chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Magnus Carlsen vs Viswanathan Anand
Anand - Carlsen World Championship (2013)  ·  Semi-Slav Defense: Marshall Gambit. Forgotten Variation (D31)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 9 times; par: 88 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 76 more Carlsen/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If Java is not installed or isn't working, a small red "X" usually appears where the game should be. Most Java problems can be resolved by downloading and (re)installing Java from www.java.com.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 32 OF 32 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-05-13  clownface: The "forgotten" variation: sounds a little bit ninjary ~$^>'///,<
Dec-29-13  Ulhumbrus: There were at least two combinations contained in what might be called a dry game.

One appears after 44...Ke6 (instead of 44...Kd5 as played). On 45 Bf5+ Kxe4 46 Bc2+ wins the exchange

A second is the one pointed out by several commentators and which might have gained Anand a draw, namely, 45...Ra1! 46 Bg8+ Kc6 47 Bxb3 Rxa3! pinning and overpowering White's bishop

The game suggests that such combinations can be expected to occur in dry positions.

One possible reason why Anand did not play the second combination was fatigue: Anand's team made no attempt to bring back the traditional time controls with adjournments.

As there was no cause to fear cheating this would not have been difficult to arrange in the hotel.

A second possible reason is that Kramnik was right to say that Anand was afraid of Carlsen. One reason for Anand to listen to Kramnik is that Anand might have then found a remedy eg to play objectively, as Carlsen would play. This meant playing game 2 as Carlsen would have played it, not granting an easy draw but using White's greater space to place some pressure on Black.

Who knows but that the quick draw in game 2 caused Anand to miss a win in game 3.

I suspect that the quick draw in game 2 against a Caro-Kann cost Anand the match in 2013 just as it cost Spassky the match in 1974.

Jan-02-14  checkmateyourmove: I love the side stepping king moves of magnus in the middle game.
Feb-09-14  Ulhumbrus: With 10 Qd3 Carlsen may have pre-empted Anand's preparation and got his novelty in first.

This was the only game of the match in which Carlsen played the queen's gambit. An alternative to the version of the Slav defence which Anand tried unsuccessfully was Lasker's defence as in the game Marshall vs Lasker, 1907 but then Anand could not have known in advance that his preparation of the opening defence which he chose would get pre-empted by Carlsen's innovation

This suggests the following lesson about opening preparation: If you have found an alternative to a move given by theory, it is possible that your opponent has also found an alternative to an earlier move.

Feb-15-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: http://www.ajschess.com/lifemastera...

My analysis of this game, this is all I am going to do, I am not going to do a web page on this particular game.

Feb-15-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: If you DL/look-at this game analysis, you will see that it runs 20 pages ...
Feb-15-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <LIFE Master AJ: If you DL/look-at this game analysis, you will see that it runs 20 pages ...>

can easily be reduced to 4 pages.

Feb-16-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Yes, then it might match your IQ.
Feb-16-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <LIFE Master AJ: Yes, then it might match your IQ.>

Absolutely.

And since you know latin, I believe in "pauca sed matura". Remove the hot air from it.

Feb-16-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <Premium Chessgames Member by courtesy of John Barleycorn><LIFE Master AJ: Yes, then it might match your IQ>

are you insulting my intelligence? I mean, I bought your premium membership. What kind of message are you sending out to your future sponsors like <Jambow> etc.?

Feb-20-14  Ulhumbrus: In the position after 16 Be2 if Black's worst placed piece is his queen's rook on a8, this suggests attending to that piece by 16...Rb8 as in the famous game Marshall vs Lasker, 1907
Feb-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <<Feb-20-14 <Ulhumbrus:> In the position after 16 Be2 if Black's worst placed piece is his queen's rook on a8, this suggests attending to that piece by 16...Rb8 as in the famous game Marshall vs Lasker, 1907 >>

I had the same thought, when I first saw this game.

Feb-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: < LIFE Master AJ: <<Feb-20-14 <Ulhumbrus:> In the position after 16 Be2 if Black's worst placed piece is his queen's rook on a8, this suggests attending to that piece by 16...Rb8 as in the famous game Marshall vs Lasker, 1907 >>

I had the same thought, when I first saw this game.>

Why isn't it included in the analysis?
Could easily bring it up to 22 pages.

Feb-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ:


click for larger view

The actual game position after 48.Rh6+!

Below is my analysis - which pretty much proves that <csmath> was correct, Black can draw ... with best play.

[ It is almost unbelievable, but Black may have had a draw with an endgame that is really amazing, almost like a composed study. (It is based on the endgame with two Rook-Pawns, the side with the extra Pawns cannot win.)

Much better was: >/= 48...Kc7!!;

A drawing resource <(initially)> missed by me, (using several engines); and just about everyone else.

We now follow a DPA by Fritz:

49.Bxb3 axb3; 50.Rxh4 Rxg2+!;
This is the most accurate, Black has to get as many Pawns off the board as possible.

<(Probably worse was: 50...Kc6?!; 51.Rg4 Kd5; 52.Kxb3

when White should win, he will have two, connected passed pawns in the endgame. )>

51.Kxb3 Re2; 52.a4 Rxe5; 53.Kc4 Kb6; 54.Rh6+ Kc7; 55.a5 Kb7; 56.h4 Re4+!; 57.Kxc5, "+4.73" - Fritz 13. Despite the winning evaluation by Fritz, (and many other engines!); its a draw ... see any tablebase for confirmation.

[ http://www.shredderchess.com/online.... ] ]

Feb-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: By the way, the last link works, but you actually have to <(manually)> set up the desired position.


click for larger view

This is my analysis position, after 57.Kxc5, above.

Feb-23-14  Ulhumbrus: <LIFE Master AJ: The actual game position after 48.h6+!

