). I'm not even sure White has the advantage.
Sep-23-18  RookFile: 17....h5 is a try. Marshall had let some of his advantage slip.
Jan-09-19  HarryP: This is the only time in his career that Pillsbury played the Pirc, as far as I know. Why on earth did he play it against a tough customer like Marshall? No doubt Marshall was surprised. But after his initial moment of being surprised he proceeded to smoke Pillsbury. As we know, Pillsbury's play was very uneven in this tournament. A week after this devastating loss to Marshall, he played one of his greatest games ever when he was paired against Lasker.
Feb-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: <HarryP> Pillsbury was actually a pioneer in the Pirc. He also played it at Monte Carlo 1903 - Schlechter vs Pillsbury, 1903 - and won smoothly against Schlechter, who clearly had no idea what to do in response.

I was very surprised to see these two games. Pillsbury is never mentioned in the conversation about hypermodern chess, but clearly he was thinking along those lines - looking for ways to hold back his pieces and counterattack at his convenience.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Solitaire Chess by Bruce Pandolfini
by SirIvanhoe
fm avari viraf's favorite games
by fm avari viraf
Ernesto7's favorite games
by Ernesto7
Bow to Marshall...
from Collections in Idleness 6 Compiled by xajik by kishchess
Bow to Marshall...
from Collections in Idleness 6 by xajik
Wednesday; April 2nd, 2014. (WTM, 21. '?') ***
from "Chess-Games" >Problem of The Day< (2014) by LIFE Master AJ
There is Nothing New Under the Sun
from Solitaire Chess by I. A. Horowitz by SirIvanhoe
Pirc Def: Austrian Attack (B08) 1-0 Cambridge Springs 1904
from M&M players... it's a mixed bag by fredthebear
Chess Miniatures, Collection XVII
by PinkLedDoor
two rooks for the queen by mate comes extra.
from magic mates by kevin86
Pirc Def: Austrian Attack (B08) 1-0 Cambridge Springs 1904
from yFredthebear's Roundhouse RUUK Manuevers I by fredthebear
b08
from favorite games according to opening b00-b99 by mirage
Pillsbury vs World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Marshall Martials
by chocobonbon
Cambridge Springs 1904 games
by CambridgeSprings1904
Important
by oao2102
25.
from MARSHALL'S BEST GAMES OF CHESS by hitsujyun
Cambridge Springs 1904
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC