1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Nge2 d5 7.O-O O-O 8.a3 cxd4 9.exd4 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Bd6 11.h3 b6 12.Bg5 Bb7 13.Qd3 Re8 14.Rad1 h6 15.Bh4 Be7 16.Bg3 Bd6 17.Bh4 Be7 18.Bg3 Bd6 19.Nf4 e5 20.Bxf7+ Kxf7 21.Qc4+ Nd5 22.Qxd5+ Kf6 23.Ne4+ *

Interivew with IM <Vinay Bhat>, Samford Fellow, in Mainz, Germany, August 3, 2008

If at first you don’t succeed, skydiving isn’t for you.

The economy is a key factor in the Ukrainian chess boom. Playing chess is a prestigious occupation and you can earn money with it. Additionally, you travel around the world. So, a professional chess player has respect, unlike in Europe or the USA. By our standards, chess is a good career.’ (Grandmaster Alexander Moiseenko in a ChessCafe.com interview).”

Although I find the average chessplayer’s income assumed here ($90,000 per year, in constant 2005 dollars)

<really?! what average he mean those 2650 elo rated player ?>

He is a very nice and approachable guy.

<reposted from GM Bhinay Vhat blog>

http://vbhat.wordpress.com/2009/06/...

The Midway Update in Montreal

We’re a little past the midway mark of the Quebec Invitational now, so I figured it was high time to say a few words about how the tournament is going.

I arrived in Montreal about a week ago, to get in some sightseeing and adjust to the time difference. The tournament began on Friday the 19th, and it continues with one game a day every day until the 27th. The games begin at 5:30 PM – rather late in the day, I’m not totally sure why that is, as even the “working” players are not working during the event. Maybe it’s for the spectators? The last round on the 27th, though, begins at 1 PM.

The tournament site is at: http://fqechecs.qc.ca/index.php?typ...

After some trouble with the DGT boards the first few days, it looks like most of them are up and running now, so the games can be tracked live.

The tournament is a 10-player round-robin with an average FIDE rating of 2411 (category 7). It was originally supposed to be a stronger event, but a couple late withdrawals meant the category went down a little bit. As it is, for most of the players, it’s stiff competition.

After 5 rounds, GM Mark Bluvshtein is leading with a perfect 5-for-5. GM Anton Kovalyov, the top seed, was held to a draw in the 5th round, so he “only” has 4.5/5. In 3rd place you can find me with 3 points.

My tournament has been a little up and down – in the first couple games, I struggled to get any real winning chances against FM Lefong Hua and IM Renier Castellanos. In the 3rd round, I was out-prepared by IM Thomas Roussel-Roozmon and emerged from the opening with a worse position. However, the position remained complicated, and when he lost his way, I managed to take advantage and win the game. But then, the following day, as white against GM Bator Sambuev, I managed to lose a long endgame that I really shouldn’t have lost. Yesterday, I bounced back with a win as black against FM Sylvain Barbeau.

There are money prizes in this event for the top 3 finishers, but one of the real special things about this event is that the top 4 finishers qualify for the Tournoi International de Montreal beginning at the end of August. The lineup for that event is filled with very strong players – the average rating of the 7 confirmed players so far is 2670 FIDE or category 17!

Last I blogged, I had 3.0/5 in the Quebec Invitational with 4 games to go. In round 6, I had the white pieces against Francois Leveille. As Dana Mackenzie noted in the comments to the previous post, Francois had won a game with quadrupled f-pawns against the American IM Jay Bonin in the 1990s!

Here’s a position from that crazy game:

I hadn’t noticed this game in my preparation for him, as I was playing him with the white pieces, but it’s pretty amazing to get quadrupled pawns in one game. I can’t remember ever having it, even in a casual game!

My own game with Leveille was less exciting – it finished in 17 moves when he realized he would be lucky to escape just down a piece. In the following position, he played 15…a6?:

There are a few tactical motifs to notice here. The first is that the queen on d7 is only guarded by the knight on f6, so if the knight leaves, then White’s queen will be pinning the knight on c6. The other is that the queen and bishop on h5 can potentially both be hit from the d5-square. This motivates the following combination starting with 16.Nxd5!. If now 16…Nxd5, 17.Nxc6 bxc6 18.Rxd5 hits queen and bishop; the pawn on c6 can’t capture the rook because the queen on d7 is now hanging, while the queen can’t find a square that is safe and guards the bishop on h5. Thus, Black loses a piece.

That bumped me up to 4.0/6 and in the next round, I had the black pieces against GM Anton Kovalyov. He was born in Ukraine, then grew up in Argentina, before moving to Montreal a couple years ago. At only 17 years and 2571 FIDE, he is clearly quite talented. I was a little bit worse after the opening, but thanks to some precise defense and tactical shots, I managed to equalize and accepted his peace offering. I now had 4.5/7.

In round 8, I had the white pieces against the lowest rated player in the tournament, Ling Feng Ye. He had won a qualifying tournament the day before the Quebec Invitational started to get the last spot in the event! I got some advantage after the opening, then threw it away and had to work hard to get an advantage back. I didn’t let the advantage go a second time, though, and the win pushed me up to 5.5/8. With Roussel-Roozmon’s win over Sambuev, this meant that I was guaranteed a top-4 finish and one of the qualification spots in the prestigious Montreal International. However, Roussel-Roozmon could still catch me with a win in the last round, so I definitely had something to play for.

In the last round, I had the black pieces against GM Mark Bluvshtein of Toronto. He was leading the tournament at that point, with a whopping 7.0 out of 8 games. As a credit to him, though, he wasn’t looking for a quick draw to finish the tournament. In fact, he had the option of repeating the position for a third time (with Nd4-f5/Re8-e6) and turned it down here:

White can double Black’s pawns on f6, but the problem then is what to do afterwards. There is no easy way to target the pawns, and Black can play against some of White’s weaknesses (the c4-square, the b4-pawn, the e4-pawn, etc). With a 22-minute to 2-minute advantage to reach move 40, Mark decided to push by playing 25.f4?!. However, after 25…Nc4, Black is already on his way to seizing the initiative. The game concluded quickly and brutally: 26.e5 Ra3 27.Qb1 Nd5 28.Nxd5 cxd5 29.Bf3 (on 29.Nxb5, Black has 29…Ra4 and the b4-pawn can’t be saved) h6 30.Bh4 Qa7 31.Kh1:

Now I dropped the hammer on him with 31…Rxf3!. After 32.Nxf3 d4!, the bishop on b7 is alive and kicking. Mark played 33.Rf1, but after 33…Qa3, he threw in the towel. There’s no good way to defend the knight on f3. For example, 34.Kg2 allows 34…Nd2, with a very strong fork.

That win brought me to 6.5/9 and clear third place in the event. Kovalyov won his last game to move up to 7.5, while Mark was in second with 7.0. Roussel-Roozmon got the last qualification spot with 5.5.

The Montreal International begins at the end of August and features an all-star cast headed by French super-GM Etienne Bacrot (2728 FIDE!). The average rating of the 8 seeded players (not those of us who qualified) is 2664 FIDE, which makes it a category 17 event! With us included, it drops to a category 15 event. The website for that event is at: http://www.echecsmontreal.ca/.

GM bhat game at montreal has ups and down, i strongly believe he gonna pick up the pace soon and will be a strong 2600 player.

[Event "SPICE Cup 2009"]
[Site "Lubbock USA"]
[Date "2009.09.22"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Robson, Ray"]
[Black "Bhat, Vinay S"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C96"]
[WhiteElo "2527"]
[BlackElo "2474"]
[PlyCount "104"]
[EventDate "2009.??.??"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 Nd7 12. Nbd2 exd4 13. cxd4 Nc6 14. d5 Nce5 15. a4 Rb8 16. Nh2 Ng6 17. g3 Nf6 18. h4 h5 19. f4 Bg4 20. Nxg4 Nxg4 21. Nf3 Re8 22. e5 Nf8 23. Bf5 Qb6 24. Kg2 Rbd8 25. Nh2 Nxh2 26. Kxh2 c4 27. Be3 Qb7 28. e6 Bf6 29. axb5 Qxb5 30. Qxh5 Re7 31. Re2 fxe6 32. dxe6 d5 33. Bd2 d4 34. Ra5 Qb6 35. g4 d3 36. Rg2 Bxb2 37. Be4 Qd4 38. Re5 c3 39. Be3 Qxe3 40. Bh7+ Nxh7 41. Rxe3 d2 42. Qc5 Rxe6 43. Rxe6 d1=Q 44. g5 Nf8 45. Re7 Qh5 46. Qc4+ Kh8 47. f5 c2 48. f6 c1=Q 49. fxg7+ Bxg7 50. Qxc1 Qxh4+ 51. Kg1 Bd4+ 52. Kf1 Qh1+ 0-1

Robson,R - Bhat,V, SPICE Cup 2009 2009

click for larger view

http://vbhat.wordpress.com/

After 9 rounds, I had 5.0/9 along with a performance rating of around 2660. In round 10, I had the white pieces against GM Alexander Moiseenko (2682 FIDE). Moiseenko came in as one of higher seeds, but after his first round loss to Bluvshtein (from what seemed to be a winning position), he had trouble finding his bearings. It took him until the 9th round to score his first win of the event!

Unfortunately, this meant that by the time we met, he had his first taste of blood in the event and he was looking to recover as many rating points as he could. He surprised me with the Queen’s Gambit Accepted, but even though he seemed to know the opening theory better than me,

I managed to get a nice positional advantage. I slowly increased my advantage until he felt he had no choice but to jettison a pawn and hope for chances with some tactics in my mild time pressure. His gamble turned out to be right.

We had the following position on the board after 29…h5-h4: click the link to read more

1-3.
Perelshteyn, Eugene
g USA
2534
* ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 6

1-3.
Bhat, Vinay
g USA
2473
½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 6

1-3.
Finegold, Benjamin
m USA
2513
0 ½ * ½ 1 ½ 1 1 ½ 1 6

4. Robson, Ray
m USA
2491
½ 0 ½ * 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 5½

5. Papp, Gabor
m HUN
2558
½ ½ 0 0 * ½ ½ 1 1 1 5

6-8.
Rensch, Daniel
f USA
2392
½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ 0 ½ ½ 4

6-8.
Kuljasevic, Davorin
m CRO
2547
½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 4

6-8.
Antal, Gergely
m HUN
2479
0 0 0 ½ 0 1 ½ * 1 1 4

9. Diamant, Andre
m BRA
2520
0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * ½ 2½