Below is my analysis - which pretty much proves that <csmath> was correct, Black can draw ... with best play.

[ It is almost unbelievable, but Black may have had a draw with an endgame that is really amazing, almost like a composed study. (It is based on the endgame with two Rook-Pawns, the side with the extra Pawns cannot win.)

Much better was: >/= 48...Kc7!!;

A drawing resource <(initially)> missed by me, (using several engines); and just about everyone else.

We now follow a DPA by Fritz:

49.Bxb3 axb3; 50.Rxh4 Rxg2+!;
This is the most accurate, Black has to get as many Pawns off the board as possible.

<(Probably worse was: 50...Kc6?!; 51.Rg4 Kd5; 52.Kxb3

when White should win, he will have two, connected passed pawns in the endgame. )>

51.Kxb3 Re2; 52.a4 Rxe5; 53.Kc4 Kb6; 54.Rh6+ Kc7; 55.a5 Kb7; 56.h4 Re4+!; 57.Kxc5, "+4.73" - Fritz 13. Despite the winning evaluation by Fritz, (and many other engines!); its a draw ... see any tablebase for confirmation.

[ http://www.shredderchess.com/online.... ] ]
> If this is so it suggests that Anand's endgame technique was inadequate and that he has a great deal of work to do in the endgame.

Feb-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: I have seen the endgame of K+R vs. K+R & 2 RP's many times. (I once saw a GM win it.) I won it in a tournament game vs. Ross Sprague - as Black. Again, it is SUPPOSED to be a dead draw, but drawing that ending is really tough.

Few people study it, although I have, albeit many years ago. Its like the ending of K+R vs. K+R+B. (I have played that a few times, as well. I once beat Kerry Leahy at the Queen of Hearts as White in that endgame as White.)

A lot of people never seriously study these rare endgames, your chances of actually playing it are probably VERY small.

Feb-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <<Premium Chessgames Member by courtesy of John Barleycorn><LIFE Master AJ>: I have seen the endgame of K+R vs. K+R & 2 RP's many times. (I once saw a GM win it.) I won it in a tournament game vs. Ross Sprague - as Black. Again, it is SUPPOSED to be a dead draw, but drawing that ending is really tough.

Few people study it, although I have, albeit many years ago. Its like the ending of K+R vs. K+R+B. (I have played that a few times, as well. I once beat Kerry Leahy at the Queen of Hearts as White in that endgame as White.)

A lot of people never seriously study these rare endgames, your chances of actually playing it are probably VERY small.>>

What is your message???

Feb-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: The way Carlsen maneuvered his king around Anand's queenside attack made me think of guiding thread through a needle eye.
Feb-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Agreed. Only Carlsen seemed to have a real mastery of this endgame, he knew exactly what he wanted to do and made it happen!
Apr-09-14  joddon: 38 ....e5 huge blunder....magnus will take his pieces anywhere and everywhere on the board to get firepower....not like a little kid he does not need to achknowledge a winning side.....its like second nature to him, if one side is winning he will recognize it immediately and knows what comes next without any thought......but until then he slides his bishops and knights and rooks all over the place until something strange happens the stops like a lion and eats away.!!great to be this talented, but anand is like a mouse and getting eatin up by the cat by following into his trap...hes gonna do this again and again in 2014 too....its coming and gonna be crazy to see.....note :to bring back the knight to c3 takes skill, he is alert that anand is putting his pieces where they wont combine for an attack, hence , n(g4)xe3, is really using up a knight for a lousy bishop....meanwhile magnus has every move accounted for, even centralizing his n and b on moves 18 and 19...then keeping forces lined up until...this is where he practices his moves...18 and 19 are his fatal decsions, and no one can win.
May-10-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: A terrific game that signaled Carlsen's match victory.
May-10-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Check It Out: A terrific game that signaled Carlsen's match victory.>

What do you mean by "signaled"?

May-10-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: <offramp> Perhaps not the best choice of words and hindsight and all that, but Anand himself said game 5 was a massive blow, and he never recovered from it.

Kind of like how that first bit of surface snow movement "signals" an avalanche.

May-10-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: 'Presaged' might have been a better option, but that is of no concern; for we are not writing a bio here.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 32)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 32 OF 32 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Anand-Carlsen WCC 2013
by chessgames.com
challenger wins first!
from Anand-Carlsen WC November 2013 by kevin86
WORL CHAMPIONSHIP 2013
from jsteward's favorite games#2 by jsteward
Carlsen wins equal rook and bishop ending again
from Out of nothing at all by Kinghunt
42nd WCC Match Chennai 2013, Game 5
from World Championship Matches 1886-2013 by Olanovich
Forgotten Variation
from Unorthodox Games; Unusual Names [ECO=A,D,E] by GumboGambit
Anand-Carlsen World Championship (2013) Rd.5
from 2013/2014 Tournaments by wanabe2000
endgame mastery
by JustAnotherPatzer
Russo's favorite games
by Russo
World Championship Match, game 5
from Carlsen in world championships: the 2013 cycle by alexmagnus
Ankh Acomson's favorite games
by Ankh Acomson
Digest Games
by npchess
Fighting Chess with Magnus Carlsen
by jakaiden
Taming the Tiger
from The Carlsen Chronicles by MoonlitKnight
Magnus Squeezing Blood out of Stone.
from Jaidip's favorite games by Jaidip
Magnus Carlsen
by akatombo
Breaking the ice
from Chess Prince by MrMelad
Rook + 2 pawns vs. rook + pawn
from Instructive chess endgames by wwall
best of 2013
by Chnebelgrind
Anand vs Carlsen World Championship rd 5
from Anand vs World Champs decisive games+ vs Asians by visayanbraindoctor
plus 4 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies